[Bug target/51235] New: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2 -mxop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235 Bug #: 51235 Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2 -mxop Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug gcov-profile/51113] [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox profiledbuild failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113 --- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-20 09:09:39 UTC --- Author: nathan Date: Sun Nov 20 09:09:34 2011 New Revision: 181524 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181524 Log: PR gcov-profile/51113

[Bug target/51236] New: ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:641 with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51236 Bug #: 51236 Summary: ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:641 with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/51181] [4.7 regression] libstdc++.so __sync_sub_and_fetch_4 linkage error causing many test suite failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/51235] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2 -mxop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: ___emutls_v.*, ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-11-20 12:43:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) FAIL: 30_threads/thread/native_handle/typesizes.cc execution test This test should be disabled on darwin (and

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: ___emutls_v.*, ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-11-20 12:50:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) confirm solved cat once.cpp #includeiostream int main() { std::once_flag flag;

[Bug middle-end/50074] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c execution test on x86_64 with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-11-20 12:52:05 UTC --- This patch fixes the sibcall-6.c failure on Epiphany. On x86_64-apple-darwin10 too. Thanks.

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized TST #imm, R0 instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-11-20 13:04:39 UTC --- With trunk rev 181517 I have observed the following problem, which happens when compiling for -m2*, -m3*, -m4* and -Os: The function compiled with -m2 -Os int

[Bug target/51237] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-[89].c (internal compiler error) caused by revision 181491

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51237 Bug #: 51237 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-[89].c (internal compiler error) caused by revision 181491 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: ___emutls_v.*, ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-20 13:46:58 UTC --- Vincenzo's comment shows the test fail for this version gcc version 4.7.0 2012 (experimental) (GCC) But pass for this one: gcc version 4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: ___emutls_v.*, ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 --- Comment #30 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-11-20 14:20:14 UTC --- sorry Dominique not to have been clear, Jonathan answer is correct. For what I'm concerned this specific PR can be closed. vincenzo

[Bug tree-optimization/51238] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use (tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1267) with -Os -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51238 Bug #: 51238 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use (tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1267) with -Os -ftree-loop-distribution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: ___emutls_v.*, ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51239] New: ICE with variadic template alias

-gnu Configured with: ../trunk/configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/opt/gcc4.7 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 2020 (experimental) (GCC) SVN revision: 181530 A version from 2009 produced the same error (at a different line number). The line in question

[Bug target/50970] Function pointer dereferenced twice in if statement on Arm cpu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50970 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rmansfield at

[Bug bootstrap/51240] New: [4.7] fortran bootstrap failure due to non-static dt_lower_string and dt_upper_string lacking prototypes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51240 Bug #: 51240 Summary: [4.7] fortran bootstrap failure due to non-static dt_lower_string and dt_upper_string lacking prototypes Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/51241] New: SH Target: Unnecessary sign/zero extensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51241 Bug #: 51241 Summary: SH Target: Unnecessary sign/zero extensions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/51242] New: Unable to use strongly typed enums as bit fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242 Bug #: 51242 Summary: Unable to use strongly typed enums as bit fields Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/51243] New: internal compiler error: in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4235

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51243 Bug #: 51243 Summary: internal compiler error: in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4235 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/51244] New: SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 Bug #: 51244 Summary: SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/51242] [C++11] Unable to use strongly typed enums as bit fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug target/51235] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2 -mxop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/51236] ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:641 with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51236 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c/51245] New: ICE in vn_reference_insert_pieces, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:1983

++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 2020 (experimental) (GCC) [regehr@gamow tmp065]$ current-gcc -Ofast -c -w small.c small.c: In function 'func_1': small.c:11:1: internal compiler error: in vn_reference_insert_pieces, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:1983 Please submit a full bug report

[Bug c/51246] New: ICE in replace_ref_with, at tree-predcom.c:1309

-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 2020 (experimental) (GCC) [regehr@gamow tmp067]$ current-gcc -c -w -Ofast small.c small.c: In function 'func_2': small.c:16:1: internal compiler error: in replace_ref_with, at tree-predcom.c:1309 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed

[Bug c/51247] New: ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:417

++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 2020 (experimental) (GCC) [regehr@gamow tmp066]$ current-gcc -c -w -O2 small.c small.c: In function 'func_93': small.c:9:1: internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:417 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source

[Bug target/51235] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2 -mxop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-20 22:26:18 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Sun Nov 20 22:26:14 2011 New Revision: 181537 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181537 Log: PR target/51235 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/51236] ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:641 with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51236 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-20 22:26:19 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Sun Nov 20 22:26:14 2011 New Revision: 181537 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181537 Log: PR target/51235 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/51235] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2 -mxop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/51236] ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:641 with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51236 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51230] [4.7 Regression] Broken diagnostic: 'template_parm_index' not supported by dump_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51230 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-20 22:37:56 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Nov 20 22:37:54 2011 New Revision: 181538 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181538 Log: /cp 2011-11-20

[Bug c++/51230] [4.7 Regression] Broken diagnostic: 'template_parm_index' not supported by dump_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51230 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51248] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with pointer to enum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51248 Bug #: 51248 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with pointer to enum Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/51248] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with pointer to enum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51248 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug bootstrap/51201] [4.7 regression] build error without Ada compiler installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51201 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug libgomp/51249] New: semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249 Bug #: 51249 Summary: semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/51250] New: [4.7 Regression] Bug with SUM(,dim,mask)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51250 Bug #: 51250 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bug with SUM(,dim,mask) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/51221] Cross GCC for AIX fails during bootstrap process

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51221 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc

[Bug fortran/51250] [4.7 Regression] Bug with SUM(,dim,mask)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51250 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oleg.e...@t-online.de

[Bug target/51251] New: SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 Bug #: 51251 Summary: SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/51251] SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 00:55:32 UTC --- Command used to compile and link the test. /home2/joel/build/b-sparc-fortran/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran \ -L

[Bug target/51241] SH Target: Unnecessary sign/zero extensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51241 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 01:52:22 UTC --- Please put the description of the problem into the trail itself instead of attachment next time. The problem looks to be splitted into several issues.

[Bug c++/48322] [C++0x] Plural variadic parameter packs are not expanded well

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48322 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 02:04:59 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 21 02:04:54 2011 New Revision: 181547 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181547 Log: PR c++/48322 gcc/cp/

[Bug target/51252] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/freq.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252 Bug #: 51252 Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/freq.c (internal compiler error) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/48322] [C++0x] Plural variadic parameter packs are not expanded well

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48322 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/51072] Build with --disable-bootstrap fails in libitm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072 --- Comment #7 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2011-11-21 02:53:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Shouldn't libitm be built with the stage1 g++ as it is a target library,

[Bug libgomp/51249] semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/51253] New: [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before relation) among intializer-clauses in braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253 Bug #: 51253 Summary: [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before relation) among intializer-clauses in braced-init-list Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/51254] New: Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned memory access.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 Bug #: 51254 Summary: Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned memory access. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/51254] Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned memory access.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 --- Comment #1 from Yuehai Du duyuehai at gmail dot com 2011-11-21 04:23:44 UTC --- Created attachment 25870 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25870 testcase

[Bug lto/51255] New: Using -flto breaks code which puts values in .ctors or .init_array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51255 Bug #: 51255 Summary: Using -flto breaks code which puts values in .ctors or .init_array Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/51251] SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 --- Comment #2 from David S. Miller davem at davemloft dot net 2011-11-21 05:05:02 UTC --- I'll take a look at this. The branch prediction tags are guarded by either TARGET_V9 or TARGET_ARCH64, but not TARGET_VIS.

[Bug target/51251] SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 --- Comment #3 from David S. Miller davem at davemloft dot net 2011-11-21 05:06:09 UTC --- BTW, Joel, you might want to check out -mdebug=options :-)

[Bug c/51256] New: ICE with invalid parameter for __atomic builtin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51256 Bug #: 51256 Summary: ICE with invalid parameter for __atomic builtin Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/51250] [4.7 Regression] Bug with SUM(,dim,mask)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51250 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/51222] [C++11][SFINAE] Unevaluated combined delete new expression completely broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51222 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-11-21 07:51:49 UTC --- When fixing this problem, I suggest to add the following tests as well, which also fail currently (In previous builds sometimes one of these