[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 --- Comment #6 from Ami Tavory 2013-02-02 07:24:16 UTC --- Hi Paolo (again) and Jonathan, Thanks for offering to add the missing functionality, Jonathan. I was wondering if there might be an interest to add _AllocatorConcept to

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #35 from Jack Howarth 2013-02-02 05:51:31 UTC --- Created attachment 29334 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29334 working va_gc implementation

[Bug c++/56179] ERROR: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)recevied while installing gnuradio.git

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56179 --- Comment #3 from William Macre 2013-02-01 23:39:50 UTC --- Does it really say "recevied" not "received" ?! YES. Will check memory size on uSD. Wrm -Original Message- From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gc

[Bug c++/56179] ERROR: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)recevied while installing gnuradio.git

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56179 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-01 23:30:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > ERROR: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)recevied while installing > gnuradio.git Does it really say "recevied" not "received" ?! Anyway

[Bug fortran/56174] Wrongly accepts "INTEGER :: b = HUGE(b)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56174 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug debug/53927] wrong value for DW_AT_static_link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2013-02-01 22:20:38 UTC --- Created attachment 29333 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29333 patch to tweak the static chain at -O0 * function.c (instantiate_decls): Process the s

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 22:19:45 UTC --- Can you explain why normal qsort wouldn't do the sort in one pass? You just do if (ctor_recordA->priority > ctor_recordB->priority) return -1; if (ctor_recordA->prior

[Bug debug/53927] wrong value for DW_AT_static_link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2013-02-01 22:16:47 UTC --- > I think this would be a nice addition. OK, I'm attaching the patchlet. I can submit it when stage #1 opens.

[Bug target/50678] [4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |WAITING --- Comment #67 from Er

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #33 from Jack Howarth 2013-02-01 21:45:42 UTC --- Replacing the... ctors->qsort (sort_by_ctor_priority); with... qsort(ctors, ctor_index+1, sizeof(ctor_record), sort_by_ctor_priority); appears to solve the bootstrap i

[Bug debug/49090] provide a way to recognize defaulted template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49090 --- Comment #10 from Tom Tromey 2013-02-01 21:44:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Does it make sense to you to use DW_AT_default_value as a flag here? That would be fine by me.

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #32 from Jack Howarth 2013-02-01 21:22:06 UTC --- Created attachment 29332 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29332 first attempt at va_gc implementation The attached patch is a first attempt at replacing th

[Bug target/50678] [4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #66 from simon at pushface dot org 2013-02-01 21:03:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #65) Something amazing has happened with Xcode 4.6. I'm running Darwin 12.2.1, Georg is running 11.4.2. When I built r195611 with Xcode 4.

[Bug c++/54601] AIX uses atexit which causes unloading of shared modules to break

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601 --- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn 2013-02-01 20:26:37 UTC --- Author: dje Date: Fri Feb 1 20:26:24 2013 New Revision: 195675 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195675 Log: PR target/54601 libgcc/

[Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN: Fortran/OMP yields false positives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 --- Comment #39 from Dmitry Vyukov 2013-02-01 20:00:22 UTC --- Sorry, I was busy previous weeks. Thanks for fixing this.

[Bug debug/49090] provide a way to recognize defaulted template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49090 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug debug/49090] provide a way to recognize defaulted template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49090 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-01 19:45:51 UTC --- Does it make sense to you to use DW_AT_default_value as a flag here?

[Bug c++/56179] ERROR: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)recevied while installing gnuradio.git

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56179 --- Comment #1 from William Macre 2013-02-01 19:00:26 UTC --- ERROR: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)recevied while installing gnuradio.git What we need -the exact version of GCC; gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GC

[Bug c++/56179] New: ERROR: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)recevied while installing gnuradio.git

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56179 Bug #: 56179 Summary: ERROR: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)recevied while installing gnuradio.git Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3

[Bug target/50678] [4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Georg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||georggcc at googlemail dot

[Bug ada/56178] New: [4.8 Regression] Conversion of Long_Float to Integer triggers CONSTRAINT_ERROR overflow check failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56178 Bug #: 56178 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Conversion of Long_Float to Integer triggers CONSTRAINT_ERROR overflow check failed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Vers

[Bug debug/53927] wrong value for DW_AT_static_link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927 --- Comment #8 from Tom Tromey 2013-02-01 18:22:21 UTC --- > Yes, but you can do something useful even with this value of > DW_AT_static_link, albeit not exactly what DWARF means. Regardless, I think GCC should emit correct DWARF. > I

[Bug debug/49090] provide a way to recognize defaulted template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49090 --- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey 2013-02-01 18:18:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > What do you think about G++ (also) switching to emitting K for DW_AT_name > in this case? Would that break GDB type compatibility with other translation

[Bug fortran/45159] Unnecessary temporaries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45159 --- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-01 18:16:30 UTC --- To allow expressions like a(n:2*n:2) = a(n+1:2*n+1:2) to be optimized, I will try to write a function which calculates the difference between two gfc_expr() for easy cas

[Bug debug/49090] provide a way to recognize defaulted template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49090 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-01 17:58:34 UTC --- What do you think about G++ (also) switching to emitting K for DW_AT_name in this case? Would that break GDB type compatibility with other translation units that had K?

[Bug target/54908] [4.8 regression] misc regressions on emutls targets remain from dynamic initialization of non-function-local TLS variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54908 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55839] Inefficiency with array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55839 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56177] New: ICE when used forward for 'auto f();'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56177 Bug #: 56177 Summary: ICE when used forward for 'auto f();' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug debug/54793] the location of a formal_parameter is not started from a function entry with -mfentry

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54793 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 16:54:23 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 16:54:14 2013 New Revision: 195669 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195669 Log: PR debug/54793 * final.c (need_

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #31 from Jack Howarth 2013-02-01 16:46:35 UTC --- FYI, the proof of concept patch from Comment 27 produces no regressions in the testsuite on x86_64-apple-darwin12... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-02/msg00070.htm

[Bug middle-end/56167] ICE with invalid __attribute__ arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56167 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-02-01 16:21:58 UTC --- > No idea why you consider the rest as bugs. The diagnostic messages are somewhat confusing. I believe that `weakref', by analogy with `alias', should give: bug.c:1:1: e

[Bug c++/56176] ICE with call to synthesized default constructor of inner struct with NSDMI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56176 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #15 from Pat Haugen 2013-02-01 16:10:09 UTC --- The recently added switch, -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations, can be used to prevent the transformation into an infinite loop. http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=19

[Bug c++/56176] internal compiler error with call to default constructor of inner struct having a std::function member attribute initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56176 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug c++/56176] internal compiler error with call to default constructor of inner struct having a std::function member attribute initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56176 --- Comment #1 from Benoit Bayol 2013-02-01 16:05:31 UTC --- I have just noticed that the example code can be simpler : struct B { typedef struct { int a = 0; } A; B(A a = A()){} };

[Bug c++/56176] New: internal compiler error with call to default constructor of inner struct having a std::function member attribute initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56176 Bug #: 56176 Summary: internal compiler error with call to default constructor of inner struct having a std::function member attribute initialization Classification: Unclas

[Bug rtl-optimization/56175] Issue with combine phase on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56175 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-02-01 15:58:49 UTC --- Created attachment 29330 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29330 testcase This test must be compiled with the following options: "-O2 -ffast-math -msse2

[Bug rtl-optimization/56175] New: Issue with combine phase on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56175 Bug #: 56175 Summary: Issue with combine phase on x86. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug tree-optimization/56125] [4.7 Regression] -O2 -ffast-math generates bad code when dividing a double by the square of another double.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56125 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/56098] [4.6 Regression] conditional write through volatile pointer produces unintended read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.6 Regression]

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49069] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.3 Summary|[4.6/4.

[Bug tree-optimization/56051] Wrong expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.3 --- Comment #10 from Jaku

[Bug middle-end/56015] [4.6 Regression] expand expands p[9] = COMPLEX_EXPR <-IMAGPART_EXPR , REALPART_EXPR >; incorrectly.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.3 Summary|[4.6/4.

[Bug target/55940] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/55921] [4.6 Regression] Crash in verify_ssa for asm to side-steps complex pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] Crash |[4.6 Regression] Crash in

[Bug rtl-optimization/55838] [4.6 Regression] ICE in extract_insn (unrecognizable insn) with -O -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.3 Summary|[4.6/4.

[Bug c++/54207] [4.7 Regression][C++0x] ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/55542] g++ segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55542 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56174] New: Wrongly accepts "INTEGER :: b = HUGE(b)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56174 Bug #: 56174 Summary: Wrongly accepts "INTEGER :: b = HUGE(b)" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/54046] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong control reaches end of non-void function for switch case with throw and default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54046 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug debug/55094] [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/55236] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr22493-1.c FAILs with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55236 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54127] [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start with asm goto, --target=powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54127 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56125] [4.7 Regression] -O2 -ffast-math generates bad code when dividing a double by the square of another double.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56125 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:17:58 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:17:50 2013 New Revision: 195664 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195664 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-0

[Bug middle-end/56098] [4.6/4.7 Regression] conditional write through volatile pointer produces unintended read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:16:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:16:20 2013 New Revision: 195663 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195663 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-0

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:15:31 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:15:21 2013 New Revision: 195662 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195662 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-

[Bug target/49069] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:14:19 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:14:11 2013 New Revision: 195661 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195661 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-

[Bug libquadmath/56072] info page wrongly defines M_PI_2 and M_PI_4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56072 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:12:38 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:12:29 2013 New Revision: 195659 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195659 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-0

[Bug tree-optimization/56051] Wrong expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:11:54 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:11:46 2013 New Revision: 195658 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195658 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-0

[Bug middle-end/56015] [4.6/4.7 Regression] expand expands p[9] = COMPLEX_EXPR <-IMAGPART_EXPR , REALPART_EXPR >; incorrectly.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:11:03 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:10:48 2013 New Revision: 195657 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195657 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-0

[Bug target/55940] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:09:53 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:09:38 2013 New Revision: 195656 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195656 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-

[Bug middle-end/55921] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Crash in verify_ssa for asm to side-steps complex pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55921 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:08:39 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:08:32 2013 New Revision: 195655 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195655 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-

[Bug rtl-optimization/55838] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn (unrecognizable insn) with -O -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:07:41 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:07:35 2013 New Revision: 195654 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195654 Log: Backported from mainline 2013-

[Bug c++/54207] [4.7 Regression][C++0x] ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:05:55 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:05:42 2013 New Revision: 195653 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195653 Log: Backported from mainline 2012-1

[Bug c++/55652] [4.8 Regression] ICE (segfault) with templates and structs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55652 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:05:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:05:42 2013 New Revision: 195653 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195653 Log: Backported from mainline 2012-1

[Bug c++/55542] g++ segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55542 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:03:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:03:44 2013 New Revision: 195652 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195652 Log: Backported from mainline 2012-1

[Bug c++/54046] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong control reaches end of non-void function for switch case with throw and default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54046 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:02:41 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:02:33 2013 New Revision: 195651 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195651 Log: Backported from mainline 2012-1

[Bug debug/55094] [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 14:00:19 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 14:00:12 2013 New Revision: 195650 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195650 Log: Backported from mainline 2012-1

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-02-01 13:59:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > > > Thus, I close the bug as INVALID. > > ... in wich case could you, please, update the testcase to be valid and > > remove > > the XFAIL

[Bug tree-optimization/55236] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr22493-1.c FAILs with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55236 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 13:58:58 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 13:58:55 2013 New Revision: 195649 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195649 Log: Backported from mainline 2012-1

[Bug rtl-optimization/54127] [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start with asm goto, --target=powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54127 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-01 13:57:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 1 13:57:46 2013 New Revision: 195648 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195648 Log: Backported from mainline 2012-1

[Bug tree-optimization/55970] [x86] Avoid reverse order of function argument gimplifying

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55970 --- Comment #5 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-02-01 13:34:20 UTC --- I sent for review a simple fix that can be considered as workaround for this issue - I simply change macros #define PUSH_ARGS_REVERSED TARGET_PUSH_ARGS that allows user t

[Bug go/56173] New: Several libgo tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56173 Bug #: 56173 Summary: Several libgo tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/56172] New: net FAILs on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56172 Bug #: 56172 Summary: net FAILs on Solaris Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/56168] [4.8 Regression] GCC seems to disregard -fno-builtin when compiling with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56168 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-02-01 12:40:18 UTC --- Created attachment 29329 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29329 alternative patch Patch which disables fixup_decls in LTRANS mode (fixes the testcase). T

[Bug middle-end/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener 2013-02-01 12:38:51 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 1 12:38:45 2013 New Revision: 195646 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195646 Log: 2013-02-01 Richard Biener

[Bug lto/56168] [4.8 Regression] GCC seems to disregard -fno-builtin when compiling with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56168 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-02-01 12:34:53 UTC --- Created attachment 29328 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29328 patch We do stream things properly as / not as builtin. Only we end up replacing the non

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #26 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-01 12:22:05 UTC --- You are right, your suggestions is what I sketched in comment #21 as choices 1 or 2. Sorry for my unclear expalanation of what was actually happening. I don't have a pr

[Bug go/56171] New: syscall FAILs on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56171 Bug #: 56171 Summary: syscall FAILs on Solaris Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|un

[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-01 11:33:23 UTC --- The comment saying "This is precisely the allocator defined in the C++ Standard." is pretty misleading ;-)

[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-01 11:32:32 UTC --- debug_allocator doesn't meet the relaxed allocator requirements in C++11, let alone C++03. At the very least it needs operator== and operator!=, and needs rebind because its t

[Bug libstdc++/56166] std::string::clear() can throw despite being marked noexcept

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56166 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-01 11:25:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > That said, for sure I don't mean to unconditionally oppose fixes to the > current > implementation, eh Jon's idea seems fine to me in principle, if

[Bug middle-end/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 --- Comment #26 from Richard Biener 2013-02-01 10:10:17 UTC --- With another patch to PTA we now are bottle-necked by the C fronted in update_label_decls ;) parser function body: 125.32 (43%) usr alias stmt walking : 7.49 (

[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at redhat dot com --- Comm

[Bug lto/56168] [4.8 Regression] GCC seems to disregard -fno-builtin when compiling with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56168 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56169] Installation the Chromium from ports fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56169 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i386-portbld-freebsd8.1

[Bug c/48418] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Bit shift operator >>=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48418 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 --- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-02-01 08:48:32 UTC --- On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 > > --- Comment #24 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-3

[Bug libstdc++/56166] std::string::clear() can throw despite being marked noexcept

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56166 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-01 08:41:59 UTC --- 4.9, yes. Of course wrt the C++11 requirements the current implementation is non conforming for many other reasons (reference counting is out ruled) + there are long standing bu