http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53846
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53849
Bug #: 53849
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in add_referenced_var_1, at
tree-dfa.c:567 with -O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2
-fno-tree-loop-im
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850
Bug #: 53850
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at
trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53826
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53849
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53848
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53707
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53675
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
09:22:58 UTC ---
I'm still seeing junk dwarf info:
/usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '0', this reader only handles
version 2 and 3 information.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53842
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53846
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
--- Comment #4 from Edward Rosten ed at edrosten dot com 2012-07-04 09:42:52
UTC ---
It doesn't seem to do with the address, entirely. It still pushes the values
onto the stack even if the class is changed to have a const int, rather than
const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
09:55:27 UTC ---
For trunk dse_possible_dead_store_p fails to look through the loop, when
being at the VDEF .MEM_165:
bb 3:
# i_93 = PHI i_78(3), 0(2)
# .MEM_100 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #21 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-04 10:10:13
UTC ---
It looks that expand_builtin_strncmp gets miscompiled.
Try to compile the testcase from Comment #5 with -O2 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Put breakpoint in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53848
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-07-04
10:18:03 UTC ---
extern C
{
struct s {
enum {
e = 0
} f;
};
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53848
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-07-04
10:19:37 UTC ---
r189094 OK
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53851
Bug #: 53851
Summary: Automatic silent allocation/deallocation of
allocatable variables in several instances
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #22 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-04 10:37:48
UTC ---
Digging deeper, both testcases (from comment #0 and comment #5) fail due to:
enum machine_mode insn_mode
= insn_data[(int)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53848
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #23 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-04 10:58:03
UTC ---
Compiling testcase from comment 0, -O0:
(gdb) b builtins.c:3830
Breakpoint 1 at 0x522c91: file ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/builtins.c, line 3830.
(gdb) r
Starting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
11:16:20 UTC ---
The hint in comment #5 together with your analysis points at the initializer
in insn-output.c:
const struct insn_data_d insn_data[] =
{
...
/*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852
Bug #: 53852
Summary: -ftree-loop-linear: large compile time / memory usage
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #25 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
11:26:55 UTC ---
Or the insn_data initializer does not properly point to the operand_data
initializer (maybe that is non-existent or the magic LTO error_mark_node
and we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #26 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-04 11:30:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
So, does
Index: gimple-fold.c
===
--- gimple-fold.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-07-04 11:53:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
So, does
Index: gimple-fold.c
===
--- gimple-fold.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53811
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-07-04
12:07:15 UTC ---
g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with -m64:
FAIL: g++.dg/other/pr53811.C -std=gnu++98 (internal compiler error)
FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53849
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
12:09:20 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 4 12:09:09 2012
New Revision: 189255
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189255
Log:
2012-07-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
12:10:56 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 4 12:10:40 2012
New Revision: 189256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189256
Log:
2012-07-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04 12:11:10
UTC ---
ISL generally has speed problems. For instance graphite/interchange-8.c
needs quite long to compile (well, several seconds), and _all_ of the runtime
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53849
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53811
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-04 12:14:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Should I open a new PR?
Yes, please. I will wait with the 4.7 backport until new PR resolves.
Note that ' -mcmodel=large' seems to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #28 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
12:14:03 UTC ---
Ok, I'll bootstrap and test and commit the fix. Thanks for tracking it down
up to a point where I thought *well, that sounds familiar in some way* ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-07-04 12:17:47 UTC ---
To fill in the X, 130 Gb is not sufficient for this testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #21 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2012-07-04
12:24:45 UTC ---
For non fat (slim) LTO builds you need to use these tools yes. ar needs to
know the symbol table for its index and that needs LTO specific knowledge.
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853
Bug #: 53853
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/other/pr53811.C -std=gnu++* (internal
compiler error)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #22 from Yuri Gribov tetra2005 at gmail dot com 2012-07-04
12:32:08 UTC ---
For non fat (slim) LTO builds you need to use these tools yes
So it seems that original testcase with fat files which used plain ar is indeed
correct and we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #29 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-04 12:32:25
UTC ---
The patch from Comment #25 works for me, too. You will need a bunch of patches
from PR53321 to finish LTO profiledbootstrap, I will post these to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
Bug #: 53854
Summary: ICE in find_constant_pool_ref
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
13:15:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 27742
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27742
gcc48-pr53854.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --program-suffix=-4.8-svn
--enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120704 (experimental) (GCC)
but similar results are reported on 4.7 as well.
Is this a continuation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
--- Comment #9 from Edward Rosten ed at edrosten dot com 2012-07-04 13:40:54
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Fixed on trunk sofar, watching for fallout.
I would like to note that your fix seems to remove the performance hit in my
numerics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-07-04 13:47:09 UTC ---
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, ed at edrosten dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
Edward Rosten ed at edrosten dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #30 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
13:47:26 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 4 13:47:18 2012
New Revision: 189260
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189260
Log:
2012-07-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
--- Comment #18 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04 13:49:24 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Jul 4 13:49:19 2012
New Revision: 189261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189261
Log:
PR middle-end/53321
* ipa.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #31 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
13:53:20 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 4 13:53:11 2012
New Revision: 189262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189262
Log:
2012-07-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #32 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
13:56:05 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 4 13:56:00 2012
New Revision: 189263
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189263
Log:
2012-07-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53670
Sergey Galanov sergey.e.galanov at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53449
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |fortran
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53428
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53670
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53449
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
--- Comment #11 from Edward Rosten ed at edrosten dot com 2012-07-04 14:13:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, ed at edrosten dot com wrote:
here D.2391 is already dead. So possibly you are returning references
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53842
jim at jtan dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53848
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53855
Bug #: 53855
Summary: Emitting a warning for some dangling references.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53856
Bug #: 53856
Summary: Default argument allowed on member defined outside of
class template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53856
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53857
Bug #: 53857
Summary: Possible problem with arithmetic overflow in optimizer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
17:17:22 UTC ---
The problem with this is that there was a reason why I originally supported
only a single constant pool reference per instruction: there needs to be an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53857
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53855
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53851
Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #4 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-07-04 19:42:51 UTC ---
I just checked trunk-20120704 and this bug seems to have reappeared.
Strange, it seemed still fixed as recently as trunk-20120701.
Suggest try original source code I supplied.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49569
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
20:59:09 UTC ---
N.B. this is easily reproducable on gcc110 in the compile farm, a
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu box
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53851
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53848
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
21:34:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jul 4 21:34:07 2012
New Revision: 189267
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189267
Log:
PR c++/53848
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53848
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53830
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04
22:17:24 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jul 4 22:17:18 2012
New Revision: 189268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189268
Log:
PR libstdc++/53830
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53830
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-05
00:19:41 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jul 5 00:19:36 2012
New Revision: 189273
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189273
Log:
PR libstdc++/53830
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53830
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-05
01:10:18 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jul 5 01:10:10 2012
New Revision: 189275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189275
Log:
PR libstdc++/53830
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53830
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
: posix
gcc version 4.8.0-pre 20120704 (experimental) commit
3d02dd733723c41be7c56f814a3072cee1b43ecc (Gentoo 4.8.0_pre)
---
84 matches
Mail list logo
