[Bug lto/50338] ICE Linking with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50338 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/50333] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_ops_from_tree, at gimple.h:1909

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50333 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/50333] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_ops_from_tree, at gimple.h:1909

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50333 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 07:41:50 UTC --- Reduced testcase: static inline void unext(unsigned int *_ui, unsigned _len, unsigned int _ui0) { unsigned j = 1; while (++j_len) ;

[Bug middle-end/50316] ICE on fortran code with -O2 and -march=core2 options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50316 --- Comment #4 from ygepes at gmail dot com 2011-09-09 08:18:11 UTC --- Hi Tobias, I have upgraded to version 4.7.0 and the cse bug is gone. However, when I tried to compile shelxl (crystal structure refinement program) with this version,

Re: [Bug lto/50338] ICE Linking with -flto

Honza, does the ICE ring any bell? I don't recall seeing it previously. The check tests that partition contains only analyzed nodes, so it should not be that hard to track down who adds the unanalyzed one. I will try to do bit of proofreading today in bus. Honza

[Bug lto/50338] ICE Linking with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50338 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-09-09 08:34:48 UTC --- Honza, does the ICE ring any bell? I don't recall seeing it previously. The check tests that partition contains only analyzed nodes, so it should not be that hard

[Bug tree-optimization/49997] [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49997 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-09-09 08:43:16 UTC --- Or finally drop the key dependence on the number of callers. Possibly. Last time I tried it it however lead to bigger and slower binaries. Well, I will patch

[Bug tree-optimization/50328] reduction with constant or invariant not vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 09:05:39 UTC --- Ah, we fail outer loop vectorization because of a bug (versioning for alias required) and then drop into vectorizable_reduction with a statement with a

[Bug middle-end/50333] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_ops_from_tree, at gimple.h:1909

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50333 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 09:06:55 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Sep 9 09:06:49 2011 New Revision: 178720 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178720 Log: 2011-09-09 Richard

[Bug middle-end/50333] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_ops_from_tree, at gimple.h:1909

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50333 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49911] SRA + DOM + VRP + -fstrict-enums incorrectly remove predicate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49911 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50287] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c compilation, -O2 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50287 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50316] ICE on fortran code with -O2 and -march=core2 options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50316 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-09-09 09:58:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Hi Tobias, I have upgraded to version 4.7.0 and the cse bug is gone. However, when I tried to compile shelxl (crystal structure

[Bug middle-end/50316] ICE on fortran code with -O2 and -march=core2 options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50316 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-09-09 10:09:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) It is not known bug, register allocator assigns x87 stack register to SImode (integer) move. This bug can't be solved without

[Bug rtl-optimization/50326] [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 11:22:00 UTC --- Hmm, are you sure you bisected that correctly? I did a build on gcc60 with the patch reverted, and it failed with the same error.

[Bug rtl-optimization/50326] [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 11:35:28 UTC --- It's indeed a very unlikely candidate (unless cc1[plus] is miscompiled of course).

[Bug tree-optimization/50052] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c scan-tree-dump eipa_sra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50339] New: suboptimal register allocation for abs(__int128_t)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50339 Bug #: 50339 Summary: suboptimal register allocation for abs(__int128_t) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug rtl-optimization/50340] New: [4.7 Regression] Fails to build SPEC 2000 176.gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50340 Bug #: 50340 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Fails to build SPEC 2000 176.gcc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/50340] [4.7 Regression] Fails to build SPEC 2000 176.gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50340 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/50328] reduction with constant or invariant not vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 12:35:16 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Sep 9 12:35:11 2011 New Revision: 178728 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178728 Log: 2011-09-09 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/50328] reduction with constant or invariant not vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50341] New: calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50341 Bug #: 50341 Summary: calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug target/50341] calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50341 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #44 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 13:27:54 UTC --- Ping.. any chance of getting the proposed 4.6 fix merged? Please. This is almost a 3 year old bug. It would be nice to get it closed.

[Bug bootstrap/50342] New: gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 if building Ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 Bug #: 50342 Summary: gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 if building Ada Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/49614] FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/gcc-bug-i.c -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49614 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 13:51:18 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Fri Sep 9 13:51:12 2011 New Revision: 178730 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178730 Log: gcc/testsuite: PR

[Bug target/49614] FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/gcc-bug-i.c -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49614 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 if building Ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at

[Bug middle-end/50343] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/id-22.f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50343 Bug #: 50343 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/id-22.f Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50343] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/id-22.f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50343 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/50343] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/id-22.f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50343 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-09 14:53:28 UTC --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-intel64corei7/bld/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran

[Bug target/19599] function pointer prevents tail-call optimization on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19599 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-04-21 14:29:50 |2011-09-09

[Bug rtl-optimization/50340] [4.7 Regression] Fails to build SPEC 2000 176.gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50340 Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/50344] New: friend declaration confused by const qualifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344 Bug #: 50344 Summary: friend declaration confused by const qualifier Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug other/47591] libiberty Makefile uses native cc (solaris) with option -print-multi-os-directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47591 --- Comment #2 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2011-09-09 15:32:53 UTC --- Created attachment 25235 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25235 output of 'gmake install' for gcc-4.6.1, using xlc v6

[Bug lto/50338] ICE Linking with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50338 --- Comment #3 from James McKelvey James.W.Mckelvey at jpl dot nasa.gov 2011-09-09 15:45:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Do any of the libraries you link with have LTO information or is it just stest0.o? If so, can you attach preprocessed

[Bug other/50345] New: Incomplete GCC Internals sentence on LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50345 Bug #: 50345 Summary: Incomplete GCC Internals sentence on LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-09 16:11:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Nothing to do with Ada per se. Other than only building ada triggers the bug. Should an separate enhancement request PR be

[Bug target/19599] function pointer prevents tail-call optimization on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19599 --- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.r at gmail dot com 2011-09-09 16:29:22 UTC --- --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 14:55:20 UTC --- Ping Ramana. Sigh - yes will look into this . Ramana

[Bug target/49030] ICE in get_arm_condition_code, at config/arm/arm.c:17180

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030 --- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 17:00:33 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Sep 9 17:00:26 2011 New Revision: 178736 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178736 Log: PR target/49030 *

[Bug target/49687] [4.6 Regression][avr] Missed optimization for widening MUL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 18:09:00 UTC --- Other than only building ada triggers the bug. Huh? How could Ada have something to do with the toplevel configure?

[Bug c++/48320] [C++0x][4.6/4.7 Regression] Template parameter packs cannot be expanded in default template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48320 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/50327] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization generates wrong code for BLAS's srotmg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 --- Comment #5 from simon at pushface dot org 2011-09-09 18:46:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Other than only building ada triggers the bug. Huh? How could Ada have something to do with the toplevel configure? The problem only happens

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 --- Comment #6 from simon at pushface dot org 2011-09-09 18:49:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Should an separate enhancement request PR be opened for the addition of these new builtins to FSF gcc? I believe this was Mike Stump's

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 18:56:19 UTC --- Is there an approved way of getting CFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 into the configure process? (there isn't AFAICT a problem with the actual build). I've

[Bug target/38306] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] 15% slowdown w.r.t. 4.3 of computational kernel on some architectures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-02-20 19:01:16

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #6 from Paul Koning pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 19:11:01 UTC --- I saw the note that PR/49911 is fixed and thought that might mean this one is fixed also. Unfortunately testing shows that is not the case, at least not in

[Bug c/49966] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c execution timeouts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49966 m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50344] friend declaration confused by const qualifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 19:47:42 UTC --- both testcases are fixed simply by adding this to the top of make_friend_class in friend.c friend_type = cv_unqualified (friend_type);

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 --- Comment #8 from simon at pushface dot org 2011-09-09 19:50:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Try CC=gcc -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 $srcdir/configure Works. Works better if you say $srcdir/configure CC=gcc -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 (then you don't

[Bug target/50341] calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50341 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 20:51:23 UTC --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Sep 9 20:51:18 2011 New Revision: 178740 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178740 Log: Branch for bug

[Bug fortran/50327] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization generates wrong code for BLAS's srotmg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09 21:59:51 UTC --- Created attachment 25236 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25236 Tentative patch This one replaces a DO WHILE loop with its equivalent, DO

[Bug middle-end/50343] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/id-22.f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50343 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-09 22:05:16 UTC --- The same error on 252.eon in SPEC CPU 2K: g++ -c -o ggPlane.o -DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 -DHAS_ERRLIST-I. -DNDEBUG -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math

[Bug middle-end/50343] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/id-22.f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50343 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-09 22:40:46 UTC --- It is caused by revision 178728: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-09/msg00343.html

[Bug c++/21498] [c++0x] friend declaration can name non-class with class-key

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21498 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|| --- Comment

[Bug c++/50346] New: Function call foils VRP/jump-threading of redundant predicate on struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346 Bug #: 50346 Summary: Function call foils VRP/jump-threading of redundant predicate on struct member Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: