http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44362
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45336
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46299
Summary: Diagnose specification expressions involving
host-associated vars with deferred bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
08:47:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Please try revision 166259.
Ok. I've started bootstrap. I'm quite sure that reverting the will fix the
problem. Perhaps I missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46300
Summary: Calls to internals _ITM_cxa_throw and
_ITM_cxa_allocate_exception are not marked as safe
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46301
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Missing diagnosis for len=:
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46301
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
10:24:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 22274
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22274
gcc46-pr46233-1.patch
Alternative fix which calls fixup_noreturn_call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702
--- Comment #23 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
11:10:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 11:10:21 2010
New Revision: 166305
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166305
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
Georg Lay avr at gjlay dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr at gjlay dot de
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45721
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45743
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45781
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213
--- Comment #5 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04 11:51:13 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Nov 4 11:51:09 2010
New Revision: 166306
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166306
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46213
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
11:54:36 UTC ---
Alex, please ping your patch, eventually CCing some DF maintainers.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45892
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46295
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
12:29:20 UTC ---
The problem is that fold figures sth out that tree-affine doesn't. The
latter doesn't simplify
{
type = long unsigned int
offset = 0
elements = {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
12:34:43 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef unsigned long gsize;
typedef int gint;
enum { NUM_LST_DSPOPE = 12 };
struct Preferences {
gint
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44765
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-04 12:41:14 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Thu Nov 4 12:41:07 2010
New Revision: 166307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166307
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
12:42:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 12:42:57 2010
New Revision: 166308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166308
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46022
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44765
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
20101104 (experimental) [master revision
b9be572:b94eff6:4b98788102c16a253dbdac0c91e13219d1c7cbc4] (GCC)
$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45743
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179
--- Comment #9 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
13:12:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I can confirm that attachment 22191 [details] fixes the original problem,
namely that
one source file from util-linux, for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46299
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
13:15:52 UTC ---
(All references relative to Fortran 2008.) Per
R516 explicit-shape-spec is [ lower-bound : ] upper-bound
and R517/518 the bounds have to be specification
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
Summary: Program with virtual public inheritance crashes at O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
--- Comment #1 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2010-11-04 13:17:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 22275
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22275
source in multiple files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
--- Comment #2 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2010-11-04 13:18:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 22276
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22276
source in single c++ file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
--- Comment #3 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2010-11-04 13:19:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 22277
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22277
preprocessed source file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
Summary: 'mutex' is not a member of 'std' failures in
30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc,
30_threads/mutex/cons/constexpr.cc,
30_threads/once_flag/cons/constexpr.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-10-20 03:22:14 |2010-11-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-04
13:27:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 22278
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22278
compressed preprocessed source file for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-04
13:29:29 UTC ---
Regressions are not present at r166156.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
13:37:13 UTC ---
the preprocessed file shows this condition in mutex is false:
#if defined(_GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS) defined(_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1)
so those new tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
13:38:54 UTC ---
Possibly:
// { dg-do compile { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd* *-*-linux* *-*-solaris*
*-*-cyg
win *-*-darwin* alpha*-*-osf* mips-sgi-irix6* } }
// {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46199
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-11-04
13:47:44 UTC ---
Also seen on powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0 between revisions 166170 and 166211
(see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-11/msg00098.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-11-04
13:51:08 UTC ---
Those are dg-do compile testcases, thus adding on top:
// { dg-require-cstdint }
// { dg-require-gthreads }
consistently with the existing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-11-04 13:54:58 UTC ---
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Joseph, does C really distinguish between
int foo()
{
}
and
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46154
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
13:55:46 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 13:55:44 2010
New Revision: 166311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166311
Log:
2010-11-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46154
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
14:07:54 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 14:07:48 2010
New Revision: 166312
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166312
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46199
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22279|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2010-11-04 14:31:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 22281
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22281
small test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2010-11-04 14:36:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 22282
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22282
.ii file
same file as sent by email few time ago.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
14:38:18 UTC ---
Bootstrap/regtest went fine on PPC, va-arg-xxx tests now pass.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46232
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
14:56:57 UTC ---
I think it's fragile to call verify_flow_info from loop_optimizer_finalize
but your patch in comment #5 looks perfectly reasonable and is ok if it
passed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756
--- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-04 14:58:48 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Thu Nov 4 14:58:40 2010
New Revision: 166313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166313
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46301
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
15:17:29 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 15:17:24 2010
New Revision: 166315
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166315
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
15:19:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 15:19:19 2010
New Revision: 166316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166316
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46099
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45102
sledge sledgeas at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sledgeas at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
16:05:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Please try revision 166259.
As expected reverting the patch fixes bootstrap on s390x.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04 16:06:51 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Nov 4 16:06:45 2010
New Revision: 166318
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166318
Log:
PR middle-end/46292
* lower-suberg.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45291
Georg Lay avr at gjlay dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr at gjlay dot de
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-11-04 16:19:20
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
We're matching
(define_insn *ashlmode3_cconly
AFAICS, there is nothing wrong with the pattern:
[(set (reg FLAGS_REG)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179
--- Comment #10 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-11-04 16:27:00
UTC ---
https://www.freewrt.org/~tg/debs68k/dists/sid/main/PS-ok-unrel/gcc-4.4/
I built a Debian source package, which means three-stage bootstrap and then
building
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-11-04 16:32:57
UTC ---
The insn that was matched looks like:
(gdb) up
#1 0x00b9da94 in recog_7 (x0=0x71f329d8, insn=0x71f296c0,
pnum_clobbers=0x7fffdc9c)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
16:35:55 UTC ---
It looks like scheduling itself adds the instruction that references
(mem/s:DI (reg:DI 4 si) [0 MEM[(struct S * {ref-all})addr.0_2]+0 S8 A64])
making use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
16:48:49 UTC ---
And indeed --param selsched-insns-to-rename=0 fixes the testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-04 17:02:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Nov 4 17:02:25 2010
New Revision: 166319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166319
Log:
2010-11-04 Paolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2010-11-04 17:03:26
UTC ---
Testing a fix...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
Summary: g++ crashes with ICE in bitmap_first_set_bit, at
bitmap.c:770
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46298
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
17:16:10 UTC ---
Please provide preprocessed input; I can't configure libstdc++ without an ARM
assembler/linker.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46298
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46305
Summary: [Regression] Bugzilla: PR n comment m type of
links: Comment links to the wrong bug
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04
17:32:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 22284
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22284
Patch I am testing
Hi,
this patch makes size metric more realistic in two
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44772
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
gee jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46301
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46305
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo