[Bug target/54815] [avr] missed optimization with operations with constant operands

2012-10-13 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54815 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug gcov-profile/44728] gcov chokes when . is present in DIR argument to -o flag

2012-10-13 Thread xiaowen.huangg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44728 maybe524 xiaowen.huangg at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiaowen.huangg

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

2012-10-13 Thread simonb at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #16 from Simon Baldwin simonb at google dot com 2012-10-13 08:08:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) ... This has not been the case since 2007, even though it appears to make a lot of sense... I noticed the same thing

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

2012-10-13 Thread aaw at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #17 from Ollie Wild aaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 08:08:49 UTC --- I'm on vacation until Mon, Oct. 15. For compiler related questions, please email c-compiler-t...@google.com. If you need to contact a manager, please

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

2012-10-13 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #18 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-13 08:13:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Created attachment 28425 [details] Patch for testing thanks... now repeated CP2K compiles give

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

2012-10-13 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #19 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 08:31:39 UTC --- Simon, I don't think the 'integer's are functions of the pointers once you process the symbols in a defined order. The non-determinism was caused by

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

2012-10-13 Thread simonb at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #20 from Simon Baldwin simonb at google dot com 2012-10-13 09:26:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) ...Since we now process these symbols in a deterministic order, the integers of the symbols added during each iteration are

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

2012-10-13 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #21 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 09:32:10 UTC --- Hm, I don't know about anonymous symbols. If they exist and end up in modules (which I honestly don't know), I would hope that they would obtain their

[Bug fortran/54917] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] TRANSFER on polymorphic variable causes ICE

2012-10-13 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 10:01:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) It could be r177486 or 177486? Not sure. (Note: Both revisions you quote are the same.) Anyway, I can confirm that at least the ICE

[Bug fortran/54917] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] TRANSFER on polymorphic variable causes ICE

2012-10-13 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 10:05:13 UTC --- However, the other ICE (which does not require -Wsurprising) appears with all gfortran versions I tried from 4.5 to trunk: subroutine test_routine2(arg)

[Bug fortran/54917] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] TRANSFER on polymorphic variable causes ICE

2012-10-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-13 10:12:28 UTC --- It could be r177486 or 177486? Not sure. (Note: Both revisions you quote are the same.) Oops! (never copy and paste after midnight.)

[Bug rtl-optimization/54919] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr54877.c FAILs with -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller

2012-10-13 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919 Bug #: 54919 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr54877.c FAILs with -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug rtl-optimization/54919] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr54877.c FAILs with -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller

2012-10-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/54834] bootstrap fails when building libbacktrace

2012-10-13 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54834 Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

2012-10-13 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #22 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 11:29:41 UTC --- Created attachment 28440 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28440 patch that doesn't use c++ Here's a patch that works essentially the same

[Bug middle-end/54885] [4.8 Regression] lto/profiledbootstrap broken

2012-10-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54885 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

2012-10-13 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #23 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-13 12:28:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) Created attachment 28440 [details] patch that doesn't use c++ I've tested the patch with (an older

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

2012-10-13 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #24 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-13 12:45:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) I've tested the patch with (an older version of) the 4.7 branch, and it works fine for CP2K. it

[Bug fortran/54917] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] TRANSFER on polymorphic variable causes ICE

2012-10-13 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 13:08:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) r177486 or r177527 (see pr50004). Out of these two, I'd rather guess for the latter (but this is not more than a guess). Anyway, I

[Bug c++/54913] [4.8 Regression] '#'indirect_ref' not supported by dump_decl#declaration error' is not a member of 'E'

2012-10-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54913 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug tree-optimization/54920] New: [4.8 Regression] segfault in tree-ssa-pre.c during Firefox build

2012-10-13 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54920 Bug #: 54920 Summary: [4.8 Regression] segfault in tree-ssa-pre.c during Firefox build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/54902] [4.7 Regression], ICE (segfault) building on arm-linux-gnueabi

2012-10-13 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54902 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at

[Bug middle-end/54921] New: [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsched2-use-superblocks -fstack-protector -ftree-slp-vectorize

2012-10-13 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54921 Bug #: 54921 Summary: [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsched2-use-superblocks -fstack-protector -ftree-slp-vectorize Classification:

[Bug target/54841] Bad optimization on stack fill before call on ARM

2012-10-13 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54841 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm

[Bug target/54892] [4.7 Regression], ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-10-13 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54892 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at

[Bug target/54829] bad optimization: sub followed by cmp w/ zero (x86 ARM)

2012-10-13 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 16:04:55 UTC --- The result of the comparison is used in more than one instruction, so combine cannot safely rework the branch instructions that follow to ensure

[Bug target/54829] bad optimization: sub followed by cmp w/ zero (x86 ARM)

2012-10-13 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 16:18:03 UTC --- Note also that flag setting behaviour of the PPC instruction essentially is a comparison of the result against zero. On ARM the flags are set as

[Bug rtl-optimization/54919] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr54877.c FAILs with -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller

2012-10-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 16:38:14 UTC --- At the .178r.loop2_invariant dump: 5 r61:SI=0x40 # 64 6 r62:DF=[`*.LC0'] # 0.0 34 r68:DF=[`*.LC1'] # 1.0e+0 L16: 11

[Bug c++/54913] [4.8 Regression] qualified lookup in ctor of class template fails to find static member of reference type

2012-10-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54913 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression]|[4.8

[Bug c++/54922] New: [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

2012-10-13 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Bug #: 54922 Summary: [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/54919] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr54877.c FAILs with -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller

2012-10-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka

[Bug gcov-profile/44728] gcov chokes when . is present in DIR argument to -o flag

2012-10-13 Thread schwab at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44728 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab schwab at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 18:41:14 UTC --- Author: schwab Date: Sat Oct 13 18:41:08 2012 New Revision: 192425 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192425 Log: PR

[Bug gcov-profile/44728] gcov chokes when . is present in DIR argument to -o flag

2012-10-13 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44728 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54404] [4.8 Regression] *cfstring* failures for (obj-c|g)++ on *-apple-darwin* after revision 186789

2012-10-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Jack

[Bug rtl-optimization/54871] [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2012-10-13 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54871 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 20:22:18 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Oct 13 20:22:07 2012 New Revision: 192426 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192426 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/54871] [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2012-10-13 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54871 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

2012-10-13 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-10-13 20:54:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) Some copy'n-paste error occurred while attempting to format the code example. The correct code under investigation was:

[Bug fortran/54870] [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/array_constructor_4.f90 FAILs

2012-10-13 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54870 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/54892] [4.7 Regression], ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-10-13 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54892 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-10-13 21:35:21 UTC --- The ICE started with Richard Henderson's [ARM] Convert to atomic optabs patch in r183050: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00288.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/54919] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr54877.c FAILs with -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller

2012-10-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 21:51:15 UTC --- Created attachment 28442 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28442 Perform replacement in REG_EQUAL notes too

[Bug fortran/54917] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] TRANSFER on polymorphic variable causes ICE

2012-10-13 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 21:52:39 UTC --- The following fixes the ICE(s) on comment 5 ... Index: gcc/fortran/target-memory.c === ---

[Bug fortran/54870] [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/array_constructor_4.f90 FAILs

2012-10-13 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54870 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/54923] New: Internal unit I/O error when using -malign-double

2012-10-13 Thread gnu.0kn at gishpuppy dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54923 Bug #: 54923 Summary: Internal unit I/O error when using -malign-double Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/50293] -flto fails if GCC is installed in directory with space in path name

2012-10-13 Thread jmesmon at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50293 --- Comment #2 from Cody Schafer jmesmon at gmail dot com 2012-10-14 00:58:44 UTC --- I've just run into the same issue with gcc 4.7.2 (using the binary here: http://www.makehackvoid.com/sites/default/files/MHV_AVR_Tools_20121007.exe )

[Bug fortran/54923] Internal unit I/O error when using -malign-double

2012-10-13 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54923 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54923] Internal unit I/O error when using -malign-double

2012-10-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54923 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID

[Bug fortran/31696] -malign-double trashes fortran format

2012-10-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31696 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/54404] [4.8 Regression] *cfstring* failures for (obj-c|g)++ on *-apple-darwin* after revision 186789

2012-10-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED