http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
vincenzo Innocente changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|lto and |[lto w/o linker plugin]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
--- Comment #6 from birender.singh at hotmail dot com 2012-05-10 06:21:54 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This Bugzilla is for bugs in GCC, not help fixing your code.
>
> Please use the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for questions about usi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
--- Comment #3 from birender.singh at hotmail dot com 2012-05-10 05:37:31 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Oh well.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53275 ***
This bugs reported have been problems caused by GCC-4.4.4 libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44228
John T changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrt at worldlinc dot net
--- Comment #3 from Joh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #18 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-10 00:55:14 UTC ---
On 9-May-12, at 8:41 PM, jimis at gmx dot net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
>
> --- Comment #16 from jimis 2012-05-10
> 00:41:04 UTC ---
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #17 from jimis 2012-05-10 00:42:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 27361
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27361
mutex.diff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #16 from jimis 2012-05-10 00:41:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I'm pretty sure we've already dealt with this failure elsewhere, IIRC the
> linuxthreads pthread_mutex_t type has a volatile member causing the default
> assignment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53301
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53302
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #15 from matrixforum at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-05-09 22:26:38 UTC
---
This is a very useful link to another x factor blog also, this is x factor blog
as all kinds of useful information, for people wanting to apply and other news
about t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53302
Bug #: 53302
Summary: a combination of union, perfect forwarding and
template parameter pack causes a seg-fault in program
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53185
--- Comment #8 from Gary Funck 2012-05-09 21:43:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Fixed.
Confirmed. We're able to rebuild our app. without encountering the
segmentation fault.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53289
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-09
21:14:22 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Wed May 9 21:14:15 2012
New Revision: 187355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187355
Log:
2012-05-09 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53301
Bug #: 53301
Summary: Spurious -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant with
reference arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09 20:41:23 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed May 9 20:41:08 2012
New Revision: 187354
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187354
Log:
PR target/52908
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
Bug #: 53300
Summary: AIX bootstrap related to varpool patch
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #16 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-05-09
19:03:01 UTC ---
Bug fixed, patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00694.html
Thanks for trying,
-Sri.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:18 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-09 18:45:15 UTC ---
On 5/9/2012 1:12 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> We might want to put something in config/os/gnu-linux/os_defines.h so that the
> macro is defined when using linuxthr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53299
Bug #: 53299
Summary: libiberty usage of GCC_PICFLAG causes -fPIC to be
passed to non-GNU compiler
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09 18:06:52 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed May 9 18:06:47 2012
New Revision: 187347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187347
Log:
PR target/44141
* config/i386/i386.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-09
17:31:17 UTC ---
This Bugzilla is for bugs in GCC, not help fixing your code.
Please use the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for questions about using GCC
and help fixing compilation failures. Non
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53288
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53296
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53291
--- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen 2012-05-09
17:17:56 UTC ---
Correction. We can keep the xor %reg,%reg. We just need it because setnz only
sets 8 bit to initialize the higher order bits.
Alternatively the value can be zero extended afterwards or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-09
17:12:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> You might try configuring with "--disable-libstdcxx-threads". It
> disables C++11 threads support.
guard.cc is always built, it's part of libsupc++ so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298
Bug #: 53298
Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY +
substring
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53256
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ra |
AssignedTo|venkataramanan.kumar at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53291
--- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill 2012-05-09
16:53:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Testcase?
It is trivial, so posting right here:
#include
unsigned a;
int
rtm_xtest (void)
{
if (_xtest ())
a = 1;
}
./build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-09
16:44:07 UTC ---
Hmm, I guess this is for the case where gthr-aix.h includes gthr-single.h,
which doesn't define the C++11 interface. The configure script determined that
_GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS shoul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53185
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53256
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-09
16:39:39 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 9 16:39:33 2012
New Revision: 187343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187343
Log:
Backport from 2012-05-12 mainline r187342.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53256
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-09
16:29:06 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 9 16:28:53 2012
New Revision: 187342
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187342
Log:
PR target/53256
* config/avr/elf.h (ASM_DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-09
16:28:20 UTC ---
*** Bug 53297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton 2012-05-09 16:20:33
UTC ---
Author: nickc
Date: Wed May 9 16:20:17 2012
New Revision: 187341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187341
Log:
PR bootstrap/50461
* configure.ac (mpfr-dir)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53185
--- Comment #6 from Michael Matz 2012-05-09 16:08:37
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Wed May 9 16:08:26 2012
New Revision: 187340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187340
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53185
* tree-vect-data-r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31351
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
Bug #: 53297
Summary: Linker error on solaris 10 using gcc-4.4.4 64bit.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
birender.singh at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53287
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-09
15:56:15 UTC ---
I'm pretty sure this is a dup - it's at least discussed in another bug I've
commented on, w.r.t self-init of a std::string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-09
15:52:48 UTC ---
A simpler testcase:
int main() {
char i = 1;
char x = ((void) i, 0);
x = i ? x : ((void) i, 0);
return 0;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53296
Bug #: 53296
Summary: Segfault on non-constant character array constructor
containing kind spec
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-09
15:36:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 27359
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27359
Draft patch: is_contiguous.diff
Attached is a mostly ready patch for IS_CONTIGUOUS.
The main TODO i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #14 from José Luis García Pallero
2012-05-09 15:01:30 UTC ---
Fixed in glibc:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14083
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=1a4b75a190006bb013a61f2031a4de86e93a629f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-09
15:01:24 UTC ---
Just try equivalent pthread program and you'll note the same behavior.
#include
#include
double *p;
int c;
void *tf (void *x)
{
int i, s = ((long) x) * c, e = s + c;
for (i =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #15 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-09 14:48:20 UTC ---
I'm indeed using a "ld" that is not the one of the system.
googling around I found this:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.help/41304
titled" g++: error: -fuse-linker-plu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
--- Comment #7 from FH 2012-05-09 14:36:00 UTC ---
Well...
Still don't really get why it is not possible to improve performance for such
basic things. I tried with allocations up to 7 Gb or more (RAM full + SWAP
full) : I still get the same resul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53294
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-09
13:45:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> if I add -fuse-linker-plugin I get
> c++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
>
> my understanding was that since 4.6 lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #13 from Manuel Lóp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
13:32:22 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed May 9 13:32:13 2012
New Revision: 187331
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187331
Log:
Add a test for PR middle-end/53249
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48423
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-09 13:16:30 UTC ---
I found the reference in the binutil bugzilla
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12629
was fixed by Ian in gold on 2011-06-30.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52617
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse 2012-05-09
13:11:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> This is PR51294.
Looks different. Here the compiler complains about casting 0 to size_t.
> And there is PR52617.
That one is not a bug, unless you want to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #11 from José Luis García Pallero
2012-05-09 13:06:56 UTC ---
Report to glibc sent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18437
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-09
12:59:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 9 12:59:46 2012
New Revision: 187330
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187330
Log:
2012-05-09 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
FH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
--- Comment #4 from FH 2012-05-09 12:53:46 UTC ---
I don't understand your answer.
Timing just times the for loop. Checking array content is single threaded :
this is added to make sure the for loop has done the job correctly and this
check is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
disable-multilib --enable-linker-plugin
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120509 (experimental) [trunk revision 187326] (GCC)
and I get
c++ -fuse-linker-plugin -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O2 -flto -shared -fPIC -o
bha.so d1.cc d2.cc d3.cc
c++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53290
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-05-09
12:33:16 UTC ---
As a temporary work around for aermod.f90, you can compile it with
'-fprotect-parens -Ofast' (it does not work for the code in pr53217).
Also a patch has been submitted at
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-09 12:21:38
UTC ---
> if I add -fuse-linker-plugin I get
> c++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
>
> my understanding was that since 4.6 linker-plugin was not required any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-09
12:19:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 9 12:19:34 2012
New Revision: 187328
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187328
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53226
* tree-ssa-forw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53295
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-09
12:15:43 UTC ---
The testcase probably only fails on SPU (the only target besides x86 that
has target support for vect_double according to the testsuite harness ...)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53295
Bug #: 53295
Summary: Vectorizer support for non-constant strided loads
depends on gather support overwriting the data-ref
with bogus data
Classification: Unclassified
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53293
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2012-05-09 12:06:37
UTC ---
typedef struct {
unsigned Ebits_to_go ;
int C
} * EncodingEnvironmentPtr ;
arienco_done_encoding ( EncodingEnvironmentPtr eep ) {
if ( ( eep -> Ebits_to_go ) ) {
while ( eep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50476
--- Comment #3 from Rui Maciel 2012-05-09
11:47:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I think it is only undefined behaviour to access the pointer after the
> life-time of y has finished, however, the following probably isn't, no?
>
> void g()
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-09 11:45:10 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson 2012-05-08
> 22:39:35 UTC ---
> Can you investigate why configure decides that __atomic_compare_exchange_8
> is implemente
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50359
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50476
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #8 from José Luis García Pallero
2012-05-09 10:56:34 UTC ---
I have used gcc 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #7 from José Luis García Pallero
2012-05-09 10:54:33 UTC ---
Hello:
I attach the preprocessed files with optimization flags -O0, -O1, -O2 and -O3
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #6 from José Luis García Pallero
2012-05-09 10:53:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 27358
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27358
Preprocessed with -O3 optimization flag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #5 from José Luis García Pallero
2012-05-09 10:52:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 27357
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27357
Preprocessed with -O2 optimization flag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53287
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #4 from José Luis García Pallero
2012-05-09 10:51:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 27356
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27356
Preprocessed with -O1 optimization flag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #3 from José Luis García Pallero
2012-05-09 10:51:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 27355
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27355
Preprocessed with -O0 optimization flag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #2 from José Luis García Pallero
2012-05-09 10:50:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 27354
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27354
Original C code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-09 10:47:02 UTC ---
if I add -fuse-linker-plugin I get
c++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
my understanding was that since 4.6 linker-plugin was not required anym
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53289
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-09 10:40:08 UTC ---
On 9 May, 2012, at 12:15 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
>
> --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-09
> 10:15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53294
Bug #: 53294
Summary: Optimize out some exception code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
--- Comment #2 from FH 2012-05-09 10:16:52 UTC ---
I have just tested on another computer (CPU : Xeon5650 12 cores + OS :
Scientific Linux) => I reproduce the unexpected behavior (OpenMP slower than
single-threaded).
So, I believe the problem is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-09
10:15:21 UTC ---
Btw, the testcase does not reproduce for me. What binutils version and which
linker do you use? Do you actually end up using -fuse-linker-plugin? Because
it reproduces for me wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-09 10:03:33 UTC ---
On 9 May, 2012, at 11:58 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Ok, so the question would be - why does GCC think this symbol is not
> possibly referenced from outside of the LT
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
