http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20397
--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
07:57:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I am reopening as an enhancement request because all this discussion could be
better summarized in the error message (in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817
Bug #: 50817
Summary: G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
08:34:47 UTC ---
I'm not sure this qualifies as an enhancement, I'd call it a plain ol' bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50809
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818
Bug #: 50818
Summary: va_list is filled incorrectly in functions with ms_abi
attribute on amd64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Sploshnov andrey.sploshnov at kaspersky dot com
2011-10-21 09:16:32 UTC ---
Sorry, there is a typo in the caller() function, it should be:
const char* str = arg;
callee(a string: %s, str);
test.ii contains a correct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50819
Bug #: 50819
Summary: missed SLP vectorization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50809
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 10:31:53
UTC ---
Author: ams
Date: Fri Oct 21 10:31:48 2011
New Revision: 180289
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180289
Log:
2011-10-21 Andrew Stubbs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50809
Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-21
11:32:16 UTC ---
Of course agreed about the substance, but I'm still finding a bit puzzling the
simple fix assessment, I don't see tons of lazy people around not willing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
11:38:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Of course agreed about the substance, but I'm still finding a bit puzzling the
simple fix assessment, I don't see tons of lazy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
12:17:11 UTC ---
The following tree is incorrectly expanded bt expand call:
(gdb) p debug_tree (exp)
call_expr 0x403bf730
type integer_type 0x4036c3c0 int public SI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48119
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820
Bug #: 50820
Summary: [avr] Use EIND consistently
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation, wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50812
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821
Bug #: 50821
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
12:48:08 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Oct 21 12:48:04 2011
New Revision: 180299
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180299
Log:
PR target/50820
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
--- Comment #3 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-10-21 13:07:33 UTC ---
Can someone confirm this and fix this? We are blocked otherwise :-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
13:31:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Oct 21 13:31:21 2011
New Revision: 180301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180301
Log:
PR c++/50811
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 13:37:47 UTC
---
Created attachment 25569
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25569
preprocessed input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 13:38:33 UTC
---
Created attachment 25570
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25570
assembler input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
-sun-solaris2*
Build: sparc-sun-solaris2*
Between 20111014 and 20111021,Solaris/SPARC bootstrap with Sun as got broken
compiling the stage1 libstdc++:
/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/var
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45632
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
14:07:53 UTC ---
Is the second call to func() in main we pass the pointer p again, p2
being basically thrown away, I think that is a mistake because this
way, there isn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17534
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
14:10:52 UTC ---
Still an issue with revision 180166. This could be warned by Wlogical-op.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:19:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Iain, maybe your machine is faster than Dominique's, so maybe you could give
it
a spin?
looks good off a stage3-bubble,
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #7 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2011-10-21 14:24:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
thanks!
You're welcome! I don't like leaving bugs open in code I wrote,
so instead of turning in early, I decided to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
14:24:28 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Oct 21 14:24:21 2011
New Revision: 180303
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180303
Log:
PR target/50820
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-10-21 14:25:47 UTC ---
If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be
committed, then monitor regress on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50740
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:32:36 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Oct 21 14:32:32 2011
New Revision: 180304
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180304
Log:
PR target/50740
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
14:38:03 UTC ---
Daniel watches any PR to do with C++11 non-conformance ;)
No, this didn't come up in the context of the library (although I might use
final on some of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382
--- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-21 14:41:13 UTC ---
One more data point. I repeated the experiment using -fsched-pressure.
Although this reduced the degradations considerably, the overall results are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50740
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29897
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:52:54
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be
committed, then monitor regress on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47064
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-21 14:55:45 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 21 14:55:42 2011
New Revision: 180307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180307
Log:
2011-10-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47064
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50788
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |i?86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50788
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
Bug #: 50823
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at
ipa-inline.c:1407
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-10-21 15:22:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 25571
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25571
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50824
Bug #: 50824
Summary: memset or memcpy on structure prevents SRA
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-10-21 16:10:45 UTC ---
Caused by:
commit 60ac8a3c08cc653bc92507cb1be08ca2ebe6774a
Author: hubicka hubicka@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Date: Thu Oct 20 11:46:08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48940
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49453
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-10-21 17:43:31 UTC ---
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:41:00PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
The errors are
[macbook] f90/bug% gfc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50825
Bug #: 50825
Summary: [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails at stage1 libgcc from
r180302
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-21
18:07:39 UTC ---
Can you test the attached patch?
Quick tests show that your path fixes the problem. For more serious testing my
time scales are ~2h30 for bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31423
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31423
--- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-21 18:19:00 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 21 18:18:55 2011
New Revision: 180309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180309
Log:
/cp
2011-10-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50825
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
18:38:48 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Oct 21 18:38:44 2011
New Revision: 180310
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180310
Log:
PR bootstrap/50825
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #14 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-10-21 18:40:41 UTC ---
If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be
committed, then monitor regress on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 18:48:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
hm.. got an ICE in stage1 libgcc .. @180302 - but possibly unrelated
/GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50825
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #16 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
19:00:59 UTC ---
Patch proposed to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02017.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
Nenad Vukicevic nenad at intrepid dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nenad at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #59 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 19:23:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #58)
Is there a final patch for this? Or more testing is required.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01245.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50813
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
19:32:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 21 19:32:20 2011
New Revision: 180311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180311
Log:
PR target/50813
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-21 20:01:34 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 21 20:01:31 2011
New Revision: 180312
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180312
Log:
/cp
2011-10-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20319
Oleg Goldshmidt pub at goldshmidt dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
Bug #: 50826
Summary: bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in
mem_loc_descriptor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-10-21 20:46:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 25573
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25573
small test case
Test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-10-21 20:55:47
UTC ---
forgot to mention that the test case needs to be compiled with -O2 -g to
reproduce the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 22:48:43 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Oct 21 22:48:39 2011
New Revision: 180316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180316
Log:
2011-10-20 Steven G. Kargl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-21
22:57:31 UTC ---
(detail: not sure about the 'if (!warn_narrowing) return;' at the beginning of
check_narrowing: probably we don't want -Wno-narrowing to suppress the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
--- Comment #15 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2011-10-21 23:02:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
David, it looks like we are seeing different things with v4.7... See my
comment 11 - I am still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-22
01:24:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
(detail: not sure about the 'if (!warn_narrowing) return;' at the beginning
of
check_narrowing:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-22
04:38:15 UTC ---
Makes sense to me.
84 matches
Mail list logo