http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54815
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44728
maybe524 xiaowen.huangg at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaowen.huangg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #16 from Simon Baldwin simonb at google dot com 2012-10-13
08:08:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
...
This has not been the case since 2007, even though it appears to make a lot of
sense...
I noticed the same thing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #17 from Ollie Wild aaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 08:08:49
UTC ---
I'm on vacation until Mon, Oct. 15.
For compiler related questions, please email c-compiler-t...@google.com.
If you need to contact a manager, please
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #18 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-13 08:13:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Created attachment 28425 [details]
Patch for testing
thanks... now repeated CP2K compiles give
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13
08:31:39 UTC ---
Simon,
I don't think the 'integer's are functions of the pointers once you process the
symbols in a defined order. The non-determinism was caused by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #20 from Simon Baldwin simonb at google dot com 2012-10-13
09:26:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
...Since we now process these symbols in a deterministic order,
the integers of the symbols added during each iteration are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #21 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13
09:32:10 UTC ---
Hm, I don't know about anonymous symbols. If they exist and end up in modules
(which I honestly don't know), I would hope that they would obtain their
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 10:01:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
It could be r177486 or 177486?
Not sure. (Note: Both revisions you quote are the same.)
Anyway, I can confirm that at least the ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 10:05:13 UTC ---
However, the other ICE (which does not require -Wsurprising) appears with all
gfortran versions I tried from 4.5 to trunk:
subroutine test_routine2(arg)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-13
10:12:28 UTC ---
It could be r177486 or 177486?
Not sure. (Note: Both revisions you quote are the same.)
Oops! (never copy and paste after midnight.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919
Bug #: 54919
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr54877.c
FAILs with -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54834
Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #22 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13
11:29:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 28440
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28440
patch that doesn't use c++
Here's a patch that works essentially the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54885
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #23 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-13 12:28:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
Created attachment 28440 [details]
patch that doesn't use c++
I've tested the patch with (an older
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #24 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-13 12:45:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
I've tested the patch with (an older version of) the 4.7 branch, and it works
fine for CP2K.
it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 13:08:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
r177486 or r177527 (see pr50004).
Out of these two, I'd rather guess for the latter (but this is not more than a
guess).
Anyway, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54913
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54920
Bug #: 54920
Summary: [4.8 Regression] segfault in tree-ssa-pre.c during
Firefox build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54902
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54921
Bug #: 54921
Summary: [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -Os
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsched2-use-superblocks
-fstack-protector -ftree-slp-vectorize
Classification:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54841
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54892
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13
16:04:55 UTC ---
The result of the comparison is used in more than one instruction, so combine
cannot safely rework the branch instructions that follow to ensure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13
16:18:03 UTC ---
Note also that flag setting behaviour of the PPC instruction essentially is a
comparison of the result against zero. On ARM the flags are set as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919
--- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13
16:38:14 UTC ---
At the .178r.loop2_invariant dump:
5 r61:SI=0x40 # 64
6 r62:DF=[`*.LC0'] # 0.0
34 r68:DF=[`*.LC1'] # 1.0e+0
L16:
11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54913
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8 Regression]|[4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
Bug #: 54922
Summary: [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require
initialization of all union members
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44728
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab schwab at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13
18:41:14 UTC ---
Author: schwab
Date: Sat Oct 13 18:41:08 2012
New Revision: 192425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192425
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44728
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Jack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54871
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13
20:22:18 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Oct 13 20:22:07 2012
New Revision: 192426
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192426
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54871
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-10-13 20:54:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Some copy'n-paste error occurred while attempting to format the code example.
The correct code under investigation was:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54870
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54892
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-10-13
21:35:21 UTC ---
The ICE started with Richard Henderson's [ARM] Convert to atomic optabs patch
in r183050:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00288.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54919
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13
21:51:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 28442
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28442
Perform replacement in REG_EQUAL notes too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 21:52:39 UTC ---
The following fixes the ICE(s) on comment 5 ...
Index: gcc/fortran/target-memory.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54870
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54923
Bug #: 54923
Summary: Internal unit I/O error when using -malign-double
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50293
--- Comment #2 from Cody Schafer jmesmon at gmail dot com 2012-10-14 00:58:44
UTC ---
I've just run into the same issue with gcc 4.7.2 (using the binary here:
http://www.makehackvoid.com/sites/default/files/MHV_AVR_Tools_20121007.exe )
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54923
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54923
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31696
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
48 matches
Mail list logo