[Bug debug/57664] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in should_move_die_to_comdat, at dwarf2out.c:6750 with -fdebug-types-section and lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57664 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/57663] Arithmetic error with -fPIC -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57663 --- Comment #2 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #1) (In reply to Sebastien Bardeau from comment #0) It seems that the gcc 4.6 branch is still receiving bug fixes, so could you have a

[Bug c/57665] New: cpp: stringification does not work for __GNUC__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57665 Bug ID: 57665 Summary: cpp: stringification does not work for __GNUC__ Product: gcc Version: 4.3.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/57663] Arithmetic error with -fPIC -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57663 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Is there any chance that someone has a look to this bug? No, but you can do it yourself. I did not test all gcc/gfortran versions, so I am 100% sure that this a 4.6-only

[Bug c/57665] cpp: stringification does not work for __GNUC__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57665 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- 1) You didn't attach a testcase 2) GCC 4.3 is unsupported and unmaintained 3) You have the wrong number of underscores: #define GCC_VERSION #__GNUC__ . #___GNUC_MINOR__ .

[Bug other/57659] Failure in installing documentation of gcc-4.7.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57659 --- Comment #2 from Ellis N. Thomas ExtraLeveLInSoftware at ntlworld dot com --- Oops...re-used a previous report as a template! Pls take (sub)sections 6 as 5. (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) (In reply to Ellis N. Thomas from

[Bug c/57665] cpp: stringification does not work for __GNUC__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57665 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53211] range-based 'for' expression of type 'const int []' has incomplete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53211 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/57666] New: valarrayT::operator= in c++11 mode does not adapt to size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666 Bug ID: 57666 Summary: valarrayT::operator= in c++11 mode does not adapt to size Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/57666] valarrayT::operator= in c++11 mode does not adapt to size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666 thunderliu at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-redhat-linux ---

[Bug c++/57408] lambda, Variable length arrays, thread, internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9327

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57408 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|superbem at gmail dot com

[Bug debug/57667] New: -femit-struct-debug-detailed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57667 Bug ID: 57667 Summary: -femit-struct-debug-detailed Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug c++/57038] Latest libreoffice compilation fails with enabled LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038 --- Comment #26 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com --- Unit tests error: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x2aaab39189ed in ScDocument::CalcAll() () from /ssd/libreoffice/solver/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libsclo.so

[Bug debug/57667] -femit-struct-debug-detailed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57667 --- Comment #1 from Evgeny Gavrin evgeny.gavrin at hotmail dot com --- Created attachment 30332 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30332action=edit structs declaration

[Bug c++/57402] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147 when initializing variable-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57402 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/57401] 'Conflicting declaration' involving using declaration and dependent name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57401 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug debug/57667] -femit-struct-debug-detailed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57667 --- Comment #2 from Evgeny Gavrin evgeny.gavrin at hotmail dot com --- Hi! From the documentation to -femit-struct-debug-detailed: The value `base' means that the base of name of the file in which the type declaration appears must match the base

[Bug libstdc++/57666] valarrayT::operator= in c++11 mode does not adapt to size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to thunderliu from comment #0) Non-member operators for valarray returns instance of _Expr (lazy evaluation?), instead of another valarray. This is non-conforming but

[Bug target/57637] Miscompare on 178.galgel in SPEC2000 on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Please try the attached patch. If it works, I will send it for community review. Hi Zhenqiang, This seems to fix the miscompare on my setup, thanks! I haven't ran a full regression test on

[Bug libstdc++/57666] valarrayT::operator= in c++11 mode does not adapt to size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666 --- Comment #3 from thunderliu at gmail dot com --- Sorry I missed that. But the remaining (which is the point of this bug) still stands. (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) (In reply to thunderliu from comment #0) Non-member

[Bug debug/57664] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in should_move_die_to_comdat, at dwarf2out.c:6750 with -fdebug-types-section and lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57664 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can't really bisect it further due to autoconf version, but it started between 186994 and 187108.

[Bug libstdc++/57666] valarrayT::operator= in c++11 mode does not adapt to size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug other/57668] New: Regression in vectorizing memcpy pattern.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57668 Bug ID: 57668 Summary: Regression in vectorizing memcpy pattern. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug other/57668] Regression in vectorizing memcpy pattern.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57668 --- Comment #1 from Ondrej Bilka neleai at seznam dot cz --- Created attachment 30333 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30333action=edit benchmark for memcpy

[Bug target/57631] [patch] spurious warning for avr interrupts with asm labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr

[Bug c/52773] internal error: in replace_pseudos_in, at reload1.c:577

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Bernd Schmidt has posted a patch for review: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg01147.html

[Bug target/57631] [patch] spurious warning for avr interrupts with asm labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631 --- Comment #4 from pebbles at riseup dot net --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #3) Would you explain what you are trying to achieve? For one thing, I'm coding in C++, so the handlers may be mangled to the wrong symbols unless I

[Bug c/57669] New: Incorrect floating point values with 32-bit compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57669 Bug ID: 57669 Summary: Incorrect floating point values with 32-bit compile Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/57408] lambda, Variable length arrays, thread, internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9327

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57408 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/57038] Latest libreoffice compilation fails with enabled LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038 --- Comment #27 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is difficult to say why the unit test fails. Would be possible to run it in GDB and figure out why it segfaults? Honza

[Bug c++/57208] Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208 --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- What about trying ulimit -m to increase the number of FDs? (it requires root)

[Bug c++/57208] Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208 --- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- chrome.wpa.000i.cgraph: _ZN3net12_GLOBAL__N_113DnsTCPAttempt12OnIOCompleteEi/8859591 (OnIOComplete) @0x7f80e10be980 Type: function definition analyzed Visibility: force_output

[Bug fortran/34928] Extension: volatile common blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34928 --- Comment #5 from Bud Davis bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org --- As the reporter of this enhancement request, I think it is something that should be left open. Low priority, but this was a 'feature' of some f77 compilers in the past. Even if no-one

[Bug c++/57208] Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208 --- Comment #20 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com --- Link to ltrans16.cgraph dump: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0pisUJ80pO1c0JTTmR5Z1pQb28/edit?usp=sharing

[Bug c++/57038] Latest libreoffice compilation fails with enabled LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038 --- Comment #28 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com --- Gdb instruction dump of ScDocument::CalcAll, place where SIGSEGV was received is marked with '', address: 0x2aaab390c19d + B+ ¦0x2aaab390c180 _ZN10ScDocument7CalcAllEv push

[Bug target/57631] [patch] spurious warning for avr interrupts with asm labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to pebbles from comment #4) (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #3) Would you explain what you are trying to achieve? For one thing, I'm coding in C++, so the

[Bug debug/57667] -femit-struct-debug-detailed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57667 --- Comment #3 from Evgeny Gavrin evgeny.gavrin at hotmail dot com --- Command to run: egavrin@debian:~/dev/vd-issues/ld-memory-consumption/gcc-tests$ gcc-4.7 test.c -O0 -g2 -gdwarf-2 -femit-struct-debug-detailed=ind:ord:base

[Bug middle-end/57670] New: Member-pointer calls should not be redirected to builtin_unreachable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57670 Bug ID: 57670 Summary: Member-pointer calls should not be redirected to builtin_unreachable Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/57670] Member-pointer calls should not be redirected to builtin_unreachable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57670 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/57666] valarrayT::operator= in c++11 mode does not adapt to size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/17166] Improve diagnostic for empty overload set listing the rejected overloads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17166 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57671] New: Compile Error: When declared a pointer const TYPE const *p ; (p is name of pointer)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57671 Bug ID: 57671 Summary: Compile Error: When declared a pointer const TYPE const *p ; (p is name of pointer) Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/57631] [patch] spurious warning for avr interrupts with asm labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631 --- Comment #6 from pebbles at riseup dot net --- You seem to be speaking from an assumption that this warning code should not change. Is there a reason for not adding this small patch, which makes gcc more extendable and accurate? (In reply to

[Bug c/57669] Incorrect floating point values with 32-bit compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57669 Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/57671] Compile Error: When declared a pointer const TYPE const *p ; (p is name of pointer)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57671 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/57631] [patch] spurious warning for avr interrupts with asm labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED

[Bug driver/45508] Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make sense?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||benoit.hudson at

[Bug target/57669] Incorrect floating point values with 32-bit compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57669 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target ---

[Bug driver/7957] change request: more flexible %D specs directive so no need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7957 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/57631] [patch] spurious warning for avr interrupts with asm labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631 --- Comment #8 from pebbles at riseup dot net --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #7) (In reply to pebbles from comment #6) This seems like a very small patch that makes GCC more extendable and accurate. I am not too attached to

[Bug target/57669] Incorrect floating point values with 32-bit compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57669 --- Comment #3 from Oliver Stoeneberg oliverst at online dot de --- It's unoptimized code and using -msse -mfpmath=sse fixes it. But there is another fix: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/7t5yh4fd(v=vs.110).aspx Changing

[Bug fortran/34928] Extension: volatile common blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34928 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- As the reporter of this enhancement request, I think it is something that should be left open. Low priority, but this was a 'feature' of some f77 compilers in the past.

[Bug target/57631] [patch] spurious warning for avr interrupts with asm labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631 pebbles at riseup dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug c++/57658] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12213

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658 --- Comment #3 from Takaki Makino t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm dot com --- Created attachment 30336 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30336action=edit Reduced testcase Hi Paolo, Thank you for referring to the useful resource. Using

[Bug c++/41437] No access control for classes in template functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437 Shane w.shane.grant at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||w.shane.grant at

[Bug c++/57658] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12213

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug target/57631] [patch] spurious warning for avr interrupts with asm labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631 --- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can have a look at it, but it might take a month or so until I get back to this issue. If I understand correctly, bottom line of what you need is that avr-gcc does not warn for

[Bug c++/57658] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12213

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c/57672] New: va_list fixinclude needed for AIX 5.3 sys/types.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57672 Bug ID: 57672 Summary: va_list fixinclude needed for AIX 5.3 sys/types.h Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/53317] Conversion from __int128 to __float128

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53317 Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/57637] Miscompare on 178.galgel in SPEC2000 on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug fortran/37336] Fortran 2003: Finish derived-type finalization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 --- Comment #26 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jun 21 21:51:41 2013 New Revision: 200321 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200321root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-06-21 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de