http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
08:03:43 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181105
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52158
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Bug #: 52167
Summary: self-assignment should at least produce
use-of-uninitialized warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
08:37:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26607
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26607
gcc47-pr52150.patch
Untested fix. I took the liberty to also overwrite the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52166
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
09:01:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Workaround is to #include foo.h instead of cfoo, but it's annoying given
that the former is supposedly The Right Way for C++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
Bug #: 52168
Summary: fixinclude test failure for complex.h on netbsd
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52035
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
09:52:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 8 09:52:11 2012
New Revision: 184000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184000
Log:
PR c++/52035
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
09:52:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 8 09:52:19 2012
New Revision: 184001
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184001
Log:
PR c++/51675
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
10:19:50 UTC ---
Weird original formatting in complex.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52166
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
10:27:32 UTC ---
Perhaps waste of space, but we have been including them there in the past, so
removing them would be an ABI change. They could be made into @ as opposed to
@@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
Bug #: 52169
Summary: the ifstream readsome() method does not signal any bit
on eof.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-02-08 10:31:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 26607 [details]
gcc47-pr52150.patch
Untested fix. I took the liberty to also overwrite the last _
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52159
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
10:38:31 UTC ---
It seems that for some weird reason you got two sections for the function
fprintf. Which means that there were two functions fprintf that have not
been
messages.
gfortran -v:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/bardeau/Softs/gcc-4.7.0-20120208/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
Tomalak Geret'kal tom at kera dot name changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at kera dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52157
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
--- Comment #2 from Tomalak Geret'kal tom at kera dot name 2012-02-08
10:45:17 UTC ---
Are you sure it's not just that in_avail is 0? Why should it be -1 here?
i.e. doesn't readsome become a noop when there's nothing to read?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
--- Comment #3 from Lluís Batlle i Rossell viriketo at gmail dot com
2012-02-08 10:53:20 UTC ---
It looks also related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8258 . The
post from Tomalak and that made all clear.
Sorry for the noise!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52166
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
10:58:16 UTC ---
N.B. if we enabled cstdint in C++03 mode users would (rightly) complain that
it makes it harder to write portable programs, and it would be a problem for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Bug #: 52170
Summary: ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:57 during
simplify_plus_minus
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
11:32:12 UTC ---
#3 0x00adba40 in neg_const_int (mode=V16QImode, i=0x7765c460) at
/work/local-checkouts/gcc-fsf/gcc/simplify-rtx.c:70
#4 0x00ae96bf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
11:46:35 UTC ---
There are some missed optimizations in simplify-rtx.c, obvious if you look
at uses of const*_rtx.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
12:29:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 8 12:29:43 2012
New Revision: 184005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184005
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Bug #: 52171
Summary: memcmp/strcmp/strncmp can be optimized when the result
is tested for [in]equality with 0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
13:27:37 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:27:31 2012
New Revision: 184006
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184006
Log:
PR gcov-profile/52150
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
13:29:28 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:29:22 2012
New Revision: 184007
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184007
Log:
2012-02-08 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Bug #: 52172
Summary: [4.7 FreeBSD ia64 regression] stage 3 Bootstrap
comparison failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
--- Comment #6 from Clément David c.david86 at gmail dot com 2012-02-08
13:49:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 26611
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26611
Test case
I'm able to reproduce with gcc 4.6.2 with a simple test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
14:16:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 26612
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26612
alternative patch
Alternative patch I am testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2012-02-08
14:35:50 UTC ---
Just make configure using FreeBSD ports infrastructure, same as always.
Or do you want to see config.log?
If yes, please let me know which one, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
14:37:24 UTC ---
For comparison against constants it might be worthwhile to still allow two
loads to improve the number of alignment cases we can handle. Well, I'm not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-02-08
14:42:48 UTC ---
Trying to update from gcc-4.7.0.20120107 to 4.7.0.20120128
You should try a revision post 183751 that fixed
PR bootstrap/52041
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
15:28:06 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 15:28:01 2012
New Revision: 184010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184010
Log:
2012-03-08 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
15:32:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26613
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26613
gcc47-pr52165.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2012-02-08 15:34:32 UTC ---
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, amodra at gmail dot com wrote:
Correct. In fact, I think it's a waste of space to put the soft-float
functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Grosser grosser at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
15:38:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 26614
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26614
A possible fix
Here a possible fix. The commit message is:
Removing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Bug #: 52173
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly
caused by itm
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
15:52:18 UTC ---
Yeah, that might be a good idea. As it would be just an optimization compared
to the present state, we might in the first step do it just for the ppc targets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #1 from Jack Lloyd lloyd at randombit dot net 2012-02-08 15:52:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 26615
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26615
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Jack Lloyd lloyd at randombit dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26615|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
16:02:18 UTC ---
Sure, I will check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-02-08 16:15:20 UTC ---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:38:42AM +, bardeau at iram dot fr wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #12 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2012-02-08
16:22:47 UTC ---
Ok, I did not realize that this patch was just a fix candidate.
This bug is not a problem to me, so there is no hurry.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52140
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
Bug #: 52174
Summary: Implicit conversion of nullptr to bool
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
16:55:26 UTC ---
but N.B. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1423
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-02-08
17:02:16 UTC ---
I saw a similar ICE for the polyhedron test air.f90. The patch in comment #7
fixes the ICE. However it produces a wrong code for -O2 and above, unless
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-08 18:10:31 UTC ---
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
10:44:51 UTC ---
Please fill out known-to-work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52175
Bug #: 52175
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start after
invalid dbr_schedule transformation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52175
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
19:24:42 UTC ---
it's not some snapshot, as it looks these were exported consistently since
4.1.1 releases. Do you say that these symbols are not exported for e.g. Fedora
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
19:26:56 UTC ---
Yes, they are not exported in Fedora/RHEL packages.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
19:40:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 8 19:40:23 2012
New Revision: 184016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184016
Log:
2012-02-08 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
19:53:59 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Feb 8 19:53:56 2012
New Revision: 184017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184017
Log:
2012-02-08 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27403
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
20:16:38 UTC ---
t4.cc:4:17: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template parameter list
for ‘templateint anonymous struct A’
t4.cc:4:17: error: expected a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||27403
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43181
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52176
Bug #: 52176
Summary: Valgrind complains about some realloc on assignment to
unallocated LHS
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
20:47:39 UTC ---
Related to PR 19105 and PR 46309
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21643
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||46309
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177
Bug #: 52177
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-trivial conversion at
assignment with __atomic_is_lock_free()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22568
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
20:59:51 UTC ---
I have a patch to tree-ssa-phiopt.c to fix comment #1 though it needs another
patch to expr.c to produce the cmov directly from COND_EXPR. I hope to post
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-02-08 21:15:50 UTC ---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:02:06PM +, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
21:29:52 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 8 21:29:45 2012
New Revision: 184020
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184020
Log:
2012-02-08 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo