http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51691
Bug #: 51691
Summary: Cast of an array with type generates a please file
bug message (See below)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51684
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-12-28 09:06:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Untested patch:
I have bootstrapped and regression tested the patch on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
[1], where it fixes all mentioned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51667
--- Comment #19 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-12-28 09:09:02
UTC ---
FYI, the patch also works correctly on alpha [1], a target with sign-extended
instructions.
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-12/msg02710.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50038
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28 09:16:28 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Dec 28 09:16:24 2011
New Revision: 182704
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182704
Log:
PR testsuite/50722
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51684
--- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28 09:20:20 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Wed Dec 28 09:20:16 2011
New Revision: 182705
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182705
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51684
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51685
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51684
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51692
Bug #: 51692
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE on several valgrind tests
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51692
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Bug #: 51693
Summary: New XPASSes in vectorizer testsuite on
powerpc64-suse-linux
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51694
Bug #: 51694
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE while compiling alliance package
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51694
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #1 from Michael Zolotukhin michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com
2011-12-28 11:08:36 UTC ---
I though that if {vect_aligned_arrays} isn't true, than arrays could
be aligned even after peeling - that's why I added such check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51694
Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |debug
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
Bug #: 51695
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE while compiling argyllcms package
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
11:35:23 UTC ---
The NOTE_INSN_VAR_LOCATION argument for variable o is extremely huge in this
case and we hit the 64KB limit on .debug_loc expressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51345
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
12:21:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 26194
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26194
tentative patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-28 12:27:18 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
I though that if {vect_aligned_arrays} isn't true, than arrays could
be aligned even after peeling - that's why I added such check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #3 from Michael Zolotukhin michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com
2011-12-28 12:59:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 26195
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26195
AVX2 vect dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #4 from Michael Zolotukhin michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com
2011-12-28 13:01:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I though that if {vect_aligned_arrays} isn't true, than arrays could
be aligned even after peeling - that's why
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-28 13:11:53 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
In vect-peel-3.c we actually assume that vector length is 16 byte. Here is the
loop body:
suma += ia[i];
sumb += ib[i+5];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680
Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51547
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-28 15:53:01 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Dec 28 15:52:54 2011
New Revision: 182709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182709
Log:
2011-12-27 Paolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-12-28 15:59:35 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #3)
Created attachment 26191 [details]
Proposed patch to improve some of the issues.
The attached patch removes the useless sequence and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
--- Comment #6 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-12-28 16:06:47
UTC ---
btw, i've tested the default allocator with std::__7 and the i686-pc-mingw32
toolchain works fine while the x86_64-pc-mingw32 reports undefined reference to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #6 from Michael Zolotukhin michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com
2011-12-28 16:19:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
In vect-peel-3.c we actually assume that vector length is 16 byte. Here is
the
loop body:
suma +=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51623
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
18:02:56 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Dec 28 18:02:49 2011
New Revision: 182710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182710
Log:
Fix PR 51623
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51623
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51556
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-28
18:12:17 UTC ---
This works with current (Rev 182710) mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
19:37:38 UTC ---
OK, loop hiearchy looks as follows:
loop_0 (header = 0, latch = 1, niter = )
{
bb_2 (preds = {bb_0 }, succs = {bb_3 })
bb_6 (preds = {bb_5 }, succs =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
--- Comment #7 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-12-28 19:51:55
UTC ---
please apply following obvious patch:
--- gcc-4.6.0/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/pre/gnu-versioned-namespace.ver.orig
2011-12-28 12:43:50.0 +0100
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23211
--- Comment #15 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28 19:53:19 UTC ---
Author: fabien
Date: Wed Dec 28 19:53:14 2011
New Revision: 182711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182711
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2011-12-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23211
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
20:09:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Well, it's just an impression ... :]
I think one reason is that unlike normal functions, template functions are
implicitly sort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51696
Bug #: 51696
Summary: [trans-mem] unsafe indirect function call in struct
not properly displayed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51623
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
20:53:33 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Dec 28 20:53:30 2011
New Revision: 182712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182712
Log:
Backport PR 51623
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28 21:24:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
please apply following obvious patch:
--- gcc-4.6.0/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/pre/gnu-versioned-namespace.ver.orig
2011-12-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
--- Comment #5 from Nikolka tsoae at mail dot ru 2011-12-28 22:06:18 UTC ---
On it.
There is an active core issue about alignof:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3309.html#1305
Probably, you should take into account the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
22:25:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I haven't ran all tests on it yet, but CSiBE shows average code size reduction
of approx. -0.1% for -m4* with some code size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50988
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
22:30:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 26197
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26197
Proposed patch
Please check this patch on the spe compiler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-28
22:31:02 UTC ---
Yeah, just allow the types at issue, that was clarified in core/930 actually.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51340
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
22:31:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Uhm, yes...
The title should have been Enable -mfused-madd by -ffast-math
Do you mean something like this?
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50988
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50988
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51502
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42668
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51340
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-12-29 00:02:40 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
Uhm, yes...
The title should have been Enable -mfused-madd by -ffast-math
Do you mean something like this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51697
Bug #: 51697
Summary: SH Target: Inefficient DImode comparisons for -Os
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263
--- Comment #15 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-12-29 00:34:53 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #14)
With trunk rev 181517 I have observed the following problem, which happens
when
compiling for -m2*, -m3*, -m4* and -Os:
This is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698
Bug #: 51698
Summary: [trans-mem] TM runtime and application with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51699
Bug #: 51699
Summary: Clang refuses to compile ext/rope citing scope
resolution issues
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51565
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51569
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-29
06:02:53 UTC ---
-0.0 does not exist in Fortran except when using the IEEE module IIRC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51613
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-29 07:37:53 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
Yes, vector_sizes_32B_16B seems to be ok in that case.
Other two tests (vect-multitypes-1.c and no-section-anchors-vect-69.c) look
like
59 matches
Mail list logo
