http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15272
Petr Tesarik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugs at tesarici dot cz
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56028
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|http:/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56072
Bug #: 56072
Summary: info page wrongly defines M_PI_2 and M_PI_4
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071
--- Comment #2 from Stephen 2013-01-22 01:44:19 UTC
---
Interestingly, add variadic templates to the mix and it compiles:
class B
{
template friend struct A;
private:
B(int, char) {}
~B() {}
};
template
struct A
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-22
01:27:25 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 01:27:19 2013
New Revision: 195355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195355
Log:
PR c++/56059
* tree.c (strip_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-01-22
00:23:03 UTC ---
An image with parameters/instructions would be ideal. Heck...not ideal...great!
Thanks so much.
"mikpe at it dot uu.se" wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55997
helo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helobugz at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-21
23:18:34 UTC ---
I'm using the ARAnym full-system m68040 emulator -- that's the only realistic
option for testing gcc on Linux/m68k at the moment. I maintain my own small
Fedora-based distr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-21
22:52:18 UTC ---
This ICE was fixed for 4.8 by Alan Modra's "PR53914, rs6000 constraints and
reload queries" fix in r189801. The ICE described in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-07/msg00142
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-01-21
22:20:33 UTC ---
What I could do is to hide the calendar button and add a "Now" link instead.
I'm not sure that having both the calendar button and a "Now" link would be
nice from a UX point of view
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071
Bug #: 56071
Summary: noexcept with template and private ctor fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-01-21
21:56:02 UTC ---
LRA does not generate any reloads (additional insns). So I don't think it is
LRA problem. I've checked reload. It generates the same code.
Although I guess, it is IRA pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denis.onischenko at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56070
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56070
--- Comment #1 from Denis Onischenko
2013-01-21 20:53:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 29244
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29244
output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56070
Bug #: 56070
Summary: genattrtab: unknown value `alu' for `type' attribute
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #15 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 20:14:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > I will try 4.6 to prove that. Off to build 4.6...
> ...
> If that prints 0 for OSXSAVE and non-zero for AVX then it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21
19:58:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> > Maybe GCC could work around it by checking both flags in the AVX detection
> > logic.
>
> Recent 4.6+ does. Please see driver-i386.c around l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55919
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55919
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2013-01-21
19:34:57 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jan 21 19:34:49 2013
New Revision: 195348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195348
Log:
2013-01-21 Thomas Koenig
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-21 19:31:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > I will try 4.6 to prove that. Off to build 4.6...
>
> Thanks for checking. See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-21 19:30:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > Created attachment 29221 [details]
> > Fix for this PR and PR 47517
>
> I confirm for this PR. However while the original code of PR 47517 executes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21
19:14:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I will try 4.6 to prove that. Off to build 4.6...
Thanks for checking. See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC for the
foolproof way to do b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54114
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |debug
Target Milestone|4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 18:03:07 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jan 21 18:02:57 2013
New Revision: 195345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195345
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/56023
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21
18:01:59 UTC ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-21
18:00:06 UTC ---
Let me run a bisection first...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:59:34 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:59:28 2013
New Revision: 195344
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195344
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/56023
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21
17:55:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:55:34 2013
New Revision: 195343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195343
Log:
PR tree-optimization/56051
* fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:51:38 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:51:23 2013
New Revision: 195342
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195342
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/56023
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #11 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:42:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Using -mno-avx (or replacing -march=cirei7) worked for me.
> Bah, that should be "replacing -march=native with -march=c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
Bug #: 56069
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] RA pessimization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21
17:32:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Using -mno-avx (or replacing -march=cirei7) worked for me.
Bah, that should be "replacing -march=native with -march=corei7"
My problem was wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-01-21
17:31:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Indeed, with #c18 patch I can reproduce the ICE. Andrey, can you try that
> too?
Sure, will do, I'll be out of office on Tuesday though. Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21
17:30:38 UTC ---
What is the illegal instruction? What version of glibc are you using?
I debugged a very similar problem last week where GCC was generating vmovsd on
a host without AVX suppo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-21
17:28:19 UTC ---
I can reproduce with a gcc-4.7-20130119 cross from x86_64-linux to ppc-linux,
but not with gcc-4.8-20130120. So possibly fixed on trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047
--- Comment #14 from Jürgen Reuter 2013-01-21
17:28:12 UTC ---
On Monday 21 January 2013 16:34:27 you wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047
>
> --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:34:27 UTC ---
> Hi,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #8 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:26:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Please try a newer version of GCC, 4.4 is no longer supported. Also since
> which version is the oldest supported version, I will use that version for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21
17:20:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 29243
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29243
gcc48-pr56052.patch
Anyway, the following patch fixes the ICE, by making the artificial var
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-21
17:17:19 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:16:57 2013
New Revision: 195341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195341
Log:
2013-01-21 Martin Jambor
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-21
17:14:54 UTC ---
> sse4a
There is the issue I think.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #5 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:14:05
UTC ---
Created attachment 29242
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29242
gcc test.c -march=native -v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #4 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:13:25
UTC ---
Created attachment 29241
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29241
gcc -v test.c output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #3 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:12:15
UTC ---
mockbuild@centos6-64bit-builder ~/build/BUILD/tmp (mock-chroot)
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #2 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:10:34
UTC ---
Created attachment 29240
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29240
diff of defines
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-21
17:09:27 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:09:22 2013
New Revision: 195340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195340
Log:
2013-01-21 Martin Jambor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
--- Comment #1 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:08:47
UTC ---
Created attachment 29239
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29239
gcc -dM -E - -march=native
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068
Bug #: 56068
Summary: -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM
guests
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-21
17:07:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you
> > already know the exact date. The calenda
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-21
17:02:18 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:02:08 2013
New Revision: 195339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195339
Log:
2013-01-21 Martin Jambor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21
15:54:08 UTC ---
Indeed, with #c18 patch I can reproduce the ICE. Andrey, can you try that too?
On x86_64-linux, do for current trunk + #c18 patch applied:
mkdir obj
cd obj
../configure --ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-21
15:41:24 UTC ---
Probably something like
Index: rs6000.c
===
--- rs6000.c(revision 195319)
+++ rs6000.c(working copy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-21
15:37:48 UTC ---
AIX 5.3 does not support TLS, so there are pieces not implemented in
config/rs6000/aix53.h. Jakub's configuration probably will not work.
Also, GNU Binutils does not support
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:34:27 UTC ---
Hi,
ich antworte jetzt mal privat, dann müssen wir unsere Privatgespräche
nicht auf Bugzilla führen ;)
>>> Janus, long time no see! XD
>> Right! It's been a while since y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067
Bug #: 56067
Summary: Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21
15:25:00 UTC ---
Using your auto-host.h (with the exception of HAVE_DECL_BASENAME - clearly host
rather than target thing) with i686-linux -> powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0 cross I
still get the same I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-21
15:16:04 UTC ---
libbacktrace only supports ELF file format and AIX does not use ELF, so
libbacktrace will not work on AIX.
Also, you patch called libbacktrace unilaterally, even without any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-21
15:13:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 29237
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29237
auto-host.h for AIX 7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56066
Bug #: 56066
Summary: g++ generates strong symbols conflicting with C99
extern inline code on Windows
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2013-01-21
14:52:35 UTC ---
The failure in comment 16 appears to be PR51784.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucdanton at free dot fr
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56065
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56034
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #13 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-01-21
13:23:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> I've tried to reproduce this with a cross compiler (without cross binutils) on
> x86_64-linux host, but it ICEs elsewhere:
>
> ../configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56065
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21
13:23:18 UTC ---
dup of PR 55663 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56065
Bug #: 56065
Summary: Constant expression incorrectly recognized not as such
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56064
Bug #: 56064
Summary: Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21
13:03:03 UTC ---
Yeah, if this ever worked, it was by pure accident. OpenMP 3.1 vs. Fortran OOP
is simply undefined territory, gfortran won't run e.g. any
constructors/destructors of privatized
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21
12:53:09 UTC ---
I've tried to reproduce this with a cross compiler (without cross binutils) on
x86_64-linux host, but it ICEs elsewhere:
../configure --target powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.1 --disable-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||LpSolit at netscape dot net
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56048
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21
12:31:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you
> already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #3 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-01-21
12:20:04 UTC ---
You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you
already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people who
remember dates such as "that was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29211|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||LpSolit at netscape dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56048
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-21
11:14:43 UTC ---
In fact, the nicest solution would be to investigate how much of Ian's document
is already duplicated in the GNU binutils sources:
http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56062
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21
11:13:44 UTC ---
Yes, but why?
How many linkers do you have in a single directory?
If you have different veersions of binutils in differnt paths then use -B to
find them. The difficulty w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56009
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56009
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2013-01-21
10:45:09 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Jan 21 10:45:05 2013
New Revision: 195332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195332
Log:
Fix up wrong marvell-pj4.md file
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo