http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57532
Bug ID: 57532
Summary: [4.8.1 regression] operator broken when used on
rvalues
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55776
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
A better example:
typedef unsigned char foo;
enum class myenum
{
foo,
bar = (foo)-1
};
Is the value -1L or 255?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57532
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2013-06-05
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another example fancy example: ftp://ftp.numerical.rl.ac.uk/pub/MRandC/oo.f90
From
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/aRz3HMpblTs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
--- Comment #2 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot
com ---
Here is a small change to work around the crash :
namespace boost {
namespace detail { namespace variant {
struct variant_hasher: public //boost::
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
--- Comment #4 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot
com ---
Created attachment 30259
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30259action=edit
test case
this is the minimal test case that I have.
by applying the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
--- Comment #5 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot
com ---
Sorry, It seems that the original attachment was not applied, I have bzip2ed it
so now it fits.
thanks
mike
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
--- Comment #6 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot
com ---
I have filed a small cosmetic bug in boost about this change to the namespace
usage :
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8651
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57389
Roland Stigge stigge at antcom dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stigge at antcom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
--- Comment #8 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot
com ---
Tested like this:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/cc1plus -std=gnu++11 -fdump-translation-unit
testvariant_min.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
Reduced testcase, which appears 'minimal' to trigger a hanging compilation at
gfortran -c -O2 -ffast-math bug.f90
cat bug.f90
SUBROUTINE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57533
Bug ID: 57533
Summary: When throwing local variable, it's being
move-constructed even if not going out of scope.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57533
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57533
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57530
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00045.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
vijay Nag vijunag at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
--- Comment #3 from vijay Nag vijunag at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to vijay Nag from comment #2)
Sorry for the confusion. Please try the unit test case below
#include stdio.h
/*remove assert in production*/
#define ASSERT(x) (void)0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
vijay Nag vijunag at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vijunag at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57530
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00045.html
Sigh, the patch isn't sufficient as the trans*.c code associate the TYPE with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
--- Comment #5 from vijay Nag vijunag at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
I think the problem is the comma operator causes it to be a rvalue. In that
((void)0, x) is considered rvalue rather than what you want as a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com ---
I've just tested latest gcc and the same message is still received by compiler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119
ajf alan.j.flavell at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alan.j.flavell at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57532
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459
--- Comment #3 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com ---
Mis-computing strlen() in shipping GCC releases doesn't look like P3 to me.
Could anyone please confirm this bug, set priority appropriately, and/or
comment on how this should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ajf from comment #10)
MY apologies if I am missing something obvious, but what exactly makes
shifting a 1 into the sign bit undefined behavior?
You're right, it isn't:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3675.html#1457 changed
this between C++11 and C++14.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51908
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
Bug ID: 57534
Summary: Performance regression versus 4.7.3, 4.8.1 is ~15%
slower
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Yasskin from comment #12)
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3675.html#1457
changed this between C++11 and C++14.
True, but the defect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
--- Comment #1 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com ---
Here is the 4.7.3 output for comparison:
8048702: 83 ef 08sub$0x8,%edi
8048705: d9 ee fldz
8048707: d9 c0 fld
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57535
Bug ID: 57535
Summary: [OOP] ICE when allocating a CLASS function-result
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57530
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30262
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30262action=edit
Draft patch - does not fully work, yet
Currently fails for
x = func1()
in assign_11.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57528
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jewillco
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57463
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081
--- Comment #23 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #22)
FWIW, the updated patch for gcc 4.9 bootstraps and regtests cleanly on
several hosts (x86_64, sparc64, powerpc64, armv5tel, m68k).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57472
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57536
Bug ID: 57536
Summary: Inconsistent behavior of strlen inline and unroll
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57472
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Of course we badly need a reduced testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #3)
Mis-computing strlen() in shipping GCC releases doesn't look like P3 to me.
P3 means unset priority.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30261|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57536
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Also -Os generates larger code:
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ gcc -S -Os -m32 x.i
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat x.s
.filex.i
.text
.globlfoo
.typefoo, @function
foo:
.LFB0:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
--- Comment #5 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com ---
Jakub Jelinek: Started with SLSR addition, guess you can get the performance
back with -fno-tree-slsr.
Thanks so much, I'll do that.
Neil Cahill.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57537
Bug ID: 57537
Summary: [4.8/4.9] gcc.dg/vect/slp-widen-mult-half.c generating
wrong code on PowerPC64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57536
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Something like this:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 8b28b61..6d11323 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -23101,21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113
Patrick Oppenlander patrick at motec dot com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28550|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Oppenlander patrick at motec dot com.au ---
Compiling the new test case results in:
patrick@gtr:~/Downloads/source$ powerpc-eabispe-gcc -v -fshort-double -flto
-nostdlib -o test bug.c
Using built-in specs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Whoops, I missed your comment 7 where you already knew the history. Sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53812
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Can we close this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30378
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10207
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53205
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
62 matches
Mail list logo