http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45975
Summary: template keyword is not allowed, however, accepted by
g++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45976
Summary: optional template keyword is not accepted by g++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #14 from Michael Schulze mschulze at ivs dot cs.ovgu.de
2010-10-12 07:08:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
Should I write two bug reports about the found problems?
Sure.
Bug #45975 and Bug #45976
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45977
Summary: warning: 'i' initialized and declared 'extern' is
spurious
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
Summary: bogus array subscript is above array bounds warning
in extremely simple code with no loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-12
08:15:40 UTC ---
I have also been hit by this pr, but only for gcc, g++, and gfortran. All the
other tests have accepted RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board 'unix{-m32,}'.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45975
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979
Summary: precompiled headers breakage on 2.6.36-rc Linux/ARM
kernels
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
08:35:52 UTC ---
Most likely when the linux arm kernel decided to randomize the heap.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45980
Summary: Use not in stead of add to generate new constant
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44950
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45976
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45981
Summary: bugzilla doesn't allow linking to specific comment
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
09:45:26 UTC ---
I use RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix/\{,-m32\} which also works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-12
10:25:57 UTC ---
Does it work on your system to
use this instead (in a tree with the patch not reverted):
make -k check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2010-10-12
10:56:39 UTC ---
I assume other Linux archs already randomize the heap. If so, why would that
cause PCH failures on ARM? Could it be because there's no TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45912
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45977
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-10-12 11:32:10 UTC ---
This is a coding style warning - the code is valid, but extremely
unidiomatic for C since extern is generally expected to mean that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45982
Summary: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] PTA does not track
integers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45982
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45982
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
11:55:02 UTC ---
Which means, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr24287{,-2}.c are bogus.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45851
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12 12:06:22 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Oct 12 12:06:18 2010
New Revision: 165366
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165366
Log:
gcc/testsuite:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45851
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45851
Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment
:
$ /usr/local/gcc-4.6-20101012/bin/g++ -flto -std=c++0x -c synth.ii
src/audio/synth.cc:96:1: internal compiler error: tree code
'template_parm_index' is not supported in gimple streams
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #8 from Artem Anisimov aanisimov at inbox dot ru 2010-10-12
12:25:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I have run 'make profiledbootstrap' of today's checkout of the 4.5
branc (revision 165315) on i686 and it finished without any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45874
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #9 from Artem Anisimov aanisimov at inbox dot ru 2010-10-12
12:28:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
It's interesting to note that profiledbootstrap break amd64 build too, though
for different reason:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45874
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2010-10-12
12:30:41 UTC ---
I am out of the office until October 28th,2010. I will have periodic access to
email in the meantime. For urgent issues please contact Fred Plante
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
13:22:33 UTC ---
Older GCC for some reason complain about
g++-4.5 -S -std=c++0x synth.cpp -msse4
In file included from src/audio/synth_params.h:12:0,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983
--- Comment #3 from tbp tbptbp at gmail dot com 2010-10-12 13:27:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Older GCC for some reason complain about
src/core/sys_log.h:95:40: error: invalid use of ‘__builtin_va_arg_pack ()’
There's code to handle that,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983
--- Comment #4 from tbp tbptbp at gmail dot com 2010-10-12 13:31:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
you probably built GCC with release checking?
Oh. Worse,
$ /usr/local/gcc-4.6-20101012/bin/g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
--- Comment #17 from Daniel Kraft domob at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
13:30:57 UTC ---
Author: domob
Date: Tue Oct 12 13:30:53 2010
New Revision: 165378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165378
Log:
2010-10-12 Daniel Kraft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
--- Comment #18 from Daniel Kraft domob at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
13:37:44 UTC ---
This commit did implement better handling for association to derived-types, but
some cases are still not handled (see the XFAIL of associate_9.f03). I wanted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45984
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for
identical types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45984
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
13:49:09 UTC ---
canonical type error - PR45984.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45985
Summary: [trans-mem] internal compiler error:
verify_cgraph_node failed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983
--- Comment #6 from tbp tbptbp at gmail dot com 2010-10-12 13:56:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
canonical type error - PR45984.
Ah. So, both the current error and your previous patch fixing it all were
nothing but side-effects.
Tuning into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
14:54:58 UTC ---
We have an array type with a TYPE_DOMAIN with TYPE_MAXVAL being
template_parm_index - 1. The array is field 'm' in chunk_array_t
which is the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45977
--- Comment #2 from Konrad Schwarz konrad.schwarz at siemens dot com
2010-10-12 15:27:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is a coding style warning - the code is valid, but extremely
unidiomatic for C since extern is generally expected to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45912
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45977
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-10-12 15:47:45 UTC ---
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, konrad.schwarz at siemens dot com wrote:
Whether or not this is idiomatic usage, or corresponds to what is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
15:53:21 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Oct 12 15:53:15 2010
New Revision: 165382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165382
Log:
PR middle-end/45962
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
15:55:09 UTC ---
Bah. Changelog conflict and I wasn't paying attention. Done now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
16:38:16 UTC ---
I think the patch that broke this should be backed out until the semantics are
sorted out. I think the middle-end people should decide on which part of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878
m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45958
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
16:40:49 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 12 16:40:39 2010
New Revision: 165389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165389
Log:
Support '-plugin' as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45986
Summary: gcc.dg/tls/pr45870.c FAILs on Solaris 10/SPARC and x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #81 from Laurent GUERBY laurent at guerby dot net 2010-10-12
17:43:19 UTC ---
Now testing r165387 + Paolo patch as this seems to be the last PR preventing
bootstrap on arm-linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45987
Summary: gcc.target/i386/push-1.c XPASSes on Solaris 10+/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45856
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45988
Summary: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr38968.f90 times out on
32-bit Solaris 10/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
Summary: Some objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1 tests XPASS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45990
Summary: 28_regex/07_traits/char/isctype.cc XPASSes on Solaris
2/IRIX 6
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
19:05:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I assume other Linux archs already randomize the heap.
Could it be because there's no TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE definition in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45856
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: Invalid
address operand in in TARGET_MEM_REF. with
-fstrict-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2010-10-12
19:26:17 UTC ---
Ok. I'll cook something up for TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE on ARM.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45987
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45990
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
19:53:18 UTC ---
Interesting ... lookup_classname isn't implemented and just returns 0
I'll look into it or ask Stephen to check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45990
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45856
--- Comment #12 from Michael Eager eager at eagercon dot com 2010-10-12
20:07:13 UTC ---
Patches checked in.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45990
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
20:12:54 UTC ---
This is DR 1337
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/lwg-active.html#1337
Rainer, could you test this 1337 hax0r patch?
Index: include/bits/regex.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
20:23:26 UTC ---
I think I'm going to use gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-5.c at -O0.
I'll compare r165239 to (r165240 plus your commit at r165382), ok?
Looking at r165240, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45992
Summary: MULTIOSSUBDIR in Makefile for target/libgcc missing
quotes on 'test'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #10 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
21:31:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I have to reopen this: the SEGV ICE is gone, but no regressions were fixed...
These aren't technically regressions; these tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45993
Summary: ICE in uses_template_parms, at cp/pt.c:7064
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
21:55:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #8)
I have to reopen this: the SEGV ICE is gone, but no regressions were
fixed...
These aren't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-10-12 21:59:12
UTC ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00800.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
22:01:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 12 22:01:04 2010
New Revision: 165401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165401
Log:
PR fortran/45636
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #12 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
22:05:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
... these tests fail with r165239 too, if you run them by hand. If you
just compare gcc.sum files of course they'll appear as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45994
Summary: During 'make clean', some variables not propagating
properly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
22:15:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
You don't agree they're new tests, or you don't agree that they
will fail when run by hand on the older compiler?
Both. They
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45972
davidxl davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
22:49:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 22025
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22025
tarball with asm files and somewhat readable simulator traces
Just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45856
--- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-12
23:17:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Patches checked in.
What revision number? I don't see any commits.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45992
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-10-12 23:30:30 UTC ---
I don't think MULTIOSDIR should ever be empty, or contain any characters
that need quoting, so the bug would be that it is empty rather
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45995
Summary: Building gcc-4.5.1 on SUSE 10.2 failed when configured
with --host=x86_64-suse-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996
Summary: -falign-functions=X does not work
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45958
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45995
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45856
--- Comment #14 from eager at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-13 02:27:45 UTC ---
Author: eager
Date: Wed Oct 13 02:27:42 2010
New Revision: 165410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165410
Log:
PR 45856
Modified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45907
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-13
03:12:27 UTC ---
This was fixed by a commit in the range 165061:165143 (or, from looking at
gcc-testresults, 165092:165096), right?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
Summary: __unknown__ type name for typedef'd int
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45874
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot
93 matches
Mail list logo
