http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #9 from bartek 'basz' szurgot bartosz.szurgot at pwr dot wroc.pl
2011-10-26 06:39:15 UTC ---
implementation is nice. i think there is still one more problem to be fixed,
though. namely the line:
~_Unlock() { _M_lock.lock(); }
since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
08:52:13 UTC ---
Thanks. FTR, the reason we get this on PA64 and not on x86* (and probably not
on PA32) is that pa_internal_arg_pointer sets up a pseudo to hold r29+offset.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-26 09:22:41 UTC ---
--- Comment #2 from Graham Reed greed at pobox dot com 2011-10-25 20:04:32
UTC ---
This may be the same fault I'm seeing on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41844
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
09:30:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 26 09:30:29 2011
New Revision: 180517
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180517
Log:
2011-10-26 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41844
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50872
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
--- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26 09:34:00 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Oct 26 09:33:56 2011
New Revision: 180519
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180519
Log:
2011-10-26 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
--- Comment #14 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26 09:33:52 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Oct 26 09:33:49 2011
New Revision: 180518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180518
Log:
2011-10-26 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50872
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
10:29:50 UTC ---
Yes, I suppose it should be:
~_Unlock()
{
if (uncaught_exception())
__try { _M_lock.lock(); } __catch(...) { }
else
_M_lock.lock();
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50592
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-26
10:30:49 UTC ---
Do you have a smaller reproducer? 190 KB is unmanageable. Have also a look to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
10:40:30 UTC ---
Ah of course it's a system header thing, but -pedantic would have caught it.
This let a bug slip through in the library, which I fixed with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-10-26 10:44:55 UTC ---
The corresponding CWG issue is
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1288
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-26
11:31:07 UTC ---
I know. -pedantic works indeed. Really, changing this would be easy, if we
wanted, maybe it's just something from the past? Jason should know...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50815
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50842
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
12:03:12 UTC ---
gnatmake needs to be linked against /usr/lib/libiconv.dylib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26 12:38:05
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Wed Oct 26 12:37:59 2011
New Revision: 180523
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180523
Log:
gcc:
PR target/48108
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #11 from bartek 'basz' szurgot bartosz.szurgot at pwr dot wroc.pl
2011-10-26 12:41:34 UTC ---
i'm not sure about uncaught_exception(). i remember reading in Herb Sutter's
that it's usage should be avoided, since it has some flaw, that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229
--- Comment #9 from Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com
2011-10-26 12:49:43 UTC ---
I received a build of a darwinx-ld binary from the darwinx toolchain maintainer
that accepts the -no_compact_unwind option, and the problem has not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
13:02:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
i'm not sure about uncaught_exception(). i remember reading in Herb Sutter's
that it's usage should be avoided, since it has some
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
13:05:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
unique_lockmutex __my_lock(_M_mutex);
_Unlock __unlock(__lock);
unique_lockmutex __my_lock2(std::move(__my_lock));
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-10-26
13:28:20 UTC ---
Can we backport r180523 to gcc-4_6-branch (perhaps even for gcc 4.6.2)?
Also in gcc trunk we should also now fully revert...
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Mar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
13:32:57 UTC ---
Nice, a testsuite run detected gcc.dg/torture/pr43165.c -Os -g on
i686-linux-gnu gets a debug stmt referencing a user variable using a debug temp
as the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
13:37:23 UTC ---
Are the libstdc++ headers treated as system headers when building the library
itself? If so, that seems like the thing to fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #14 from bartek 'basz' szurgot bartosz.szurgot at pwr dot wroc.pl
2011-10-26 13:42:29 UTC ---
uhum - i missed that one... :/
ok then - looks like http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862#c10 is a
working solution. :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50873
Bug #: 50873
Summary: The fix to PR50730 causes
gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dilayout.c to ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
13:46:45 UTC ---
Yes they are. Not doing that would be a good idea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
13:47:56 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 26 13:47:48 2011
New Revision: 180525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180525
Log:
PR debug/50826
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #15 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
13:55:25 UTC ---
Shouldn't the testcase contain:
// { dg-require-sched-yield }
? I'm getting a failure because this_thread::yield is not defined, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26
14:06:12 UTC ---
Yes, thanks for spotting it. Ideally we'd define this_thread::yield() anyway,
but until then the test should use the dg-require
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50874
Bug #: 50874
Summary: loc_t in tree-diagnostics.c conflicts with system
header on AIX
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #4 from Graham Reed greed at pobox dot com 2011-10-26 15:36:40
UTC ---
Created attachment 25617
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25617
KLUDGE/workaround for ICE
I worked around the ICE on AIX with this patch. THIS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #5 from Graham Reed greed at pobox dot com 2011-10-26 15:39:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Sorry, forgot to add:
I made the patch against 4.6.1, and have run bootstrap and testing on AIX 5.3
TL4. I was able to apply it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
Bug #: 50875
Summary: O3 and -march=native lead to internal compiler error:
in find_reloads
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-26 15:52:07 UTC ---
I made the patch against 4.6.1, and have run bootstrap and testing on AIX 5.3
TL4. I was able to apply it unchanged against
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xunxun1982 at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #2 from Joly Aarons holyjoly at gmail dot com 2011-10-26 16:08:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Your gcc -v information?
And your cpu model? (I think it's related with cpu instruction set)
I use i686-w64-mingw32 gfortran 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #3 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-10-26 16:35:38
UTC ---
The issue is related with -mavx
I use gfortran -O3 -mavx to reproduce the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25614|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48437
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50210
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49821
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47435
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47481
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48666
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47841
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47918
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45402
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47936
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50275
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44495
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50078
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50807
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #4 from Joly Aarons holyjoly at gmail dot com 2011-10-26 17:30:32
UTC ---
Excellent, just for completeness, I can confirm that :
gfortran -O3 -mavx
does reproduce the problem identically and that :
(In reply to comment #3)
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44415
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-26 17:59:42 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 26 17:59:36 2011
New Revision: 180531
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180531
Log:
2011-10-26 Paolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48173
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #5 from Joly Aarons holyjoly at gmail dot com 2011-10-26 17:35:29
UTC ---
Excellent, just for completeness, I can confirm that on my machines :
gfortran -O3 -mavx
does reproduce the problem identically and that :
gfortran -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
