http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Error: SSA name in freelist but still
referenced
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266
Summary: Optimization: Declare PRIVATE module procedures as
TREE_PUBLIC = 0 (static function)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267
Summary: array constructor causing long compile times
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
reconfirmed||2011.01.12 10:24:01
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 10:24:01
UTC ---
Confirmed with gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20110112 (experimental).
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47268
Summary: Documentation: missing (Optional) keyword for
parameters of get_command_argument() and
get_environment_variable()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47233
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:39:43 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:39:39 2011
New Revision: 168700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168700
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |mjambor at suse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #12 from Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:44:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Created attachment 22945 [details]
Test patch
Could you try the following? It's a variant of a patch Richard Sandiford
recently
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47233
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:52:28 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:52:25 2011
New Revision: 168701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168701
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:53:24 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:53:21 2011
New Revision: 168702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168702
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:54:01 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:53:59 2011
New Revision: 168703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168703
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:54:38 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:54:36 2011
New Revision: 168704
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168704
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47255
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 11:22:35
UTC ---
I just noticed that this failure was reported on 9 January 2011, but it is no
longer reported on 10 January 2011. What changed ?
I asked Matthias Klose if he
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46993
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Klimovsky arseny.klimovsky at gmail dot com
2011-01-12 11:59:13 UTC ---
This bug is quite similar to another one in Debian BTS
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561611
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
12:04:45 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 12:04:39 2011
New Revision: 168708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168708
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46894
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46946
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
12:07:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 12:07:44 2011
New Revision: 168709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168709
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46946
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-01-12 13:10:07 UTC ---
For example, linux uses global reg var esp. As there is no need to reserve
this register, can GCC accept it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
13:32:32 UTC ---
In 99.% of all cases there is a better way than using a global register
variable.
Also it is not clear to me how to merge translation units where a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
13:37:53 UTC ---
Kai sent a draft patch. The issue is that TREE_PUBLIC/TREE_EXTERNAL should come
before setting the attribute - otherwise the decl seems to be inconsistent.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-12 13:38:20
UTC ---
First I think we need to note that if we allocate the pseudo holding the value
for ext in memory that we get some savings (because ext is already sitting
in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
13:50:11 UTC ---
You're right, however in fact all redirections and updates should be
taking place already. Either in inline_transform() for calls that are
in the function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #6 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2011-01-12
14:11:28 UTC ---
I also was unable to get the procedure into a DLL with omission of DLLEXPORT,
instead attempting to get it in using a .DEF file and either gfortran or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #25 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-01-12
15:00:11 UTC ---
Testresults for lto-bootstrap with revised patch on x86_64-apple-darwin10...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg01002.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
15:01:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:01:09 2011
New Revision: 168713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168713
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47269
Summary: DSYMUTIL_SPEC doesn't handle -gtoggle
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
15:22:08 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:21:59 2011
New Revision: 168715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168715
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270
Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] GCC produces
unnecessary/wrong code on -O2 and -O3 levels
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
15:47:36 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:47:29 2011
New Revision: 168717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168717
Log:
PR driver/47244
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
Balakrishnan B balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 17:02:51
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 12 17:02:41 2011
New Revision: 168718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168718
Log:
2011-01-12 Kai Tietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
17:10:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
With the same object when accessed directly produces different results and
when
accessed using a pointer of same type produces
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Schepler aschepler at gmail dot com 2011-01-12
17:16:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
struct B : virtual A {
virtual void f();
};
struct C : B , virtual A {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
Summary: gcc-4.6 -O1 -ftree-vectorize removes a test (if), the
function generates invalid outputs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #1 from Victor Stinner victor.stinner at haypocalc dot com
2011-01-12 18:54:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 22951
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22951
Example to reproduce the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-12 19:42:38
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 160030:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-05/msg01089.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 20:00:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
[macbook] f90/bug% gfc -O2 pr35971_red.f90
pr35971_red.f90: In function 'gp':
pr35971_red.f90:67:0: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
Summary: In addition to the bug uncovered in 42751, gcc can't
bootstrap using --with-cpu=power7
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-12 20:59:31 UTC ---
sorry, I can not reproduce this at r168655 (plus patch from comment #7), at
least not on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Do you only get this error with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
21:17:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 22952
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22952
preprocessed source
configured with
../gcc-4.6-20110108/configure
reconfirmed||2011.01.12 21:21:12
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.6.0
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 21:21:12
UTC ---
Yes, confirmed with gcc version 4.6.0 20110112
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
21:34:13 UTC ---
./gcc/include/stddef.h is being included, but it doesn't define size_t
machine/ansi.h has the header guard _X86_64_ANSI_H_ but it appears that gcc's
stddef.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
21:49:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
pr35971_red.f90:67:0: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
I can reproduce this with a clean trunk on x86-64-linux with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
21:54:25 UTC ---
Note, the fixes for 47251 will be needed in addition to changes for this bug in
order to do a full bootstrap on a power7 system using the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-12 22:18:35 UTC ---
I can reproduce this with a clean trunk on x86-64-linux with both -m32 and
-m64.
I confirm that the ICE is not due to the patch.
Regarding the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
Summary: References to unaligned packed structure members not
allowed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
Summary: [4.6 regression] ICE in lto_varpool_replace_node, at
lto-symtab.c:306
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46791
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46688
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13
00:02:48 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jan 13 00:02:41 2011
New Revision: 168732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168732
Log:
2011-01-13 Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13
00:28:20 UTC ---
actually it's not every arch - most still use _ANSI_H_ it's just x86 and x86-64
that are different
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22953|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46903
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39077
--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-13 04:12:10
UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00797.html
Apparently I didn't format my subject line correctly...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47269
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-01-13
05:23:00 UTC ---
This seems impossible to implement without the addition of a logical AND to the
spec language and the ability to place parentheses. We have two cases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37829
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47275
Summary: ofstream::put(255) results in bad stream when built
with -fsigned-char on platforms that default to
unsigned char
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47275
--- Comment #1 from ceckak at frontier dot com 2011-01-13 06:40:17 UTC ---
Typo in the original description: fails at i=255 (not 256)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13
07:27:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 22955
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22955
Patch that fixes the bug, testing with enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap-O3
93 matches
Mail list logo
