[Bug c++/20397] improve diagnostic for 'is inaccessible' error

2011-10-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20397 --- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 07:57:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) I am reopening as an enhancement request because all this discussion could be better summarized in the error message (in

[Bug c++/50817] New: G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

2011-10-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 Bug #: 50817 Summary: G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

2011-10-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

2011-10-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

2011-10-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 08:34:47 UTC --- I'm not sure this qualifies as an enhancement, I'd call it a plain ol' bug

[Bug target/50809] driver-arm.c:55:11: error: anonymous type with no linkage used to declare variable 'anonymous struct vendors []' with linkage [-Werror]

2011-10-21 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50809 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/50818] New: va_list is filled incorrectly in functions with ms_abi attribute on amd64

2011-10-21 Thread andrey.sploshnov at kaspersky dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818 Bug #: 50818 Summary: va_list is filled incorrectly in functions with ms_abi attribute on amd64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status:

[Bug target/50818] va_list is filled incorrectly in functions with ms_abi attribute on amd64

2011-10-21 Thread andrey.sploshnov at kaspersky dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818 --- Comment #1 from Andrey Sploshnov andrey.sploshnov at kaspersky dot com 2011-10-21 09:16:32 UTC --- Sorry, there is a typo in the caller() function, it should be: const char* str = arg; callee(a string: %s, str); test.ii contains a correct

[Bug tree-optimization/50819] New: missed SLP vectorization

2011-10-21 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50819 Bug #: 50819 Summary: missed SLP vectorization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

2011-10-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/50809] driver-arm.c:55:11: error: anonymous type with no linkage used to declare variable 'anonymous struct vendors []' with linkage [-Werror]

2011-10-21 Thread ams at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50809 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 10:31:53 UTC --- Author: ams Date: Fri Oct 21 10:31:48 2011 New Revision: 180289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180289 Log: 2011-10-21 Andrew Stubbs

[Bug target/50809] driver-arm.c:55:11: error: anonymous type with no linkage used to declare variable 'anonymous struct vendors []' with linkage [-Werror]

2011-10-21 Thread ams at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50809 Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-21 11:32:16 UTC --- Of course agreed about the substance, but I'm still finding a bit puzzling the simple fix assessment, I don't see tons of lazy people around not willing

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

2011-10-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 11:38:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Of course agreed about the substance, but I'm still finding a bit puzzling the simple fix assessment, I don't see tons of lazy

[Bug middle-end/50691] Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread argument

2011-10-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 12:17:11 UTC --- The following tree is incorrectly expanded bt expand call: (gdb) p debug_tree (exp) call_expr 0x403bf730 type integer_type 0x4036c3c0 int public SI

[Bug c++/48119] -Wtype-limits should warn when bit masking cannot possibly be true due to type size

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48119 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug target/50820] New: [avr] Use EIND consistently

2011-10-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 Bug #: 50820 Summary: [avr] Use EIND consistently Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation, wrong-code

[Bug target/50820] [avr] Use EIND consistently

2011-10-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug bootstrap/50812] libbid build fails with ICE on bid128_div.c

2011-10-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50812 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/50821] New: [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

2011-10-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 Bug #: 50821 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/50820] [avr] Use EIND consistently

2011-10-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 12:48:08 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Oct 21 12:48:04 2011 New Revision: 180299 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180299 Log: PR target/50820 *

[Bug debug/50816] [4.6.1] Discriminators are emitted in DWARF 2 format

2011-10-21 Thread anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816 --- Comment #3 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com 2011-10-21 13:07:33 UTC --- Can someone confirm this and fix this? We are blocked otherwise :-(

[Bug c++/50811] [C++0x] G++ rejects class-virt-specifier if class-head-name includes nested-name-specifier

2011-10-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 13:31:26 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Oct 21 13:31:21 2011 New Revision: 180301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180301 Log: PR c++/50811 *

[Bug bootstrap/50326] [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

2011-10-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/50822] [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

2011-10-21 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 13:37:47 UTC --- Created attachment 25569 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25569 preprocessed input

[Bug bootstrap/50822] [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

2011-10-21 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 13:38:33 UTC --- Created attachment 25570 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25570 assembler input

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-10-21 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/50822] New: [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

2011-10-21 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
-sun-solaris2* Build: sparc-sun-solaris2* Between 20111014 and 20111021,Solaris/SPARC bootstrap with Sun as got broken compiling the stage1 libstdc++: /var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/var

[Bug bootstrap/50822] [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

2011-10-21 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/45632] const function pointer propagation issues with inlining

2011-10-21 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45632 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:07:53 UTC --- Is the second call to func() in main we pass the pointer p again, p2 being basically thrown away, I think that is a mistake because this way, there isn't

[Bug c++/50811] [C++0x] G++ rejects class-virt-specifier if class-head-name includes nested-name-specifier

2011-10-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/17534] gcc fails to diagnose suspect expressions that have incompatible bit masks

2011-10-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17534 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:10:52 UTC --- Still an issue with revision 180166. This could be warned by Wlogical-op.

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-10-21 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:19:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Iain, maybe your machine is faster than Dominique's, so maybe you could give it a spin? looks good off a stage3-bubble, -

[Bug c++/50811] [C++0x] G++ rejects class-virt-specifier if class-head-name includes nested-name-specifier

2011-10-21 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811 --- Comment #7 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com 2011-10-21 14:24:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) thanks! You're welcome! I don't like leaving bugs open in code I wrote, so instead of turning in early, I decided to

[Bug target/50820] [avr] Use EIND consistently

2011-10-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:24:28 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Oct 21 14:24:21 2011 New Revision: 180303 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180303 Log: PR target/50820

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-10-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-21 14:25:47 UTC --- If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be committed, then monitor regress on

[Bug target/50820] [avr] Use EIND consistently

2011-10-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.2

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

2011-10-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/50740] CPUID leaf 7 for BMI/BMI2/AVX2 feature detection not qualified with max_level and doesn't use subleaf

2011-10-21 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50740 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:32:36 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Fri Oct 21 14:32:32 2011 New Revision: 180304 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180304 Log: PR target/50740 *

[Bug c++/50811] [C++0x] G++ rejects class-virt-specifier if class-head-name includes nested-name-specifier

2011-10-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:38:03 UTC --- Daniel watches any PR to do with C++11 non-conformance ;) No, this didn't come up in the context of the library (although I might use final on some of the

[Bug middle-end/44382] Slow integer multiply

2011-10-21 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:41:13 UTC --- One more data point. I repeated the experiment using -fsched-pressure. Although this reduced the degradations considerably, the overall results are

[Bug driver/50740] CPUID leaf 7 for BMI/BMI2/AVX2 feature detection not qualified with max_level and doesn't use subleaf

2011-10-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50740 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86

[Bug translation/29897] %s substituted with parts of sentence can not be translated correctly

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29897 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-10-21 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:52:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be committed, then monitor regress on

[Bug translation/47064] params.def: Translatable string compilatoin (vs. compilation)

2011-10-21 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47064 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:55:45 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Oct 21 14:55:42 2011 New Revision: 180307 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180307 Log: 2011-10-21

[Bug translation/47064] params.def: Translatable string compilatoin (vs. compilation)

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47064 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50788] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in merge_overlapping_regs, at regrename.c:318 with -mavx -fpeel-loops -fstack-protector-all and __builtin_ia32_maskloadpd256

2011-10-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50788 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |i?86-*-*

[Bug rtl-optimization/50788] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in merge_overlapping_regs, at regrename.c:318 with -mavx -fpeel-loops -fstack-protector-all and __builtin_ia32_maskloadpd256

2011-10-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50788 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/50823] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1407

2011-10-21 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823 Bug #: 50823 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1407 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

2011-10-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/50823] [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1407

2011-10-21 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-21 15:22:35 UTC --- Created attachment 25571 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25571 testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/50824] New: memset or memcpy on structure prevents SRA

2011-10-21 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50824 Bug #: 50824 Summary: memset or memcpy on structure prevents SRA Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug middle-end/50823] [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1407

2011-10-21 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-21 16:10:45 UTC --- Caused by: commit 60ac8a3c08cc653bc92507cb1be08ca2ebe6774a Author: hubicka hubicka@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 Date: Thu Oct 20 11:46:08

[Bug c++/48940] GCC fails to issue expected error

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48940 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/24314] Extra template in partial specialization is compiled successfuly.

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/49453] Accepts invalid syntax for partial specialization of class template where the specialization is a class template

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49453 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

2011-10-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-10-21 17:43:31 UTC --- On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:41:00PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: The errors are [macbook] f90/bug% gfc

[Bug bootstrap/50825] New: [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails at stage1 libgcc from r180302

2011-10-21 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50825 Bug #: 50825 Summary: [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails at stage1 libgcc from r180302 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

2011-10-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-21 18:07:39 UTC --- Can you test the attached patch? Quick tests show that your path fixes the problem. For more serious testing my time scales are ~2h30 for bootstrap

[Bug c++/31423] Improve upon invalid use of member (did you forget the '' ?)

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31423 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/31423] Improve upon invalid use of member (did you forget the '' ?)

2011-10-21 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31423 --- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 18:19:00 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Oct 21 18:18:55 2011 New Revision: 180309 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180309 Log: /cp 2011-10-21

[Bug bootstrap/50825] [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails at stage1 libgcc from r180302

2011-10-21 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50825 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 18:38:48 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Oct 21 18:38:44 2011 New Revision: 180310 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180310 Log: PR bootstrap/50825

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-10-21 Thread dodji at seketeli dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #14 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-10-21 18:40:41 UTC --- If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be committed, then monitor regress on

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-10-21 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 18:48:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) hm.. got an ICE in stage1 libgcc .. @180302 - but possibly unrelated /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function

[Bug bootstrap/50825] [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails at stage1 libgcc from r180302

2011-10-21 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50825 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-10-21 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #16 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 19:00:59 UTC --- Patch proposed to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02017.html

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-10-21 Thread nenad at intrepid dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 Nenad Vukicevic nenad at intrepid dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nenad at

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-10-21 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #59 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 19:23:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #58) Is there a final patch for this? Or more testing is required. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01245.html

[Bug target/50813] gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-{v4di,v8si}.c fail on AVX target

2011-10-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50813 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 19:32:23 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 21 19:32:20 2011 New Revision: 180311 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180311 Log: PR target/50813 *

[Bug c++/45385] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] missing -Wconversion for method calls

2011-10-21 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 20:01:34 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Oct 21 20:01:31 2011 New Revision: 180312 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180312 Log: /cp 2011-10-21

[Bug c++/45385] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missing -Wconversion for method calls

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7

[Bug middle-end/20319] -fkeep-static-consts with -O asserted doesn't keep consts

2011-10-21 Thread pub at goldshmidt dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20319 Oleg Goldshmidt pub at goldshmidt dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pub at

[Bug bootstrap/50826] New: bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

2011-10-21 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 Bug #: 50826 Summary: bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

2011-10-21 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-10-21 20:46:46 UTC --- Created attachment 25573 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25573 small test case Test case.

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

2011-10-21 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-10-21 20:55:47 UTC --- forgot to mention that the test case needs to be compiled with -O2 -g to reproduce the problem.

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

2011-10-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 22:48:43 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Oct 21 22:48:39 2011 New Revision: 180316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180316 Log: 2011-10-20 Steven G. Kargl

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

2011-10-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

2011-10-21 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-21 22:57:31 UTC --- (detail: not sure about the 'if (!warn_narrowing) return;' at the beginning of check_narrowing: probably we don't want -Wno-narrowing to suppress the

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2011-10-21 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #15 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2011-10-21 23:02:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) David, it looks like we are seeing different things with v4.7... See my comment 11 - I am still

[Bug target/50691] Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread argument

2011-10-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target ---

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

2011-10-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

2011-10-21 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-22 01:24:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) (detail: not sure about the 'if (!warn_narrowing) return;' at the beginning of check_narrowing:

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

2011-10-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-22 04:38:15 UTC --- Makes sense to me.