http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45807
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47487
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
08:11:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Created attachment 25730 [details]
Possible patch which pushes the vtab to the toplevel
At least that approach fails for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 08:24:54
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
FWIW gcc-4.2.1 (Apple local) fails and clang passes the test (although clang's
asm at version 2.9 is a bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698
--- Comment #6 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
08:42:00 UTC ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Mon Nov 7 08:41:55 2011
New Revision: 181075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181075
Log:
gcc/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50962
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
08:47:18 UTC ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Mon Nov 7 08:47:15 2011
New Revision: 181077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181077
Log:
gcc/
PR target/50962
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34983
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||34983
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34983
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-11-07 09:23:30 UTC ---
The situation now is even more confused.
Most of the std algos have iterators as arguments. Visibility seems not to
propagate there..
below is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51000
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
09:28:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
FWIW gcc-4.2.1 (Apple local) fails and clang passes the test (although
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51004
Bug #: 51004
Summary: ICE in lower_stmt at gimple-low.c:428
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
--- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-11-07 09:38:08 UTC ---
Reduced test
actually it is enough to add
s::foo(v);
in the main after s::foo(a);
to get
0e34 t void s::fooA(A)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51005
Bug #: 51005
Summary: -ftree-tail-merge slows down compilation of
20001226-1.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51006
Bug #: 51006
Summary: bootstrap fails on NetBSD 5.1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51006
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
09:46:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 25732
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25732
use system getpagesize on netbsd
testing this now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51005
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 09:53:15 UTC ---
-ftree-tail-merge optimises about half of the basic blocks away:
...
$ egrep -c '^bb.*:' 20001226-1.c.091t.crited
16385
$ egrep -c '^bb.*:' 20001226-1.c.092t.pre
8195
...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51006
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
09:54:01 UTC ---
bootstrap completes successfully with that patch
the manual page says getpagesize first appeared in 4.2BSD so I can't imagine
it's absent on any NetBSD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51005
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 10:05:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 25733
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25733
possible patch
This patch brings the computation time back down:
...
$ time gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51005
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-11-07 10:49:23 UTC ---
Just hit the same problem today:
...
/tmp/ccNz0HZT.ltrans29.ltrans.o:ccNz0HZT.ltrans29.o:function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
Bug #: 51007
Summary: Quadmath I/O doesn't work on MinGW
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51005
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
11:00:39 UTC ---
Note that PRE already performs TODO_update_ssa_only_virtuals (well, of course
only if something marked the VOP for renaming which happens whenever it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #19 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas
at gmail dot com 2011-11-07 11:00:47 UTC ---
Dear Tobias,
I have been keeping out of this for the time being because I want to
get some of the final OOP array issues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-07 11:03:32 UTC ---
I don't know if it's related, or two different bugs, but hexadecimal printing
has the correct mantissa with a wrong exponent. See below the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-07 11:29:39 UTC ---
The bug is not in the I/O routine, it can be reproduce by this simple
self-contained testcase (which doesn't need libquadmath).
#include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-07 11:39:12 UTC ---
Going further: I tried to compare the trees generated by the simple function
below:
#include stdint.h
typedef union
{
__float128 value;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50913
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 12:00:49
UTC ---
The issue is caused by bitfield layout. For mingw targets the -mms-bitfields
option is for 4.7 active by default.
So the mixture of different sized types in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
12:02:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 25734
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25734
proposed patch
Hm, on x86_64 the EH table is not empty (look at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 12:19:09
UTC ---
Suggested patch for this issue
ChangeLog
* quadmath-imp.h (ieee854_float128): Adjust
for ms-bitfield layout.
Index: quadmath-imp.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-07 12:48:30 UTC ---
On 7-Nov-11, at 6:07 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Is hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 a host-wide-int 32bit host? (no idea how I
can
force HWI 32bit here :/)
No,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50913
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51004
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50913
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 13:37:16
UTC ---
still not right .. generates wrong code for the first two accesses (missing the
indirect load).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51008
Bug #: 51008
Summary: GTHR - extend interface with
__gthread_recursive_mutex_destroy
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51008
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Galkin andvgal at gmail dot com 2011-11-07
13:52:36 UTC ---
* The problem is in incompatible types when __gthread_mutex_destroy is called
instead of __gthread_recursive_mutex_destroy (missing in the default interface)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51008
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
14:02:52 UTC ---
The best solution is to add that function to the gthr API, but stage1 is about
to end, so we might not have time to do it (the reason for the _S_destroy hack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51008
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
14:04:09 UTC ---
P.S. this is very unlikely to get fixed on the 4.6 branch, but there might be
time to get it done for 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51008
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
14:24:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 25735
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25735
use __GTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_DESTROY_FUNCTION if defined
here's a proof of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51008
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Galkin andvgal at gmail dot com 2011-11-07
14:28:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 25736
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25736
PR51008 workaround, fits GCC 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51008
Andrey Galkin andvgal at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |minor
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45723
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 14:32:56
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Nov 7 14:32:50 2011
New Revision: 181085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181085
Log:
Revert previous fix for PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45723
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-07 14:44:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 25738
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25738
arith-rand-ll.c.124t.vrp2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-07 14:44:50 UTC ---
On 11/7/2011 6:07 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Can you attach -fdump-tree-vrp-details dumps for trunk head?
Attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #43 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
15:04:30 UTC ---
Jonathan,
Your patch works, but Rainer still has not checked in his original patch fixing
gthr headers, AFAIK.
Thanks, David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #44 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
15:12:26 UTC ---
Great, thanks - we can leave it open for now until it's fully resolved.
As I said in comment 28, we might need to adjust the libstdc++ testsuite now
that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
15:09:54 UTC ---
Weird. My cross configured with
/space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
--disable-nls --target=hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
15:29:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
ChangeLog
* quadmath-imp.h (ieee854_float128): Adjust
for ms-bitfield layout.
+#ifdef __MINGW32__
+ /* On
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51009
Bug #: 51009
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51009
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
15:47:08 UTC ---
Hi,
the problem seems to be due to fact that C++ FE output extern aliases. This is
not quite documented and they was simply removed by the old alias pair
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42636
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
15:59:10 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 7 15:59:07 2011
New Revision: 181089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181089
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
16:10:10 UTC ---
Reviewing these warnings w.r.t the much improved third edition...
(In reply to comment #1)
# Item 11: Define a copy constructor and an assignment operator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-07 16:11:55 UTC ---
On 11/7/2011 10:09 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guentherrguenth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-07 16:11:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 25740
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25740
xxx.c.124t.vrp2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #20 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
16:17:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #16)
Created attachment 25730 [details]
Possible patch which pushes the vtab to the toplevel
The reason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50963
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-11-07 16:24:28
UTC ---
The problem is in (call:DI (mem:QI (symbol_ref:DI (__tls_get_addr)) [0 S1
A8]), the symbol_ref does not satisfy constant_call_address_operand predicate.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38928
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #21 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
16:27:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
The reason for the failure is clear: For the derived type/class, the function
__copy_xtt_Foo is created. The created function is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34152
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51010
Bug #: 51010
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bad diagnostics: #'ssa_name' not
supported by pp_c_expression#]'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #45 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 16:34:37
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Nov 7 16:34:31 2011
New Revision: 181095
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181095
Log:
Return gthr-posix.h to libgcc (PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51004
--- Comment #2 from kennytm at gmail dot com 2011-11-07 16:36:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 25741
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25741
The processed file that triggers the bug.
Reduced test case:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #46 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 16:43:35
UTC ---
David,
I had been waiting to see if the remaining AIX gthread issues were releated to
my patch. Since that's not the case and my own testing had completed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #47 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-07 16:45:36 UTC ---
--- Comment #44 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
15:12:26 UTC ---
Great, thanks - we can leave it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51004
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255
--- Comment #28 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
17:51:28 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:51:24 2011
New Revision: 181100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181100
Log:
PR c++/33255
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
17:51:43 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:51:40 2011
New Revision: 181102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181102
Log:
PR c++/35688
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-07 17:54:00 UTC ---
I am testing the attached patch that ought to solve the issue.
A sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap with Sun as is now into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
18:08:40 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Nov 7 18:08:35 2011
New Revision: 181104
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181104
Log:
PR target/49313
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50919
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 18:41:16 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Nov 7 18:41:12 2011
New Revision: 181107
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181107
Log:
2011-11-07 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50919
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20634
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
Bug #: 51011
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic-generic.c (test for excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Kloeckner inform at tiker dot net 2011-11-07
19:25:32 UTC ---
Zydrunas and I have successfully completed the copyright assignment process,
and we're ready to move forward with this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22065
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51012
Bug #: 51012
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:1897 with -fno-early-inlining and passing
incompatible function ptr
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-07 19:49:39 UTC ---
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 07:25:32PM +, inform at tiker dot net wrote:
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Kloeckner inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-07 20:03:43 UTC ---
On 11/7/2011 2:27 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
Is dejagnu on hpux limited somehow
That's not the problem.
The problem is the atomic functions are not being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013
Bug #: 51013
Summary: complex::{imag,real}() should maintain
lvalue-returning extension in C++11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo at gcc dot gnu.org|gdr at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50997
--- Comment #3 from Fredrik Hederstierna
fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com 2011-11-07 21:11:13 UTC ---
Ok, answer to myself. I found the patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00169.html
I think the patch is very
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51014
Bug #: 51014
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in apply_opt_in_copies, at
loop-unroll.c:2283 with -O2 -g -funroll-loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
21:17:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 25744
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25744
patch for 4.6
I think I'm not going to apply this to release branches, as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
21:24:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created attachment 25734 [details]
proposed patch
Hm, on x86_64 the EH table is not empty (look at g++.dg/lto/20081109_1.C,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51015
Bug #: 51015
Summary: ice in vect_determine_vectorization_factor with -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo