http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
Bug #: 52037
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at
tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-01-29
10:38:59 UTC ---
This one is evidently due to the reference-counted nature of our string class,
and is also very, very old. It will go away automagically when we'll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
gee jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26338|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
Bug #: 52038
Summary: [4.7 regression] fortran bootstrap failure: no
previous prototype for 'symbol_as'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 11:14:19 UTC ---
-flto-partition=none is fine and every optimization level !=-O3, too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 11:32:59 UTC ---
I've uploaded the slim-lto files here:
http://trippelsdorf.de/testcase.tar.bz2
To reproduce just run:
% g++ @testcase -flto=4 -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
11:56:23 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jan 29 11:56:18 2012
New Revision: 183675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183675
Log:
2012-01-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
11:59:59 UTC ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.7). Thanks for the report!
(In reply to comment #1)
Added (accidentally) with Rev. 183620 of 2012-01-27
(That's for PR 52016.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-29 12:09:57 UTC ---
Using 'symbol_as' without prototypes, as in comment #28, breaks bootstrap when
configured with '--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx' (see pr52038).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #33 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
12:17:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Using 'symbol_as' without prototypes, as in comment #28, breaks bootstrap when
configured with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
Philipp s...@s-e-f-i.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-29 12:20:56 UTC ---
As written in comment 27, if it is only used in resolve.c, not a prototype but
static should be used.
AFAICT it could also be used in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 13:17:12 UTC ---
-O2 -finline-functions -fipa-cp-clone -flto=4
or
-O1 -findirect-inlining -fipa-cp -finline-small-functions -finline-functions
-fipa-cp-clone -flto=4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 13:56:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 26500
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26500
lto testcase
% /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lto1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46321
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
14:06:41 UTC ---
Remember also to update the component handling, cf. PR 51972 comment 3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039
Bug #: 52039
Summary: gcc/gimplify.o differs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52040
Bug #: 52040
Summary: TR1 is not accessible using compiler flags alone
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
-apple-darwin10.8.0
Configured with: ../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java,ada,lto --with-gmp=/opt/mp
--with-system-zlib --with-cloog=/opt/mp --enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20120129 (experimental
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29
14:36:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 26501
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26501
Assembler for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 2
Assembler generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29
14:42:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 26502
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26502
bzipped assembler for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 3
Assembler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29
14:44:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 26503
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26503
bzipped preprocessed file for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
14:51:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 26504
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26504
This fixes the ice-on-valid of comment #0
This patch (extracted from PR50981
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
14:53:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 26505
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26505
This fixes the class_41 failure with the previous patch
This fixes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-29
15:30:12 UTC ---
Here is a single stepping through 30_threads/try_lock/3.cc at -m64...
(gdb) break main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x10cd0: file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 15:37:45
UTC ---
could you also let me know what the value of
HAVE_AS_TLS
is in gcc/auto-host.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-29
15:54:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
could you also let me know what the value of
HAVE_AS_TLS
is in gcc/auto-host.h
Both the darwin10 build (without this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kay benjamin at benkay dot net 2012-01-29
16:24:29 UTC ---
Oops! You're quite right, pi is automatic in my test case. However compilation
still fails if pi is given internal linkage by declaring it static, i.e.
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042
Bug #: 52042
Summary: libitm.c/clone-1.c and libitm.c/stackundo.c execution
tests are not pie compatible
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 17:19:38
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jan 29 17:19:32 2012
New Revision: 183677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183677
Log:
PR 51808 Support arbitrarily
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 17:27:24 UTC ---
On 23-Jan-12, at 10:39 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
do the printers ever work, outside the testsuite?
No.
Need to study the gdb build for this target. It looks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-01-29 17:28:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
However compilation still fails if pi is given internal linkage by declaring
it static, i.e.
int main()
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51947
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 17:41:54
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jan 29 17:41:49 2012
New Revision: 183678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183678
Log:
PR 51808 Fix ChangeLog entry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52043
Bug #: 52043
Summary: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV in tsubst_copy
(pt.c:12081) with -Wreturn-type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52044
Bug #: 52044
Summary: [OOP] Invalid memory access with ALLOCATE, default
initializer and polymorphic array components
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52040
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
--- Comment #9 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2012-01-29 18:30:43 UTC ---
Thanks :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52045
Bug #: 52045
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at
passes.c:1748 with -O3 -ftracer -fno-tree-ccp
-fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce and stpcpy_chk()
Classification:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
18:49:10 UTC ---
When fixed, correctness check should be added to test3() of the test case
submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00252.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52044
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52046
Bug #: 52046
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid
operands in ternary operation with -O -fexceptions
-fnon-call-exceptions -ftree-vectorize
Classification:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 19:01:14
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jan 29 19:01:09 2012
New Revision: 183679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183679
Log:
PR 51808 Constify binding_label.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52047
Bug #: 52047
Summary: [trans-mem] ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark
(trans-mem.c:2270) with -O -fgnu-tm
-fprefetch-loop-arrays
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 19:41:40 UTC ---
Actually, I've used a slightly different testcase (a random shuffle of the
contents of the @testcase input file) for the bisection and unfortunately
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51972
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
20:02:25 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jan 29 20:02:19 2012
New Revision: 183680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183680
Log:
2012-01-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51972
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
20:51:22 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jan 29 20:51:19 2012
New Revision: 183682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183682
Log:
2012-01-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
20:54:38 UTC ---
Status: Comment 1 is fixed by the just committed patch of comment 8.
TODO: The test case of comment 0: Once as is, once with CLASS IS instead of
TYPE IS -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51920
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048
Bug #: 52048
Summary: [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2
-fcompare-debug -fnon-call-exceptions
-fno-tree-dominator-opts
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-29 21:41:58 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Jan 29 21:41:54 2012
New Revision: 183684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183684
Log:
/cp
2012-01-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-29 21:43:00 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Jan 29 21:42:56 2012
New Revision: 183685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183685
Log:
/cp
2012-01-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--with-system-zlib
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20120129 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52040
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
22:22:07 UTC ---
We discussed this years ago, GCC's interpretation is valid, WONTFIX.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
22:25:02 UTC ---
At least we should change has not external linkage to proper English, that's
annoyed me for some time ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
22:36:34 UTC ---
That gdb session in comment 18 makes no sense, owns_lock can't call trylock.
Your sources don't match your lib.
I thought this was a problem with WARNING:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8026
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2012-01-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050
Bug #: 52050
Summary: -Wdeclaration-after-statement does not warn on
declaration in for loop initialiser
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8026
--- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
22:50:28 UTC ---
The GCC 4.1.1 install comes from a depot that contains GNU_C_C++_64.
Unfortunately I can't see if this is a stock FSF build or something changed by
the HP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16150
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
23:09:08 UTC ---
Does not FAIL in Results for 4.6.3 20120129 (prerelease) [gcc-4_6-branch
revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38384
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44581
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46057
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52046
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51920
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 23:23:56 UTC ---
On 29-Jan-12, at 6:05 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050
--- Comment #2 from Mans Rullgard mans at mansr dot com 2012-01-29 23:34:12
UTC ---
I tested and found it failing with 3.4.6, 4.1.2, 4.2.4, 4.3.6, 4.4.6, 4.5.3,
and 4.6.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46057
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 23:43:48 UTC ---
On 29-Jan-12, at 6:16 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
So, fixed? Or suspended?
Not fixed. The stack alignment would need adjustment in main.
The HP-UX runtime
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51875
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
23:56:44 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Jan 29 23:56:38 2012
New Revision: 183688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183688
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52045
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910
--- Comment #17 from Sandra Loosemore sandra at codesourcery dot com
2012-01-30 00:12:53 UTC ---
Cleaned up version of patch, with Jason's test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01591.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52049
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
00:15:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
I'm not sure whether this is actually a problem of the SH back-end or of some
middle-end passes. It happens for all sub-targets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050
--- Comment #4 from Mans Rullgard mans at mansr dot com 2012-01-30 00:45:05
UTC ---
I'm not here to argue semantics. I use -Wdeclaration-after-statement to avoid
accidentally introducing code that will fail with compilers that do not support
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051
Bug #: 52051
Summary: [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O
flag
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051
--- Comment #1 from gee jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-01-30 04:17:43 UTC ---
in dump.zip,
filename with prefix 0 : without -O flag
with prefix 1 : with -O flag.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901
--- Comment #3 from gee jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-01-30 07:14:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 26512
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512
proposed patch for handling thiscall r3
FAIL: TestClosureGC output
FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901
--- Comment #4 from gee jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-01-30 07:15:28 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 26512
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512
proposed patch for handling thiscall r3
invalid attachment. please ignore it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
gee jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26499|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 07:29:28
UTC ---
Hmm, not sure if you already noticed it, but ffi_call supports by recent patch
thiscall/fastcall convention.
So parts of you patch won't apply mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
07:52:12 UTC ---
Probably tail-merge bug, looking into it.
100 matches
Mail list logo