http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51439
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-12-07 09:08:41 UTC ---
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
09:00:47 UTC ---
Can't reproduce that with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
09:21:16 UTC ---
Can't reproduce with i686-linux x mips-sgi-irix6.5 cross either.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51318
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51441
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #42 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-12-07
09:58:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
I'll continue to bisect and test with r162897 reverted.
With r162897 reverted subsequent gcc-4.6 snapshots up to the 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40154
--- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-07 10:17:53 UTC ---
Actually, it is not enough to ensure that the mode matches; we must ensure
that the SET_DEST of the insn we attach the note to is set to the value.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
10:30:55 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Dec 7 10:30:49 2011
New Revision: 182076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182076
Log:
2011-12-07 Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51448
Bug #: 51448
Summary: Compiler crash when assigning floating point values of
different kinds
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
10:55:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created attachment 26010 [details]
Only use BLKmode for volatile accesses which are not naturally aligned.
Per Julian
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50051
Anthony Green green at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #43 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-12-07 11:07:16
UTC ---
What is the argument of fp_size_to_prec here?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51448
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-07 11:36:55 UTC ---
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
11:44:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Any guess when this ICE might get some attention and into a release version?
Well, as you can see from the discussion here, it does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50873
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
11:55:19 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 7 11:55:16 2011
New Revision: 182077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182077
Log:
2011-12-07 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #44 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-12-07
12:04:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #43)
What is the argument of fp_size_to_prec here?
size == 80
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51229
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
12:04:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 26015
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26015
gcc47-pr51229.patch
Untested fix.
This patch doesn't deal with missing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51448
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37130
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #45 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-12-07 12:48:29
UTC ---
That should probably be 96.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
12:51:39 UTC ---
I get
-2251799813685248 9221120237041090560
vs.
-2251799813685248 -2251799813685248
the subtraction is carried out with 4.7, also with 4.6.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=864
--- Comment #22 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
12:54:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
I would also very much like to see the patch in comment 16 applied. There is
now a second report open at bug 51095, I will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51444
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.7
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #46 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-12-07 13:10:15
UTC ---
There were a lot of float related changes around 2011-08-02.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51390
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07 13:13:16
UTC ---
with a stage1 compiler built with O0/g3:
/GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/recip-5.c:12:39: error:
Builtin function __builtin_recipdiv is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #50 from Venkataramanan Kumar venkataramanan.kumar.gnu at gmail
dot com 2011-12-07 13:18:57 UTC ---
In the machine I used Induct run time improves from 68.9 seconds to 55.94
seconds for -Ofast. I will update on other benchmarks and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51449
Bug #: 51449
Summary: [4.7 regression] Rev181994 causes tramp3d-v4 profiled
build failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50896
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2011-12-07 13:48:42
UTC ---
The bug is that rbx is added to the EXIT_BLOCK uses:
Basic block 1 , prev 2, loop_depth 0, count 0, freq 0.
Predecessors:
;; bb 1 artificial_defs: { }
;; bb 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51448
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.6
Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR lto/48100
* gcc.dg/lto/20111207-1_0.c: New testcase.
* gcc.dg/lto/20111207-1_1.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/lto/20111207-1_2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/lto/20111207-1_3.c: Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20111207-1_0.c
trunk/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51449
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2011-12-07 14:04:04
UTC ---
Untested patch...
Index: df-problems.c
===
--- df-problems.c (revision 177688)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
14:06:41 UTC ---
I think goto ptr can't be nonlocal, so that testcase indeed would be invalid.
register void *ptr asm (rbx);
int
foo (void)
{
__label__ nonlocal_lab;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40154
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51450
Bug #: 51450
Summary: configure's test for -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions broken
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51429
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49945
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49945
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
14:59:52 UTC ---
Index: gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
===
--- gcc/lto-streamer-out.c (revision 182081)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51449
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-12-07 15:14:40 UTC ---
Here is a (somewhat) reduced testcase:
% cat test.ii
extern C
{
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
}
namespace std __attribute__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
15:31:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Draft patch - one probably needs to do something similar for derived types.
The patch breaks the Different CHARACTER lengths
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51420
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
15:41:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 7 15:41:03 2011
New Revision: 182083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182083
Log:
PR c++/51420
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51451
Bug #: 51451
Summary: Premature EOF in stream
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50051
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
16:00:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thanks Andrew. Does this force the generation of FP instructions, which are
then emulated through OS traps?
Yes and the traps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434
--- Comment #11 from Andy Nelson andy.nelson at lanl dot gov 2011-12-07
16:11:38 UTC ---
On Dec 6, 2011, at 7:17 PM, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434
--- Comment #8 from Steve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50747
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
16:13:14 UTC ---
The function in question is DECL_ABSTRACT (it's one of the B::B constructors).
Not sure why we have a cgraph node for it at all:
#0 cgraph_create_node
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47687
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51395
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51452
Bug #: 51452
Summary: has_nothrow_.*constructor bugs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
--- Comment #11 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
16:56:46 UTC ---
I still have HP's patch in my local tree. Should I remove it? Or does it need
to be committed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51398
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51403
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51452
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
17:16:58 UTC ---
I think this is by design, see the thread beginning with c++std-lib-30698
I've been surprised by that reasoning several times e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
17:20:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Draft patch - one probably needs to do something similar for derived types.
The patch breaks the Different CHARACTER lengths
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51452
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51401
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51452
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51452
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
17:38:39 UTC ---
yes, I keep forgetting that noexcept should be implied on dtors now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51448
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51354
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51453
Bug #: 51453
Summary: Feature request: Implement Empty Base Optimization in
std::tuple
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51454
Bug #: 51454
Summary: For loop improper scoping
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51453
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51453
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51455
Bug #: 51455
Summary: Possible uninitialized register use when array
subscript is unsigned
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51452
--- Comment #5 from d...@boost-consulting.com 2011-12-07 18:41:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I think this is by design, see the thread beginning with c++std-lib-30698
I've been surprised by that reasoning several times e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-12-07
18:54:57 UTC ---
Hmm, you mean a copy with the version number in addition? Would be reasonable I
guess.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51452
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:03:30 UTC ---
c++std-lib-30708 has Daniel's explanation of his interpretation, as implemented
in GCC.
FWIW I prefer your interpretation, but will peace Daniel to comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:07:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
I still have HP's patch in my local tree.
I assume you mean Bernd's patch referenced in this PR.
(I was only doing the legwork.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51455
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:10:55 UTC ---
((unsigned char *)offsets)[index] still sign extends to int.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51454
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-07
19:19:17 UTC ---
Note that ICC and Comeau also reject it in strict mode.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:23:13 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Dec 7 19:23:10 2011
New Revision: 182084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182084
Log:
2011-12-07 Andrew
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51455
--- Comment #2 from frederik.deweerdt at gmail dot com 2011-12-07 19:25:30 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
((unsigned char *)offsets)[index] still sign extends to int.
I'm not sure how to parse this. My problem is that '((unsigned char
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51455
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:28:29 UTC ---
movzbl 0x20d(%rsp),%eax
is the same as:
movzbq 0x20d(%rsp),%rax
as all l instructions zero extend to q.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51455
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:30:21 UTC ---
Probably time for you to read the docs.
E.g. AMD 24592 pdf, in 3.1.2 says:
In general, byte and word operands are stored in the low 8 or 16
bits of GPRs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51455
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
Bug #: 51456
Summary: gcc-4.5.3 ARM misaligned relocation for
__gxx_personality_v0 in libstdc++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:43:26 UTC ---
What version of glibc are you using? glibc should be handling the unaligned
relocation correctly. Also GCC is correct here in using the unaligned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:44:09 UTC ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2005-07/msg00325.html for a problem against
MIPS for the same unaligned relocation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386
--- Comment #8 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:47:08 UTC ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Wed Dec 7 19:47:03 2011
New Revision: 182085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182085
Log:
2011-12-07 François
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51369
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:51:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 19:51:54 2011
New Revision: 182086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182086
Log:
PR c++/51369
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-07 19:55:32 UTC ---
I don't understand what you're saying.
On my linux box
heine:~/Downloads uname -a
Linux heine 3.0.0-13-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 2 13:27:26 UTC 2011 x86_64
x86_64
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo