[Bug middle-end/39976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Big sixtrack degradation on powerpc 32/64 after revision r146817

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976 --- Comment #44 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2012-02-24 08:09:25 UTC --- I'm not sure if this kind of bug has been completely fixed, and posted a qeustion in mail list at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-02/msg00415.html .

[Bug rtl-optimization/37516] ~(-2 - a) is not being optimized into a + 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-24 08:38:19 UTC --- On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug rtl-optimization/52060] [4.6 Regression] Invalid constant simplification in combine with parallel result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.6.3

[Bug tree-optimization/52361] gcc.dg/pr48141.c times out with checking enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 09:16:43 UTC --- Well, that's sort-of expected ...

[Bug middle-end/52355] [4.7 regression] address difference between array elements is not considered to be a compile time constant anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 09:47:33 UTC --- We fold end up trying to fold (long int) (*(a + 256))[0][0] - (long int) (*a)[0][0] because a is of type char[16][16] *. I have a patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/52361] gcc.dg/pr48141.c times out with checking enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 10:35:32 UTC --- Actually I have a simple patch that speeds things up a bit, but not significantly so.

[Bug tree-optimization/52361] gcc.dg/pr48141.c times out with checking enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-24 10:43:02 UTC --- --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 10:35:32 UTC --- Actually I have a simple patch

[Bug middle-end/52355] [4.7 regression] address difference between array elements is not considered to be a compile time constant anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 11:14:24 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 24 11:14:17 2012 New Revision: 184548 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184548 Log: 2012-02-24 Richard

[Bug fortran/52365] Procedure interface wrongly imported into interface without IMPORT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52365 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug c++/52369] New: Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369 Bug #: 52369 Summary: Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted default constructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug target/52367] Many incorrect thumb insn lengths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52367 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/52361] gcc.dg/pr48141.c times out with checking enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 11:38:43 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 24 11:38:39 2012 New Revision: 184549 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184549 Log: 2012-02-24 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/52361] gcc.dg/pr48141.c times out with checking enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/52355] [4.7 regression] address difference between array elements is not considered to be a compile time constant anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/46092] Improve constant handling of thumb2 instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46092 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/52361] gcc.dg/pr48141.c times out with checking enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 12:48:00 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 24 12:47:56 2012 New Revision: 184552 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184552 Log: 2012-02-24 Richard

[Bug c++/52371] New: [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371 Bug #: 52371 Summary: [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52371] [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371 --- Comment #1 from Ai Azuma ai.azuma at gmail dot com 2012-02-24 13:54:18 UTC --- Created attachment 26741 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26741 Output of -v option and preprocessed file

[Bug c++/52371] [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371 --- Comment #2 from Ai Azuma ai.azuma at gmail dot com 2012-02-24 14:01:41 UTC --- I'm sorry. I forgot to write that this ICE appears with -std=c++11 option.

[Bug c++/52369] Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52370] Spurious may be used uninitialized warning for check of optional argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52370 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic ---

[Bug c++/52369] Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 14:17:17 UTC --- With 4.6.2 and -Wall gives the same as 4.7.0: l.cc:4:13: warning: non-static const member 'const int B::v_' in class without a constructor [-Wuninitialized]

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #13 from pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 15:21:20 UTC --- Author: pmarlier Date: Fri Feb 24 15:21:12 2012 New Revision: 184555 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184555 Log: 2012-02-23 Patrick Marlier

[Bug boehm-gc/52179] boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179 --- Comment #27 from pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 15:21:20 UTC --- Author: pmarlier Date: Fri Feb 24 15:21:12 2012 New Revision: 184555 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184555 Log: 2012-02-23 Patrick Marlier

[Bug target/50580] gcc.target/mips/interrupt_handler-[23].c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50580 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 15:52:09 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Fri Feb 24 15:52:01 2012 New Revision: 184557 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184557 Log: [testsuite] Skip

[Bug target/50580] gcc.target/mips/interrupt_handler-[23].c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50580 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/52261] [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 16:26:46 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Feb 24 16:26:35 2012 New Revision: 184559 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184559 Log: PR target/52261 *

[Bug target/52372] New: gcc.target/mips/mips16-attributes{,-4}.c SEGV in dwf_regno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372 Bug #: 52372 Summary: gcc.target/mips/mips16-attributes{,-4}.c SEGV in dwf_regno Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52372] [4.7 regression] gcc.target/mips/mips16-attributes{,-4}.c SEGV in dwf_regno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/52373] New: template usage drops some checks on the accessibility of a member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52373 Bug #: 52373 Summary: template usage drops some checks on the accessibility of a member Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/37272] [4.5 Regression] IRA has caused ppc64-double-1.c to fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37272 --- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 16:42:37 UTC --- This looks to be fixed, probably by Mike's fp convert changes from a while back. I'm now seeing the following src code being generated: fctidz 1,1

[Bug c++/52374] New: [C++11] Fails to transform id-expression into dependent base member access in lambda expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52374 Bug #: 52374 Summary: [C++11] Fails to transform id-expression into dependent base member access in lambda expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/52373] template usage drops some checks on the accessibility of a member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52373 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/41437] No access control for classes in template functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sylvestre at

[Bug c++/52374] [C++11] Fails to transform id-expression into dependent base member access in lambda expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52374 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/16458] PowerPC - redundant compare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 ---

[Bug c++/52282] [C++0x] ICE / confused by earlier errors with decltype/constexpr

main(). GCC version: g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 20120224 (experimental)

[Bug target/52352] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF using registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-02-24 18:32:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) It is fixed on hjl/x32/addr32, hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch and hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch+mx32 branches. The problem is ;; Stores and

[Bug target/52352] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF using registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-02-24 19:14:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) But this is the _address_ that we are talking, see the MEM RTX. So, following (untested) patch can help - access is in PTR mode,

[Bug target/52364] The unnecessary second form in *movabsmode_[12]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52364 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/52352] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF using registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352 --- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-02-24 19:29:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) I checked a similar fix into hjl/x32/addr32, hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch and hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch+mx32 branches. I also added I code

[Bug middle-end/52375] New: [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 at -O3 -mfpu=neon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375 Bug #: 52375 Summary: [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 at -O3 -mfpu=neon Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug gcov-profile/52376] New: [4.7 regression] ICE in lto_input_tree_ref, at lto-streamer-in.c:266 while linking LTO-PGO libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52376 Bug #: 52376 Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in lto_input_tree_ref, at lto-streamer-in.c:266 while linking LTO-PGO libxul Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug gcov-profile/52376] [4.7 regression] ICE in lto_input_tree_ref, at lto-streamer-in.c:266 while linking LTO-PGO libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52376 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-02-24 19:42:43 UTC --- Created attachment 26745 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26745 nsXMLContentSink.o

[Bug middle-end/52201] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com 2012-02-24 19:47:18 UTC --- Created attachment 26746 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26746 disable tests if no atomic support present That test case really

[Bug middle-end/52375] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 at -O3 -mfpu=neon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug target/52352] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF using registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-02-24 20:03:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) I checked a similar fix into hjl/x32/addr32, hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch and hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch+mx32

[Bug libstdc++/50349] /usr/bin/ld: warning: wildcard match appears in both version 'GLIBCXX_3.4' and 'CXXABI_1.3' in script

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50349 Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/52375] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 at -O3 -mfpu=neon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375 Bernhard Rosenkränzer Bernhard.Rosenkranzer at linaro dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26744|0

[Bug middle-end/52375] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 at -O3 -mfpu=neon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375 Bernhard Rosenkränzer Bernhard.Rosenkranzer at linaro dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/52375] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 at -O3 -mfpu=neon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/52377] New: C++11 non-static initializers in unions are not used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52377 Bug #: 52377 Summary: C++11 non-static initializers in unions are not used Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 --- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-02-25 02:23:06 UTC --- Created attachment 26749 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26749 back port of thread_leak_test.c from ivmai-bdwgc-8b168d0 The random

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-02-25 02:27:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) Note that at r184560 with the back ported thread_leak_test.c changes applied, I am able to run the 64-bit thread_leak_test

[Bug target/52378] New: Can't build most recent svn version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52378 Bug #: 52378 Summary: Can't build most recent svn version Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/52378] Can't build most recent svn version, i.e., trunk 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52378 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last