http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56138
Bug #: 56138
Summary: Deferred-length character RESULT: ICE in
gfc_add_modify_loc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56136
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-01-29 09:01:23 UTC ---
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270
--- Comment #10 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #17 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
09:10:24 UTC ---
Note that there is at least one known bug in asan with -static-libstdc++
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=147
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-01-29 09:10:25 UTC ---
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, sje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073
Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
09:13:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Note that there is at least one known bug in asan with -static-libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #19 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
09:18:49 UTC ---
As with the patch for this PR -lasan is linked before -lstdc++, the wrapper
should kick in. But the patch is still unreviewed.
How?
If we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
09:29:39 UTC ---
Ah, you're right. My patch is mostly to fix -static-libasan or even
non-static-libasan - to make sure it comes early and thus override what it
thinks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
09:38:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
I'll test an alternative patch.
FYI, I've tried this one:
--- a/gcc/loop-init.c
+++ b/gcc/loop-init.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #21 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
09:44:22 UTC ---
we could similarly error for
-static-libstdc++ -fsanitize=address combination.
Maybe.
Generally this works (in clang at least) and no one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-01-29 09:52:12 UTC ---
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
--- Comment #9 from Steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com 2013-01-29
09:59:09 UTC ---
Looking at the disassembly I see that __asan_init is placed into some
__GLOBAL__sub_I_00099_1_cov.cc function, which isn't being called at runtime
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56139
Bug #: 56139
Summary: unmodified static data could go in .rodata, not .data
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56137
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53610
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
10:33:24 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jan 29 10:33:18 2013
New Revision: 195532
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195532
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
10:40:29 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 29 10:40:24 2013
New Revision: 195533
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195533
Log:
2013-01-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com 2013-01-29
11:56:02 UTC ---
Here's the dump of __mod_init_func (the static ctors array):
===
Disassembly of section
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44830
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53537
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkrahn at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
13:23:37 UTC ---
Confirmed with testcase in comment #5, compiling with:
[guest@aranym2 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ a.c -O2
[guest@aranym2 gcc]$ ./a.out
Aborted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
Matt Godbolt matt at godbolt dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
14:22:56 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 29 14:22:47 2013
New Revision: 195541
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195541
Log:
2013-01-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
14:24:01 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 29 14:23:48 2013
New Revision: 195542
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195542
Log:
2013-01-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-29 15:05:14 UTC ---
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2013-01-25
23:43:57 UTC ---
May be fixed now. Not sure.
function in serial irrevocable transaction.
This is incorrect and causes the slowdown of irrevocable transactions.
The correct behavior it to inline non-instrumented function.
The bug is present in 4.7.2 and 4.8 (gcc version 4.8.0 20130129)
when compiling with -O1, -O2, -O3.
// examle.c
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56128
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56141
Bug #: 56141
Summary: 4.8.0 git version fails to config - there is no
cloog-ppl-0.18.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56141
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56141
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
16:22:25 UTC ---
If you're doing a non-default build (e.g. using cloog) you need to say exactly
what you're doing and provide the FULL configure command.
Trunk no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56141
--- Comment #3 from jarausch at igpm dot rwth-aachen.de 2013-01-29 17:09:22 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
If you're doing a non-default build (e.g. using cloog) you need to say exactly
what you're doing and provide the FULL configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #29 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
17:24:58 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 29 17:24:51 2013
New Revision: 195550
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195550
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
17:26:46 UTC ---
In adding debugging printfs throughout a locally reduced testcase, I ran into
something peculiar, that may or may not be related to this PR. Perhaps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56133
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2013-01-29 17:37:12
UTC ---
On 01/29/2013 10:26 AM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56086
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
17:46:21 UTC ---
All hail extended precision, and lack of proper rounding operations
(until the 68040 anyway).
Aldy's analysis in #c11 suggests that compiling (all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54508
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-01-29
18:03:04 UTC ---
The wrong-code occurs in the test wrapper rather than in gmp proper, and the
test wrapper does contain a helper function (my_ldexp) which computes and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 19:34:08 UTC ---
A more structured version of the patch:
...
Index: cfgrtl.c
===
--- cfgrtl.c (revision 195240)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com 2013-01-29
19:47:24 UTC ---
double d, d2;
...
if (d != d2) {
dumpd(d,d2);
return -1;
}
By this point, d and d2 are in fp2/fp3,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56121
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 20:29:34
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jan 29 20:29:29 2013
New Revision: 195558
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195558
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56121
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 21:12:56
UTC ---
I've checked this again on rev. 19 and the problem doesn't seem to happen
anymore. It also doesn't show up in the latest SH4 test result post
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in CSE |ICE in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
--- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
21:20:53 UTC ---
Both -fexcess-precision=standard and -ffloat-store fix the testcase. This is
perhaps a duplicate of PR323.
Although, Jakub mentions that according
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
--- Comment #13 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2013-01-29 21:25:58
UTC ---
… oh, sorry, the automatic retry is apparently Debian/Feodora specific.
Still… in this very case… this ICE in CSE is hitting us often enough…
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #28 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 21:40:55 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jan 29 21:40:51 2013
New Revision: 195562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195562
Log:
2013-01-29 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
--- Comment #29 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29 21:45:56 UTC ---
r195562 fixes comment 0.
ToDo: The test case in comment 4 still fails (cf. also comment 23 - 27).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-01-29
22:04:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 29302
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29302
assembly file for reduced testcase from comment 5
generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-01-29
22:15:29 UTC ---
Is it significant that in the assembly, the .mod_term_func section section
(which captures the call to __asan_init) is emitted before the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56142
Bug #: 56142
Summary: During *make*, Perl error regarding unescaped left
brace in texi2pod.pl, line 319
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56142
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-29
23:04:53 UTC ---
checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in
`/usr/local/src/gcc/objdir/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgcc':
configure: error: cannot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
--- Comment #14 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2013-01-29 23:29:54
UTC ---
just don’t hit me… I’m trying this now, until someone fixes this PR:
# DP: retry a known ICE with -O1 then -O0 in case it gets better
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56143
Bug #: 56143
Summary: Incorrect code generation with -O0 in x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56143
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56143
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30
02:11:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
*_jit-pc.ui++ = i0 - (_jit-pc.w + 4);
You have a sequence point issue. This is like doing:
*i++ = i0 - (i + 4);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56143
--- Comment #3 from Paulo César Pereira de Andrade pcpa at mandriva dot
com.br 2013-01-30 02:19:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
*_jit-pc.ui++ = i0 - (_jit-pc.w + 4);
You have a sequence point issue. This is like doing:
*i++ = i0 - (i +
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30
02:56:52 UTC ---
Return NULL_RTX in extract_bit_field_using_extv when it's not
possible to create pseudos just results in another similar error
a little further
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56142
--- Comment #2 from Ray Lauff ray at temple dot edu 2013-01-30 03:26:23 UTC
---
You are correct, of course. Thank you for the pointer, which led me to a
successful build.
ray
On Jan 29, 2013, at 6:05 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/regehr/z/compiler-source/gcc/configure
--with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r195565-install
--enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20130129 (experimental) (GCC)
-install/gcc-r195565-install
--enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20130129 (experimental) (GCC)
it
stops gcc from produce the ice.
gcc version 4.8.0 20130129 (experimental)
[gcc trunk revision 195526]
(mingw-w64 trunk revision 5568)
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -m64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include
-I../libmp3lame -O1 -ffast-math -floop-parallelize-all -c layer3.c -o layer3.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56138
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56138
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||51976
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56128
--- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30
06:43:51 UTC ---
I'd prefer to simply disable libsanitizer build if something is not supported.
Since we are not testing it on older kernels, many things may be broken
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56138
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-30
07:47:20 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Jan 30 07:47:14 2013
New Revision: 195570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195570
Log:
2012-01-30
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56138
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
82 matches
Mail list logo
