[Bug fortran/47750] testsuite/gfortran.dg: dg-warning and dg-error should be distinguished

2012-03-02 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47750 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer aldot at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug testsuite/29882] gfortran testsuite doesn't recognize warnings and errors

2012-03-02 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29882 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer aldot at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2012-03-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 08:07:15 UTC --- Created attachment 26809 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26809 pr50182.C Even the reduced testcase is orders of magnitude longer than what

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2012-03-02 Thread oleg at smolsky dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #31 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-03-02 08:21:41 UTC --- I don't think there is a need to actually check the result in this benchmarkable fragment, so that will reduce the code a little. The only thing that I was hitting is about

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2012-03-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 08:28:34 UTC --- For me, 4.1 is equally fast to 4.6 on my CPU and on the reduced testcase I've attached (not clear if it models what the original benchmark did right or not),

[Bug c++/52460] New: Misleading error message with templated c++ code

2012-03-02 Thread petschy at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52460 Bug #: 52460 Summary: Misleading error message with templated c++ code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2012-03-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 09:13:52 UTC --- After Jason's patch (which needs to be kept, it was a wrong-code bugfix), we get out of the FE the addition in int type, while previously it was in unsigned

[Bug c++/52460] Misleading error message with templated c++ code

2012-03-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52460 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/52455] Symbolic constant treated as extern when -O not specified resulting in undefined symbol at link

2012-03-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52455 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 09:33:08 UTC --- This is a FAQ http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#undefined_reference_to_.60S::a.27

[Bug c++/52458] [c++0x] compiler fails on for(:*this) with non-public inheritance with message: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

2012-03-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/45397] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Issues with integer narrowing conversions

2012-03-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 09:36:52 UTC --- Another testcase (lightly based on PR50182), -O3 -mavx: signed char a[1024], b[1024]; void foo (void) { int i, s, t; for (i = 0; i 1024; i++) { s =

[Bug tree-optimization/45397] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Issues with integer narrowing conversions

2012-03-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 09:39:16 UTC --- Note that once can't use signed type in the narrowing + of course, it needs to be unsigned char addition to avoid overflows.

[Bug tree-optimization/45397] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Issues with integer narrowing conversions

2012-03-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 09:48:17 UTC --- Another testcase: signed char a[1024], b[1024]; void baz (void) { int i, s, t; for (i = 0; i 1024; i++) { s = a[i]; t = b[i]; s += t + 0x12345600;

[Bug tree-optimization/52459] PPRE performs stupid inserts

2012-03-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52459 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/52457] Wrong VSX code generation bug when compiled with -O1 -m32 -mcpu=power7

2012-03-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52457 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug target/49069] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

2012-03-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target

[Bug c++/52458] [c++0x] compiler fails on for(:*this) with non-public inheritance with message: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

2012-03-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/52452] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] INTRINSIC cannot be applied to gfortran's ETIME

2012-03-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 11:00:17 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Mar 2 11:00:04 2012 New Revision: 184778 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184778 Log: 2012-03-02 Tobias Burnus

[Bug c/52411] BUG gcc 4.6.2 Illegal Instruction (core dumped) asterisk

2012-03-02 Thread evrinoma at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52411 --- Comment #11 from evrinoma at gmail dot com 2012-03-02 11:13:22 UTC --- many thanks for help the asterisk makefile detecting and using incorrect compilation flags ifeq ($(OSARCH),linux-gnu) ifeq ($(PROC),x86_64) # You must have GCC 3.4

[Bug c/52411] BUG gcc 4.6.2 Illegal Instruction (core dumped) asterisk

2012-03-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52411 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/48820] TR 29113: Implement parts needed for MPI 3

2012-03-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/52461] New: [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash

2012-03-02 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461 Bug #: 52461 Summary: [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52461] [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash

2012-03-02 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/52461] [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash

2012-03-02 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fbi.sr at gmx

[Bug c++/52458] [c++0x] compiler fails on for(:*this) with non-public inheritance with message: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

2012-03-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 12:39:03 UTC --- It works ok if you do the conversion to the base class explicitly: for (int x: static_caststd::vectorint(*this)) { } I think the range-for code needs

[Bug fortran/52270] [OOP] Polymorphic vars: wrong intent(in) check, passing nonptr variable to intent(in) ptr dummy

2012-03-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52270 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 13:07:55 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Mar 2 13:07:46 2012 New Revision: 184784 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184784 Log: 2012-03-02 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/52325] unclear error: Unclassifiable statement

2012-03-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 13:21:00 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Mar 2 13:20:52 2012 New Revision: 184785 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184785 Log: 2012-03-02 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/52270] [OOP] Polymorphic vars: wrong intent(in) check, passing nonptr variable to intent(in) ptr dummy

2012-03-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52270 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/52325] unclear error: Unclassifiable statement

2012-03-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/52325] unclear error: Unclassifiable statement

2012-03-02 Thread kloedej at knmi dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325 --- Comment #7 from Jos de Kloe kloedej at knmi dot nl 2012-03-02 13:50:59 UTC --- Thanks for your (really) fast response and fix. I'll keep my eye open for other details that might improve gfortran.

[Bug go/52462] New: Several libgo tests FAIL intermittently: ../testdata races

2012-03-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52462 Bug #: 52462 Summary: Several libgo tests FAIL intermittently: ../testdata races Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52425] [4.6 Regression] ICE when compiling file from audacious on debian sparc

2012-03-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 14:22:54 UTC --- For some reason I can never reproduce sparc bugs with cross compilers. The original testcase doesn't fail here; the reduced one fails but with a different

[Bug target/46716] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code generated with -mno-sse2 -m64

2012-03-02 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46716 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7

[Bug c++/52458] [c++0x] compiler fails on for(:*this) with non-public inheritance with message: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

2012-03-02 Thread crimaniak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458 --- Comment #5 from Alexey Kulentsov crimaniak at gmail dot com 2012-03-02 14:49:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) It works ok if you do the conversion to the base class explicitly: Yes, I just make public inheritance so this problem is

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

2012-03-02 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 14:52:09 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Mar 2 14:51:58 2012 New Revision: 184787 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184787 Log: 2012-03-02 Bill

[Bug tree-optimization/50969] 17% degradation in 168.wupwise for interleave via permutation

2012-03-02 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969 --- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 14:52:09 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Mar 2 14:51:58 2012 New Revision: 184787 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184787 Log: 2012-03-02 Bill

[Bug tree-optimization/52406] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-03-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52406 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 14:59:01 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 2 14:58:55 2012 New Revision: 184789 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184789 Log: 2012-03-02 Richard

[Bug fortran/52325] unclear error: Unclassifiable statement

2012-03-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52325 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 14:59:05 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Mar 2 14:58:58 2012 New Revision: 184790 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184790 Log: 2012-03-02 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/52452] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] INTRINSIC cannot be applied to gfortran's ETIME

2012-03-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 15:03:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) New Revision: 184778 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c As it is far from being obvious what trunk means: At that point

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

2012-03-02 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/52406] [4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-03-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52406 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug testsuite/16464] gfortran.dg test harness does not use loop

2012-03-02 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16464 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer aldot at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/52457] Wrong VSX code generation bug when compiled with -O1 -m32 -mcpu=power7

2012-03-02 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52457 Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

2012-03-02 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 --- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 16:18:34 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Mar 2 16:18:25 2012 New Revision: 184796 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184796 Log: /cp 2012-03-02

[Bug target/52425] [4.6 Regression] ICE when compiling file from audacious on debian sparc

2012-03-02 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-03-02 16:21:37 UTC --- Reproduced with a vanilla gcc-4.6-20120224, configured /tmp/gcc-4.6-20120224/configure --target=sparc64-unknown-linux

[Bug testsuite/45988] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr38968.f90 times out on 32-bit Solaris 10/x86

2012-03-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45988 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last

[Bug testsuite/45988] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr38968.f90 times out on 32-bit Solaris 10/x86

2012-03-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45988 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 16:25:59 UTC --- Created attachment 26811 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26811 profile on arenal

[Bug testsuite/45988] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr38968.f90 times out on 32-bit Solaris 10/x86

2012-03-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45988 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 16:25:21 UTC --- Created attachment 26810 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26810 profile on zingana

[Bug target/45988] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr38968.f90 times out on 32-bit Solaris 10/x86

2012-03-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45988 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|testsuite |target --- Comment #7

[Bug libstdc++/52456] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

2012-03-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52456 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at

[Bug libstdc++/52456] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

2012-03-02 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52456 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-02 16:56:23 UTC --- --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-02 16:47:44 UTC --- And the undesignated symbols

[Bug libstdc++/52456] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

2012-03-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52456 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/52456] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

2012-03-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52456 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-02 17:00:17 UTC --- Indeed (sorry) the troublesome (ie, leading to FAIL) symbols seem the added ones, on x86_64-linux too we have two undesignated and no FAIL.

[Bug target/46716] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code generated with -mno-sse2 -m64

2012-03-02 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46716 --- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 17:03:44 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Fri Mar 2 17:03:36 2012 New Revision: 184802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184802 Log: PR target/46716 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug libstdc++/52456] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

2012-03-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52456 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-02 17:03:22 UTC --- (by the way, while we are at it, on x86_64-linux I also currently have 1 added, no FAIL, when building --enable-libstdcxx-time=rt, I suppose it's fine)

[Bug c++/52458] [c++0x] compiler fails on for(:*this) with non-public inheritance with message: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

2012-03-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 17:06:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) but this was a bug so I post it. It's pity MinGW updated only to 4.6.2. The newest GCC release, 4.6.3, was only released yesterday!

[Bug middle-end/52463] New: libitm.c/memcpy-1.c FAILs

2012-03-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463 Bug #: 52463 Summary: libitm.c/memcpy-1.c FAILs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug regression/52383] [4.6 Regression] miscompiles Perl on m68k

2012-03-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52383 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

2012-03-02 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 18:21:47 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Mar 2 18:21:41 2012 New Revision: 184809 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184809 Log: 2012-03-02 Jack

[Bug boehm-gc/52179] boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11

2012-03-02 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179 --- Comment #29 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 18:21:46 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Mar 2 18:21:41 2012 New Revision: 184809 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184809 Log: 2012-03-02 Jack

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

2012-03-02 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 18:30:44 UTC --- libjava is back to being pie in 4.6.4 and 4.7.0.

[Bug boehm-gc/52179] boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11

2012-03-02 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179 m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot

[Bug c++/52464] New: When I compile my source codes with -O3 option, the compiler fails. This does not occur if I use -O2

2012-03-02 Thread bli at cs dot wisc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52464 Bug #: 52464 Summary: When I compile my source codes with -O3 option, the compiler fails. This does not occur if I use -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/52464] When I compile my source codes with -O3 option, the compiler fails. This does not occur if I use -O2

2012-03-02 Thread bli at cs dot wisc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52464 --- Comment #1 from bli at cs dot wisc.edu 2012-03-02 19:01:32 UTC --- Please find the source code from the URL listed, or : http://deweylab.biostat.wisc.edu/rsem/rsem-1.1.17.bug.tar.gz Do the following to trigger the bug: tar -xzf

[Bug rtl-optimization/29589] incorrect conversion of (ior (ashiftrt (plus ...))) in combine.c

2012-03-02 Thread bernhard.kaindl at thalesgroup dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29589 Bernhard Kaindl bernhard.kaindl at thalesgroup dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/27321] Compare against constant infinity fails with IBM long double format

2012-03-02 Thread bernhard.kaindl at thalesgroup dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27321 Bernhard Kaindl bernhard.kaindl at thalesgroup dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/50335] ICE in psct_dynamic_dim, at graphite-poly.h:659

2012-03-02 Thread mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335 Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/31640] cache block alignment is too aggressive on sh-elf

2012-03-02 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31640 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 20:56:50 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Fri Mar 2 20:56:46 2012 New Revision: 184825 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184825 Log: PR target/31640 *

[Bug bootstrap/49486] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

2012-03-02 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49486 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 21:21:17 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Fri Mar 2 21:21:13 2012 New Revision: 184829 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184829 Log: PR target/49486 *

[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch

2012-03-02 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26191|0 |1 is

[Bug fortran/47030] !GCC$ Attributes do not work for COMMON variables in procedures and BLOCK DATA

2012-03-02 Thread eh.toussaint at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47030 Erik Toussaint eh.toussaint at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/52457] Wrong VSX code generation bug when compiled with -O1 -m32 -mcpu=power7

2012-03-02 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52457 Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/48596] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] unable to find a register to spill in class 'FPUL_REGS'

2012-03-02 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48596 --- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 23:59:16 UTC --- Author: kkojima Date: Fri Mar 2 23:59:08 2012 New Revision: 184844 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184844 Log: PR target/48596

[Bug target/48806] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

2012-03-02 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48806 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02 23:59:17 UTC --- Author: kkojima Date: Fri Mar 2 23:59:08 2012 New Revision: 184844 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184844 Log: PR target/48596

[Bug libstdc++/52456] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

2012-03-02 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52456 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-03 00:05:34 UTC --- On 2-Mar-12, at 11:47 AM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: And the undesignated symbols are...? Is the issue recent? Attached is the symbol diff. The

[Bug c++/52464] When I compile my source codes with -O3 option, the compiler fails. This does not occur if I use -O2

2012-03-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52464 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/52464] When I compile my source codes with -O3 option, the compiler fails. This does not occur if I use -O2

2012-03-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52464 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2012-03-02 Thread oleg at smolsky dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #34 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-03-03 02:19:21 UTC --- OK, here are some benchmark numbers for the test compiled verbatim with g++41/g++463 -O2: $ time ./test41 rv=4243767296 real0m6.063s user0m6.058s sys 0m0.001s

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2012-03-02 Thread oleg at smolsky dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #35 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-03-03 02:45:15 UTC --- Here is a smaller version. BTW, I've noticed another regression in optimization in v4.1 when using a const global...

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2012-03-02 Thread oleg at smolsky dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #36 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-03-03 02:59:11 UTC --- Here is the code emitted by g++ 4.6.3 for smaller_test.cpp (attached to the bug) unsigned int test_constant proc near mov r9d, cs:iterations

[Bug libfortran/36044] user-requested backtrace

2012-03-02 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36044 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|