http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
08:03:53 UTC ---
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++ b/gcc/combine.c
@@ -2138,6 +2138,12 @@ cant_combine_insn_p (rtx insn)
return asm_noperands (PATTERN (insn)) 0;
src =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46494
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
Summary: Assigning an object of one type to a class variable
leads to an ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47722
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i586-pc-mingw32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
Summary: Failure to receive warning message when comparing
signed and unsigned integers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47730
Summary: ICE as a consequence of invalid source code attempting
to register a type-bound procedure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47731
Summary: [4.6 Regression] futex_wait broken on Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47731
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47731
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
09:56:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23334
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23334
gcc46-pr47731.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 10:09:15 UTC ---
Fixing up the CLASS declaration with the ALLOCATABLE attribute yields:
class(shape), dimension(2), allocatable :: object
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 10:16:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
shouldn't that read:
class(shape), dimension(:), allocatable :: object
^
| no fixed dimension
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47730
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-14
10:23:49 UTC ---
Error: Polymorphic array at (1) not yet supported
I wonder if this should not be a fatal error: if a feature is not implemented,
it is likely to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47730
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 10:27:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
It seems related to bug #46849
Yes, in particular to comment #2 in that PR:
module m
implicit none
type :: dt
end type
contains
subroutine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 10:30:15
UTC ---
So, necessary patch is now committed to binutils. Could you please retest this
issue with a recent binutils/HEAD version?
Thanks in advance,
Kai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47730
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 10:32:18 UTC ---
Another related test case was recently reported by Andrew Benson at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-02/msg00111.html:
module mod1
type treeNode
end type treeNode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
Samuel Marks samuelmarks at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47415
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-14 11:28:32 UTC ---
I have applied the patches in attachments 23312 and 23318 on top of revision
170124 on x86_64-apple-darwin10. I did not do a full bootstrap, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23312|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #60 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-02-14
11:56:59 UTC ---
Backport for gcc 4.5.3...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00869.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-02/msg01536.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47415
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47349
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 11:59:56 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Feb 14 11:59:53 2011
New Revision: 170125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170125
Log:
2011-02-14 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47349
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47704
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47415
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
12:24:03 UTC ---
Already fixed in revision 170050, with correct ChangeLog entry in revision
170051.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47415
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47684
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
12:25:35 UTC ---
*** Bug 47415 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47560
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41929
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 12:32:15
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Feb 14 12:32:11 2011
New Revision: 170126
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170126
Log:
gcc:
PR ada/41929
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41929
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-14 12:51:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23335 [details]
gcc46-pr47642.patch
AFAICT this patch fixes the gfortran side. What are the expected outputs for
the C tests in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
Dan Horak dan at danny dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan at danny dot cz
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896
--- Comment #15 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas
at gmail dot com 2011-02-14 13:08:13 UTC ---
Tobias,
You shame me - I undertook to do something with this one and did not.
I do not know that the fix is compatible
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-14 13:51:27
UTC ---
Does this patch make any senses?
diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c b/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
index ce4eab4..e7e7890 100644
--- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 13:57:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
If this survives the testsuite, I will commit it as obvious.
Regtest successful. Will commit shortly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
14:05:58 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Feb 14 14:05:52 2011
New Revision: 170129
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170129
Log:
2011-02-14 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-14 14:06:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Who generates insn #2? The machinery handling parameters in function.c? If
so, maybe it should do the copy in the incoming mode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
--- Comment #16 from Jos de Kloe kloedej at knmi dot nl 2011-02-14 14:12:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
FIXED on the 4.4 and 4.5 branches and on the 4.6 trunk.
Thanks Jos and Eric for the reports!
Hi Tobias,
thanks a lot for looking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-14 14:13:32
UTC ---
This seems to work:
diff --git a/gcc/function.c b/gcc/function.c
index 3f721fb..4c78407 100644
--- a/gcc/function.c
+++ b/gcc/function.c
@@ -3000,11 +3000,15 @@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-02-14 14:21:32 UTC ---
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47484
--- Comment #2 from gary at gcc dot gnu.org gary at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-14 14:28:07 UTC ---
Author: gary
Date: Mon Feb 14 14:28:00 2011
New Revision: 170131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170131
Log:
PR libjava/47484:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
14:29:12 UTC ---
THe output depends. I get:
1.234500e+06
1.234500e+06
33.3
33.3
1.7
1.7
1.7e+36
1.7e+36
0x1.2d644p+20
0x1.2d644p+20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47732
Summary: counter decremented to zero not detected when other
counter overflows
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-14 14:34:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Not really. simplify-rtx should never emit new instuctions. Probably
Ulrich, when introducing address-spaces didn't properly think
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47696
--- Comment #2 from Omar Choudary choudary.omar at gmail dot com 2011-02-14
14:51:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23337
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23337
Patch based on the proposed solution. Seems to fix the problem.
Just a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47733
Summary: psignal (int, const? char*) in libiberty/strsignal.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47560
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47731
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
15:08:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 14 15:08:23 2011
New Revision: 170133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170133
Log:
PR libgomp/47731
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
15:13:44 UTC ---
If one enables fbuf debugging (FBUF_DEBUG in fbuf.c), one sees:
fbuf_read done: fbuf_debug pos: 0, act: 14, buf: ''LINE 1
LINE 2
''
Then the expected:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-14 15:32:50 UTC ---
For the 23313 testcase (which requires -L/opt/gcc/gcc4.6w/lib -lquadmath) I get
Qe
1.234500e+06
Qf
33.3
Qg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
15:34:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 14 15:34:44 2011
New Revision: 170135
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170135
Log:
PR fortran/47642
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35491
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47696
--- Comment #3 from aesok at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 15:49:39 UTC ---
Author: aesok
Date: Mon Feb 14 15:49:35 2011
New Revision: 170137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170137
Log:
PR target/47696
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47696
aesok at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47731
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
--- Comment #4 from David C. Rankin drankinatty at suddenlinkmail dot com
2011-02-14 15:57:15 UTC ---
Thanks guys,
The iccconfig.cpp build failure is reproducible 100% of the time on gcc-4.5.2
on both i686 and x86_64 (this error does not exist
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47734
Summary: no comparisons like X=Y=Z do not have their
mathematical meaning warning in c++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47734
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
16:19:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
So if I understand what you need, you need me to build kdelibs with 4.5.2 to
the point of failure with?
cmake ../ \
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
16:44:33 UTC ---
iccconfig.cpp:289 looks like:
KRandrSimpleAPI *randrsimple = new KRandrSimpleAPI::KRandrSimpleAPI();
That code is invalid, gcc 4.5 is correct to reject
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
16:46:28 UTC ---
the code can be reduced to
struct S { };
int main()
{
S* p = new S::S();
}
which is rejected too.
The Trinity code needs to be fixed as suggested
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
Samuel Marks samuelmarks at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
17:09:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The relevant comment in the source code of the compiler is:
/* Do not warn if the comparison is an equality operation,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
17:16:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Sure, no problem. Here's a tested patch.
The patch is OK with a ChangeLog. I think no test case is needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-14 17:24:56
UTC ---
The problem may be in convert_memory_address_addr_space:
case PLUS:
case MULT:
/* For addition we can safely permute the conversion and addition
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47729
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47735
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] Unnecessary adjustments to stack
pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47736
Summary: [4.6 Regression] libquadmath build broken with
pre-2.10 glibc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46494
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
17:59:13 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Feb 14 17:59:10 2011
New Revision: 170141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170141
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46494
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14 18:12:59 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Feb 14 18:12:55 2011
New Revision: 170144
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170144
Log:
2011-02-14 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47728
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47736
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47732
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Hi us,
When i want to download the mirror of Gcc 4.3 from the URL of China
it shows broken. The URL is: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
You can click China's for a try. Could anyone do for it. Or i want
to take the mirror on my website server(www.harrywei.org). I don't
-include=/usr/include/cloog-ppl/
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20110214 (experimental) (GCC)
$ gcc -O -funswitch-loops -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fgraphite-identity
testcase.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted
Tested revisions:
r170138 - fail
4.5.2 - OK
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
18:33:30 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Feb 14 18:33:27 2011
New Revision: 170146
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170146
Log:
Update TLS symbol PIC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45649
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47736
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
18:49:10 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 14 18:49:07 2011
New Revision: 170147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170147
Log:
PR bootstrap/47736
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47736
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
18:53:32 UTC ---
Should be fixed now, can you verify on real glibc 2.9 or earlier?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
18:54:15 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Feb 14 18:54:12 2011
New Revision: 170148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170148
Log:
Copy the hard register
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-14
19:00:55 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:00:52 2011
New Revision: 170149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170149
Log:
Permute the conversion
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
--- Comment #8 from David C. Rankin drankinatty at suddenlinkmail dot com
2011-02-14 19:43:14 UTC ---
Ok,
I managed to generate iccconfig.ii and it is too big to attach. I have made it
available on my site:
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
