[Bug c/56647] use return value of malloc() as initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56647 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 06:11:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) --- r.c:4:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled

[Bug c/56647] use return value of malloc() as initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56647 shia zhabgyuan1993 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/56566] bogus is narrower than values of its type warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56566 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 07:10:41 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 18 07:10:33 2013 New Revision: 196767 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196767 Log: PR c/56566

[Bug c/56648] New: ignored by target warning not triggered by -fpic but by -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56648 Bug #: 56648 Summary: ignored by target warning not triggered by -fpic but by -fPIC Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/56635] [4.8/4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/56496] [OOP] [F08] ICE with TYPE(*) coarray and SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56496 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 --- Comment #49 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 08:43:08 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 18 08:42:57 2013 New Revision: 196768 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196768 Log: 2013-03-18

[Bug tree-optimization/56635] [4.8/4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 08:46:43 UTC --- Even more reduced (-O3): struct A { _Complex double a; }; void foo (A **x, A **y) { A r; if (__real__ x[0]-a) { r.a = y[0]-a /

[Bug c/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 --- Comment #30 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 08:47:02 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 18 08:46:44 2013 New Revision: 196769 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196769 Log: 2013-03-18

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #33 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 08:53:51 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 18 08:53:42 2013 New Revision: 196771 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196771 Log: 2013-03-18

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/56649] New: ICE gfc_conv_structure with MERGE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56649 Bug #: 56649 Summary: ICE gfc_conv_structure with MERGE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/56635] [4.8/4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/56650] New: Odd error messages with C_SIZEOF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56650 Bug #: 56650 Summary: Odd error messages with C_SIZEOF Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug fortran/56650] Odd error messages with C_SIZEOF for valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56650 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c/56647] use return value of malloc() as initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56647 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug c/56651] New: sin() and tan() has different values during compile time and run time.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651 Bug #: 56651 Summary: sin() and tan() has different values during compile time and run time. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug tree-optimization/54627] VRP uses lots of memory and compile-time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54627 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c/56651] sin() and tan() has different values during compile time and run time.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651 --- Comment #1 from sergey.s at samsung dot com 2013-03-18 09:50:25 UTC --- Created attachment 29690 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29690 Source code with tangent test

[Bug c/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||47344

[Bug tree-optimization/54627] VRP uses lots of memory and compile-time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54627 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/55977] [C++11] vector range construction imposes unnecessary conversion constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55977 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 10:16:07 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Mar 18 10:15:56 2013 New Revision: 196774 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196774 Log:

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc

[Bug libgcc/56634] libgcc does not compile for 4.7.2: Yields internal compiler error: Bus error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56634 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug middle-end/56483] LTO issue with expanding GIMPLE_COND

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 10:29:58 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 18 10:29:43 2013 New Revision: 196776 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196776 Log: 2013-03-18

[Bug middle-end/56483] LTO issue with expanding GIMPLE_COND

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/56210] invalid -Warray-bounds warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 10:33:27 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 18 10:33:11 2013 New Revision: 196777 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196777 Log: 2013-03-18

[Bug c/56651] sin() and tan() have different values during compile time and run time.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2013-03-18 11:04:58 UTC --- Since very recently (between 20130313 and 20130315) gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 execution started to XPASS not only at -O0/-O1, but at every optimisation level.

[Bug c/56651] sin() and tan() have different values during compile time and run time.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651 --- Comment #3 from sergey.s at samsung dot com 2013-03-18 11:06:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) For what target is this? x86, host also is x86.

[Bug c++/56639] ice in cp_parser_late_return_type_opt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56639 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56640] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56642] ice in backtrace_dwarf_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56642 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/56644] --disable-nls requires symbols from libintl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56644 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug bootstrap/56645] libgcc /configure identifies non-existing /lib/cpp as preprocessor on Mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56645 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 11:20:12 UTC --- I think the issue is that checking for /c/Devel/gcc-cvs.not/build_native/./gcc/xgcc -B/c/Devel/gcc-cvs.not/build_native/./gcc/

[Bug bootstrap/56645] libgcc /configure identifies non-existing /lib/cpp as preprocessor on Mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56645 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56646] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in cp_parser_late_return_type_opt, at cp/parser.c:16970

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56646 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c/56651] sin() and tan() have different values during compile time and run time.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug target/56470] [4.7 Regression] ICE output_operand: invalid shift operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56470 --- Comment #9 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 11:52:15 UTC --- Author: rearnsha Date: Mon Mar 18 11:52:08 2013 New Revision: 196780 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196780 Log: PR

[Bug target/56470] [4.7 Regression] ICE output_operand: invalid shift operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56470 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56652] New: Wrong code in O2 - if in inline function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652 Bug #: 56652 Summary: Wrong code in O2 - if in inline function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c++/56652] Wrong code in O2 - if in inline function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652 --- Comment #1 from dominik.siatkowski at aldec dot com.pl 2013-03-18 12:05:05 UTC --- Created attachment 29691 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29691 example

[Bug c++/56652] Wrong code in O2 - if in inline function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/56652] Wrong code in O2 - if in inline function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652 --- Comment #3 from dominik.siatkowski at aldec dot com.pl 2013-03-18 12:16:35 UTC --- Is seems its 4.7 reggresion. Example works if compiled with 4.6.2

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-18 12:16:59 UTC --- Yes. I hope this variant should work better (regtesting now): It works better, but still has regressions: [macbook] f90/bug% gfc

[Bug c++/56652] Wrong code in O2 - if in inline function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652 --- Comment #4 from dominik.siatkowski at aldec dot com.pl 2013-03-18 12:24:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Quick check with clang -fsanitize=undefined shows: ... numeric.cc:47:30: fatal error: negation of -2147483648 cannot be

[Bug c++/56652] Wrong code in O2 - if in inline function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2013-03-18 12:33:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) Quick check with clang -fsanitize=undefined shows: ... numeric.cc:47:30: fatal

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 12:56:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Yes. I hope this variant should work better (regtesting now): It works better, but still has regressions: Yes, I already noticed

[Bug tree-optimization/56635] [4.8/4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 13:02:01 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 18 13:01:49 2013 New Revision: 196781 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196781 Log: PR

[Bug other/56653] New: Warning when verifying checksums from MD5SUMS file in tarballs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56653 Bug #: 56653 Summary: Warning when verifying checksums from MD5SUMS file in tarballs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/56654] New: uninit warning behaves erratically

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654 Bug #: 56654 Summary: uninit warning behaves erratically Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement