[Bug middle-end/36593] [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90, 22_locale/num_get/get/char/2.cc

2008-06-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 08:39 --- These tests have also regressed for mmix-knuth-mmixware 132182 - 136827, so if it's a target-specific thing that went wrong (assuming it's the same reason; there are two more regressions in that range but that's it

[Bug c/36594] New: [4.4 Regression] multiple regressions on powerpc at rev.136976

2008-06-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
Multiple regressions have appeared at revision 136976 (last known working 136953), see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-06/msg01644.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-06/msg01650.html A typical failure is: [karma] f90/bug% /opt/gcc/gcc4.4w/bin/gcc

[Bug ada/36575] [4.3/4.4 Regression][Ada] ACATS c460011 runtime fails at -O3

2008-06-22 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 11:03 --- Setting to P4 as an Ada bug, please restore to P3 if a C or C++ testcase is found. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/36584] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Stack is not aligned correctly in recursive function

2008-06-22 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36584

[Bug bootstrap/36595] New: [4.4 Regression] Multiple warnings about C++ for C codes

2008-06-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
From revision 136960 (not in 136942) I see multiple warnings during bootstrap: ... ../../gcc-4.4-work/gcc/objc/objc-act.c:6693: warning: request for implicit conversion from 'void *' to 'const char *' not permitted in C++ ../../gcc-4.4-work/gcc/collect2.c:849: warning: request for implicit

[Bug c/36594] [4.4 Regression] multiple regressions on powerpc at rev.136976

2008-06-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-06-22 11:18 --- If I revert revision 136959, the test in comment#0 passes. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/36594] [4.4 Regression] multiple regressions on powerpc at rev.136976

2008-06-22 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-22 12:00 --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jun 19 18:00:12 2008 New Revision: 136959 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=136959 Log: * builtins.c (expand_builtin_nonlocal_goto): Stabilize r_sp before

[Bug c/36596] New: occasional segfault in bitmap_elt_clear_from

2008-06-22 Thread marcus at jet dot franken dot de
only since some days I get a segfault with this backtrace: gdb cc1 r -fpreprocessed agfa_cl20.i -dumpbase agfa_cl20.i -mtune=generic -auxbase agfa_cl20 -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-declarations -version -fstack-protector -fPIC -o /tmp/ccqJyq0F.sQuit Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation

[Bug c/36596] occasional segfault in bitmap_elt_clear_from

2008-06-22 Thread marcus at jet dot franken dot de
--- Comment #1 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2008-06-22 12:11 --- Created an attachment (id=15800) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15800action=view) agfa_cl20.i /home/marcus/projects/gcc.trunk/BIN/bin/gcc -Wall -g -fstack-protector -Wmissing-declarations

[Bug middle-end/36597] New: OpenMP 3: _OPENMP should be 200805 instead of 200505

2008-06-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://www.openmp.org/mp-documents/spec30.pdf Version 3.0 May 2008 2.2 Conditional Compilation In implementations that support a preprocessor, the _OPENMP macro name is defined to have the decimal value mm where and mm are the year and month designations of the version of the OpenMP API

[Bug middle-end/36597] OpenMP 3: _OPENMP should be 200805 instead of 200505

2008-06-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 12:27 --- Not sure where you are looking? http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/c-cppbuiltin.c?r1=136425r2=136433 is the latest revision of c-cppbuiltin.c and that has: if (flag_openmp)

[Bug fortran/36590] internal error: Can't convert LOGICAL(1) to LOGICAL(1)

2008-06-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 12:28 --- The error only occurs for logical(1), kind=2,4,8,16 all work. The program also works if one removes the .not. interface Near0 function Near0_dp (TestNumber) result (NumberNear0) real ::

[Bug middle-end/36597] OpenMP 3: _OPENMP should be 200805 instead of 200505

2008-06-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 12:31 --- (In reply to comment #1) Not sure where you are looking? I'm a Fortran guy thus I looked here: fortran/cpp.c:cpp_define (pfile, _OPENMP=200505); -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug c/36598] New: Failed optimisation of return of struct argment in memcpy-1.c

2008-06-22 Thread hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org
Testcase gcc.dg/memcpy-1.c fails on AVR target. Failure occurs because the return value is not simplified to avoid memcpy. This test works on i686 and I can't see why same optimization should not apply to AVR Test is: /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options -O2 -fdump-tree-optimized } */ /* {

[Bug c/36598] Failed optimisation of return of struct argment in memcpy-1.c

2008-06-22 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-06-22 13:32 --- Subject: Re: New: Failed optimisation of return of struct argment in memcpy-1.c On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: Testcase gcc.dg/memcpy-1.c fails on AVR target. Have you

[Bug c/36598] Failed optimisation of return of struct argment in memcpy-1.c

2008-06-22 Thread hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 14:33 --- Thanks for information --param sra-max-structure-size=32 does indeed remove test failure and produces optimal code. But changing the testcase does not remove the optimization problem - unless

[Bug middle-end/36594] [4.4 Regression] multiple regressions on powerpc at rev.136976

2008-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Keywords|

[Bug c/36596] occasional segfault in bitmap_elt_clear_from

2008-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 14:46 --- I belive this was fixed by 2008-06-21 Bernhard Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] * tree-ssa-pre.c (fini_antic): Bitmap_sets have to be freed before the grand_bitmap_obstack. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu

[Bug middle-end/34905] valgrind error indication from testsuite typeck.c:comptypes

2008-06-22 Thread lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 14:49 --- Closing since valgrind errors are unreproducible now -- lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/36591] error: a-reatim.adb must be compiled

2008-06-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 14:49 --- This was fixed by a library rebuild. There's probably a make file dependency that is not quite right but I am closing as invalid. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c/36598] Failed optimisation of return of struct argment in memcpy-1.c

2008-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 14:50 --- This is really not a task for SRA but for struct copy propagation (which we do not do). See PR14295. As this testcase was for SRA you can either XFAIL it for avr or see if the cost metrics need adjustment. --

[Bug tree-optimization/14295] [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates

2008-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 15:05 --- If we would disallow struct copies in the gimple IL and instead require a register temporary that we would re-write into SSA form like struct s temp_struct3; struct s temp_struct2; struct s temp_struct1;

[Bug tree-optimization/14295] [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates

2008-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 15:07 --- Created an attachment (id=15801) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15801action=view) aggregate temporary registers Like this simple, untested patch. Breaks tree-sra. --

[Bug c/34867] valgrind error indication in testsuite from c-lex.c:996:c_lex_with_flags for gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c

2008-06-22 Thread lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 15:23 --- Confirmed with r137000. To set unsignedp value, lex_charconst calls cpp_interpret_charconst. Here it quits early with an error, leaving unsignedp uninitialized. I will post a patch to fix. -- lauras at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/34906] valgrind error indication from testsuite gimplify.c: gimplify_asm_expr

2008-06-22 Thread lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 15:28 --- Subject: Bug 34906 Author: lauras Date: Sun Jun 22 15:28:04 2008 New Revision: 137020 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137020 Log: 2008-06-22 Laurynas Biveinis [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/34906] valgrind error indication from testsuite gimplify.c: gimplify_asm_expr

2008-06-22 Thread lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 15:30 --- Fixed on trunk. -- lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/36593] [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90, 22_locale/num_get/get/char/2.cc

2008-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 15:43 --- I certainly belive this was uncovered by my patch for PR36345. But I also believe newlib is at fault here ;) The fix simply makes strict-aliasing rules followed even more (thus, if you build newlib with

[Bug middle-end/34906] valgrind error indication from testsuite gimplify.c: gimplify_asm_expr

2008-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34906

[Bug c/36598] Failed optimisation of return of struct argment in memcpy-1.c

2008-06-22 Thread hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 16:11 --- Quite possibly due to cost metrics. They are far from ideal. Will mark test XFAIL until we can investigate and fix. -- hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/36590] internal error: Can't convert LOGICAL(1) to LOGICAL(1)

2008-06-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 16:26 --- Patch. The problem was that gfortran failed to find a conversion routine for logical(1) to logical(1), now it simply does nothing and reports success. I'm not sure whether BT_VOID needs some special care or not.

[Bug other/36579] gcc refuses to recognize libraries on the command line

2008-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 16:56 --- I think you're mad. I won't be reporting any bugs to gcc until I see signs of intelligence coming from you people. Huh? Also the linker is not part of GCC anyways. It comes from the binutils project. You

[Bug fortran/36599] New: major execution regression for induct.f90 polyhedron benchmark in 4.3.1 on Intel

2008-06-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
There is a 20% execution regression on the polyhedron induct.f90 benchmark when compiled with gfortran in gcc 4.3.1 compared to gcc 4.2.4. This reduction appears to be triggered by the -fassociative-math (which appears to require -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math to actually be used by

[Bug fortran/36599] major execution regression for induct.f90 polyhedron benchmark in 4.3.1 on Intel

2008-06-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-06-22 16:58 --- Created an attachment (id=15802) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15802action=view) assembly file generate with -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math --

[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

2008-06-22 Thread pepalogik at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #114 from pepalogik at seznam dot cz 2008-06-22 16:59 --- (In reply to comment #113) It is available when storing a result to memory. Yes, but this requires quite a complicated workaround (solution (4) in my comment #109). So you could say that the IEEE754 double precision

[Bug fortran/36599] major execution regression for induct.f90 polyhedron benchmark in 4.3.1 on Intel

2008-06-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-06-22 17:00 --- Created an attachment (id=15803) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15803action=view) assembly file generate with -fassociative-math -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math --

[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

2008-06-22 Thread pepalogik at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #115 from pepalogik at seznam dot cz 2008-06-22 17:28 --- That #174; should be (R). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323

[Bug fortran/36599] major execution regression for induct.f90 polyhedron benchmark in 4.3.1 on Intel

2008-06-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 17:54 --- Fortran requires that parenthesis are always honoured. All other associative maths operations are allowed in Fortran, but as IEEE is also allowed, this gives problems e.g. INF is involved or signed zeros. Therefore,

minor cc1 crash (SIGILL in my tests)

2008-06-22 Thread der Mouse
I ran into this on NetBSD 4.0; the crash said to report it to NetBSD. When I did so, they said Why don't you let _them_ know, then?, them referring to you people. However, gcc 4.0 does not have either the bugs.html or the BUGS referred to by bugreport.texi, as far as I can see. When I looked at

[Bug fortran/36599] major execution regression for induct.f90 polyhedron benchmark in 4.3.1 on Intel

2008-06-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-06-22 18:30 --- If the problem is due to the honoring of parenthesis in fortran, why doesn't this issue manifest itself on powerpc-apple-darwin as well? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-06/msg00249.html --

[Bug tree-optimization/36600] New: [4.3 Regression] ICE while building e2fsprogs with -fipa-pta -O2

2008-06-22 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
Nico R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] reports that building e2fsprogs with gcc-4.3.1 and -fipa-pta triggers an ICE ... observed on both x86 and x86_64 gcc-4.2.4 seems to work fine CC tdb.c cc -I../../lib -I../../lib -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DROOT_SYSCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\\

[Bug tree-optimization/36600] [4.3 Regression] ICE while building e2fsprogs with -fipa-pta -O2

2008-06-22 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #1 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2008-06-22 19:48 --- Created an attachment (id=15804) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15804action=view) e2fsprogs-fipa-pta.i reduced test case by Nico R. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36600

[Bug tree-optimization/36600] ICE while building e2fsprogs with -fipa-pta -O2

2008-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 19:48 --- -fipa-pta was never did anything anyways . -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/35518] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above

2008-06-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 20:02 --- The same change gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-2.c on all hppa targets (both 32 and 64 bit). On hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, testK is the first test to fail. In this case, it appears retmeK is miscompiled. --

[Bug tree-optimization/35518] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above

2008-06-22 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-06-22 20:04 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above to fail. In this case, it appears retmeK is miscompiled. Simplified test attached. Dave

[Bug c++/36601] New: Can't be friended by template class argument

2008-06-22 Thread igodard at pacbell dot net
This: templatetypename F class Foo { friend class F; }; gets you this: ~/ootbc/asm$ g++ foo.cc foo.cc:2: error: using template type parameter ‘F’ after ‘class’ foo.cc:2: error: friend declaration does not name a class or function -- Summary: Can't be friended by template

[Bug c++/24629] Can't use template argument as friend

2008-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 20:13 --- *** Bug 36601 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/36601] Can't be friended by template class argument

2008-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 20:13 --- Because the C++ standard says you cannot. See PR 24629. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24629 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug other/36595] Multiple warnings about C++ for C codes

2008-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 20:27 --- Not really a regression as the warning was just enabled in the first place recently. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/36599] major execution regression for induct.f90 polyhedron benchmark in 4.3.1 on Intel

2008-06-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-06-22 20:43 --- I think the problem is that the vector cost model is not tune for the Intel Core family. My understanding of the problem is that without the relevant suboption of -ffast-math the inner implicit loops in induct are

[Bug tree-optimization/35518] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above

2008-06-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 20:44 --- retmeK (struct K x) { unnamed-unsigned:10 SR.14; unnamed-unsigned:15 SR.13; unnamed-unsigned:7 SR.12; unnamed-unsigned:10 SR.11; unnamed-unsigned:15 SR.10; unnamed-unsigned:15 x$i;

[Bug tree-optimization/36602] New: memset should be optimized into an empty CONSTRUCTOR

2008-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
I noticed this while looking into tree-ssa-sccvn.c sources (though I doubt it helps in general really). But anyways we should optimize the following code into just a return 0;: struct f { int t, k; int g[1024]; }; int g(void) { struct f a; __builtin_memset(a, 0, sizeof(a)); return

[Bug tree-optimization/35518] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above

2008-06-22 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-06-22 21:13 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #13 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

2008-06-22 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org
--- Comment #116 from vincent at vinc17 dot org 2008-06-22 21:14 --- (In reply to comment #114) Yes, but this requires quite a complicated workaround (solution (4) in my comment #109). The problem is on the compiler side, which could store every result of a cast or an assignment to

[Bug tree-optimization/36602] memset should be optimized into an empty CONSTRUCTOR

2008-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 21:26 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/35518] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above

2008-06-22 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-06-22 21:34 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above x$B0F7_8 = BIT_FIELD_REF x, 7, 0; D.1258.i ={v} x$i_5; D.1258.j ={v} x$j_7; SR.12_9 =

[Bug target/36603] New: Use \r\n for generated *.s files on Windows

2008-06-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
To quote James van Buskirk on comp.lang.fortran: Is there any possibility for gfortran's output text files to receive line termination appropriate to the host OS? (he can't display *.s files properly on Windows without converting them first) -- Summary: Use \r\n for generated *.s

[Bug target/36603] Use \r\n for generated *.s files on Windows

2008-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 21:48 --- (he can't display *.s files properly on Windows without converting them first) What text editor is he using? I know NotePad does not support UNIX style line endings but WordPad supports it which is what I use

[Bug tree-optimization/16427] dead 0 memset not optimized away

2008-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 21:54 --- Related to bug 36602. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16427

[Bug tree-optimization/35518] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above

2008-06-22 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-06-22 22:23 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: --- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot

[Bug fortran/36599] major execution regression for induct.f90 polyhedron benchmark in 4.3.1 on Intel

2008-06-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-06-22 22:30 --- IMHO when a new optimization technique is enabled by default in -O3 and degrades common benchmark performance, it qualifies as a performance regression for that release. --

[Bug tree-optimization/35518] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above

2008-06-22 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-06-22 22:43 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution at -O2 and above --- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-06-22 21:34 --- Subject:

[Bug middle-end/36594] [4.4 Regression] multiple regressions on powerpc at rev.136976

2008-06-22 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-22 23:42 --- Yes, similarly multiple regressions on AIX. Reverting Honza's patch fixes it. The failure on AIX is: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20050122-2.c:11: internal compiler error: in copy_rtx, at rtl.c:314 rs6000.md

[Bug fortran/36599] major execution regression for induct.f90 polyhedron benchmark in 4.3.1 on Intel

2008-06-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #7 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-06-23 00:07 --- Looking at the polyhedron benchmark data from http://physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/gcc-trunk/benchmark/, there appears to be a big jump in performance in the induct runtime with -ffast-math and -O3 between

[Bug fortran/36599] major execution regression for induct.f90 polyhedron benchmark in 4.3.1 on Intel

2008-06-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #8 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-06-23 00:46 --- Looking at the SuSe polyhedron benchmark servers, the induct regression in trunk was eliminated between 2008-04-27 and 2008-04-28. My guess is this was fixed with... r134730 | rguenth | 2008-04-27

[Bug target/36603] Use \r\n for generated *.s files on Windows

2008-06-22 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-06-23 02:54 --- Using \r\n will cause problems with pch files. This is why I made this change 2004-06-05 Danny Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] * toplev.c (init_asm_output): Add explicit 'b' to mode when

[Bug target/27880] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] undefined reference to `_Unwind_GetIPInfo'

2008-06-22 Thread russiane39 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #26 from russiane39 at gmail dot com 2008-06-23 04:34 --- This bug also affects OpenSolaris. # gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11 Configured with: ../gcc-4.2.4/configure --prefix=/usr/gnu --libdir=/usr/gnu/lib --libexecdir=/usr/gnu/lib