[Bug java/56372] New: Missing libgcj caused ICE (stack overflow) in jc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56372 Bug #: 56372 Summary: Missing libgcj caused ICE (stack overflow) in jc1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/56366] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (incompatible types in PHI argument)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56366 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/56349] ICE in create_preheader at cfgloopmanip.c:1525

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56349 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/56349] ICE in create_preheader at cfgloopmanip.c:1525

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56349 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 09:40:39 UTC --- The issue here is that we have an inner loop that has an exit edge that is at the same time the latch edge for its outer loop (that is, its latch

[Bug tree-optimization/56350] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4731

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56350 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libgomp/56357] [4.8 Regression] missing symbol references for libgomp when using -flto -fopenmp on mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56357 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/56355] abs and multiplication

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56355 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/55030] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memcpy-chk.c execution, -Os (et al)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 10:48:18 UTC --- I've lost track. What was the original patch, what do you mean by the blockage patch (that has been installed) and I'm pretty sure there were

[Bug tree-optimization/56360] Loop invariant motion by default can introduce speculative store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56360 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/56359] [4.8 regression] Bogus error: no matching function for call to ...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56359 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/56362] bitfield refs over-optimized?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56362 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/56363] over aggressive division folding ignores sign conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c/56370] RFE: warn on 'foo = realloc(foo, …)'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56370 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug debug/56307] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr55579.c scan-tree-dump esra Created a debug-only replacement for s

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 10:55:32 UTC --- Probably not because s is a local variable, not a parameter and the only function parameter in the testcase is an integer. Unfortunately, I cannot

[Bug tree-optimization/56365] Missed opportunities for smin/smax standard name patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56365 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/56347] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/56077] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] volatile ignored when function inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 --- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 11:08:10 UTC --- I will test the patch removing the JUMP_P part of the conditional on x86-64 and ia64, but for 4.8 I'd suggest trying some more platforms, like ppc at

[Bug middle-end/56344] ICE for program with very large structs returned by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 11:20:43 UTC --- There is now better ways of implementing -fstrict-volatile-bitfields which I repeatedly told the arm people. Not for 4.6, but for 4.7 and trunk.

[Bug middle-end/56363] over aggressive division folding ignores sign conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug c++/56373] New: -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: does not catch issues with smart pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373 Bug #: 56373 Summary: -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: does not catch issues with smart pointers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/56366] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (incompatible types in PHI argument)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56366 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 11:50:13 UTC --- The bug must be latent before, added by vectorizing of sign-conversions. I missed the induction initial value case in case of outer loop

[Bug c++/56373] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: does not catch issues with smart pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 12:07:49 UTC --- The warning isn't issued when 0 converts to std::nullptr_t, only when it converts to a pointer type. struct shared_ptr {

[Bug tree-optimization/56321] [4.8 Regression] ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 12:11:59 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 18 12:11:47 2013 New Revision: 196117 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196117 Log: 2013-02-18

[Bug tree-optimization/56321] [4.8 Regression] ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/56294] BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' leads to bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug middle-end/56301] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with the fix for PR53844

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 12:31:31 UTC --- Created attachment 29482 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29482 test case no reduced test case yet, but there is a diff in the tree

[Bug c++/56374] New: N3276 Incomplete return types Implent in gcc 4.8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56374 Bug #: 56374 Summary: N3276 Incomplete return types Implent in gcc 4.8 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/56301] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with the fix for PR53844

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug c++/56374] N3276 Incomplete return types Implent in gcc 4.8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56374 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/52748] [C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 12:47:32 UTC --- *** Bug 56374 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/56301] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with the fix for PR53844

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 12:48:13 UTC --- I don't see how this is a bug. job_64 = job_new (class_39, ); # DEBUG job = job_64 if (job_64 == 0B) goto bb 43; else goto bb

[Bug middle-end/56301] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with the fix for PR53844

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/56373] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: does not catch issues with smart pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373 --- Comment #2 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com 2013-02-18 12:52:46 UTC --- Thanks a lot for the detailed answer. The warning isn't issued when 0 converts to std::nullptr_t, only when it converts to a pointer type.

[Bug tree-optimization/56350] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4731

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56350 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 13:03:24 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 18 13:03:15 2013 New Revision: 196118 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196118 Log: 2013-02-18

[Bug middle-end/56349] [4.8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader at cfgloopmanip.c:1525

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56349 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization

[Bug middle-end/56349] [4.8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader at cfgloopmanip.c:1525

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56349 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/56349] [4.8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader at cfgloopmanip.c:1525

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56349 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 13:09:24 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 18 13:09:17 2013 New Revision: 196119 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196119 Log: 2013-02-18

[Bug c++/56373] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: does not catch issues with smart pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 13:20:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) It's necessary, because otherwise you get bogus warnings from ScopeGuard-style RAII types. In which case the

[Bug c++/56373] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: does not catch issues with smart pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373 --- Comment #4 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com 2013-02-18 13:23:08 UTC --- If you're smart enough to know the object isn't used then don't create it :) :) :) :) ~shared_ptr() has non-trivial side-effects, the

[Bug middle-end/56301] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with the fix for PR53844

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug middle-end/56301] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with the fix for PR53844

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-02-18 13:34:31 UTC --- On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc

[Bug c/56375] New: SIGSEGV when assign SIMD variable to member of allocated structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 Bug #: 56375 Summary: SIGSEGV when assign SIMD variable to member of allocated structure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug middle-end/56301] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with the fix for PR53844

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 13:42:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Do you think I should revert the patch on the branch nevertheless? (it was a fix for a missed-optimization regression only

[Bug c/56375] SIGSEGV when assign SIMD variable to member of allocated structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53844] [4.6 Regression] GCC generates suboptimal code for unused members of classes in some cases on multiple targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 13:46:46 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 18 13:46:37 2013 New Revision: 196120 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196120 Log: 2013-02-18

[Bug middle-end/53844] [4.6/4.7 Regression] GCC generates suboptimal code for unused members of classes in some cases on multiple targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.7.3 |

[Bug tree-optimization/56366] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (incompatible types in PHI argument)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56366 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 13:58:30 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 18 13:58:21 2013 New Revision: 196121 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196121 Log: 2013-02-18

[Bug tree-optimization/56366] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (incompatible types in PHI argument)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56366 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 13:58:47 UTC --- Fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/56350] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4731

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56350 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 14:19:04 UTC --- The previous commit was for PR56349.

[Bug debug/56376] New: gdb needs a way to associate a vtable symbol with a class type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56376 Bug #: 56376 Summary: gdb needs a way to associate a vtable symbol with a class type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug libgomp/56357] [4.8 Regression] missing symbol references for libgomp when using -flto -fopenmp on mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56357 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 14:24:50 UTC --- Works just fine on x86_64-linux.

[Bug tree-optimization/56265] [4.8 Regression] ICE in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 14:27:29 UTC --- Honza, any progress on this?

[Bug c++/56359] [4.8 regression] Bogus error: no matching function for call to ...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56359 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/56366] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (incompatible types in PHI argument)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56366 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/37237] Debug information for virtual destructors omits DW_AT_vtable_elem_location

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37237 --- Comment #11 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 15:20:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) I don't think such an attribute belongs in the DWARF standard, since this is very much an internal detail of the ABI; another

[Bug target/56214] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20050121-1.c compilation, ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 15:21:41 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Feb 18 15:21:32 2013 New Revision: 196122 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196122 Log: PR

[Bug target/56214] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20050121-1.c compilation, ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Sandra Loosemore sandra at codesourcery dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/56375] SIGSEGV when assign SIMD variable to member of allocated structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 16:04:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) User error, malloc doesn't guarantee sufficient alignment of the pointer, which you are relying on. You need to use

[Bug c++/56377] New: [4.8 Regression] missing template args in substitution-failure diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377 Bug #: 56377 Summary: [4.8 Regression] missing template args in substitution-failure diagnostics Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug c++/56373] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: does not catch issues with smart pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56373] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: does not catch issues with smart pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/56377] [4.8 Regression] missing template args in substitution-failure diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377 --- Comment #1 from Paul Smith pl.smith.mail at gmail dot com 2013-02-18 16:12:00 UTC --- Looks like this was introduced in rev. 190664, with the merging of 'deduction_tsubst_fntype' into 'fn_type_unification'. The instantiation context

[Bug c++/56377] [4.8 Regression] missing template args in substitution-failure diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/47333] [4.6, 4.8 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 --- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-18 16:16:18 UTC --- I've run another reghunt, which revealed that the 4.8 regression was caused by this patch: 2012-05-23 Jan Hubicka

[Bug c/56375] SIGSEGV when assign SIMD variable to member of allocated structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 16:17:35 UTC --- If you mean Joseph's http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6527 comment, then that is about _Decimal128, thus something not part of ISO C89 nor

[Bug fortran/56378] New: gfortran internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 Bug #: 56378 Summary: gfortran internal compiler error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/56347] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 16:29:56 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Feb 18 16:29:49 2013 New Revision: 196123 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196123 Log: PR

[Bug fortran/56378] gfortran internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/56378] gfortran internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 --- Comment #2 from David Sagan david.sagan at gmail dot com 2013-02-18 16:34:30 UTC --- Created attachment 29483 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29483 3 *.f90 files and script to run them

[Bug fortran/56378] gfortran internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 --- Comment #3 from David Sagan david.sagan at gmail dot com 2013-02-18 16:36:14 UTC --- Somehow the attachment did not get sent with the initial writeup Now it is downloaded. (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to comment #0) 1)

[Bug libquadmath/56379] New: libquadmath: Wrong result for strtoflt128.c if compiled with -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56379 Bug #: 56379 Summary: libquadmath: Wrong result for strtoflt128.c if compiled with -O0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56380] New: Const/reference mutable members are not always rejected in class templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56380 Bug #: 56380 Summary: Const/reference mutable members are not always rejected in class templates Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug c++/56381] New: ICE: cc1plus: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381 Bug #: 56381 Summary: ICE: cc1plus: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7842 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug c++/56381] ICE: cc1plus: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381 --- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2013-02-18 17:10:03 UTC --- Created attachment 29484 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29484 preprocessed file of user code (sorry for not reducing)

[Bug c/56370] RFE: warn on 'foo = realloc(foo, …)'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56370 Dave Malcolm dmalcolm at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm

[Bug libquadmath/56379] libquadmath: Wrong result for strtoflt128.c if compiled with -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56379 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug c++/56381] ICE: cc1plus: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug c++/56380] Const/reference mutable members are not always rejected in class templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56380 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56348] internal compiler error in assign_by_spills with -m32 -fPIC -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348 Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56347] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 18:04:23 UTC --- Patch to remove old work around is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00854.html

[Bug fortran/56378] gfortran internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56382] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr55921.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56382 Bug #: 56382 Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr55921.c (internal compiler error) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/56382] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr55921.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56382 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 18:34:54 UTC --- Created attachment 29485 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29485 Patch I tried the above changes to expmed.c but this

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de 2013-02-18 18:41:55 UTC --- hhmm... could some one give an example where packedp would be false but the value is packed or unaligned?

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work on Darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #44 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 18:44:02 UTC --- If unformatted sequential ever worked, it was by chance. Look at this piece of code: /* Seek to the head and overwrite the bogus length with

[Bug fortran/56378] gfortran internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2013-02-18 18:48:28 UTC --- simplified testcase: module t use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding interface fvec2vec module procedure int_fvec2vec end

[Bug libstdc++/56383] New: error with multiple enable_shared_from_this base classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56383 Bug #: 56383 Summary: error with multiple enable_shared_from_this base classes Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work on Darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #45 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-02-18 19:15:43 UTC --- ... I would therefore suggest to resolve this PR by issuing a well-defined error if we encounter a pipe on opening. Are you suggesting to

[Bug fortran/56378] gfortran internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56381] ICE: cc1plus: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 19:24:28 UTC --- Created attachment 29486 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29486 pr56381.ii Somewhat reduced, just -std=c++11 -O2 is enough to

[Bug c++/56381] ICE: cc1plus: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at

[Bug c++/56381] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: cc1plus: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7842

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3

[Bug tree-optimization/56384] New: ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:10422

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com With GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130218 : $ cat fold.c int a, c; void f(void) { unsigned char b; if(a) { for(; b 1; b++); lbl1: c = (b

[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 19:43:06 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 18 19:42:56 2013 New Revision: 196124 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196124 Log: PR pch/54117

[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56378] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gfortran internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/56365] Missed opportunities for smin/smax standard name patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56365 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 20:04:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I see, at -O2, on x86_64 in 070t.phiopt: test_04 (int a, int b) { int D.1744; int D.1741; int _3; int _4;

  1   2   >