[Bug bootstrap/46086] fail to build gcc 4.5.2 on sparc64-portbld-freebsd9.0 - configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46086 --- Comment #13 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2010-12-25 09:21:48 UTC --- I switched back to the default system compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] now GMP passes all tests, gcc45 is built fine, and I can build and run lapack fine. No idea what happened in the meantime, as I surely started from the system compiler in the first place. Perhaps something changed in GMP in the meantime. Anyway, please close this bug report. thanks anton
[Bug c++/15774] Conflicting function decls not diagnosed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15774 --- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-25 10:41:09 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Sat Dec 25 10:41:05 2010 New Revision: 168241 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168241 Log: 2010-12-25 Kai Tietz kai.ti...@onevision.com PR c++/15774 * decl.c (decls_match): Check for FUNCTION_DECL also for identity of compatible attributes. ChangeLog gcc/testsuite 2010-12-25 Kai Tietz kai.ti...@onevision.com PR c++/15774 * g++.dg/warn/pr15774-1.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/pr15774-2.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/pr15774-1.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/pr15774-2.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug testsuite/47057] FAIL/XPASS gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-outer-fir.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47057 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2010.12.25 11:49:58 CC||irar at il dot ibm.com AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |irar at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2010-12-25 11:49:58 UTC --- The first loop now gets vectorized, it didn't because of: /* Currently not vectorized because we get too many BBs in the inner-loop, because the compiler doesn't realize that the inner-loop executes at least once (cause k4), and so there's no need to create a guard code to skip the inner-loop in case it doesn't execute. */ So, the correct fix is to expect 2 outer loop vectorized on targets that support realignment. I'll fix the test. Ira
[Bug testsuite/47057] FAIL/XPASS gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-outer-fir.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47057 --- Comment #2 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-25 12:54:02 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sat Dec 25 12:53:58 2010 New Revision: 168242 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168242 Log: PR testsuite/47057 * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-outer-fir.c: Change comment. Expect two outer loops to get vectorized. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-outer-fir.c
[Bug testsuite/47057] FAIL/XPASS gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-outer-fir.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47057 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2010-12-25 12:55:18 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug ada/47063] New: ada fails to build for alpha64-dec-vms
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47063 Summary: ada fails to build for alpha64-dec-vms Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: amyl...@gcc.gnu.org Host: i686-pc-linux-gnu Target: alpha64-dec-vms gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I. -Iada -I../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../gcc/gcc/ada -I../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/opt/cfarm/mpc/include -I../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber ../../../gcc/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/targtyps.c -o ada/targtyps.o ../../../gcc/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/targtyps.c:170:1: error: MALLOC_ALIGNMENT redefined In file included from ./tm.h:16, from ../../../gcc/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/targtyps.c:32: ../../../gcc/gcc/config/alpha/vms.h:76:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition make[2]: *** [ada/targtyps.o] Error 1
[Bug translation/47064] New: params.def: Translatable string compilatoin (vs. compilation)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47064 Summary: params.def: Translatable string compilatoin (vs. compilation) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: translation AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sti...@antcom.de params.def:123: The translatable string Probability that COMDAT function will be shared with different compilatoin unit should be corrected with respect to the word compilatoin (should be compilation)
[Bug other/47062] -mfpmath=sse,387 causes pow() to produce incorrect results
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47062 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-12-25 19:33:53 UTC --- The testcase is useless, it only shows that the call to pow() returns wrong result. In case this is really a gcc bug, please provide runtime testcase from the implementation of pow and also exact compile flags that can be used to trigger the bug.
[Bug rtl-optimization/43653] ICE: in reload, at reload1.c:1188 with -O1 -ftree-vectorize and empty struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653 --- Comment #3 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2010-12-25 23:43:13 UTC --- 4.5.1 shows the same issue when building Clang 2.8.
[Bug fortran/25714] concat of strings create an extra temporary variable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25714 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-26 00:42:35 UTC --- The test case from comment#1 could be done as c(1:1) = a c(2:2) = b in the front end optimization pass. I'll give it a shot.
[Bug target/45726] Thumb2 instruction emitted for incompatible CPU
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45726 Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org --- Comment #17 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-12-26 05:45:45 UTC --- Doesn't this second change also need to be on the 4.5 branch?
[Bug c++/47022] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11682
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47022 Yu Simin silver24k at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: in tsubst_copy, at |[4.6 Regression] ICE: in |cp/pt.c:11682 |tsubst_copy, at ||cp/pt.c:11682 --- Comment #1 from Yu Simin silver24k at gmail dot com 2010-12-26 07:34:55 UTC --- Still fails with trunk r168244.
