http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51203
Pubby8 pubby.8 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |trivial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51206
Bug #: 51206
Summary: Building Cross-Compiler for Linux/x86_64 multilibs
fails due to FLAGS_FOR_TARGET
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51206
--- Comment #1 from gcc at rkeene dot org 2011-11-18 08:27:00 UTC ---
If I remove the -B.../lib argument from
x86_64-slackware-linux/libgcc/Makefile then both the 32-bit and the 64-bit
libgcc builds complete.
That is, if I change the line from:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51194
--- Comment #2 from fate66260 at gmail dot com 2011-11-18 08:59:28 UTC ---
http://ideone.com/lZEbs
g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 2012
g++ -std=c++0x a.cpp
--
a.cpp: In instantiation of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51207
Bug #: 51207
Summary: [OOP] Mark __def_init_... as FL_PARAMETER
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51207
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 09:54:07 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Nov 18 09:54:02 2011
New Revision: 181468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181468
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51118
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-11-18
09:50:30 UTC ---
Testing Richard's patch ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
Bug #: 51208
Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE= or MOLD=: Diagnose if
variable occurs twice
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51207
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
10:00:43 UTC ---
allocate(t :: y)
allocate(x, mold=x)
The last line should be: x, mold=y. (Cf. PR 51208.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #60 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 10:52:37
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Nov 18 10:52:32 2011
New Revision: 181469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181469
Log:
toplevel:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #61 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 10:54:24
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Nov 18 10:54:21 2011
New Revision: 181470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181470
Log:
gcc/ada:
2011-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #62 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 11:45:48
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Nov 18 11:45:44 2011
New Revision: 181471
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181471
Log:
toplevel:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #63 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 11:47:01
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Nov 18 11:46:58 2011
New Revision: 181472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181472
Log:
gcc/ada:
2011-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51147
--- Comment #3 from Paul Koning pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
11:49:56 UTC ---
That workaround seems to do the right thing for what I need, so I'm no longer
stuck. Thanks for the suggestion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51145
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
13:11:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
- error (using typedef-name %qD after %qs, decl, tag_name (tag_code));
- error (%q+D has a previous declaration here,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #57 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 13:19:29
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Nov 18 13:19:25 2011
New Revision: 181474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181474
Log:
gcc/ada:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-18 13:24:22 UTC ---
On 17-Nov-11, at 4:49 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
Created attachment 25846
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25846
potential second patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51191
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
14:07:49 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Nov 18 14:07:41 2011
New Revision: 181475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181475
Log:
PR c++/51191 - ICE on alias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51191
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51194
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209
Bug #: 51209
Summary: The template _M_find_node in hashtable.h has a bad
return value
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50605
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
15:13:58 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Nov 18 15:13:54 2011
New Revision: 181477
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181477
Log:
2011-11-18 Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-18 15:31:45 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 18 15:31:38 2011
New Revision: 181478
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181478
Log:
/cp
2011-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-18 15:51:47 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 18 15:51:41 2011
New Revision: 181479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181479
Log:
/cp
2011-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
16:03:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
allocate(i, stat=i)
1
Error: Stat-variable at (1) shall not be ALLOCATEd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-18 16:09:36 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 18 16:09:29 2011
New Revision: 181480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181480
Log:
2011-11-18 Harti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209
--- Comment #4 from Harti Brandt hartmut.brandt at dlr dot de 2011-11-18
16:16:31 UTC ---
Thanks a lot,
harti
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com [gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50605
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
16:44:12 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Nov 18 16:44:00 2011
New Revision: 181482
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181482
Log:
gcc/
PR target/49868
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51210
Bug #: 51210
Summary: [C++11][DR 547] std::type_info works incorrectly with
function types with cv-qualifier-seq
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51211
Bug #: 51211
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark (trans-mem.c:2242)
with -fgnu-tm -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer --param
hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1 and __transaction_atomic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51187
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33944
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212
Bug #: 51212
Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 3 can not throw but
has an EH edge with -fgnu-tm -fnon-call-exceptions and
transaction_callable
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
18:06:18 UTC ---
Proposed fix posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01935.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51211
Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
--- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
18:20:50 UTC ---
Your patch will fix the problem, but, as I wrote in comment 10, I think it is
wrong. I guess you can change the semantics of tm_mangle() to return NULL for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-18 18:38:11 UTC ---
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-11-18 18:28:17 UTC ---
Rainer, any idea what is this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-18 18:40:31 UTC ---
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:03:04PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Well, it is not. One can restrict one to the common case of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51141
--- Comment #4 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 18:44:25 UTC ---
Author: fabien
Date: Fri Nov 18 18:44:23 2011
New Revision: 181490
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181490
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2011-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
19:02:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Although I think this is equivalent to putting a bandaid
on a AK-47 bullet hole, here you go
Thanks for the patch. Only one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33944
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
19:02:49 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Nov 18 19:02:45 2011
New Revision: 181491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181491
Log:
Add _mm_stream_si64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51203
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51145
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
19:16:52 UTC ---
A candidate fix has been posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01945.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51194
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
19:18:46 UTC ---
Here is a smaller reproducer:
templateclass U, class V
struct foo {};
templateclass U, class V=char
struct P {};
templatetemplateclass... U class... TT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2011-11-18 19:34:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #2)
So it would be nice to actually write the SIG* information also
to stderr.
(In reply to comment #3)
So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-18 19:49:32 UTC ---
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 07:02:25PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1131
--- Comment #5 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-11-18 19:50:42 UTC ---
jason at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit:
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
13:11:48 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson johann at myrkraverk dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Bug #: 51213
Summary: [C++11][DR 1170] Access control checking has to be
done under SFINAE conditions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187
Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skunk at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214
Bug #: 51214
Summary: [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
--- Comment #14 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 20:32:08 UTC ---
Author: fabien
Date: Fri Nov 18 20:32:04 2011
New Revision: 181492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181492
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2011-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #14 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-18 21:02:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Introduced by the following change:
2011-10-17 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/50729
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #15 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-18 22:15:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 25855
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25855
Preprocessed testcase for epiphany
I can't reproduce the test on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson johann at myrkraverk dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-18
22:27:22 UTC ---
Ah Ok, let's add this: https://www.illumos.org/issues/1794
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #16 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-18 22:45:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
I can also replicate this on gcc45 using trunk revision 181496.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51215
Bug #: 51215
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid array initializer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51215
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51211
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2011-11-18 22:52:44 UTC ---
After looking at it. I guess the problem was in the tracer...
The tracer tries to duplicate the BB where the __transaction_atomic is.
Unfortunately
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51216
Bug #: 51216
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with statement expression
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51217
Bug #: 51217
Summary: Cannot disable bootstrap in gcc 3.4.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51216
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51217
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218
Bug #: 51218
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218
--- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2011-11-18 23:08:09
UTC ---
Created attachment 25856
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25856
Source archive
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976
William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51216
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51219
Bug #: 51219
Summary: ICE with structure initializer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729
--- Comment #8 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-19 00:03:56 UTC ---
More specifically, the problem appears when innerop has a different signedness
than middleop, and the value range of middleop is such that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #17 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-19 02:05:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 25857
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25857
Proposed patch
Could you test if this also fixes your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729
--- Comment #9 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-19 02:06:36 UTC ---
I've added a patch attachment to PR50802 that replaces the test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-19 03:47:39 UTC ---
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:40:49AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
The miscompilation is triggered by -ffrontend-optimize, work-around:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #16 from Venkataramanan Kumar venkataramanan.kumar.gnu at gmail
dot com 2011-11-19 04:25:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
Created attachment 25764 [details]
Tentative fix (3)
Final version. Can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50306
--- Comment #3 from Marc-Andre Laperle malaperle at omnialabs dot net
2011-11-19 05:38:32 UTC ---
I tried 4.6.2, r181503 and r180166 and they all compiled the sample code
without error. Do you have any local changes or special parameters that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-19
07:17:58 UTC ---
I tested on machine with -march=amdfam10, with your patch induct run time
improves by ~5%. Other benchmarks are not affected much.
OK, thanks.
With
100 matches
Mail list logo