http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
06:05:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Manuel, what do you think about this? I see the warning happening because the
underlying type of Code is unsigned int.
Isn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54559
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
--- Comment #22 from Jörg Richter joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de 2012-09-14 07:58:16
UTC ---
I have reduced a real live case. But still using vector.
$ cat t.cc
#include vector
struct ClassicUpdate
{
ClassicUpdate();
};
typedef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54578
Bug #: 54578
Summary: [OOP] -Wunused-function warnings for __copy functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
08:34:52 UTC ---
I can't reproduce this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54571
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54577
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54576
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54576
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
11:42:00 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Sep 14 11:41:53 2012
New Revision: 191294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191294
Log:
Check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #4 from Wolfgang Bangerth bangerth at gmail dot com 2012-09-14
11:48:56 UTC ---
Would this do? ;-)
..
templatetypename _From, typename _To
struct is_convertible { static const bool value = true; };
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-14
12:00:21 UTC ---
Fantastic, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:16:59 UTC ---
H.J., could you please review the fmaintrin.h changes of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00921.html
(Uros wanted your feedback on that). Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:22:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:22:27 2012
New Revision: 191295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191295
Log:
2012-09-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:36:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:36:33 2012
New Revision: 191297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191297
Log:
PR target/54564
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:36:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:36:33 2012
New Revision: 191297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191297
Log:
PR target/54564
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:37:32 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:37:16 2012
New Revision: 191298
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191298
Log:
PR target/54564
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:40:37 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk, backport also tested on the 4.7 branch, but as 4.7.2-rc1 is in
the works, I'll defer it for after 4.7.2 is released.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 12:44:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Fixed
Thank you.
(in case you have a testcase feel free to add it).
Mostly I could tweak the last forwprop-xx.c tests to dump an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54546
--- Comment #2 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 13:22:34 UTC ---
Author: chrbr
Date: Fri Sep 14 13:22:29 2012
New Revision: 191301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191301
Log:
PR target/54546
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #46 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
13:28:52 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Sep 14 13:28:44 2012
New Revision: 191302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191302
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54579
Bug #: 54579
Summary: missed optimization: ASR idiom
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:42:44 UTC ---
--- Comment #26 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-08-30 14:19:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #34 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:44:22 UTC ---
--- Comment #27 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-08-30 14:56:46 UTC ---
FWIW, I just filed the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org|
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #35 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:49:28 UTC ---
--- Comment #28 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-08-30 17:32:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #36 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:51:58 UTC ---
--- Comment #30 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-09-01 08:18:06 UTC ---
I commented out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #37 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:54:42 UTC ---
--- Comment #32 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-09-01 11:22:55 UTC ---
Went back to 4.5.0 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
13:55:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Martin,
Have you done any more digging on this? I just discovered that cpu2006
benchmark 471.omnetpp suffers the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54579
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
14:07:21 UTC ---
Wconversion does not warn either, but it also does not warn for:
enum Code {
SUCCESS=-1
};
Code a;
void foo(void)
{
unsigned int r;
r = a;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #38 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-09-14 14:43:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
I've no idea why gmp 4.3.x or 5.x works for you: both fail make check
for me if built with gcc 4.4.2. I've not yet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54580
Bug #: 54580
Summary: 64-bit pointer to int cast fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
--- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
16:59:21 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Sep 14 16:59:10 2012
New Revision: 191304
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191304
Log:
c:
PR c/54103
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54580
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
17:07:50 UTC ---
C++ is not C.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54516
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
17:10:53 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Sep 14 17:10:45 2012
New Revision: 191307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191307
Log:
PR target/54516
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54540
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
17:10:53 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Sep 14 17:10:45 2012
New Revision: 191307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191307
Log:
PR target/54516
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 17:17:08
UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Sep 14 17:17:01 2012
New Revision: 191308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191308
Log:
2012-09-14 Marc Glisse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 17:22:24
UTC ---
Progress :-)
Documentation update is needed.
Next useful one would be ?: so we can generate vec_cond_expr. See the OpenCL
specification for a list of what's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #48 from Chip Salzenberg chip at pobox dot com 2012-09-14
17:23:08 UTC ---
May Shub-Internet not see you as you pass.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-09-14 17:38:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Would this do? ;-)
..
templatetypename _From, typename _To
struct is_convertible { static const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54581
Bug #: 54581
Summary: decltype and opaque vector types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-14
18:22:17 UTC ---
Ah, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
18:25:52 UTC ---
I tend to agree; this isn't the only place in the middle-end this could cause
trouble. The handling of pow/powf in reassociation comes to mind as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
18:30:18 UTC ---
Seems the C++ FE ignores the nothrow attribute from builtins and instead just
uses its own cfns.gperf. pow is in there, but powf/powl is not (as C++03 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
Bug #: 54582
Summary: gap in FORTIFY checking of buffer lengths
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54583
Bug #: 54583
Summary: Spurious warning: value computed is not used with
variable-size array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584
Bug #: 54584
Summary: m68k-uclinux error: Link tests are not allowed after
GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #28 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-09-14 20:52:14
UTC ---
Created attachment 28194
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28194
Patch for trunk version 2012-09-09 of gcc/config/m68k/uclinux.h
To fix the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487
--- Comment #32 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 21:06:54 UTC ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Fri Sep 14 21:06:49 2012
New Revision: 191312
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191312
Log:
Backport from trunk r190952 to add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54585
Bug #: 54585
Summary: stack space allocated but never used when calling
functions that return structs in registers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
21:17:00 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Sep 14 21:16:56 2012
New Revision: 191313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191313
Log:
c:
PR c/54552
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
21:20:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28195
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28195
reduced testcase
Further reduced testcase that triggers on either C/C++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38607
--- Comment #20 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
23:23:45 UTC ---
Author: dje
Date: Fri Sep 14 23:23:41 2012
New Revision: 191316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191316
Log:
PR target/38607
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
Bug #: 54586
Summary: Help diagnosing error: Link tests are not allowed
after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-15
00:28:08 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Sep 15 00:28:05 2012
New Revision: 191336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191336
Log:
PR c/54103
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-15
00:29:31 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Sep 15 00:29:28 2012
New Revision: 191337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191337
Log:
PR c/54552
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE at |[4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.2
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584
--- Comment #1 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-09-15 00:39:14 UTC
---
I found that the -msep-data link would succeed if program section
.tm_clone_table has a non-zero length.
I changed __JCR_LIST__[] and __TMC_LIST__[] to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #29 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-09-15 05:41:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 28196
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28196
Patches for Sourcery (Mentor Graphics) CodeBench Lite GCC 4.6-2011.09-23
Patches
76 matches
Mail list logo