[Bug libstdc++/52195] cstdio doesn't put stdio, stderr and stdin in the std namespace

2012-02-10 Thread nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52195 --- Comment #3 from nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 08:21:40 UTC --- Oh, because simply doing: namespace std { using ::stdout; using ::stderr; using ::stdin; } seemed to work fine for me on both linux and windows so I

[Bug fortran/52196] New: Add -Wrealloc-lhs

2012-02-10 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52196 Bug #: 52196 Summary: Add -Wrealloc-lhs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/52177] ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-trivial conversion at assignment with __atomic_is_lock_free()

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 10:14:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Created attachment 26636 [details] A patch This should be implemented in constant_address_p.

[Bug tree-optimization/52188] [4.7 regression] IPA-CP change broke libstdc++ symbol versioning on Solaris

2012-02-10 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 10:24:36 UTC --- caused libstdc++.so symbol versioning to be broken on Solaris. Before the patch, when compiling locale-const.cc only

[Bug middle-end/51929] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-cp-clone

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 10:33:33 UTC --- This is related to same body aliases. The verification fails because IPA-CP decides to cgraph_redirect_edge_callee a call_stmt that calls a same_body_alias of

[Bug translation/52193] Bad translatable string: failed to reclaim unneeded functionin same comdat group

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52193 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 11:10:12 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 10 11:10:04 2012 New Revision: 184086 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184086 Log: 2012-02-10 Richard

[Bug translation/52193] Bad translatable string: failed to reclaim unneeded functionin same comdat group

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52193 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/52191] abi_check should flag additions to released versions

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52191 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/52190] question about atomic intrinsics -- test and documentation vary -- please clarify

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52190 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/52189] [4.7 regression] Relaxed gthreads check breaks Solaris 8/9 symbol versioning

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52189 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI

[Bug tree-optimization/52188] [4.7 regression] IPA-CP change broke libstdc++ symbol versioning on Solaris

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 11:23:49 UTC --- Then simply don't export it? It's a template instantiation after all.

[Bug libstdc++/52189] [4.7 regression] Relaxed gthreads check breaks Solaris 8/9 symbol versioning

2012-02-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52189 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 11:25:35 UTC --- This change: --- baseline_symbols.txt2012-01-23 19:01:03.590486000 +0100 +++ baseline_symbols.txt.s8g2012-01-23 19:03:38.063402000 +0100 @@

[Bug middle-end/51929] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-cp-clone

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 11:27:39 UTC --- What happens is that cgraph_materialize_clone on the _ZN1BIcEC2E1Ai.constprop.1 clone performs: 2451 if (!node-clone_of-analyzed !node-clone_of-clones) 2452

[Bug libstdc++/52189] [4.7 regression] Relaxed gthreads check breaks Solaris 8/9 symbol versioning

2012-02-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52189 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 11:29:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) * Default to --disable-threads on Solaris 8/9 to avoid breaking symbol versioning. That's my current preference, but certainly

[Bug libstdc++/52189] [4.7 regression] Relaxed gthreads check breaks Solaris 8/9 symbol versioning

2012-02-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52189 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 11:31:22 UTC --- i.e #undef _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS

[Bug tree-optimization/52188] [4.7 regression] IPA-CP change broke libstdc++ symbol versioning on Solaris

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/51929] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-cp-clone

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/48600] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE when using cold attribute

2012-02-10 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 12:21:24 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Feb 10 12:21:16 2012 New Revision: 184089 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184089 Log: PR middle-end/48600

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #8 from Steffen Schmidt steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com 2012-02-10 12:23:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Created attachment 26636 [details] A patch I've tried the patch, it applied cleanly, but unfortunately it had no effect

[Bug middle-end/48600] [4.7 Regression] ICE when using cold attribute

2012-02-10 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE|[4.7 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/52188] [4.7 regression] IPA-CP change broke libstdc++ symbol versioning on Solaris

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/51929] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-cp-clone

2012-02-10 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 12:31:24 UTC --- Yes, it looks OK to me. Thanks! Perhaps we will eventually need to give up on this sanity check as the transformations we do to callgraph gets more general...

[Bug middle-end/49536] latent bug with creation of vector of arrays

2012-02-10 Thread baldrick at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536 --- Comment #8 from Duncan Sands baldrick at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 12:34:21 UTC --- Author: baldrick Date: Fri Feb 10 12:34:17 2012 New Revision: 184090 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184090 Log: Backport the fix for PR

[Bug libitm/52197] New: library cannot be rebuilt by make all-target

2012-02-10 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52197 Bug #: 52197 Summary: library cannot be rebuilt by make all-target Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/52192] GCC_CHECK_TLS doesn't detect native TLS on Solaris 8/9

2012-02-10 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52192 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 13:59:12 UTC --- --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 20:01:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) needs to

[Bug bootstrap/52172] [4.7 Regression] stage 3 Bootstrap comparison failure on FreeBSD ia64

2012-02-10 Thread mexas at bristol dot ac.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172 --- Comment #5 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2012-02-10 14:35:12 UTC --- Same for gcc-4.7-20120204. Is this snapshot after r183751? gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc47/work/build' Comparing stages 2 and 3

[Bug bootstrap/52172] [4.7 Regression] stage 3 Bootstrap comparison failure on FreeBSD ia64

2012-02-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug tree-optimization/52198] New: SLP vectorization does not consider swapped operands consistently

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52198 Bug #: 52198 Summary: SLP vectorization does not consider swapped operands consistently Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/52186] array out of bounds error when accessing last byte of a struct via char ptr

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52186 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

2012-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 ---

[Bug bootstrap/52172] [4.7 Regression] stage 3 Bootstrap comparison failure on FreeBSD ia64

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 15:10:54 UTC --- So, can you from your build log paste the command to compile var-tracking.c with the stage2 gcc and rerun it in the gcc subdir with additional -fcompare-debug

[Bug preprocessor/33919] __BASE_FILE__ does not expand correctly when included from the command line

2012-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33919 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/52104] go1 fails to link on Solaris 8/9 x86 with native TLS

2012-02-10 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52104 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 15:22:41 UTC --- --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-06 21:37:09 UTC --- please let me know what issues

[Bug target/51753] Many gcc.dg/simultate-thread tests fail on Solaris 10+/x86

2012-02-10 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 15:28:17 UTC --- With this fixed, all but the FAIL: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-load-int128.c -O0 -g thread simulation test failures

[Bug middle-end/52177] ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-trivial conversion at assignment with __atomic_is_lock_free()

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 15:31:23 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 10 15:31:18 2012 New Revision: 184096 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184096 Log: PR middle-end/52177

[Bug middle-end/52177] ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-trivial conversion at assignment with __atomic_is_lock_free()

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug boehm-gc/48514] [4.6] boehm gc incorrectly compile using __declspec(dllexport) on i686-w64-mingw32 target

2012-02-10 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514 --- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 16:30:59 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Fri Feb 10 16:30:47 2012 New Revision: 184100 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184100 Log: PR boehm-gc/48514

[Bug boehm-gc/48514] [4.6] boehm gc incorrectly compile using __declspec(dllexport) on i686-w64-mingw32 target

2012-02-10 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514 --- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 16:32:44 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Fri Feb 10 16:32:36 2012 New Revision: 184101 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184101 Log: PR boehm-gc/48514

[Bug boehm-gc/48514] [4.6] boehm gc incorrectly compile using __declspec(dllexport) on i686-w64-mingw32 target

2012-02-10 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48514 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

2012-02-10 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 16:38:44 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Feb 10 16:38:37 2012 New Revision: 184102 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184102 Log: 2012-02-10 Bill

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

2012-02-10 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #38 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 17:01:39 UTC --- --- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 09:22:29 UTC --- Rainer, you should now be able to

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 17:05:47 UTC --- HJ, Steffen, can you please test following patch instead: --cut here-- Index: i386/i386.c ===

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 17:28:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) HJ, Steffen, can you please test following patch instead: --cut here-- Index: i386/i386.c

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 17:42:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) HJ, Steffen, can you please test following patch instead: val_signbit_known_set_p is a bit overkill, following patch works as well:

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 17:48:42 UTC --- What if the CONST_INT is from DImode expansion instead of SImode? val_signbit_known_set_p would handle that, INTVAL () 0 not.

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

2012-02-10 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 17:51:19 UTC --- I don't understand this sentence completely - if the types have been merged then the COMPONENT_REFs should have been updated, too (do they only have

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 18:01:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) What if the CONST_INT is from DImode expansion instead of SImode? val_signbit_known_set_p would handle that, INTVAL () 0 not. I

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

2012-02-10 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #39 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 18:10:19 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Fri Feb 10 18:10:12 2012 New Revision: 184108 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184108 Log: Use __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

2012-02-10 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/51798] [4.7 regression] libstdc++ atomicity performance regression due to __sync_fetch_and_add

2012-02-10 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798 --- Comment #30 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 18:20:50 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Fri Feb 10 18:20:43 2012 New Revision: 184110 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184110 Log: 2012-02-10 Benjamin Kosnik

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 18:23:16 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Feb 10 18:23:12 2012 New Revision: 184111 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184111 Log: Disallow negative

[Bug testsuite/50722] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr49994-3.c (test for excess errors)

2012-02-10 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722 Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at gcc dot

[Bug c/52190] question about atomic intrinsics -- test and documentation vary -- please clarify

2012-02-10 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52190 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com 2012-02-10 18:37:22 UTC --- Author: amacleod Date: Fri Feb 10 18:37:18 2012 New Revision: 184112 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184112 Log: 2012-02-10 Andrew

[Bug target/52199] New: V2DI vec_duplicate ICE on valid code

2012-02-10 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52199 Bug #: 52199 Summary: V2DI vec_duplicate ICE on valid code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/52199] V2DI vec_duplicate ICE on valid code

2012-02-10 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52199 Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux

[Bug target/52187] armeb-unknown-eabi not recognized as big-endian

2012-02-10 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52187 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

2012-02-10 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 --- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 19:19:56 UTC --- Hmm, I assume issue is related to using of -mms-bitfields for 4.7 for windows-targets. Does the following patch fix the issue? Index: exception.cc

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

2012-02-10 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/52117] allocated arrays give incorrect results when used with RESHAPE in gcc v4.6.2

2012-02-10 Thread sphirshman at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117 --- Comment #9 from steven hirshman sphirshman at yahoo dot com 2012-02-10 20:00:47 UTC --- Tobias We have a problem in v4.6.2 with the following (using the std=f95 flag):  There seems to have been a limitation in past versions of gfortran with

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #15 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 20:03:11 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Feb 10 20:03:08 2012 New Revision: 184113 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184113 Log: Add the testcase for

[Bug fortran/52117] allocated arrays give incorrect results when used with RESHAPE in gcc v4.6.2

2012-02-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug web/52200] New: Archives of some old versions of gcc are corrupted

2012-02-10 Thread maisqual.project at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52200 Bug #: 52200 Summary: Archives of some old versions of gcc are corrupted Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug web/52200] Archives of some old versions of gcc are corrupted

2012-02-10 Thread maisqual.project at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52200 --- Comment #1 from Boris Baldassari maisqual.project at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 21:18:59 UTC --- Well.. Actually I was NOT able to get them right with bzip2recover. The gcc-4.6.2.tar.bz2 is corrupted as well. (other not-mentioned releases were

[Bug middle-end/52201] New: FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-02-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201 Bug #: 52201 Summary: FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for excess errors) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/52202] New: [C++11][DR 1376] Should not extend lifetime of temporary wrapped in static_cast to reference type

2012-02-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52202 Bug #: 52202 Summary: [C++11][DR 1376] Should not extend lifetime of temporary wrapped in static_cast to reference type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug web/52200] Archives of some old versions of gcc are corrupted

2012-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52200 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug web/52200] Archives of some old versions of gcc are corrupted

2012-02-10 Thread maisqual.project at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52200 --- Comment #3 from Boris Baldassari maisqual.project at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 21:44:13 UTC --- Confirmed, has twice download problems. Third was right. Thank you!

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] New: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

2012-02-10 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 Bug #: 52203 Summary: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags Classification:

[Bug middle-end/52201] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-02-10 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201 Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at

[Bug middle-end/52201] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-02-10 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-02-10 22:41:42 UTC --- On 2/10/2012 5:26 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201 Andrew Macleodamacleod at redhat dot com changed:

[Bug other/52204] New: libiberty/at-file.texi has no copyright or license statement whatsoever

2012-02-10 Thread naesten at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52204 Bug #: 52204 Summary: libiberty/at-file.texi has no copyright or license statement whatsoever Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

2012-02-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/52201] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-02-10 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-02-10 22:44:17 UTC --- On 2/10/2012 5:41 PM, John David Anglin wrote: There is only only one atomic instruction (ldcw). Actually, loads and stores are also atomic and strongly ordered. But

[Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions

2012-02-10 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205 Bug #: 52205 Summary: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken

2012-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot

[Bug target/52205] SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions

2012-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken

2012-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 23:35:15 UTC --- Here is a C++ example (which comes from PR 52205 which I marked as a dup of this bug): #include signal.h #include stdio.h #include stdlib.h #include

[Bug target/52206] New: Strange %P in stack_tls_protect_set_mode and movabs patterns

2012-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52206 Bug #: 52206 Summary: Strange %P in stack_tls_protect_set_mode and movabs patterns Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/52207] New: License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up the licenses of many other documents.

2012-02-10 Thread naesten at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207 Bug #: 52207 Summary: License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up the licenses of many other documents. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug target/52206] Strange %P in stack_tls_protect_set_mode and movabs patterns

2012-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52206 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-02-10 23:41:50 UTC --- I think it is used to avoid '$ in operand.

[Bug target/52206] Strange %P in stack_tls_protect_set_mode and movabs patterns

2012-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52206 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/52207] License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up the licenses of many other documents.

2012-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal ---

[Bug go/51874] Many libgo testsuite failures on Solaris, IRIX

2012-02-10 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||52205 --- Comment

[Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken

2012-02-10 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921 --- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-02-11 00:10:13 UTC --- Note that the C++ example must be compiled -fnon-call-exceptions.

[Bug boehm-gc/52179] boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11

2012-02-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-02-11 01:10:48 UTC --- Interestingly, aslr randomizes the gdb crash log. For instance... # gdb ./gctest (gdb) break mark.c:361 Breakpoint 1 at 0x20c49ba5e20a81: file

[Bug target/52208] New: [4.7 Regression] Useless store

2012-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208 Bug #: 52208 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Useless store Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/52208] [4.7 Regression] Useless store

2012-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com

[Bug c/52209] New: wrong code at -O0

2012-02-10 Thread regehr at cs dot utah.edu
--with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto --prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r184082-install --program-prefix=r184082- --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20120210 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

2012-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/52208] [4.7 Regression] Useless store

2012-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/52209] wrong code at -O0

2012-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug middle-end/52209] [4.7 Regression] wrong code at -O0

2012-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.5, 4.6.0

[Bug middle-end/52209] [4.7 Regression] wrong code at -O0

2012-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc