http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
Laurent GUERBY laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-*-* |hppa64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788
Summary: -fwhole-program causes ICE error: BB 3 can not throw
but has an EH edge
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Strange astrange at ithinksw dot com 2010-09-25
06:51:33 UTC ---
BTW, I think the error would be a lot clearer if it printed the pre-cloning/etc
function name.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45789
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree code 'lang_type' is not
supported in gimple streams with -flto when using
__builtin_printf()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45778
--- Comment #3 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-25
09:04:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I also think that the last four lines quoted above should
go away. Do we really need the 150+ byte message tacked
onto ever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45778
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45790
Summary: 1308 new GCC h...@164592 regressions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45628
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44557
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2010-09-25
11:51:17 UTC ---
The default_secondary_reload ICE still triggers on trunk (4.6 r164610) if you
target Thumb-1:
objdir/gcc/xgcc -Bobjdir/gcc -march=armv7-a -mthumb -O1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40569
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25
12:34:38 UTC ---
First part of an implementation.
TODO: (a) Use a module rather than the normal name space. (b) Get the command
line options; cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45776
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Kraft domob at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25 14:27:27
UTC ---
Author: domob
Date: Sat Sep 25 14:27:20 2010
New Revision: 164619
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164619
Log:
2010-09-25 Daniel Kraft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25
14:30:55 UTC ---
The issue seems to be how alias checking is implemented in trans-array.c:
gfc_could_be_alias (gfc_ss * lss, gfc_ss * rss)
[...]
for (rref = rss-expr-ref;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45776
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Kraft domob at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25 14:30:58
UTC ---
This implemented all IO related checks (items 5-10), so only missing are now 14
and 15 which are the LOCK/UNLOCK related ones. These depend on implementation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788
Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45778
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2010-09-25 15:01:19 UTC ---
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 09:04:32AM +, LpSolit at netscape dot net wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45778
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45778
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791
Summary: Missed devirtualization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45778
--- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-25
16:40:37 UTC ---
OK, signature removed for the mailing-lists.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45769
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||LpSolit at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792
Summary: [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due
to fix for PR44374
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||45375
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793
Summary: [4.6 Regressions] Numerous test-suite failures
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45394
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25
17:22:21 UTC ---
The workaround is to remove -g from the command line.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45787
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-09-25 17:28:29 UTC ---
Try adding an option entry
undefined
Driver Separate
to darwin.opt.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45394
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45794
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45787
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-09-25
19:06:18 UTC ---
Thanks! Adding...
Index: gcc/config/darwin.opt
===
--- gcc/config/darwin.opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45794
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Strange astrange at ithinksw dot com 2010-09-25
19:50:29 UTC ---
I (probably) definitely attached it, is the attachment form in the new bugs
page not working?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35551
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793
--- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25
20:01:14 UTC ---
Others can not confirm this so I am checking local configuration.
4.6.0 20100925 (experimental) (GCC)
[sfili...@localhost bug24]$ gfortran -c bug24.f03
bug24.f03:68.10:
call b%cp_to_foo(tmp,info)
1
Error: Type mismatch in argument 'a' at (1); passed CLASS(base) to
CLASS(s_base)
bug24.f03:11:0: internal compiler error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45795
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-09-25
21:21:19 UTC ---
It is very likely a duplicate of pr45783.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45783
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-09-25
21:21:46 UTC ---
pr45795 is very likely a duplicate of this one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25
22:10:15 UTC ---
Hmm,
normally we should see it from COMPONENT_REF:
while (true)
{
if (TREE_CODE (ref) == COMPONENT_REF)
{
tree par_type;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25
22:12:39 UTC ---
Note that the patch attached solves one indirect call in the testcase but has
no effect on mozilla.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25
22:17:41 UTC ---
Another testcase where we devirtualize via folding is:
// { dg-do assemble }
// { dg-options -g -O2 }
// Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40568
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25
22:42:38 UTC ---
Patch for the issue in comment 0:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-09/msg00455.html
TODO: Issue mentioned in comment 1: C_SIZEOF in init expressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40569
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-25
22:43:13 UTC ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-09/msg00455.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248
--- Comment #8 from margali at imapmail dot org 2010-09-25 22:43:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
At least one fink-user has reported that Jack's latest packaging that
automatically uses --with-dwarf2 on darwin8 builds successfully (was on a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #28 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-09-26
01:11:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
So I would like to see some proper detailed analysis on object files
establishing exactly what constitutes all this bloat and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-09-26 02:10:54
UTC ---
Thank you. From my experience, I tried to upload attachment in the original
report ~3 times, once (PR45768) it failed. I wasn't sure if that was my fault
or not,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26
03:33:09 UTC ---
This is the same location I was seeing the failure before. Now I have no
segfault, but valgind shows:
==17145== 48 (32 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26
03:39:17 UTC ---
This patch untested gets rid of the valgrind error I was seeing.
Index: module.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26
04:17:19 UTC ---
The patch in comment 5 regression tests fine on x86-64.
Kazumoto Kojima, does this patch fix the problem for you?
49 matches
Mail list logo
