[Bug middle-end/21718] real.c rounding not perfect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718 --- Comment #14 from Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net 2012-11-05 08:12:08 UTC --- Otherwise, how about taking code from the glibc implementation of strtof/strtod/strtold? Code in strtod was recently fixed. I don't know about

[Bug bootstrap/55211] New: [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 Bug #: 55211 Summary: [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug target/55212] New: [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 Bug #: 55212 Summary: [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/52466] gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for --target=lm32-rtems4.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466 --- Comment #4 from Jon Beniston jon at beniston dot com 2012-11-05 08:53:50 UTC --- I always used to configure with --enable-sjlj-exceptions.

[Bug tree-optimization/54986] [4.7 regression] segfault on constant initialized to object address at -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54986 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/55207] Automatic deallocation of variables declared in the main program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 09:07:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Therefore it has the same testsuite failures as the patch in comment 1 (possibly more?). Indeed it has a few more ... FAIL:

[Bug target/41993] [sh] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:399

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 09:13:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) In -O0 case, we broke discovery loop too early, so we can't find all return regs. I would argue, that we should ignore

[Bug target/41993] [sh] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:399

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 09:16:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) In -O0 case, we broke discovery loop too early, so we can't find all return regs. I would argue, that we should ignore

[Bug rtl-optimization/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 09:21:57 UTC --- Does the patch at [1] fix also this failure? [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg00353.html

[Bug fortran/55207] Automatic deallocation of variables declared in the main program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 09:37:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Most of them seem to be scan-tree-dump failures, except for: FAIL: gfortran.dg/storage_size_3.f08 -O0 execution test which

[Bug target/41993] [sh] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:399

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993 --- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 10:19:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Will you submit the patch to gcc-patches, please? OK, I'll send it to the list when the tests on i686-linux and sh are

[Bug testsuite/55188] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr19105.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 Optimizing range tests v_[0-9]*.D. -.2, 2. and -.3, 4.[\n\r]* into 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55188 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davem at

[Bug testsuite/51128] [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51128 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 10:59:55 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Nov 5 10:59:49 2012 New Revision: 193156 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193156 Log: PR testsuite/51128 *

[Bug target/55194] h8300 ICE during conftest in libgcc dwarf2out:7605

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55194 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 11:11:32 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 5 11:11:28 2012 New Revision: 193158 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193158 Log: PR

[Bug target/55194] h8300 ICE during conftest in libgcc dwarf2out:7605

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55194 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54747] config/bfin/bfin.c:2721: possible missing break ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54747 Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds

[Bug target/55175] i386/sfp-exceptions.c:52:7: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 11:44:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) H have backported similar change to 4.7 branch. Thanks for the backport. Please reopen the PR if there are still

[Bug tree-optimization/55213] New: vectorizer ignores __restrict__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55213 Bug #: 55213 Summary: vectorizer ignores __restrict__ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/55213] vectorizer ignores __restrict__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55213 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug target/55175] i386/sfp-exceptions.c:52:7: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 12:11:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) H have backported similar change to 4.7 branch. Thanks for the backport. Please reopen the

[Bug target/55175] i386/sfp-exceptions.c:52:7: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175 --- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 12:28:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) H have backported similar change to 4.7 branch. Thanks for the backport. Please reopen the

[Bug target/55175] i386/sfp-exceptions.c:52:7: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175 --- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 12:41:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) You should use t-softfp instead of 386/t-softfp for i[34567]86-*-rtems* in libgcc/config.host. In fact, there

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert still slower than 4.6.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-05 13:14:22 UTC --- I'm now trying a bootstrap with r192871, r192824, and r192757 reverted, as those were the only recent SPARC-specific changes I could find.

[Bug tree-optimization/55213] vectorizer ignores __restrict__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55213 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-11-05 13:28:51 UTC --- reading PR49279 it seems to me that gcc should NOT emit runtime alias checks, Instead I see 15: create runtime check for data references

[Bug fortran/55214] New: Program fail to evaluate where clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55214 Bug #: 55214 Summary: Program fail to evaluate where clause Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/55214] Program fail to evaluate where clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55214 --- Comment #1 from pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com 2012-11-05 14:03:32 UTC --- $ gfortran -g -O0 -ffpe-trap=invalid -static where.F90 $ ./a.out Program received signal SIGFPE: Floating-point exception - erroneous arithmetic operation.

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-05 14:12:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) = 0x00575f94 _ZL27emit_note_insn_var_locationPPvS_+1604: ldd [ %i0 + %g1 ], %o1 The destination register field is

[Bug target/55175] i386/sfp-exceptions.c:52:7: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175 --- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 14:15:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) You should use t-softfp instead of 386/t-softfp for i[34567]86-*-rtems* in libgcc/config.host. In fact, there

[Bug target/55175] i386/sfp-exceptions.c:52:7: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175 --- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 14:24:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Then the problem is either in newlib or generic libgcc configury. Please note that t-fdpbit is not enabled by default for

[Bug tree-optimization/54776] [4.8 Regression] tramp3d-v4: 20% performance regression using -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #10 from Adi adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-05 14:34:25 UTC --- I found the real problem ! Now it can be reproducible even with a small test case. I can summarize it like this: If you have a global object/function

[Bug debug/54970] Missing DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer in debuginfo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54970 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 14:36:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 5 14:36:47 2012 New Revision: 193162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193162 Log: PR

[Bug debug/54971] SRA pessimizes debug info by not creating debug stmts for fields without replacements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54971 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 14:36:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 5 14:36:47 2012 New Revision: 193162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193162 Log: PR

[Bug target/55175] i386/sfp-exceptions.c:52:7: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 14:38:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) Then the problem is either in newlib or generic libgcc configury. I meanwhile came to

[Bug bootstrap/52466] gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for --target=lm32-rtems4.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466 --- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 14:44:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) I always used to configure with --enable-sjlj-exceptions. Thanks for the pointer. I see in gcc/configure.ac, the command

[Bug bootstrap/52466] gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for --target=lm32-rtems4.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466 --- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 14:47:31 UTC --- Created attachment 28618 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28618 For sjlj exceptions on for lm32*-*-* Is this the correct way to

[Bug fortran/55214] Program fail to evaluate where clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55214 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/54877] [4.7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in copy_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:335

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54877 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 15:05:48 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 5 15:05:42 2012 New Revision: 193164 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193164 Log: Backported

[Bug c++/54988] fpmath=sse target pragma causes inlining failure because of target specific option mismatch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54988 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 15:07:22 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 5 15:07:14 2012 New Revision: 193165 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193165 Log: Backported

[Bug debug/54828] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in based_loc_descr at dwarf2out.c:10560 with -g -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 15:09:34 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 5 15:09:28 2012 New Revision: 193166 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193166 Log: Backported

[Bug bootstrap/52466] gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for --target=lm32-rtems4.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 15:17:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Created attachment 28618 [details] For sjlj exceptions on for lm32*-*-* Is this the correct way to force it on?

[Bug bootstrap/52466] gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for --target=lm32-rtems4.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466 --- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 15:30:46 UTC --- I was careful to say this issue :) \ That is the next issue to face on the lm32 and was reported before this cropped up.

[Bug fortran/55210] cannot use macro #define FOO 'a' in a conditional

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55210 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/55215] New: Constructor seeding is broken for Mersenne twister

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55215 Bug #: 55215 Summary: Constructor seeding is broken for Mersenne twister Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/55215] Constructor seeding is broken for Mersenne twister

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55215 --- Comment #1 from wgh at beyondunreal dot com 2012-11-05 16:15:06 UTC --- Created attachment 28619 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28619 reproduction

[Bug middle-end/55195] [4.8 Regression] shorten_branches generates incorrect forward branch distances

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target

[Bug tree-optimization/54776] [4.8 Regression] tramp3d-v4: 20% performance regression using -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 16:24:07 UTC --- Yeah + there is quite nice code size savings. I must say it took quite a while to chase out all bugs that was affecting tramp3d's performance. One

[Bug tree-optimization/55187] [4.8 regression] not able to determine number if iterations of loops with perfect nest.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55187 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug go/55201] [4.8 regression] libgo.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_8'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55201 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug testsuite/55188] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr19105.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 Optimizing range tests v_[0-9]*.D. -.2, 2. and -.3, 4.[\n\r]* into 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55188 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/55151] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1217 with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55151 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 16:38:34 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Mon Nov 5 16:38:27 2012 New Revision: 193170 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193170 Log:

[Bug libstdc++/55215] Constructor seeding is broken for Mersenne twister

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55215 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/55207] Automatic deallocation of variables declared in the main program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 17:45:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28620 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28620 patch Here is an extended patch, based on comment 3, which fixes the

[Bug target/53264] gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/24025] libstdc++ crashes when out of memory exception thrown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24025 Jonathan Larmour jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #5 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 18:22:17 UTC --- I'm really surprised to see the integer ldd/std patterns matching in a 64-bit build.

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #6 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 18:24:11 UTC --- Oh I see, you're forcing v8 in the configure line. It's so much easier to sparc32 bash before running configure so that the build/host/target ends up being correct

[Bug tree-optimization/55216] New: Infinite loop generated on non-infinite code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55216 Bug #: 55216 Summary: Infinite loop generated on non-infinite code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 18:51:40 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Mon Nov 5 18:51:33 2012 New Revision: 193178 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193178

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 18:54:47 UTC --- I believe that the G++ front end tries to create a unique name from the first symbol it sees. I do not now if this is related to the constructor name

[Bug rtl-optimization/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 18:55:38 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Mon Nov 5 18:55:35 2012 New Revision: 193179 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193179

[Bug tree-optimization/55216] [4.8 Regression] Infinite loop generated on non-infinite code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55216 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-05 19:13:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I'm now trying a bootstrap with r192871, r192824, and r192757 reverted, as those were the only recent SPARC-specific changes

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #8 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 19:16:14 UTC --- Thanks for tracking this down, I'll fix or revert.

[Bug libstdc++/55028] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is broken when using v7 namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55028 Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/55216] [4.8 Regression] Infinite loop generated on non-infinite code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55216 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libstdc++/55215] Constructor seeding is broken for Mersenne twister

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55215 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 19:25:27 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Nov 5 19:25:20 2012 New Revision: 193181 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193181 Log:

[Bug libstdc++/55215] Constructor seeding is broken for Mersenne twister

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55215 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 20:11:44 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Nov 5 20:11:32 2012 New Revision: 193183 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193183 Log:

[Bug libstdc++/55215] Constructor seeding is broken for Mersenne twister

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55215 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/55217] New: False -Wstrict-overflow warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217 Bug #: 55217 Summary: False -Wstrict-overflow warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55191] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic at tree-ssa-pre.c:2511

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55191 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 20:23:55 UTC --- Ugliness in cfganal.c, it depends on the block ordering for the DFS it performs on the reverse CFG. The following patch should fix the issue.

[Bug middle-end/21718] real.c rounding not perfect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718 --- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-11-05 20:49:24 UTC --- The glibc code is pretty complicated (using glibc's copies of mpn_* low-level GMP functions for multiple-precision arithmetic)

[Bug libstdc++/55028] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is broken when using v7 namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55028 --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:01:15 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Mon Nov 5 21:01:08 2012 New Revision: 193185 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193185 Log: 2012-11-05

[Bug middle-end/55176] [4.8 Regression] Out of memory during Chromium build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55176 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/55191] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic at tree-ssa-pre.c:2511

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55191 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-11-05 21:05:07 UTC --- *** Bug 55176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/53988] [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #12 from Adi adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-05 21:14:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) I believe that the G++ front end tries to create a unique name from the first symbol it sees. I do not now if this is related to

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #9 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:38:40 UTC --- I'm having a hard time reproducing this, I've tried 32-bit bootstraps with several variations of your listed configure command line. But meanwhile I want some

[Bug tree-optimization/54986] [4.7 regression] segfault on constant initialized to object address at -O

tree-optimization/54986 * gimple-fold.c (canonicalize_constructor_val): Strip again all no-op conversions on entry but add them back on exit if needed. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/20121105-1.C Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/gimple-fold.c trunk

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:41:09 UTC --- I guess best would be if you could attach your var-tracking.ii and the exact cc1plus command line used to compile it.

[Bug tree-optimization/54986] [4.7 regression] segfault on constant initialized to object address at -O

tree-optimization/54986 * gimple-fold.c (canonicalize_constructor_val): Strip again all no-op conversions on entry but add them back on exit if needed. Added: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/20121105-1.C - copied unchanged from r193188, trunk/gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/55151] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1217 with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55151 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 21:44:50 UTC --- On Linux/x86-64: [hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc -B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:47:17 UTC --- I'm having a hard time reproducing this, I've tried 32-bit bootstraps with several variations of your listed configure command line. I can

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #12 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:50:38 UTC --- That configuration doesn't make any sense. It's going to pass -m64 down into the libgcc2 build, then the internal --with-cpu=v8 setting is going to override all

[Bug libstdc++/55028] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is broken when using v7 namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55028 --- Comment #7 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:52:32 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Mon Nov 5 21:52:28 2012 New Revision: 193190 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193190 Log: 2012-11-05

[Bug libstdc++/55028] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is broken when using v7 namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55028 --- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:53:40 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Mon Nov 5 21:53:31 2012 New Revision: 193191 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193191 Log: 2012-11-05

[Bug libstdc++/55028] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is broken when using v7 namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55028 --- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:54:29 UTC --- Fixed in trunk and 4.7

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 21:55:13 UTC --- Created attachment 28621 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28621 Preprocessed file /home/ebotcazou/build/./prev-gcc/cc1plus

[Bug target/55218] New: armv6 doesn't use unaligned access for packed structures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55218 Bug #: 55218 Summary: armv6 doesn't use unaligned access for packed structures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/39157] Code that compiles fine in 1GB of memory with 4.1.2 requires 20GB in 4.2.* and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39157 --- Comment #25 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 22:02:18 UTC --- This problem has been fixed in DF with the DF_RD_PRUNE_DEAD_DEFS flag. I see no good reason to deprecate the param, though. For such a huge loop,

[Bug target/55218] armv6 doesn't use unaligned access for packed structures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55218 Michael Hope michael.hope at linaro dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #14 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 22:04:10 UTC --- The bug does not trigger using that var-tracking test file using a properly configures 32-bit compiler, I just checked. This sparc64+--with-cpu=v8 is not a legal

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05 22:08:00 UTC --- That configuration doesn't make any sense. It's going to pass -m64 down into the libgcc2 build, then the internal --with-cpu=v8 setting is

[Bug tree-optimization/54986] [4.7 regression] segfault on constant initialized to object address at -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54986 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert still slower than 4.6.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 Lawrence tlawrence85 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tlawrence85 at

  1   2   >