[Bug target/49781] [x32] Unnecessary lea in x32 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x32

[Bug bootstrap/50010] i386-unknown-freebsd bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-08-12 06:57:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) x86_64-unknown-freebsd seems to work, and with nobody seeing this on GNU/Linux I am wondering whether this may be due to i386 (vs

[Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libgcj/50053] New: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 Bug #: 50053 Summary: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/49911] SRA + DOM + VRP + -fstrict-enums incorrectly remove predicate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49911 --- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 08:01:36 UTC --- No, they still mean nothing, but VRP assumes they are the canonical value according to precision/signedness. Which C and C++ do not follow.

[Bug c++/50054] New: Fails to recover from type error in function signature

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50054 Bug #: 50054 Summary: Fails to recover from type error in function signature Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 08:27:30 UTC --- Try to build everything with -fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp.

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #49 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 08:51:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #47) (In reply to comment #43) Changing the topic to target - although there's a latent issue with the two diagnostic

[Bug c++/50054] Fails to recover from type error in function signature

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50054 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #2 from gee jojelino at gmail dot com 2011-08-12 08:59:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Try to build everything with -fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp. I understand what you meant is append -fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp to {C,CXX,GCJ}FLAGS when

[Bug target/34790] [avr] no sibling call optimisation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34790 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/50050] Internal compiler error free_expr0 at expr.c:3709 via gfc_done_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #3 from gee jojelino at gmail dot com 2011-08-12 11:44:58 UTC --- using only '-fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp' didn't work too. Reading symbols from /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/java/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-gij...done. (gdb) r Starting program:

[Bug c++/50055] New: [PATCH] Location information for the throw() specification in a function may be incorrect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50055 Bug #: 50055 Summary: [PATCH] Location information for the throw() specification in a function may be incorrect Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug fortran/50050] Internal compiler error free_expr0 at expr.c:3709 via gfc_done_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 11:54:27 UTC --- In gfc_expr_to_initialize, we copy an expression, result = gfc_copy_expr (e); and then change it to something else: /* Change the last array reference

[Bug c++/50055] [PATCH] Location information for the throw() specification in a function may be incorrect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50055 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-12 12:18:37 UTC --- Patches go to the gcc-patches mailing list. Also, always clearly state how you tested it, etc, according to the guidelines

[Bug c++/50056] New: Binding a temporary object to a reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50056 Bug #: 50056 Summary: Binding a temporary object to a reference Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/50050] Internal compiler error free_expr0 at expr.c:3709 via gfc_done_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/50056] Binding a temporary object to a reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50056 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 12:46:42 UTC --- Are you sure G++ isn't correct? The cast creates a temporary reference, which binds to the temporary object, then initalizes 's' with the temporary reference.

[Bug libgcj/50057] New: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natObject.cc:58

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 Bug #: 50057 Summary: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natObject.cc:58 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/50058] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr41186.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50058 Bug #: 50058 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr41186.C Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/50059] New: [C++0x] Broken error message with __builtin_remquo constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50059 Bug #: 50059 Summary: [C++0x] Broken error message with __builtin_remquo constexpr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/50059] [C++0x] Broken error message with __builtin_remquo constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50059 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-12 14:49:27 UTC --- __builtin_modf has similar problems

[Bug c++/50056] Binding a temporary object to a reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50056 --- Comment #2 from Wolfgang Roehrl wolfgang.roe...@gi-de.com 2011-08-12 14:51:25 UTC --- Hi Jonathan, I would analyze the crucial line of the code as follows: The cast creates a temporary reference, which binds to the temporary object, and

[Bug c++/50059] [C++0x] Broken error message with __builtin_remquo constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50059 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c/50032] Bad optimization with sin/cos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-12 15:10:51 UTC --- if your math library implementation has a slower cosf than cos it's definitely broken ;) So it is at least for fedora (see

[Bug bootstrap/49681] 4.6.1 cross-build fails in libquadmath/libiberty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49681 Manuel Lauss manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50060] New: intrinsics not folded by the middle-end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50060 Bug #: 50060 Summary: intrinsics not folded by the middle-end Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug middle-end/50060] intrinsics not folded by the middle-end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50060 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-12 16:12:56 UTC --- Uhm, remquo is strange. I see a do_mpfr_remquo but the following C++11 snippet is rejected, I don't know why: int r = 0; constexpr double d =

[Bug libfortran/50016] The fortran program 's io is very slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 16:17:21 UTC --- I would like to see if Kai has any thought on this. Unfortunately I am not very familiar with the windows OS.

[Bug c++/50059] [C++0x] Broken error message with __builtin_remquo constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50059 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-12 16:21:08 UTC --- ... and __builtin_frexp (std::frexp)

[Bug middle-end/50060] intrinsics not folded by the middle-end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50060 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-12 16:26:00 UTC --- ... frexp also don't understand at the moment. I see a fold_builtin_frexp but the following doesn't compile: int r = 0; constexpr double d =

[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 --- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 16:58:13 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Fri Aug 12 16:58:09 2011 New Revision: 177705 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177705 Log: Fix PR

[Bug middle-end/50060] intrinsics not folded by the middle-end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50060 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c/50032] Bad optimization with sin/cos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032 --- Comment #3 from Felipe fbafelipe at gmail dot com 2011-08-12 17:07:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) if your math library implementation has a slower cosf than cos it's definitely broken ;) So it is at least for fedora (see

[Bug bootstrap/50047] [4.7 Regression] Revision 177670 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50047 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2011-08-12 17:13:10 UTC --- Author: bonzini Date: Fri Aug 12 17:13:04 2011 New Revision: 177706 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177706 Log: 2011-08-12 Paolo Bonzini

[Bug middle-end/50061] New: [4.7 regression] emit_library_call_value_1 change broke SF-TI conversion on MIPS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50061 Bug #: 50061 Summary: [4.7 regression] emit_library_call_value_1 change broke SF-TI conversion on MIPS Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/50059] [C++0x] Broken error message with __builtin_remquo constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50059 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-12 18:01:43 UTC --- And I suspect that this diagnostic issue may be not unrelated to what I was noticing today together with PR50060: these badly printed intrinsics

[Bug fortran/50062] New: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062 Bug #: 50062 Summary: GNU Fortran is not working Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.3.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50062] GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/50032] Bad optimization with sin/cos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-12 18:28:56 UTC --- Some bug reports for this performance issue date from 2008, so it seems we won't see that fixed any time soon. IIRC the excuses were: (1) nobody use

[Bug c++/50055] [PATCH] Location information for the throw() specification in a function may be incorrect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50055 --- Comment #2 from Siddhesh Poyarekar siddhesh.poyarekar at gmail dot com 2011-08-12 19:21:15 UTC --- Thanks, done, with a test case this time: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01158.html As mentioned in the submission, I ran the

[Bug fortran/49693] Spurious unused-variable warnings for COMMON block module variables.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49693 Bill Long longb at cray dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||longb at cray dot com

[Bug fortran/50062] GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062 --- Comment #2 from hsong6 at ucsc dot edu 2011-08-12 19:38:46 UTC --- Thank you for pointing out. Here is an error message -- checking whether the GNU Fortran compiler is working... no configure: error: GNU

[Bug target/50063] New: [avr]: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 Bug #: 50063 Summary: [avr]: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug middle-end/50061] [4.7 regression] emit_library_call_value_1 change broke SF-TI conversion on MIPS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50061 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50063] [avr]: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/50064] New: Failure in stage 2 (lazy binding) on openbsd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50064 Bug #: 50064 Summary: Failure in stage 2 (lazy binding) on openbsd Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/49994] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2234 with -fsched2-use-superblocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 21:00:17 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Fri Aug 12 21:00:00 2011 New Revision: 177721 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177721 Log: PR rtl-opt/49994 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/49994] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2234 with -fsched2-use-superblocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50060] intrinsics not folded by the middle-end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50060 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 21:17:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (It seems more a problem with my C++ test snippets in Comments #1 / #2: I suppose any definition of such functions isn't viable for

[Bug middle-end/50060] intrinsics not folded by the middle-end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50060 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org| ---

[Bug debug/50006] [4.7 Regression] ICE in in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.c:2677

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug c++/50034] [4.7 regression] Overload selection failure within class template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50034 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 21:28:01 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Aug 12 21:27:52 2011 New Revision: 177722 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177722 Log: PR c++/50034 *

[Bug c/50065] New: -Os, -O2, -O3 optimization breaks LD/ST ordering on 32-bit SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50065 Bug #: 50065 Summary: -Os, -O2, -O3 optimization breaks LD/ST ordering on 32-bit SPARC Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/50006] [4.7 Regression] ICE in in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.c:2677

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006 --- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 21:49:19 UTC --- Created attachment 24993 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24993 proposed patch This seems to fix the bug. Doing an Ada sanity check on

[Bug bootstrap/50010] i386-unknown-freebsd bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010 --- Comment #3 from Nenad Vukicevic nenad at intrepid dot com 2011-08-12 22:03:03 UTC --- I tried gcc-src/configure i586-linux on my 32-bit machine and got the following: Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs warning:

[Bug target/49903] [avr] Redundant comparisons in binary-search switch/case expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49903 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/50066] New: [4.7 Regression] Bad signed long to unsigned long long conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50066 Bug #: 50066 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bad signed long to unsigned long long conversion Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/50066] [4.7 Regression] Bad signed int to unsigned long long conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50066 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/50067] New: Wrong code with -fpredictive-commoning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067 Bug #: 50067 Summary: Wrong code with -fpredictive-commoning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/50034] [4.7 regression] Overload selection failure within class template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50034 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50068] New: Invalid memory access in incr_ticks_for_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50068 Bug #: 50068 Summary: Invalid memory access in incr_ticks_for_insn Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/50068] Invalid memory access in incr_ticks_for_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50068 --- Comment #1 from Valeriy E. Ushakov uwe at netbsd dot org 2011-08-13 01:18:00 UTC --- Created attachment 24995 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24995 Preprocessed source that triggers the bug

[Bug debug/50006] [4.7 Regression] ICE in in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.c:2677

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-08-13 01:19:35 UTC --- On 12-Aug-11, at 5:49 PM, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24993 proposed patch Testing on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00. Will

[Bug rtl-optimization/50068] Invalid memory access in incr_ticks_for_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50068 --- Comment #2 from Valeriy E. Ushakov uwe at netbsd dot org 2011-08-13 01:27:57 UTC --- The command that fails: .../libexec/gcc/shle--netbsdelf/4.5.3/cc1plus -fpreprocessed fstream-inst.i -quiet -dumpbase fstream-inst.i -auxbase-strip

[Bug tree-optimization/19832] don't remove an if when we know the value is the same as with the if (subtraction)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19832 --- Comment #2 from jimis jimis at gmx dot net 2011-08-13 01:37:14 UTC --- Created attachment 24996 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24996 Make cse.c:preferable() more readable, slightly faster, without affecting its logic.

[Bug tree-optimization/19832] don't remove an if when we know the value is the same as with the if (subtraction)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19832 jimis jimis at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jimis at gmx dot net ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/50065] -Os, -O2, -O3 optimization breaks LD/ST ordering on 32-bit SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50065 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-13 02:21:05 UTC --- I fixed a volatile bug dealing with inlining and ipa-sra. Maybe this was fixed by that too.

[Bug middle-end/50066] [4.7 Regression] Bad signed int to unsigned long long conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50066 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-13 04:32:16 UTC --- - LONG_MIN is undefined.