http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47583
--- Comment #6 from Harald Klimach harald at klimachs dot de 2011-02-02
08:04:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Thanks a lot, at least for me this patch seems to solve the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #15 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
08:48:27 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Feb 2 08:48:24 2011
New Revision: 169517
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169517
Log:
PR 47571 Weakref trickery for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #6 from Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de 2011-02-02 09:00:10 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
As far as I can see (from the header files that came with pre-compiled
binaries) this was used:
#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING 2.4.1
#define
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47585
Summary: remaining dependent base lookup
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #7 from Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de 2011-02-02 09:09:07 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
I have had a look at the test code. Could you try
(1) to comment the call to EXCH2_UV_AGRID_3D_RL,
(2) the same for the (two?)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47551
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47553
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-02
09:35:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I have used gdb for minimally, but what is its use here? I cannot create an
executable if I do not reduce the optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47543
--- Comment #9 from Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02 09:50:23
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
The potential fix seems to work fine on x86 as well. I'm going to build a
arm-elf toolchain and see if anything else pops up during
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47566
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
09:59:29 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 2 09:59:23 2011
New Revision: 169518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169518
Log:
2011-02-02 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47564
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47566
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47583
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
10:05:24 UTC ---
And now a new version of that patch has been checked in. Can you verify if
this bug still exists with current trunk (r169513 or newer)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23201|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #10 from Martin Losch mlo...@uni-bremen.de 2011-02-02 10:28:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #6)
I have used gdb for minimally, but what is its use here? I cannot create an
executable if I do not reduce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-02 11:22:39 UTC ---
This is embarrissing. I apologize for attaching another wrong file (the
correct
file name would have been exch2_uv_agrid_3d_rl.f). I have now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47585
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
11:50:00 UTC ---
dup of PR 24163 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47585
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24163
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kreckel at ginac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47584
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
12:12:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Before Richard's commit apparently expand_one_var wasn't updating
stack_alignment_needed, just stack_alignment_estimated, now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
12:25:01 UTC ---
But then wouldn't be size != 0?
At least when I try -O2 -m32:
int
foo (int x, int y)
{
long long a = (x + 0LL) * y;
long long b = (x - 63LL) * ((y | 12)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47583
--- Comment #7 from jpr at csc dot fi 2011-02-02 12:48:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Thanks a lot, at least for me this patch seems to solve the problem.
Well, that patch did break the direct_io_1.f90 test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47501
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-02-02 13:00:06
UTC ---
Thank you for quick fix. I tested that patch on top of r169501 (I tested it
before with r169450, but deleted the results...) - bootstrap with yes,rtl,df
checking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47572
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02 13:11:54 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Feb 2 13:11:50 2011
New Revision: 169520
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169520
Log:
2011-02-02 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47572
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
13:52:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 23213
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23213
gcc46-pr47581.patch
This patch indeed fixes the testcase and passed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23185|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47586
Summary: allocatable components: deep copy missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47455
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02 14:10:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Thus, left to do for this PR is comment 5: A deep copy is missing.
This is now PR 47586. Closing this one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47455
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-02 14:18:22
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Created attachment 23213 [details]
gcc46-pr47581.patch
This patch indeed fixes the testcase and passed bootstrap/regtest on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47543
--- Comment #10 from Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
14:49:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
The potential fix seems to work fine on x86 as well. I'm going to build a
arm-elf toolchain and see if anything else pops up during
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02 14:49:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
If gfortran is 4.5, I get
hydro_fluxes.f90:7.18:
use hydro_speeds
1
Internal Error at (1):
mio_component_ref():
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47543
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-02-02 14:51:19
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/11 07:49, ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47543
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-02 14:57:22
UTC ---
For this tescase, gcc 4.4 generates the most efficient code
while 4.5/4.6 become worse and worse:
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat x.i
unsigned mulh(unsigned a, unsigned b)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47543
--- Comment #12 from Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
15:06:07 UTC ---
The native bootstrap was successful.
I configured with: --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-float=softfp
--with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47044
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-02-02
15:08:33 UTC ---
This issue appears to be resolved at r169520 with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00070.html (omitting the
TODO_update_address_taken part)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
15:14:45 UTC ---
As #c8 is caused by a different patch and is much lower priority (because only
very few people use explicitly aligned long longs on i?86), please track it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
15:24:25 UTC ---
One possibility would be to only fold __builtin_fma* into FMA_EXPR after IPA
passes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
15:30:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
One possibility would be to only fold __builtin_fma* into FMA_EXPR after IPA
passes.
Expanding FMA_EXPR as __builtin_fma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
15:39:00 UTC ---
FMA_EXPR is created though not only just for __builtin_fma{,l,f} in the code,
but also for x * y + z when contracting. Can expansion rely that this is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47589
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47589
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Yegorushkin maxim.yegorushkin at gmail dot com
2011-02-02 15:43:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 23215
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23215
Archived preprocessed source
Could not attach the preprocessed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47044
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02 15:52:27
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Feb 2 15:52:21 2011
New Revision: 169531
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169531
Log:
Fix PR40979 and PR47044: after
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40979
--- Comment #22 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
15:52:26 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Feb 2 15:52:21 2011
New Revision: 169531
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169531
Log:
Fix PR40979 and PR47044:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47555
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02 15:52:15
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Feb 2 15:52:08 2011
New Revision: 169530
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169530
Log:
Fix PR47576 and PR47555: add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47576
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02 15:52:15
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Feb 2 15:52:08 2011
New Revision: 169530
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169530
Log:
Fix PR47576 and PR47555: add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47044
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47576
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40979
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47555
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
16:01:34 UTC ---
What about backporting this patch to 4.4 and 4.5?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47589
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
16:05:34 UTC ---
I think this is PR 45894
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590
Summary: var tracking produces wrong debug in code where
optimization is turned off using pragma
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590
--- Comment #1 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2011-02-02 16:07:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 23218
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23218
The assembly output from -Os compilation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
16:07:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 23217
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23217
gcc46-pr47274.patch
I think it is fairly obvious where the bug is (though
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47589
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590
--- Comment #2 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2011-02-02 16:08:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 23219
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23219
The assembly with instruction addresses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42860
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47574
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
16:27:46 UTC ---
Although this bug has 4.4.5 in the Known to work field, the bug in cp/tree.c
is present on the 4.4 branch, and the testcase in PR 47589 causes an ICE with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47555
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-02-02 16:29:46 UTC ---
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, spop at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47555
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop spop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #32 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-02-02 16:42:05
UTC ---
Similar (dormant) problem with slot_num.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #33 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-02-02 16:47:54
UTC ---
All other calls to lto_output_data_stream use sizeof, so this should probably
do as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47543
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
16:52:24 UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Feb 2 16:52:21 2011
New Revision: 169533
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169533
Log:
PR middle-end/47543
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #4 from Rich Townsend townsend at astro dot wisc.edu 2011-02-02
16:52:49 UTC ---
On Feb 2, 2011, at 8:49 AM, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47543
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
16:57:26 UTC ---
Isn't the format of that section mandated by lto-plugin though?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:08:14 UTC ---
... alternatively, I'll re-open PR 47589 as a separate non-C++0x bug on the 4.4
branch
here's a reduced testcase which makes 4.4.5 ICE, a regression since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02 17:14:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Rich, which version are you using?
Here's what gfortran -v gives:
[...]
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10
[...]
gcc version 4.6.0 20110122
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47589
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23215|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519
--- Comment #10 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:40:46 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:40:40 2011
New Revision: 169536
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169536
Log:
Visit basic blocks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47387
--- Comment #7 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:41:46 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:41:43 2011
New Revision: 169539
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169539
Log:
2011-01-24 Graham
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659
--- Comment #12 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:42:07 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:42:05 2011
New Revision: 169542
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169542
Log:
PR c/21659
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47452
--- Comment #3 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:42:33 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:42:31 2011
New Revision: 169546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169546
Log:
PR go/47452
Pick
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47414
--- Comment #8 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:45:53 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:45:50 2011
New Revision: 169575
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169575
Log:
2011-01-25 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273
--- Comment #11 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:46:20 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:46:18 2011
New Revision: 169579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169579
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
--- Comment #12 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:46:52 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:46:50 2011
New Revision: 169583
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169583
Log:
PR target/45701
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47427
--- Comment #7 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:46:08 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:46:04 2011
New Revision: 169577
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169577
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428
--- Comment #8 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:46:08 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:46:04 2011
New Revision: 169577
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169577
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43567
--- Comment #10 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:48:04 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:48:00 2011
New Revision: 169591
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169591
Log:
Add testcase for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47382
--- Comment #5 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:47:25 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:47:21 2011
New Revision: 169587
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169587
Log:
2011-01-25 Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #18 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:46:36 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:46:33 2011
New Revision: 169581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169581
Log:
Fix PR47271: only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
--- Comment #11 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:47:39 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:47:35 2011
New Revision: 169589
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169589
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47443
--- Comment #4 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:47:40 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:47:35 2011
New Revision: 169589
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169589
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47426
--- Comment #7 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:47:02 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:46:57 2011
New Revision: 169584
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169584
Log:
2011-01-25 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45136
--- Comment #15 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:49:12 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:49:06 2011
New Revision: 169597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169597
Log:
PR debug/45136
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46215
--- Comment #5 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:48:45 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:48:39 2011
New Revision: 169595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169595
Log:
Add testcase for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
--- Comment #9 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:47:18 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:47:13 2011
New Revision: 169586
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169586
Log:
PR 47375 getlog thread
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #128 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-26 01:26:52 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 26 01:26:48 2011
New Revision: 169267
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169267
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47411
--- Comment #9 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:46:00 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:45:57 2011
New Revision: 169576
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169576
Log:
2011-01-25 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46970
--- Comment #10 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:49:01 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:48:51 2011
New Revision: 169596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169596
Log:
Add testcase for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46168
--- Comment #7 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:48:33 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:48:28 2011
New Revision: 169594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169594
Log:
Add testcase for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29832
--- Comment #12 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-02
17:48:11 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb 2 17:48:08 2011
New Revision: 169592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169592
Log:
Add testcase for
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo