[Bug bootstrap/56258] Please upgrade doc/*.texi to the latest texinfo package(s)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258 --- Comment #16 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org 2013-03-24 07:06:40 UTC --- Bootstrap of gcc-4.7-20130323 works perfectly. Thanks.

[Bug c/56705] New: 4.8-20130319 misdiagnoses initialized var (regression from 4.7.2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56705 Bug #: 56705 Summary: 4.8-20130319 misdiagnoses initialized var (regression from 4.7.2) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-12-13 09:36:18

[Bug middle-end/56705] 4.8-20130319 misdiagnoses initialized var (regression from 4.7.2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56705 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-24 08:15:48 UTC --- Looks like a missing jump threading which is causing this warning to show up: bb 24: # _48 = PHI 0(28), prephitmp_80(31), 0(23) # value_89 =

[Bug lto/56706] New: failure building CP2K at -flto -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56706 Bug #: 56706 Summary: failure building CP2K at -flto -O3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/56706] failure building CP2K at -flto -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56706 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug lto/56706] [4.8 Regression] failure building CP2K at -flto -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56706 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|

[Bug libfortran/56696] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Formatted (list-directed) input fails to signal end of record

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56696 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-24 11:15:58 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Mar 24 10:16:33 2013 New Revision: 197019 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197019root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-03-24

[Bug tree-optimization/56707] New: [4.7 regression] ICE in distance_non_agu_define_in_bb for -mtune=atom -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56707 Bug #: 56707 Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in distance_non_agu_define_in_bb for -mtune=atom -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3

[Bug lto/56700] Optimizing at compile and link result in different binary size than only optimizing at link time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56700 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/56704] rlim_t problem gcc 4.8.0 on Solaris 2.10/sparc?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56704 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/56708] New: [4.9 Regression] Failure calling random_seed with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56708 Bug #: 56708 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Failure calling random_seed with optimization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug fortran/56708] [4.9 Regression] Failure calling random_seed with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56708 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56709] New: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709 Bug #: 56709 Summary: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug c++/56709] Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/56709] Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/56644] --disable-nls requires symbols from libintl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56644 Markus Eisenmann meisenmann@fh-salzburg.ac.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/56710] New: Using reserved double underscore variable name in a lambda causes internal compiler error

: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ./configure Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130324 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-std=c++11' '-o' 'test' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64' /usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0

[Bug c++/56710] Using reserved double underscore variable name in a lambda causes internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56710 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/56709] Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709 Markus Elfring Markus.Elfring at web dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/56709] Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56711] New: spectaculary bad code generated for __uint128_t

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56711 Bug #: 56711 Summary: spectaculary bad code generated for __uint128_t Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/56712] New: constuctor function is called twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56712 Bug #: 56712 Summary: constuctor function is called twice Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/52305] [avr] ICE in avr_print_operand: unknown mode (const_double)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52305 Pitchumani pitchumani.s at atmel dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/56712] constuctor function is called twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56712 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-24 17:02:38 UTC --- I think this has been fixed already.

[Bug tree-optimization/56711] missed optimization for __uint128_t of (unsigned long long)x != x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56711 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug libstdc++/56002] [C++11] allow generic locks to be used without requiring plattform support for threads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56002 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/53221] [C++11] basic_string lacks copy/move constructors with allocator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.1 |4.9.0

[Bug c++/53159] Missing narrowing check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53159 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/56701] [C++11] The *this* pointer fails to bind to rvalue reference to pointer type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56701 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libfortran/56696] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Formatted (list-directed) input fails to signal end of record

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56696 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-24 20:26:51 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Mar 24 20:19:23 2013 New Revision: 197022 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197022root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-03-24

[Bug libfortran/56696] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Formatted (list-directed) input fails to signal end of record

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56696 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 --- Comment #19 from Zouzou internet at 123gen dot com 2013-03-24 20:56:40 UTC --- Hi, This appears to have been fixed. I can no longer reproduce it with GCC 4.8 and GDB 7.5.

[Bug bootstrap/56714] New: [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline f unction might not be inlinable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 Bug #: 56714 Summary: [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline f unction might not be inlinable Classification: Unclassified

[Bug middle-end/56712] constructor function is called twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56712 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at

[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/45824] Update expr.c's check_inquiry for C_SIZEOF, compiler_version/_options, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45824 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug c++/56715] New: Explicit Reg Vars are being ignored for consts when using g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56715 Bug #: 56715 Summary: Explicit Reg Vars are being ignored for consts when using g++ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug c++/56715] Explicit Reg Vars are being ignored for consts when using g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56715 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-24 23:33:16 UTC --- const is a bit special in C++, it can be used as part of a const integer expression which is what is happening here.

[Bug c++/56715] Explicit Reg Vars are being ignored for consts when using g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56715 --- Comment #2 from Goswin von Brederlow goswin-v-b at web dot de 2013-03-25 00:07:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) const is a bit special in C++, it can be used as part of a const integer expression which is what is happening here.

[Bug c/56716] New: during gcc 4.8.0 build on Cygwin: bid128_fma.c:4460:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 Bug #: 56716 Summary: during gcc 4.8.0 build on Cygwin: bid128_fma.c:4460:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Classification: Unclassified Product:

[Bug c/56716] during gcc 4.8.0 build on Cygwin: bid128_fma.c:4460:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 pen7cmc at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |major

[Bug preprocessor/56686] gcc cannot find include header file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686 --- Comment #4 from Pan Ruochen panruochen at gmail dot com 2013-03-25 03:21:34 UTC --- I find something interesting: With -I. option, gcc works well. With -I./ option, gcc fails. gcc -v says: ignoring nonexistent directory ./

[Bug preprocessor/56686] gcc cannot find include header file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686 --- Comment #5 from Pan Ruochen panruochen at gmail dot com 2013-03-25 03:28:24 UTC --- Created attachment 29716 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29716 screen snapshot

[Bug preprocessor/56686] gcc cannot find include header file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686 Pan Ruochen panruochen at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/56038] declarations in xmmintrin.h conflict with mingw-w64 intrin.h in c++ mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Liu net147 at gmail dot com 2013-03-25 04:12:41 UTC --- I can reproduce this with MinGW-w64 GCC 4.8.0 x86 DW2/SJLJ. It does not occur with MinGW-w64 GCC 4.8.0 x86_64 SEH/SJLJ.

[Bug preprocessor/33415] Can't compile .cpp file with UTF-8 BOM.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33415 Vikas chalakella at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chalakella at

[Bug lto/55113] internal compiler error: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:3739

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Oppenlander patrick at motec dot com.au 2013-03-25 05:41:48 UTC --- Still present in 4.8 etpu/etpu_port.c: In function 'tpu_port_status_get.isra.26': etpu/etpu_port.c:326:2: internal compiler error: in

[Bug lto/55112] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5424

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55112 Patrick Oppenlander patrick at motec dot com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED