http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56557
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
08:19:28 UTC ---
Wouldn't that mean that if you emit _ZTT* for the same class in multiple TUs in
one shared library and the _ZTT* references these static _ZTC* symbols,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
08:32:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I can reproduce the failure with a i686-apple-darwin9 cross
to hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
Can you please attach
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56586
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56600
Bug #: 56600
Summary: loop goes indefinite when non-loop integer variable
overflows
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
09:09:12 UTC ---
Indeed, bootstrap with BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' now finally
passes. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56600
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56598
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56600
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56597
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mingw*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56598
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56578
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56601
Bug #: 56601
Summary: OpenBSD lto-plugin fails to use
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56598
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56601
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56601
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
10:19:43 UTC ---
Seems to work for me with a quick test targeting arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56601
--- Comment #4 from m...@waldemar-brodkorb.de 2013-03-12 10:25:23 UTC ---
Hi,
thanks for the fast response.
I ktrace't the driver and the log is here:
http://www.waldemar-brodkorb.de/kdump
30611 arm-openwrt-linu NAMI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326
--- Comment #46 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
10:46:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 29649
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29649
symmetry in reference testing
Exploit symmetry in reference
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29639|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
11:26:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 29651
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29651
X2
Incremental debugging hack.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
11:30:02 UTC ---
First issue is (with -Werror -O2) error on attribs.c. Reduced testcase:
const void *a, *b, *c, *d, *e;
const void *f[4];
void
foo (void)
{
unsigned long
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56560
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
11:37:27 UTC ---
This patch adds expand_args to track library calls to
expend arguments. We add vzeroupper when expand_args == 1,
which indicates we are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56263
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
11:42:30 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Mar 12 11:42:26 2013
New Revision: 196611
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196611
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
11:48:09 UTC ---
Second issue is from caller-save.c (setup_save_areas), again -Werror -O2:
int a, b[53][5], c[53][5];
int bar (void);
void
foo (void)
{
int i,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56571
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
12:13:44 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Mar 12 12:13:33 2013
New Revision: 196612
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196612
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56571
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
12:35:59 UTC ---
There is also a problem in unwind-dw2.c, but that looks like something we
should probably fix:
../../../libgcc/unwind-dw2.c: In function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56557
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
12:38:54 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Mar 12 12:38:47 2013
New Revision: 196613
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196613
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
12:40:54 UTC ---
On:
int a[18];
void
foo (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 16; i 32; i++)
a[i] = 26;
}
distilled from unwind-dw2.c, I'm just surprised that at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56557
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56557
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
13:00:11 UTC ---
Filled in binutils PR http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56312
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
13:03:36 UTC ---
Sadly this problem does not reproduce to me (though I use -fno-fat-lto-objects
that makes the build quite a bit faster). Can you please upload for me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55611
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28931|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #36 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
13:05:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #35)
I am still bit confused how keyed construction vtables are supposed to work.
If I understand it right, and there is no C++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56597
--- Comment #3 from jjwang kruglinski at gmail dot com 2013-03-12 13:24:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
but when I try to run a test program compiled by VC++ that use the Dlls
compiled by gcc
so I assume this is on mingw32/64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56557
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56578
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-03-12 13:30:30 UTC ---
We could say the bug is in the testcase. Failing is:
[...]
that's because you are providing an implementation of
malloc in libxxx.a a.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56312
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com 2013-03-12
13:31:06 UTC ---
Hello Jan, there's a link to dump:
https://mega.co.nz/#!bBF3kBSI!JPkMhRtHgUAx_lUw-VctVB0llul3BSrad2dpF9_6yJQ
(extracted size is about 16GB)
Could you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #37 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2013-03-12 13:32:15
UTC ---
So perhaps the construction vtables should be always comdat hidden?
Hmm? My earlier patch made them hidden, and they were already comdat. Do you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #38 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
14:03:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #37)
I assumed it to be public... So I suppose there is no way to write
constructor
of fstream that would not be linked into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326
--- Comment #47 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
14:05:10 UTC ---
With caching affine-combination compute and ao_ref compute I have it down to
tree loop invariant motion: 596.91 (79%) usr 0.73 (29%) sys 599.77
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
14:13:56 UTC ---
Ok, based on reading what exactly record_estimate does, I've tried:
--- tree-ssa-loop-niter.c.xx2013-03-12 13:47:08.0 +0100
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56602
Bug #: 56602
Summary: ICE: internal compiler error: in
default_no_named_section, at varasm.c:6346
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56602
--- Comment #1 from Alan Hourihane alanh at fairlite dot co.uk 2013-03-12
14:19:02 UTC ---
configure:3371: /j/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.7.2/work/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/j/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.7.2/work/build/./gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
14:28:22 UTC ---
With patch, build fails with following error:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir1/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir1/./prev-gcc/
-B/opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522
--- Comment #15 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2013-03-12 14:28:43 UTC
---
I can see different results with different linkers - see above.
Your CPU is Nehalem quad core, but my CPU is Sandy Bridge dual core, which have
less L1/L2/L3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56597
--- Comment #4 from jjwang kruglinski at gmail dot com 2013-03-12 14:31:27
UTC ---
I think one rule can be add to gcc that is:
if GCC decide to use the vector instructions that require alignment in
condition the users are not realized
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-03-12 14:33:52 UTC ---
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, wbrana at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522
--- Comment #15 from wbrana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
14:52:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 29653
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29653
Tree dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
14:53:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 29654
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29654
Tree dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56603
Bug #: 56603
Summary: Different _MM_HINT_TX values from ICC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56593
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56593
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56560
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29645|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56593
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
16:53:15 UTC ---
Is there any advantage in putting nested functions in different partition from
the parent function? I'd say LTO just should try hard to make to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604
Bug #: 56604
Summary: Missing obj-c++.srcman target
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56560
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
17:07:40 UTC ---
This patch adds callee_pass_avx256_p and callee_return_avx256_p
to ix86_args. ix86_function_arg copies them to cfun-machine
when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54970
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56593
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56593
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
17:31:28 UTC ---
What it do you mean at (1)?
-g
Putting nested functions in the same partition as the parent is not
really arbitrary. Nested functions have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56602
--- Comment #2 from Alan Hourihane alanh at fairlite dot co.uk 2013-03-12
17:42:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 29656
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29656
non-ELF m68k systems require default .text section for code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56602
--- Comment #3 from Alan Hourihane alanh at fairlite dot co.uk 2013-03-12
17:43:12 UTC ---
I'm trying the attached patch now, but does this look o.k. ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
17:48:15 UTC ---
I'm just guessing, but is it possible that MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_STMTS is 0
even with -g on hppa-hpux? If so, that (and I suppose the debug
format) would be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54970
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54896
--- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
18:23:29 UTC ---
With r196576 on x86_64 (gcc17):
at -O1:
alias stmt walking : 30.99 (36%) usr
reload CSE regs : 18.94 (22%) usr
CSE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-03-12 18:27:01 UTC ---
On 3/12/2013 1:59 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
I think -fvar-tracking-assignments is disabled by default if selective
scheduler is enabled, but I doubt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54970
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56605
Bug #: 56605
Summary: Redundant branch introduced during loop2 phases
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56605
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56605
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
19:54:05 UTC ---
Confirmed, compiling with -mcpu=power7 -msvx -O3 -fno-unroll-loops
Comes from here:
Breakpoint 8, doloop_modify (loop=0x3fffb5dc0ee0,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29650|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56606
Bug #: 56606
Summary: GCC refuses to emit long calls for operator new/delete
on PowerPC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56263
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54764
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55972
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53265
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-12
21:47:38 UTC ---
Short C testcase reproducing the exp_ch7.adb issue (for -O2):
void bar (int);
__attribute__((noinline)) static int
foo (int x)
{
int i = 1;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56607
Bug #: 56607
Summary: [4.8 regression] GCC fails to warn on division by zero
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56605
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56605
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-03-13 01:50:05 UTC ---
On 12-Mar-13, at 1:48 PM, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
I'm just guessing, but is it possible that MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_STMTS is 0
even with -g on hppa-hpux?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52374
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56608
Bug #: 56608
Summary: built-in floor function returns false results when
build with -ffast-math
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56608
--- Comment #1 from udifuchs at gmail dot com 2013-03-13 02:56:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 29659
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29659
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55532
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56608
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-13 05:32:15
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Mar 13 05:32:07 2013
New Revision: 196627
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196627
Log:
2013-03-13 Paul
88 matches
Mail list logo
