http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56644
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658
Bug #: 56658
Summary: Silent conversion between 'char' and 'int' even though
there are 'signed char' and 'unsigned char'
alternatives
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56659
Bug #: 56659
Summary: Segfault due to missing libcpp error handler for
gfortran -cpp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56660
Bug #: 56660
Summary: Fails to read NAMELIST with certain form array syntax
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-03-20 07:45:22
UTC ---
This is probably fallout from move pattern unification. Can you please attach
preprocessed source and assembly? Please use -dp when compiling, it will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53325
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
2013-03-20 08:09:50 UTC ---
It is also fixed in the GCC 4.6 and 4.7 branches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48618
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48618
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-20
08:14:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 29696
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29696
preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51825
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-20
08:15:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 29697
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29697
assembly with -dp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20
08:42:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 20 08:40:08 2013
New Revision: 196808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196808root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56657
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Bug #: 56661
Summary: [4.8 regression] Incorrect code with -O1 -ftree-pre
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56657
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-03-20
09:07:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 29698
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29698
reduced test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994
Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-03-20 09:29:13
UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Mar 20 09:23:39 2013
New Revision: 196813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196813root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.0 |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53323
--- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org 2013-03-20 09:36:44 UTC ---
Still fails on 4.8.
However: package Indefinite_Dynamic begins
generic
type Item () is private;
type Item_Ptr is access Item;
Storage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53323
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-20
09:43:46 UTC ---
(friendly note to Daniel: gcc 4.8.0 trunk doesn't make much sense ;) Either
you mean trunk (future 4.9) or the recently created gcc-4_8-branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56655
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20
09:48:46 UTC ---
Actualy I think the clang guys tried to implement the standard, like the gcc
guys.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56662
Bug #: 56662
Summary: ICE in gcc.dg/vect/vect-outer-5.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-03-20 10:19:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I tested gcc 4.8.0 20130310 (experimental)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56644
--- Comment #4 from Rolf Ebert rolf.ebert.gcc at gmx dot de 2013-03-20
10:23:43 UTC ---
I used the release candidate 4.8.0 from 2013-03-16 (see initial problem
description)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56663
Bug #: 56663
Summary: [PATCH] docs can't be built with texinfo 5.x
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56659
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56657
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56662
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56663
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #54 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-03-20
11:05:58 UTC ---
Status update:
Although gnat is solid enough to rebuild itself with (patched) gcc-4.6 on m68k,
there is a regression with (similarly patched) 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56664
Bug #: 56664
Summary: internal compiler error: in
estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline.c:1940
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20
11:16:14 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 20 11:06:35 2013
New Revision: 196819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196819root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-03-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20
11:16:42 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 20 11:08:52 2013
New Revision: 196820
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196820root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-03-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522
wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20
11:39:31 UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Mar 20 11:34:56 2013
New Revision: 196821
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196821root=gccview=rev
Log:
Don't XFAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56665
Bug #: 56665
Summary: -O2 with -fno-strict-aliasing makes
boost::spirit::classic::assign_a not working
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56665
--- Comment #1 from Bogdan bodzio131 at op dot pl 2013-03-20 11:50:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 29700
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29700
preprocessor output + log + test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56665
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56664
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56580
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56646
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Bug #: 5
Summary: Suppression flag for DO loop at (1) will be executed
zero times
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
Bug #: 56667
Summary: Syntax error causes misleading message: Expected
PARAMETER symbol in complex constant
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #12 from Rich Townsend townsend at astro dot wisc.edu 2013-03-20
12:56:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
So I guess an important question is if the svn-fetched 4.8.0 wasn't actually
svn-fetched trunk instead, Uros' changes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56655
--- Comment #2 from Rich Townsend townsend at astro dot wisc.edu 2013-03-20
13:25:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
Created attachment 29692 [details]
Test source file to reproduce the error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20
13:28:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 20 13:26:19 2013
New Revision: 196825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196825root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-03-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56668
Bug #: 56668
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr56494.c: ICE in simplify_subreg, at
simplify-rtx.c:5725
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56655
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Associate construct with|[F03] ASSOCIATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56305
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20
14:42:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
It seems to be invalid Fortran 2003 but valid Fortran 2008
Fortran 2003 has (15.1.2.5 C LOC (X)):
Argument. X shall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56669
Bug #: 56669
Summary: Short code causes segfault with large -ftemplate-depth
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56669
--- Comment #1 from Antoine Poliakov antoinep92 at gmail dot com 2013-03-20
14:46:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 29702
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29702
error message from 4.8.0 with stack trace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658
--- Comment #3 from GS greenscape777 at gmail dot com 2013-03-20 15:07:00 UTC
---
What about warning? Would it be like harmful, or what?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56355
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20 15:40:30
UTC ---
Jeff Law mentions that it would be good to add this squares are nonnegative
information to VRP, not just tree_binary_nonnegative_warnv_p.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51304
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56669
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56355
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20 16:19:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Jeff Law mentions that it would be good to add this squares are nonnegative
information to VRP, not just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51304
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-20
16:22:26 UTC ---
And indeed, I can confirm that the problem is the stack. Likewise happens with
clang++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51304
--- Comment #4 from Antoine Poliakov antoinep92 at gmail dot com 2013-03-20
16:52:35 UTC ---
Yes, I also submitted the bug (15551) to clang. Doesn't seem to kill intel's
icc though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53323
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org 2013-03-20 17:24:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Confirmed on mainline, but this will compile with the 4.8.0 release.
So it will (with gcc version 4.8.0 20130320 (prerelease) [gcc-4_8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
Bug #: 56670
Summary: Allocatable-length character var causes bogus warning
with -Wall
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53323
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20
22:00:26 UTC ---
Must have been a recent fix, cos it failed with gcc version 4.8.0 20130309
(experimental) [trunk revision 196573] (GCC)!
Sort of, we now disable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54805
Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56434
--- Comment #7 from Chip Salzenberg chip at pobox dot com 2013-03-21 00:31:40
UTC ---
So ... is there still a question of the Right Thing here? It seems that fixing
MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT for the world, and ensuring that BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56671
Bug #: 56671
Summary: Gcc uses large amounts of memory and processor power
with large C++11 bitsets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
78 matches
Mail list logo