http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-04-07 06:20:24 UTC ---
There is a call to a non-static member function of the object before
initialization by a constructor. That's undefined behavior. Not a compiler bug.
But i wanted to try them indivisually. Is there any method to do so?
The compiler doesn't optimize anything if you don't pass at least -O.
--
Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:50:12 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:50:08 2011
New Revision: 172077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172077
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:51:52 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:51:49 2011
New Revision: 172078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172078
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:52:33 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:52:29 2011
New Revision: 172079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172079
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:53:48 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:53:44 2011
New Revision: 172080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172080
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46602
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:54:25 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:54:23 2011
New Revision: 172081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172081
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46585
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:56:50 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:56:47 2011
New Revision: 172082
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172082
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45354
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:58:31 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:58:29 2011
New Revision: 172083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172083
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:59:21 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:59:19 2011
New Revision: 172084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172084
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46875
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:00:15 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:00:10 2011
New Revision: 172085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172085
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46649
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:01:30 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:01:25 2011
New Revision: 172086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172086
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:02:40 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:02:34 2011
New Revision: 172087
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172087
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:04:10 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:04:02 2011
New Revision: 172088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172088
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:04:10 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:04:02 2011
New Revision: 172088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172088
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #29 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:04:09 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:04:02 2011
New Revision: 172088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172088
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:05:19 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:05:16 2011
New Revision: 172089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172089
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48215
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48442
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #18 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon
dot at 2011-04-07 07:59:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
ld: 0711-596 SEVERE ERROR: Object expand.o
An RLD for section 2 (.data) refers to symbol 852,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
08:00:28 UTC ---
And some of our sel-sched-ir.h helpers can be moved to cfgloop.c as well (e.g.
get_loop_exit_edges_unique_dests).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43920
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07 08:10:38 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Apr 7 08:10:34 2011
New Revision: 172090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172090
Log:
2011-04-07 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
08:20:30 UTC ---
Sure, but for types with user alignment smaller than their size, loop peeling
may often never be able to align it.
This regressed with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
Summary: Wrong default format for real numbers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43920
--- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07 08:35:27 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Apr 7 08:35:23 2011
New Revision: 172091
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172091
Log:
2011-04-07 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
08:55:37 UTC ---
Actually now verified that it is r128979.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #15 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-04-07 09:00:43 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #14)
Sure, but for types with user alignment smaller than their size, loop peeling
may often never be able to align it.
This regressed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-04-07
09:08:01 UTC ---
In write.c the intended default format for real numbers is documented as:
/* Output a real number with default format.
This is 1PG14.7E2 for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48484
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48485
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43920
--- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07 09:28:15 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Apr 7 09:28:11 2011
New Revision: 172093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172093
Log:
2011-04-07 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
09:34:36 UTC ---
So perhaps:
bool
default_builtin_vector_alignment_reachable (const_tree type, bool is_packed)
{
- if (is_packed)
+ if (is_packed || (TYPE_USER_ALIGN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
09:39:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
So perhaps:
bool
default_builtin_vector_alignment_reachable (const_tree type, bool is_packed)
{
- if (is_packed)
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43920
--- Comment #13 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07 09:48:42 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Apr 7 09:48:39 2011
New Revision: 172094
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172094
Log:
2011-04-07 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #19 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-04-07 09:55:44 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #18)
I think rather tree-vect-data-refs.c:vector_alignment_reachable_p should
be adjusted. These packed checks in the target hooks don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48485
--- Comment #2 from konst krasutug at mail dot ru 2011-04-07 10:04:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 23907
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23907
main.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48485
--- Comment #3 from konst krasutug at mail dot ru 2011-04-07 10:08:59 UTC ---
gcc -fmudflap main.c -lmudflap -o main ./main
and nothing, but if I do 'a[-2]=c;' in main.c and compile it then the mistake
is discovered by following output:
***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-04-07 10:24:45 UTC ---
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, irar at il dot ibm.com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #19 from Ira Rosen irar at il
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48485
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
10:50:10 UTC ---
It works for me.
/tmp /space/rguenther/install/gcc-4.5.2/bin/gcc -fmudflap t.c -lmudflap -o t
/tmp ./t
***
mudflap violation 1 (check/write):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48485
--- Comment #5 from konst krasutug at mail dot ru 2011-04-07 11:01:30 UTC ---
Note that openSUSE has libmudflap disabled, so I wonder how it even compiles
and links for you ;)
Yes, I downloaded src.rpm, compiled it (gcc and mudflap) and make
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-04-07 11:22:49 UTC ---
Ok, now I found that this was changed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=128967
The testcase says:
! This tests that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #21 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-04-07 11:37:29 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #20)
I saw them, but I can't see what the difference is between
aligned and aligned ;) Either the targets have aligned loads
or they
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #11 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
11:44:54 UTC ---
In both cases, I built gcc + newlib multilib + rtems multilib to ensure the
entire software base was built with and without the patch.
$ m68k-rtems4.11-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
11:45:57 UTC ---
When would
compare_tree_int (TYPE_SIZE (type), TYPE_ALIGN (type)) = 0
give not what you are looking for?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489
Summary: Invalid error message 'has no member named' when
referring directly to the base class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #23 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-04-07 12:02:46 UTC
---
Well, it's hard to accept such an easy solution when the original patch has
hundreds of rows ;)
So, you think that
Index: tree-vect-data-refs.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23890|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
12:07:29 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 12:07:24 2011
New Revision: 172097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172097
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48481
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
12:16:23 UTC ---
Haven't bootstrapped/regtested it, but it is definitely improvement.
With N=1000 and N=2000 the generated assembly is identical, for N=1000
reported TOTAL went
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48490
Summary: delete with template convertion operator does
overload resolution for class operands, but shouldn't.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48491
Summary: ICE in delete with template convertion operator
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
12:42:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Well, it's hard to accept such an easy solution when the original patch has
hundreds of rows ;)
So, you think that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #25 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
12:44:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
(In reply to comment #23)
Well, it's hard to accept such an easy solution when the original patch has
hundreds of rows ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
12:48:12 UTC ---
int a = __alignof__ (double);
struct A { int b; double c; int d; } e;
int f = __alignof__ (e.c);
double *p;
int g = __alignof__ (*p);
int a2 = __alignof__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #19 from Perry Smith pedzsan at gmail dot com 2011-04-07 12:55:19
UTC ---
Yes. Thats the one.
Dave,
First, I believe this link is a public facing interface to Fix Central
http://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/
(it came from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #27 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
12:56:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
int a = __alignof__ (double);
struct A { int b; double c; int d; } e;
int f = __alignof__ (e.c);
double *p;
int g =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48492
Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failure in
copy_constant
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493
Summary: [ICE] in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48492
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
13:16:13 UTC ---
I mean a and g are 8 with -m64 -malign-power, but f is 4. If you do:
extern void abort (void);
struct S { long long x; int a; double b[1]; int c; } s;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #10 from Lisp2D lisp2d at lisp2d dot net 2011-04-07 13:19:16 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #9)
No, the variable is in scope after its identifier, so it can be used in the
initializer expression, e.g.
int i = sizeof(i); // ok
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-04-07 13:21:20 UTC ---
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
13:26:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
The answer of question gives the C++ standard. Show me this document.
3.3.1 Point of declaration [basic.scope.decl]
1 The point
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
13:29:15 UTC ---
This is certainly a valid testcase:
struct S { long long x; int a; double b[1]; int c; } s;
double *p = s.b[0];
int
foo (double *q)
{
int i, j = 0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
13:29:43 UTC ---
For the example in comment 2 G++, EDG and Clang++ all accept it without
warning.
MSVC rejects it, but is wrong to do so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
Yufeng Zhang yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yufeng at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #31 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
13:35:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
This is certainly a valid testcase:
struct S { long long x; int a; double b[1]; int c; } s;
double *p = s.b[0];
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
13:38:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
No, the variable is in scope after its identifier, so it can be used in the
initializer expression,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
13:39:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
No, the variable is in scope after its identifier, so it can be used in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
13:43:47 UTC ---
Given that without vectorization that code surely works well on all the weird
ABIs, such ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN is used only on targets that either aren't strict
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-04-07 13:57:09 UTC ---
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
--- Comment #15 from Lisp2D lisp2d at lisp2d dot net 2011-04-07 13:58:38 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #12)
For the example in comment 2 G++, EDG and Clang++ all accept it without
warning.
MSVC rejects it, but is wrong to do so.
The answer is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48494
Summary: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boehm-gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48435
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48495
Summary: ICE in in reload_cse_simplify_operands
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-04-07 15:04:49
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/11 17:00, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #56 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07 15:15:14
UTC ---
What works for me on Cygwin, and so may well also work for anyone using MSYS,
is setting the heap_chunk_in_mb registry parameter to some value in the range
1024 -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible
reload in libffi/src/ia64/ffi.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #13 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
15:28:39 UTC ---
Not a problem to redo.. just CPU time and if you don't use it, you lose it. :-D
I am repeating some information so it is all in one post.
In both cases, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
15:35:34 UTC ---
From the test results you posted, it appears to have been
+WARNING: program timed out.
+FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-double.c -O2 -flto execution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #15 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
15:44:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
From the test results you posted, it appears to have been
+WARNING: program timed out.
+FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07 15:49:29
UTC ---
Well, this is basically a weakness in the pass-through solution implemented for
PR 42690; it only knows about the compilers stdlibs, and doesn't process any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07 15:51:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 23913
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23913
WIP patch
Work in progress: see comment at start of do_rescan_work() re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #57 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
2011-04-07 15:53:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #56)
What works for me on Cygwin, and so may well also work for anyone using MSYS,
is setting the heap_chunk_in_mb registry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
16:00:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 23914
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23914
first testcase
Compile with -Os -mcpu=arm7tdmi -marm -fno-short-enums
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
