[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #35 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 08:38:50 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Mar 6 08:38:46 2013 New Revision: 196487 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196487 Log: 2013-03-06

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug target/55181] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Expensive shift loop where a bit-testing instruction could be used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55181 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 08:51:30 UTC --- Note that a bit-test instruction can only be used if the and only feeds a comparison against zero. Not sure how canonical bit-test patterns should

[Bug libquadmath/55473] quadmath.h should have extern C for C++ users

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55473 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan skannan at redhat dot com 2013-03-06 08:53:19 UTC --- Created attachment 29593 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29593 Added cplusplus macro usage

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8

[Bug c++/56543] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/56548] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56548 Bug #: 56548 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/56541] vectorizaton fails in conditional assignment of a constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56541 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/56294] BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' leads to bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug pch/56549] New: #pragma once ineffective with BOM in include file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56549 Bug #: 56549 Summary: #pragma once ineffective with BOM in include file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug pch/56549] #pragma once ineffective with BOM in include file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56549 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Khan yurivkhan at gmail dot com 2013-03-06 09:52:01 UTC --- Also reproduced on 4.7.2.

[Bug middle-end/56548] [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56548 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-06 10:13:07 UTC --- Thanks Jakub, that seems consistent with my simple analysis.

[Bug middle-end/56548] [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56548 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56470] [4.8 Regression] ICE output_operand: invalid shift operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56470 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/55402] Compiling large initializer lists never finishes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55402 --- Comment #11 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 10:30:20 UTC --- Maybe the issues in this bug are the same as those for bug 55135.

[Bug fortran/56378] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with C_LOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug c++/53958] set_slot_part and canon_value_cmp using 90% of compile time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53958 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub

[Bug libquadmath/56379] libquadmath: Wrong result for strtoflt128.c if compiled with -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56379 Shakthi Kannan skannan at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||skannan

[Bug middle-end/37448] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] cannot compile big function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile

[Bug target/56550] New: cortex-m3: incorrect write to member of volatile packed structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56550 Bug #: 56550 Summary: cortex-m3: incorrect write to member of volatile packed structure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug middle-end/37448] cannot compile big function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|cannot

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.4.5 |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/47344] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower and uses more memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 --- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 10:51:27 UTC --- This bug looks like the wrong idea to me. Old is apparently anything older than the maintained release branches, but many users in the field still

[Bug c/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |c

[Bug c++/12850] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations tripled since 3.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12850 --- Comment #48 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 10:53:50 UTC --- I've added the testcase to http://gcc.opensuse.org/c++bench/random/

[Bug middle-end/47344] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower and uses more memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-06 10:57:15 UTC --- On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 --- Comment #7 from Steven

[Bug middle-end/38474] compile time explosion in dataflow_set_preserve_mem_locs at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug middle-end/54896] optimization slowness on large basic blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54896 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Some optimization slowness

[Bug c++/56543] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |

[Bug middle-end/54896] optimization slowness on large basic blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54896 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-06 11:11:28 UTC --- On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54896 Steven Bosscher steven at

[Bug c++/56543] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 11:13:23 UTC --- The second is NULL if there are no explicit arguments, or a TREE_VEC of arguments. Thus, perhaps: -if (TREE_CODE (fullname) ==

[Bug tree-optimization/56294] BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' leads to bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 11:24:20 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Mar 6 11:24:07 2013 New Revision: 196488 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196488 Log: 2013-03-06

[Bug tree-optimization/56294] BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' leads to bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 11:38:07 UTC --- 4.7.2 -O0 25s 2189981kB integrated RA : 8.96 (35%) usr 0.89 (28%) sys 9.89 (34%) wall 206439 kB (16%) ggc reload

[Bug middle-end/47344] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower and uses more memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven

[Bug middle-end/47344] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower and uses more memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 12:07:28 UTC --- I agree with Richard here, it isn't that much hidden, simplifies RM tasks and allows us to actually release the compiler in roughly timely manner.

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.3

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #25 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 12:10:31 UTC --- (NB 4.6.3 known to work w.r.t. comment #5, not w.r.t. original bug report)

[Bug middle-end/47344] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower and uses more memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 12:11:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) All these regressions clutter the list of important regressions. And why would all of

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-06 12:14:03 UTC --- On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 Steven Bosscher steven at

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 12:16:06 UTC --- Btw, I wouldn't call gcc-4.6.3: 1:39.92 total work ;) Also the reporter says the bug is in 4.4.5 (so we are again turning a bug into a

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #28 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 12:18:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) Posted for discussion here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00193.html OT: Another trivial speed-up for

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-06 12:23:21 UTC --- On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #28 from Steven

[Bug c++/51884] [C++11] ICE with local class/lambda template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/56539] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56539 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56543] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 14:28:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) -if (TREE_CODE (fullname) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR) +if (TREE_CODE (fullname) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR +

[Bug c++/56543] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/56522] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 9% / 11% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 15:06:41 UTC --- Created attachment 29598 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29598 assign.c With -O3 -march=corei7 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops

[Bug tree-optimization/56539] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56539 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 15:08:29 UTC --- The patch fixes the problem for both 4.7 and 4.8, using the testcase above and the original C++ one it was reduced from.

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #179 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 15:14:35 UTC --- I'm currently (gcc revision 196427, FF changeset 123831:c95439870e05) facing a few ICEs during the compilation phase with the following backtrace:

[Bug c++/56543] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 15:19:17 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 6 15:19:11 2013 New Revision: 196491 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196491 Log: PR c++/56543

[Bug libstdc++/56551] New: A faster implementation of std::function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56551 Bug #: 56551 Summary: A faster implementation of std::function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/56543] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 15:27:25 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 6 15:27:13 2013 New Revision: 196492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196492 Log: PR c++/56543

[Bug c++/56543] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 15:34:19 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 6 15:34:11 2013 New Revision: 196493 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196493 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 16:11:22 UTC --- Created attachment 29599 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29599 do not set overflow on [+-]INF This is Richi's suggestion from

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 16:18:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 6 16:18:40 2013 New Revision: 196497 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196497 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #19 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2013-03-06 16:18:50 UTC --- Those tests are more or less the whole point of the strict-overflow warning. -Wstrict-overflow exists to have an optional warning that tells you when you

[Bug libstdc++/56551] A faster implementation of std::function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56551 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 16:24:20 UTC --- I've only glanced at the code but it's good to see you support passing an Allocator to the constructor (though it should use std::allocator_traits to

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #20 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 16:28:12 UTC --- Oh, no worries Ian. I totally agree. I just wanted to put all this out there, since I'm unfortunately about to drop it. We should probably close

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 --- Comment #23 from Sergei Steshenko sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2013-03-06 16:49:51 UTC --- FYI, the original file ( http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17377 ) can be compiled with 'clang', albeit slowly:

[Bug middle-end/56548] [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56548 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 17:18:53 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 6 17:18:46 2013 New Revision: 196498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196498 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/56474] [4.8 regression] bogus Storage_Error raised for record containing empty zero-based array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 17:19:42 UTC --- Note the hacks all boil down to the fact that FEs use signed array domains but unsigned sizetype TYPE_DOMAIN. The C and C++ FE were adjusted to

[Bug middle-end/56548] [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56548 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 17:54:41 UTC --- This is ICEing here: /* ?? If this fails, we should temporarily restore the default target first (set_cfun (NULL) ??), do the rest of this

[Bug middle-end/56548] [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56548 --- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 18:04:30 UTC --- For the record, this does undo the performance regression fix on MIPS. I will submit a new bug for that issue. The problem (on mips) is that we want to do

[Bug middle-end/56548] [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56548 --- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 18:22:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) But you can't achieve that through generation of invalid RTL. Agreed. Anyway, I wonder why nonzero_bits during combine

[Bug middle-end/56548] [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56548 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 18:18:52 UTC --- But you can't achieve that through generation of invalid RTL. Anyway, I wonder why nonzero_bits during combine doesn't figure out that the upper bits

[Bug middle-end/56552] New: conditional move can generate unnecessary conversion code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552 Bug #: 56552 Summary: conditional move can generate unnecessary conversion code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug lto/50293] -flto fails if GCC is installed in directory with space in path name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50293 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto

[Bug libstdc++/56492] std::packaged_task requires CopyConstructible stored task

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56492 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 20:08:55 UTC --- Created attachment 29600 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29600 Patch for after 4.9

[Bug libstdc++/56492] std::packaged_task requires CopyConstructible stored task

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56492 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 20:59:01 UTC --- Created attachment 29601 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29601 Tentative patch How about this patch? Only

[Bug tree-optimization/56539] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56539 --- Comment #8 from Vincent vchou79 at gmail dot com 2013-03-06 21:20:29 UTC --- Jakub, The patch also fixed this problem testcase on cross compiler (x86_64-w64-mingw32).

[Bug lto/56495] ICE in lto_output_tree with -g -flto -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56495 --- Comment #3 from Florian Meyer spammeup2011 at googlemail dot com 2013-03-06 21:34:11 UTC --- Seems i can only reproduce it with the live package provided by Gentoo , even though it does not apply any patches. If I configure and compile

[Bug libquadmath/55473] quadmath.h should have extern C for C++ users

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55473 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug libquadmath/56379] libquadmath: Wrong result for strtoflt128.c if compiled with -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56379 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/56529] [SH] Calls to __sdivsi3_i4i and __udivsi3_i4i are generated on SH2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56529 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 22:54:18 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Wed Mar 6 22:54:11 2013 New Revision: 196510 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196510 Log: Backport

[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 23:01:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Created attachment 29601 [details] Tentative patch How about this patch? Only lightly tested. It fixes the testcase

[Bug bootstrap/56554] New: stage2 ./intl: error: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56554 Bug #: 56554 Summary: stage2 ./intl: error: C compiler cannot create executables Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/56554] stage2 ./intl: error: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56554 --- Comment #1 from Douglas Mencken dougmencken at gmail dot com 2013-03-06 23:15:46 UTC --- Created attachment 29602 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29602 readelf of /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.0.1

[Bug bootstrap/56554] stage2 ./intl: error: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56554 --- Comment #2 from Douglas Mencken dougmencken at gmail dot com 2013-03-06 23:16:36 UTC --- Created attachment 29603 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29603 readelf of _gcc_bootstrap/./prev-gcc/libgcc_s.so.1

[Bug bootstrap/56554] stage2 ./intl: error: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56554 --- Comment #3 from Douglas Mencken dougmencken at gmail dot com 2013-03-06 23:20:51 UTC --- Created attachment 29604 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29604 Attaching intl/config.log

[Bug tree-optimization/56539] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56539 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 23:26:48 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 6 23:26:42 2013 New Revision: 196511 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196511 Log: PR

[Bug bootstrap/56554] stage2 ./intl: error: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56554 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 23:26:58 UTC --- What binutils version are you using?

[Bug bootstrap/56554] stage2 ./intl: error: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56554 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 23:28:19 UTC --- Did you rebuild a candian cross to the target first before updating your libc? I think you broke your system by changing your libc without first

[Bug tree-optimization/56539] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56539 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/55786] g++ segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55786 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 23:47:30 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Mar 6 23:47:20 2013 New Revision: 196513 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196513 Log: /cp

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 --- Comment #25 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-07 00:08:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) (In reply to comment #22) 4.8.0 -O2 (terminated after 9 minutes waiting, LIM being the offender, I suspect domwalk

[Bug fortran/56555] New: read from pipe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56555 Bug #: 56555 Summary: read from pipe Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 --- Comment #26 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-07 00:26:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) FYI, the original file ( http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17377 ) can be compiled with 'clang', albeit

[Bug fortran/56555] read from pipe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56555 --- Comment #1 from Ryo Furue furue at hawaii dot edu 2013-03-07 00:33:40 UTC --- I'm sorry That was a mistake! I want to withdraw it but don't know how. I'm very sorry for posting a total nonsense! Ryo

[Bug fortran/56555] read from pipe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56555 Ryo Furue furue at hawaii dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE

  1   2   >