[Bug fortran/47023] [4.6/4.7 regression] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/50727] [4.7 Regression] ICE with segfault in flow_bb_inside_loop_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50727 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug middle-end/48668] [4.6/4.7 regression] COMDAT Group signature not emitted in group

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 09:02:38 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Oct 16 09:02:33 2011 New Revision: 180053 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180053 Log: PR target/48668

[Bug bootstrap/50689] AIX bootstrap failure from cgraphunit.c aliases change

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 09:02:38 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Oct 16 09:02:33 2011 New Revision: 180053 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180053 Log: PR target/48668

[Bug tree-optimization/50730] SLP vectorization confused by unrelated DRs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/32614] -fmessage-length documentation and implementation disagree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32614 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/50724] isnan broken by -ffinite-math-only in g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724 --- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 09:59:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Richard said: The documentation states Allow optimizations for floating-point arithmetic that assume that arguments and

[Bug c++/50741] New: remove_unused_locals causes seg fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50741 Bug #: 50741 Summary: remove_unused_locals causes seg fault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug target/50737] FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 execution, generic dwarf2 EH problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50737 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/50742] New: tree check fail in check_previous_goto_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50742 Bug #: 50742 Summary: tree check fail in check_previous_goto_1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/50742] tree check fail in check_previous_goto_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50742 --- Comment #1 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2011-10-16 10:37:19 UTC --- Created attachment 25513 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25513 gzipped C++ source code

[Bug objc/50743] New: [4.7 regression] objc-act.c triggers -Werror=sign-compare breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50743 Bug #: 50743 Summary: [4.7 regression] objc-act.c triggers -Werror=sign-compare breaking bootstrap Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/50744] New: ice in good_cloning_opportunity_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744 Bug #: 50744 Summary: ice in good_cloning_opportunity_p Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug objc/50743] [4.7 regression] objc-act.c triggers -Werror=sign-compare breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50743 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-10-16 10:50:19 UTC --- Created attachment 25515 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25515 preliminary patch Casting the value of TREE_VEC_LENGTH to size_t before

[Bug libstdc++/50745] New: proposal to make visibility of namespace gcc configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 Bug #: 50745 Summary: proposal to make visibility of namespace gcc configurable Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug objc/50743] [4.7 regression] objc-act.c triggers -Werror=sign-compare breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50743 Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/50683] GCC compiles MPFR 3.1.0 wrongly on sparc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED

[Bug objc/50743] [4.7 regression] objc-act.c triggers -Werror=sign-compare breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50743 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-10-16 11:31:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Thanks for reporting this! The patch looks good to me (but I can't approve it). Thanks. Do you want to submit the patch to

[Bug c++/50744] ice in good_cloning_opportunity_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug tree-optimization/50730] SLP vectorization confused by unrelated DRs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-16 12:23:43 UTC --- First blush, looks like something could be abstracted as a function or a macro?!?

[Bug tree-optimization/50596] Problems in vectorization of condition expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 13:10:26 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Oct 16 13:10:20 2011 New Revision: 180057 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180057 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/50615] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in distribute_notes, at combine.c:13282 with -O --param max-cse-insns=1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50615 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 13:14:37 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sun Oct 16 13:14:34 2011 New Revision: 180058 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180058 Log: PR

[Bug fortran/50690] [4.7 Regression] ICE with front end optimization and OMP workshare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #37 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 13:20:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) (In reply to comment #32) (In reply to comment #31) * expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Use

[Bug rtl-optimization/50615] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in distribute_notes, at combine.c:13282 with -O --param max-cse-insns=1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50615 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50596] Problems in vectorization of condition expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 --- Comment #17 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-10-16 13:47:22 UTC --- cool! even signed char k[1024]; 61void foo6() { 62 for (int i=0; i!=N; ++i) 63k[i] = (a[i]b[i]) (c[i]d[i]);

[Bug tree-optimization/50727] [4.7 Regression] ICE with segfault in flow_bb_inside_loop_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50727 --- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 13:47:58 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun Oct 16 13:47:54 2011 New Revision: 180060 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180060 Log: PR tree-optimization/50727 *

[Bug libstdc++/50745] proposal to make visibility of namespace std configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 13:51:57 UTC --- I understand the benefit of hiding internal implementation details, but your proposal seems to imply that you could alter the visibility of everything in

[Bug tree-optimization/50727] [4.7 Regression] ICE with segfault in flow_bb_inside_loop_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50727 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/50745] proposal to make visibility of namespace std configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-16 14:20:44 UTC --- I'm thinking, maybe as a normal, not configure-time, macro, like _GLIBCXX_DEBUG, the idea would make more sense? Of course a very dangerous thing, but

[Bug libstdc++/50745] proposal to make visibility of namespace std configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-10-16 14:20:19 UTC --- I want just to remove _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default) from namespace std so that visibility of std::xyz can be inherited from the outer scope for

[Bug tree-optimization/50746] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37482.c (internal compiler error) on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746 Bug #: 50746 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37482.c (internal compiler error) on powerpc-apple-darwin9 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libstdc++/50745] proposal to make visibility of namespace std configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 14:27:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I'm thinking, maybe as a normal, not configure-time, macro, like _GLIBCXX_DEBUG, the idea would make more sense? Of course a very

[Bug libstdc++/50745] proposal to make visibility of namespace std configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-16 14:30:21 UTC --- We could add the macro-mechanism without documenting it ;)

[Bug libstdc++/50745] proposal to make visibility of namespace std configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-16 14:35:18 UTC --- Seriously, wait a second: what happen if at configure time one simply passes --disable-visibility? Doesn't that disable completely the namespace

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #23 from Mans Rullgard mans at mansr dot com 2011-10-16 14:40:29 UTC --- Created attachment 25516 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25516 Small test case with invalid code exhibiting the problem Here's a small test

[Bug target/50683] GCC compiles MPFR 3.1.0 wrongly on sparc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davem at

[Bug tree-optimization/50746] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37482.c (internal compiler error) on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/50746] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37482.c (internal compiler error) on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 14:53:13 UTC --- Starting program: /Volumes/ScratchCS/gcc-4-7-trunk-build/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed pr37482.i -fPIC -quiet -dumpbase pr37482.c -mmacosx-version-min=10.5.8 -maltivec

[Bug c++/50741] remove_unused_locals causes seg fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50741 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug c++/29859] reference-compatible is defined too narrowly in [decl.int.ref]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29859 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/50745] proposal to make visibility of namespace std configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 --- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-10-16 15:32:29 UTC --- At a first look --disable-visibility does the job.. have to check exception. the #pragma is still there though. I think I can experiment with

[Bug lto/50747] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in produce_symtab, at lto-streamer-out.c:1435

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50747 Bug #: 50747 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in produce_symtab, at lto-streamer-out.c:1435 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/50747] [4.7 Regression] ICE in produce_symtab, at lto-streamer-out.c:1435

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50747 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-16 17:45:35 UTC --- Created attachment 25517 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25517 delta reduced testcase

[Bug libstdc++/50745] proposal to make visibility of namespace std configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50737] FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 execution, generic dwarf2 EH problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50737 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-10-16 18:16:52 UTC --- Hm, I didn't notice new Java failure with the patch: === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: Array_3 execution - source compiled test FAIL:

[Bug c++/48489] Invalid error message 'has no member named' when referring directly to the base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/50745] proposal to make visibility of namespace std configurable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50745 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-16 19:03:59 UTC --- Yeah! ;)

[Bug fortran/50547] dummy procedure argument of PURE shall be PURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 19:17:03 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Oct 16 19:16:59 2011 New Revision: 180061 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180061 Log: 2011-10-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/50547] dummy procedure argument of PURE shall be PURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/50737] FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 execution, generic dwarf2 EH problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50737 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 19:33:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Hm, I didn't notice new Java failure with the patch: === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: Array_3

[Bug c++/50748] New: Incorrect error message for lambda inside static member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50748 Bug #: 50748 Summary: Incorrect error message for lambda inside static member function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/47023] [4.6/4.7 regression] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 19:42:50 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Oct 16 19:42:48 2011 New Revision: 180062 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180062 Log: 2011-10-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug target/50749] New: SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access

with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --target=sh-elf --prefix=/usr/local --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-multilib --disable-libssp --disable-nls --disable-werror --enable-lto --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib Thread model: single gcc version 4.7.0 20111016 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/50737] FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 execution, generic dwarf2 EH problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50737 --- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-10-16 20:34:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Running target unix FAIL: Array_3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Array_3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source

[Bug target/50750] New: SH Target: Pre-decrement addressing used only for first memory access

--with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib Thread model: single gcc version 4.7.0 20111016 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/50554] INQUIRE cannot redefine DO index (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50554 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/50751] New: SH Target: Displacement addressing does not work for QImode and HImode

-ld --with-system-zlib Thread model: single gcc version 4.7.0 20111016 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/50748] [C++0x] Incorrect error message for lambda inside static member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50748 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50694] SH Target: SH2A little endian does not actually work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50694 Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/50749] SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 23:33:40 UTC --- GCC makes usual mem accesses into those with post_inc/pre_dec at auto_inc_dec pass. I guess that auto_inc_dec pass can't find post_inc insns well in that

[Bug fortran/50552] type name cannot be statement function dummy argument (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50552 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/50552] type name cannot be statement function dummy argument (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50552 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 23:55:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to comment #0) ! type name cannot be statement function dummy argument (r178939) type t real g end type

[Bug target/50751] SH Target: Displacement addressing does not work for QImode and HImode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 00:29:55 UTC --- This is a known issue. See the comment just before sh.c:sh_legitimate_index_p. Unfortunately, I guess this PR might be marked as WONTFIX.

[Bug target/50749] SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 00:32:39 UTC --- *** Bug 50750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/50750] SH Target: Pre-decrement addressing used only for first memory access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50750 Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50751] SH Target: Displacement addressing does not work for QImode and HImode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-10-17 00:37:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) This is a known issue. See the comment just before sh.c:sh_legitimate_index_p. Unfortunately, I guess this PR might be marked as

[Bug target/50751] SH Target: Displacement addressing does not work for QImode and HImode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751 --- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 00:51:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Yeah, I know this has been around for a while. I'd like to take my chances anyway :) Welcome to the

[Bug fortran/50540] Internal Error: Can't convert UNKNOWN to INTEGER(4) (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50540 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/50683] GCC compiles MPFR 3.1.0 wrongly on sparc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 --- Comment #6 from David S. Miller davem at davemloft dot net 2011-10-17 01:52:02 UTC --- I would suggest against a gcc workaround, let's just fix binutils. I have posted a fix to the binutils list for testing.

[Bug rtl-optimization/50489] [UPC/IA64] mis-schedule of MEM ref with -ftree-vectorize and -fschedule-insns2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489 --- Comment #7 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2011-10-17 03:04:08 UTC --- Do you have any suggestions on additional tests, debug steps that we can perform to narrow down the factors that lead to instructions being mis-scheduled?

[Bug middle-end/50724] isnan broken by -ffinite-math-only in g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724 Ethan Tira-Thompson ejtttje at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED