http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-01-22 09:00:52
UTC ---
flag_trapping_math is supposed to be set to 0 by java_init_options_struct,
which is called after init_options_struct in toplev_main. But
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51933
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
09:42:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 26410
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26410
gcc47-pr51933.patch
Patch I wrote last night. Passed bootstrap/regtest, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
--- Comment #10 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org 2012-01-22
10:18:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Fixed.
Confirmed, using gcc-4.7-20120121. Thank you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51931
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-22 10:33:10 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Jan 22 10:33:07 2012
New Revision: 183389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183389
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51941
Bug #: 51941
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-3.C scan-assembler
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-01-22 12:12:07
UTC ---
Note that this ICE also happens in cc1plus when compiling libjava/interpret.cc,
so the java frontend bug isn't the real cause.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-01-22
12:29:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Note that this ICE also happens in cc1plus when compiling
libjava/interpret.cc,
so the java frontend bug isn't the real cause.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-01-22 12:45:56
UTC ---
In 4.7. Ada is also affected.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51941
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |*-apple-darwin*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51924
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
14:35:44 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Jan 22 14:35:39 2012
New Revision: 183390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183390
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51924
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51942
Bug #: 51942
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c scan-tree-dump-times ...
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51943
Bug #: 51943
Summary: the compile declares an internal error when compiling
a fortran 2003 source file
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobi at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51943
--- Comment #1 from Dominique Pelletier dominique.pelletier at polymtl dot ca
2012-01-22 16:39:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 26411
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26411
bug occurs when compiling file interable_model.module.f03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40060
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-22 16:42:36 UTC ---
Still failing on trunk r183385!-(see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-01/msg02085.html ).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45682
--- Comment #7 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2012-01-22 16:48:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
There are still other few GDB testsuite regressions by -fdebug-types-section,
I will re-check them with this fix in,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51944
Bug #: 51944
Summary: file compiles properly on IBM xlf compiler and cary
compiler
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32347
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-22 16:51:12 UTC ---
Is the test still failing? It does not appear in the
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu logs (both -m32 and -m64) at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
Bug #: 51946
Summary: file compiles properly on IBM xlf compiler and cary
compiler
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51945
Bug #: 51945
Summary: Diagnose wrong default initialization of DTs in a DT
declaration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51931
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51947
Bug #: 51947
Summary: [OOP]Polymorphic coarrays: Bogus errors for dummy
arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
17:12:12 UTC ---
The test case is incomplete:
use air_module ,only : air ! puppet for 1st Lorenz eq. and corresonding
1
Fatal Error: Can't open module file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
17:12:39 UTC ---
*** Bug 51944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51944
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51943
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51948
Bug #: 51948
Summary: [OOP] Rejects valid: Polymorphic arguments in
MOVE_ALLOC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
17:45:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Created attachment 26412
taken from Damian Rouson's book , allocate seems to be the culprit
Source if from Damian Rouson from
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com
Created attachment 26413
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26413
C source code
I just tried to compile the package schismtracker-20110101-1
on latest trunk dated 20120122 on an AMD x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51943
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-01-22 18:16:38 UTC ---
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #4
-type = void (S::*)(S * const)
-(gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test type of F in k2_m
+type = void (S::*)(S *, S * const)
+(gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test type of F in k2_m
UNSUPPORTED: gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120122 (prerelease) - no DWARF-4
PASS: gcc (GCC) 4.5.4 20120122 (prerelease)
FAIL: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51933
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26410|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #6 from Dominique Pelletier dominique.pelletier at polymtl dot ca
2012-01-22 19:22:29 UTC ---
enclosed is a .zip archive of the source files
I compile as follows
gfortran-c global_parameters_module.f03
gfortran-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #7 from Dominique Pelletier dominique.pelletier at polymtl dot ca
2012-01-22 19:36:44 UTC ---
here is the full code
i compileeach file separately with
gfortran -c
in the following order
problems_parameter_module.f03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29543
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22 19:54:11 UTC ---
Reduced testcase
module integrable_model_module
implicit none
type, abstract, public :: integrable_model
contains
procedure(default_constructor),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51951
Bug #: 51951
Summary: Template function dependent name resolution fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51952
Bug #: 51952
Summary: Wish: -Wextra should warn on result of integer
division being assigned to a float
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51951
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51951
--- Comment #2 from Vasily Sukhanov basil at list dot ru 2012-01-22 20:39:41
UTC ---
Compilation of attached code fails despite it is accepted by previous GCC
versions.
1 template class T
2 class Option {
3 public:
4 bool m_bValid;
5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51951
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
20:55:33 UTC ---
bool has no namespace associated with it as it is a foundational type. There
is a DR against the C++ standard about this issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832
--- Comment #20 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
20:56:37 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Jan 22 20:56:34 2012
New Revision: 183396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183396
Log:
PR c++/51832
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51949
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51949
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression]|[4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-linux-gnu|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51940
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51946
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
22:00:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Reduced testcase
foo.f90:23:0: internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at
gcc version 4.7.0 20120119 (experimental)
OK,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Wolf nephatrine at gmail dot com 2012-01-22
22:10:17 UTC ---
If someone has any ideas about what the issue might be or can point me in the
right direction, I'll try to suss this out myself and post a patch if possible.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51897
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
22:24:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
This is the patch which I am testing:
I Have a slightly different one since we should do a few more things before the
mergephi and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51953
Bug #: 51953
Summary: [F2008] Allow multiple allocate-objects in ALLOCATE
with SOURCE=
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51951
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22
23:39:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Compilation of attached code fails despite it is accepted by previous GCC
versions.
That's not a bug, GCC has been fixed to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50339
Steven Fuerst svfuerst at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||svfuerst at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51951
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51954
Bug #: 51954
Summary: __int128_t negation can be optimized
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51940
--- Comment #2 from Gary Barnes garynot at comcast dot net 2012-01-23
00:23:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 26418
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26418
gcc -v output, gnat make command, copy of the .gpr file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50639
Nix nix at esperi dot org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nix at esperi dot org.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51955
Bug #: 51955
Summary: _mm_setzero_si128 intri causes segfault without -O
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com 2012-01-23
01:48:59 UTC ---
Has this bug been resolved?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51955
--- Comment #1 from Dale Weiler graphitem at gmail dot com 2012-01-23
01:53:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 26420
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26420
Test case
This is a working test case which will cause the segmentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51955
--- Comment #2 from Dale Weiler graphitem at gmail dot com 2012-01-23
01:57:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 26421
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26421
objdump -d (dissasembly)
This is a dissasembly of the generated assembly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51955
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51954
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51925
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51956
Bug #: 51956
Summary: [patch] improve shared_ptr and weak_ptr
pretty-printers for gdb
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51955
--- Comment #4 from Dale Weiler graphitem at gmail dot com 2012-01-23
03:59:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This is a bug in how your _start does not realign the stack to 16 byte
aligned.
movdqa%xmm0, -32(%rbp)
movdqa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51957
Bug #: 51957
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ppc64 .debug_loc toc reference
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51957
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.3
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51882
--- Comment #2 from Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de
2012-01-23 07:24:14 UTC ---
Configured with :
--target=arm-linux-gnueabi --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=neon
--with-float=softfp -
Command line options. :
./xgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51957
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-23
07:25:19 UTC ---
Compile with -m64 -g -O2 -fprofile-generate (*.gcda file missing), look for
DW_OP_deref in .debug_loc section.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51958
Bug #: 51958
Summary: [4.7 Regression] -ffrontend-optimize generates wrong
code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51958
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
82 matches
Mail list logo