http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50284
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50287
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208
--- Comment #5 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 09:22:42 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Sun Sep 4 09:22:38 2011
New Revision: 178508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178508
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50208
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 10:49:18 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Sep 4 10:49:13 2011
New Revision: 178509
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178509
Log:
2011-09-04 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316
--- Comment #33 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-09-04
11:03:41 UTC ---
And if you don't like errors saying that X can't be converted to X, you'll need
something like the below. I don't think I'll go much further anytime
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 11:18:23
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
bootstrapped with your amended change to rs6000.c
./gcc/xgcc -Bgcc ../tests/hello.c -o hc -fstack-check -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04
13:02:15 UTC ---
for a smaller frame ... and the asm looks sensible...
Great, thanks.
Defining STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN to 1 for Darwin would be a separate thing.
In
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279
Steffen Möller steffen_moeller at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50023
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 15:28:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Defining STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN to 1 for Darwin would be a separate thing.
In particular, you'd need to test Ada to validate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-04
17:29:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Created attachment 25177 [details]
import-export.diff
Just the import/export changes, i.e. outside libgo directory.
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
leopardboy2 at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leopardboy2 at yahoo dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50285
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #15 from Anders F Björklund afb at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-09-04 18:14:48 UTC ---
The whole patch is Darwin-centric, in that it's only applied on Darwin.
You are right that it first needs to be conditionalized to go upstream.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50282
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04
18:45:24 UTC ---
The problem is is your code, not gcc
The type of T4::f is void(T2::*)() not void(T4::*)() so when you cast the
pointer to void(T4::*)() you are not casting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50288
Bug #: 50288
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_45b.f03
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 18:50:13
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Sep 4 18:50:09 2011
New Revision: 178510
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178510
Log:
PR debug/49901
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50278
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50288
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-04
19:18:00 UTC ---
I think I understand what's happening, although I don't know how to fix it:
(1) gfortran.dg/class_45a.f03 is compiled and generate g_nodes.mod,
(2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 19:17:29
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Sep 4 19:17:25 2011
New Revision: 178511
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178511
Log:
PR libffi/49594
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50288
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 19:19:43
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Sep 4 19:19:39 2011
New Revision: 178512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178512
Log:
PR libffi/49594
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50288
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50288
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-04
20:35:36 UTC ---
An evil trick would be the following, which causes a run once: ...
It works, but I think if this trick is used, it should be documented as in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50288
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04
21:19:31 UTC ---
I think one problem is that
! { dg-additional-sources class_45a.f03 }
compiles the additional source *after* the main file. That's not trivially
fixable as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50281
--- Comment #10 from NickParker at Eaton dot com 2011-09-04 21:22:30 UTC ---
Richard, 'bogus' isnt a technical term I'm familiar with - I'm not entirely
sure
what you mean, however, I have found the problem with my ASM code.
If you'll notice I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256
--- Comment #4 from NickParker at Eaton dot com 2011-09-04 21:27:43 UTC ---
Hi,
Thanks for your input and sorry to make a mess of reporting this.
The arithmetic is fine and the code gives the results I expect.
However, I have since discovered and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256
--- Comment #5 from NickParker at Eaton dot com 2011-09-04 21:29:40 UTC ---
Thanks, also was able to add a few movws to save cycles.
Nick.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50289
Bug #: 50289
Summary: [avr]: call-prologues saveing/restoring global
register variables
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50289
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04
22:19:53 UTC ---
You don't need R20: Simply use %D0 which is cleared, anyway. As %0 is early
clobber, it's not an input and you can clear is at the beginning.
You don't need
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50290
Bug #: 50290
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in distribute_notes, at
combine.c:13282 with -flto -funroll-loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50290
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50099
Michael Hope michael.hope at linaro dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hope
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50099
--- Comment #7 from Michael Hope michael.hope at linaro dot org 2011-09-05
00:05:23 UTC ---
arm_legitimate_index_p() seems to be wrong. Near the end it has:
/* For ARM v4 we may be doing a sign-extend operation during the
load. */
if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50291
Bug #: 50291
Summary: A bug of if-condition optimization in x32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50282
--- Comment #6 from zhuli imzhuli at vip dot qq.com 2011-09-05 03:12:55 UTC
---
I guess we have some agreement on HOW gcc works. the following are what i got
through the test-cases:
1.simply using T4::f, will only get a value of T2::f, as the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50292
Bug #: 50292
Summary: compiler bug box - pl-io.ads
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50292
--- Comment #1 from Gary Barnes garynot at comcast dot net 2011-09-05
04:09:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 25192
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25192
gnatchop file containing the source
gnatchop format file with the source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50292
--- Comment #2 from Gary Barnes garynot at comcast dot net 2011-09-05
04:10:32 UTC ---
gcc \
-c \
-gnata \
-gnatE \
-fstack-check \
-gnatef \
-gnatf \
-gnatm50 \
-gnatn \
-gnato \
-gnatU \
-gnatwa \
-gnatwe \
-gnatwi \
-gnatwj \
-gnatwK \
-gnatwl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50248
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-05
04:33:14 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 5 04:33:08 2011
New Revision: 178518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178518
Log:
PR c++/50248
Core
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49458
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-05
04:33:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 5 04:33:48 2011
New Revision: 178520
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178520
Log:
PR c++/49267
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-05
04:34:01 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 5 04:33:57 2011
New Revision: 178521
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178521
Log:
PR c++/49267
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-05
04:33:53 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 5 04:33:48 2011
New Revision: 178520
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178520
Log:
PR c++/49267
PR
51 matches
Mail list logo
