[Bug middle-end/52999] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE, segmentation fault in c_tree_printer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 06:03:47 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 24 06:03:43 2012 New Revision: 186741 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186741 Log: PR middle-end/52999

[Bug middle-end/53084] [4.7/4.8 Regression] GCC cannot handle array initialization of string constant with point arithmetic properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53084 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 06:07:34 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 24 06:07:30 2012 New Revision: 186742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186742 Log: PR middle-end/53084

[Bug middle-end/52999] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE, segmentation fault in c_tree_printer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 06:09:00 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 24 06:08:55 2012 New Revision: 186743 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186743 Log: PR middle-end/52999

[Bug middle-end/53084] [4.7/4.8 Regression] GCC cannot handle array initialization of string constant with point arithmetic properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53084 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 06:11:00 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 24 06:10:53 2012 New Revision: 186745 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186745 Log: PR middle-end/53084

[Bug middle-end/53084] [4.7/4.8 Regression] GCC cannot handle array initialization of string constant with point arithmetic properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53084 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 06:14:43 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 24 06:14:37 2012 New Revision: 186746 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186746 Log: PR middle-end/53084

[Bug c++/53099] New: Internal compiler error on short testcase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53099 Bug #: 53099 Summary: Internal compiler error on short testcase Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/27139] Optimize double INT-FP-INT conversions with -ffast-math

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27139 Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/52940] conversion from MODE_PARTIAL_INT uses sign extension for unsigned types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52940 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 07:05:15 UTC --- Author: pinskia Date: Tue Apr 24 07:05:09 2012 New Revision: 186749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186749 Log: 2012-04-24 Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53100] New: Optimize __int128 with range information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53100 Bug #: 53100 Summary: Optimize __int128 with range information Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug middle-end/53010] [4.8 Regression] crash due to null ptr deref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53010 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/53033] [avr]: Wrong register number for 3-byte loads via X

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53033 --- Comment #6 from Michal Hlavinka mhlavink at redhat dot com 2012-04-24 07:26:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Fixed in 4.7.1 verified Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |fortran ---

[Bug tree-optimization/53098] [4.8 Regression] tree-vect-loop.c:1414:19: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53098 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53098] [4.8 Regression] tree-vect-loop.c:1414:19: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53098 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 08:06:33 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 24 08:06:20 2012 New Revision: 186754 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186754 Log: 2012-04-24 Richard

[Bug c/53095] std=gnu99 atof x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53095 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53092] ICE using -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53092 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/53089] [4.8 Regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/atomic_1.f90 and gfortran.dg/coarray/registering_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53089 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||JoaquinMonleon

[Bug middle-end/53088] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hubicka at

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 08:19:59 UTC --- Patch which I am testing: Index: tree-ssa-forwprop.c === --- tree-ssa-forwprop.c

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 --- Comment #14 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 08:30:49 UTC --- Hmm, I have right now in my tree Index: tree-ssa-forwprop.c === --- tree-ssa-forwprop.c

[Bug c++/53078] [C++11] Wrong diagnostic no return statement in function returning non-void on lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53078 mattipee at yahoo dot co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattipee at yahoo dot co.uk

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 08:37:52 UTC --- Hmm, I have right now in my tree The most common case is with b being a constant which is why I only looked into that case.

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 08:38:43 UTC --- Found the discussion: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00079.html

[Bug translation/52984] Different information message in Turkish locale.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52984 --- Comment #2 from Yaşar Arabacı yasar11732 at gmail dot com 2012-04-24 08:43:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) The translations are handled by the translation project. Translation issues should be reported directly to them rather to us.

[Bug middle-end/31094] Support annotating function parameters as read-only and/or non-escaping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31094 Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slayoo at

[Bug c++/25973] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|vries

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 09:14:57 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-09/msg02301.html

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 09:17:23 UTC --- I think http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-07/msg00307.html is also referencing it too.

[Bug c++/53078] [C++11] Wrong diagnostic no return statement in function returning non-void on lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53078 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug c++/52845] non-void return type deduced for lambda with empty compound statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52845 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||M8R-gt1qwe

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 09:29:10 UTC --- A fix would be for example Index: gcc/expr.c === --- gcc/expr.c (revision 186757) +++

[Bug c++/53078] [C++11] Wrong diagnostic no return statement in function returning non-void on lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53078 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/52999] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE, segmentation fault in c_tree_printer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 09:35:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) This occurs in default_elf_select_section. For example, You are looking at wrong spot. What happens on this testcase is

[Bug middle-end/53084] [4.7/4.8 Regression] GCC cannot handle array initialization of string constant with point arithmetic properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53084 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/25973] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973 ssomers at opnet dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53101] New: Recognize casts to sub-vectors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101 Bug #: 53101 Summary: Recognize casts to sub-vectors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c++/25973] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 10:30:45 UTC --- Noone cares about 4.4 bugs now, that release has reached end-of-life, but the problem isn't fixed in 4.5, 4.6 or 4.7 so this isn't FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 10:47:04 UTC --- Doesn't apparently need a loop, the following fails on 4.7 branch and older trunk with -O2 -ftree-vectorize as well. The dummy foo function is important to

[Bug c++/53102] New: Misplaced 'typename' gives access to private type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53102 Bug #: 53102 Summary: Misplaced 'typename' gives access to private type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/53101] Recognize casts to sub-vectors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27228|0 |1 is

[Bug c++/53102] Misplaced 'typename' gives access to private type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53102 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 11:41:47 UTC --- This is a kind of dup of PR48124, certainly on the 4.7 branch that doesn't even try to handle it, and on the trunk (after Honza's changes one needs to swap

[Bug tree-optimization/52891] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_bool_pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52891 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/53065] ICE replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at caller-save.c:1125

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53065 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc

[Bug c++/51033] generic vector subscript and shuffle support was not added to C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033 --- Comment #23 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-24 11:57:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) What does it mean exercise the backend a lot? Do you mean it takes a lot of time? I think so. I haven't looked at the

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 11:57:53 UTC --- But it uses TYPE_SIZE_UNIT to constrain it which is 5, and maxbitsize 40. Which then leads to a representative of BLKmode via if (mode == VOIDmode)

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 --- Comment #4 from brag unixoid2003 at mail dot ru 2012-04-24 12:27:29 UTC --- Alexander Monakov, As for me it's ok to treat whole struct as non-volatile even if it has a volatile members when doing smth like this: struct ss0 a,b; a=b; a=b;

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 12:28:24 UTC --- Btw, get_best_mode for Breakpoint 6, get_best_mode (bitsize=6, bitpos=31, bitregion_start=0, bitregion_end=39, align=128, largest_mode=DImode,

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/53093] [4.8 Regression]: tls/alias-1.c ICE, emutls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53093 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug middle-end/53089] [4.8 Regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/atomic_1.f90 and gfortran.dg/coarray/registering_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53089 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 13:13:26 UTC --- Patch that applies to all maintained branches (the bug is also in 4.5!) Index: gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c

[Bug fortran/40766] this fortran program is too slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40766 --- Comment #23 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 13:13:13 UTC --- The glibc libm work has mainly been oriented at correctness rather than performance, and postdates the 2.15 release so will be new in

[Bug rtl-optimization/52983] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3243

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52983 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot

[Bug c++/52639] ice in supportable_widening_operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 --- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net 2012-04-24 13:22:08 UTC --- Same problem here under Debian/unstable (x86_64), with: gcc-snapshot -O3 -march=native -std=gnu99 -c ice-setf.i and the testcase below, using: gcc

[Bug target/47197] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7153 on AltiVec code (vec_dst)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47197 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |wschmidt

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 13:59:10 UTC --- On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: The infrastructure to detect whether options have been set explicitly seems to be

[Bug c++/52639] ice in supportable_widening_operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 14:04:42 UTC --- Supposedly fixed by 2012-04-10 Ulrich Weigand ulrich.weig...@linaro.org PR tree-optimization/52870 * tree-vect-patterns.c

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 14:10:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: This is explicitly not a detailed design; anyone implementing it would

[Bug c/53091] Const assignment fails in GCC 4.2, 4.4, 4.6, 4.7 - works fine in clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53091 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 14:25:06 UTC --- There is no requirement to accept this static initializer, but the code does try to be lax about constants in initializers (there is

[Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000 --- Comment #1 from İsmail cartman Dönmez ismail at namtrac dot org 2012-04-24 14:32:34 UTC --- clang people have the following patch proposed as a workaround to this issue:

[Bug c/53091] static initializer accepted by clang but not by gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53091 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 14:41:59 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 24 14:41:49 2012 New Revision: 186764 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186764 Log: 2012-04-24 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 14:43:01 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 24 14:42:53 2012 New Revision: 186765 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186765 Log: 2012-04-24 Richard

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 14:43:16 UTC --- On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Say we have: A enables B enables C. Do we actually need to track that C was

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] [4.7/4.8 Regression] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-04-24 14:49:18 UTC --- On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:57:43AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 Richard

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 14:49:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Init() should I think ideally be just for the defaults (with _set replacing the present uses of -1 or 2 in Init to mean not

[Bug c/53091] static initializer accepted by clang but not by gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53091 --- Comment #14 from bugs at m8y dot org 2012-04-24 15:00:42 UTC --- Heh. Thanks, but our current target is clang-llvm, I was just surprised that gcc did not accept it. The codebase being converted by unc0rr's haskell-based tokeniser is pascal

[Bug middle-end/53088] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 15:07:21 UTC --- At few places in cgraph code we set location to get those late diagnostics right. It sort of makes sense for function wide diagnostics, but it is not this one.

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 15:09:34 UTC --- On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #4 from Manuel

[Bug middle-end/53088] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 15:12:36 UTC --- I guess get_curr_insn_source_location is what I neeed...

[Bug bootstrap/52850] Linker path ends up using wrong zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52850 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org 2012-04-24 15:18:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) That sounds like an user problem rather than a GCC issue. From the Installing GCC: Configuration doc: --with-system-zlib

[Bug target/53065] ICE replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at caller-save.c:1125

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53065 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 15:21:36 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 15:21:29 2012 New Revision: 186768 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186768 Log: PR target/53065 *

[Bug target/53065] ICE replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at caller-save.c:1125

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53065 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 15:23:51 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 15:23:46 2012 New Revision: 186770 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186770 Log: Backport from 2012-04-24

[Bug target/53065] ICE replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at caller-save.c:1125

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53065 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/53103] New: bug locating unsigned type for non-standard precision

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53103 Bug #: 53103 Summary: bug locating unsigned type for non-standard precision Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/47197] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7153 on AltiVec code (vec_dst)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47197 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 15:52:04 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 24 15:51:58 2012 New Revision: 186771 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186771 Log: gcc: 2012-04-24

[Bug target/47197] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7153 on AltiVec code (vec_dst)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47197 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53102] Misplaced 'typename' gives access to private type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53102 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 16:19:38 UTC --- (N.B. using 'typenme' outside of templates is valid in C++11) That was a Defect report. I think my patch to fix PR22154 was not a complete one.

[Bug c++/52363] Presence/absence of -pedantic compilation affects run-time behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52363 --- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 16:25:33 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Apr 24 16:25:15 2012 New Revision: 186774 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186774 Log: /cp 2012-04-24

[Bug c++/52363] Presence/absence of -pedantic compilation affects run-time behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52363 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug go/51874] Many libgo testsuite failures on IRIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874 --- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-04-24 16:33:13 UTC --- At some point, can you update this bug with the current set of test failures using Go on Irix? No rush.

[Bug tree-optimization/52633] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1 (ARM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52633 --- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 16:52:59 UTC --- Some more details on what's going on here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01486.html

[Bug tree-optimization/52891] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_bool_pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52891 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 17:08:28 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 17:08:20 2012 New Revision: 186775 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186775 Log: PR testsuite/52641 PR

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 17:08:28 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 17:08:20 2012 New Revision: 186775 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186775 Log: PR testsuite/52641 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/52891] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_bool_pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52891 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 17:19:03 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 17:18:54 2012 New Revision: 186776 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186776 Log: PR testsuite/52641 PR

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 17:19:03 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 17:18:54 2012 New Revision: 186776 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186776 Log: PR testsuite/52641 PR

[Bug c++/39970] gcc accepts the . dot operator in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39970 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

  1   2   >