http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55726
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22 08:57:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
templatetypename Float
inline
Float atan(Float t) {
constexpr float PIO4F = 0.7853981633974483096f;
constexpr Float zero =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-22 08:57:46
UTC ---
Take a look at gcc/config.log.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55786
Bug #: 55786
Summary: g++ segmentation fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #32 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
10:46:42 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Dec 22 10:46:37 2012
New Revision: 194694
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194694
Log:
2012-12-22
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-12-22 12:02:52 UTC ---
I still see
status from open is0
status from open is0
At line 7 of file pr30162_1.f (unit = 20, file = 'np')
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55714
--- Comment #3 from piotr5 at netscape dot net 2012-12-22 12:11:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 29026
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29026
the requested preprocessor output
youn probably are right it's a duplicate,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-12-22
12:46:02 UTC ---
Try to add $GMPINC to INCLUDES INCLUDES_FOR_SUBDIR in
gcc-interface/Makefile.in
This leads to
make -C ../gcc/ada/tools -f ../Makefile \
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55787
Bug #: 55787
Summary: Comparisons of double values don't work correctly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #35 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de tkoenig at netcologne dot
de 2012-12-22 15:38:08 UTC ---
I still see
status from open is0
status from open is0
At line 7 of file pr30162_1.f (unit = 20,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55788
Bug #: 55788
Summary: inlining failed in call to always_inline: mismatched
arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52343
--- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-12-22 16:08:25 UTC ---
A candidate patch for this was proposed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01312.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55311
--- Comment #3 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-12-22 16:09:18 UTC ---
A candidate patch for this was proposed to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01361.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55311
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789
Bug #: 55789
Summary: Needless realloc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790
Bug #: 55790
Summary: Build Failure on Head Targeting x86_64 Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49241
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
17:27:06 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Dec 22 17:27:03 2012
New Revision: 194696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194696
Log:
2012-12-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55787
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55791
Bug #: 55791
Summary: gcc fails to detect wrong type in sizeof in malloc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55791
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55788
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
17:58:28 UTC ---
Works on the turnk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
Bug #: 55792
Summary: Bad memory access with profiledbootstrap and LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55787
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-12-22 18:28:49
UTC ---
Most likely a dup of bug 323.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-12-22
18:38:55 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 I have successfully bootstrapped revision 194694 with
the patches in comments #3 and #5, and configured with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
18:57:55 UTC ---
but I finished bootstrap with the following patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in2012-11-07
08:50:19.0 +0100
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-12-22 19:13:23 UTC ---
Can you strace (or whatever) the code and tell me what lseek()
returns? Is it really EINVAL like the error message suggests?
The best I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55793
Bug #: 55793
Summary: Compile hog with -gdwarf-4 and -O2 (-fvar-tracking
issue)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55787
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794
Bug #: 55794
Summary: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C -std=gnu++98
and -std=gnu++11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-12-22 20:12:50
UTC ---
ASAN:SIGSEGV
=
==19402== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0008 (pc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #37 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de tkoenig at netcologne dot
de 2012-12-22 20:16:07 UTC ---
Hi Dominique,
The best I can do (without understanding it) is
(1) if I use dtruss (should be equivalent to strace) on a, I get
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55793
--- Comment #1 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-12-22
20:44:32 UTC ---
85%+ of the time is spent in var-tracking dataflow. This may just be a
duplicate of #54402 but the testcase there is different.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #44 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-22 20:53:41 UTC ---
I have made a some more progress in understanding the failure. I all compile
with
FCFLAGS = -O1 -g -ffree-form -fsanitize=address
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #38 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-12-22 21:23:07 UTC ---
Can you tell me what happens if you apply this patch?
The behavior stays unchanged;-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
23:00:21 UTC ---
As might have been expected, libgfortran/random.o differs between revisions
189365 and 189366. Even in the .i files, there are many differences.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
23:01:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 29031
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29031
.s file difference
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
23:06:42 UTC ---
Can you please attach random.i and what exact gcc options were used to compile
random.c ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-12-22 23:20:37
UTC ---
I'll give this patch a try and let you know how it affects the
performance I see. But unrolling shouldn't affect inlining, since all
unrolling is after
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
23:27:54 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Dec 22 23:27:49 2012
New Revision: 194700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194700
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
23:35:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 29032
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29032
Preprocessed source from r189366
Compilation command:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22
23:38:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 29033
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29033
Preprocessed source from r189365
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52089
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55274
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53607
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52778
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53327
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53327
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49746
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-23
05:07:39 UTC ---
(gdb) bt
#0 gen_reg_rtx (mode=SImode) at ../../gcc/gcc/emit-rtl.c:859
#1 0x007957d4 in legitimize_tls_address (addr=0x412d6cd0)
at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #45 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-23
07:44:32 UTC ---
The point of failure is not in the object,
but in a routine called after a routine from this object finishes.
What if you remove
59 matches
Mail list logo