[Bug c++/57545] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Generation of debug symbols leads to internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57545 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/57532] [4.8/4.9 regression] operator broken when used on rvalues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57532 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/57853] pointer arithmetic on arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853 Howard Brodale brodhow at all2easy dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED ---

[Bug c++/57437] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] C++11: mutable lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57437 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/57526] [4.8/4.9 Regression] use of X before deduction of auto error for seemingly good code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57526 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/57853] pointer arithmetic on arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug target/31798] lib1funcs.asm:1000: undefined reference to `raise'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31798 Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugdal at aerifal

[Bug c++/57043] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] converting overloaded complex function pow in C++11 is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug plugins/57852] lib/plugin-support.exp incorrectly sets PLUGINCC to compilers in prev-gcc breaks testing on lean bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57852 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/57858] New: AVX2: ymm used for div, not for sqrt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57858 Bug ID: 57858 Summary: AVX2: ymm used for div, not for sqrt Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/57859] New: -ftrapv does not trap on signed overflows for struct fields (32-bit mode)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57859 Bug ID: 57859 Summary: -ftrapv does not trap on signed overflows for struct fields (32-bit mode) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/57860] New: wrong code for bitwise ops with long long literal on x86_64-linux (32-bit mode)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57860 Bug ID: 57860 Summary: wrong code for bitwise ops with long long literal on x86_64-linux (32-bit mode) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/57850] Option -fdump-translation-unit not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850 --- Comment #3 from Andrey Ponomarenko aponomarenko at rosalab dot ru --- Please do not remove this option! I know that it's private option for debugging GCC only, but it's used in the ABI Compliance Checker tool:

[Bug tree-optimization/57861] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57861 Bug ID: 57861 Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/57850] Option -fdump-translation-unit not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850 --- Comment #4 from Andrey Ponomarenko aponomarenko at rosalab dot ru --- It's also used for maintaining binary compatibility of glibc: http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Testing/ABI_checker and by the API Sanity Checker tool for generating unit

[Bug c/47409] volatile struct member bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47409 Francesco Zappa Nardelli francesco.zappa.nardelli at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libgcc/57851] [patch] unwinding via signal trampoline for kfreebsd*-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57851 --- Comment #2 from Petr.Salinger at seznam dot cz --- Posted in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00304.html

[Bug lto/57602] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 --- Comment #6 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Jan, have you had a chance to look at the problem?

[Bug c/57862] New: invalid read struct uint32_t member (ARMV5)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57862 Bug ID: 57862 Summary: invalid read struct uint32_t member (ARMV5) Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/57856] for an uninitialized variable, gcc assumes it already has value instead of report uninitialized warnings.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57856 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gang.chen at

[Bug c++/51786] [c++0x] Invalid declaration with decltype accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51786 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54366] [meta-bug] decltype issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54366 Bug 54366 depends on bug 51786, which changed state. Bug 51786 Summary: [c++0x] Invalid declaration with decltype accepted http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51786 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/57854] Would like to have a warning for virtual overrides without C++11 override keyword

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc

[Bug c++/57854] Would like to have a warning for virtual overrides without C++11 override keyword

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #0) It should be in -Weffc++. Not unless a new C++11 edition of Effective C++ recommends using override on all overriding functions, and

[Bug tree-optimization/57858] AVX2: ymm used for div, not for sqrt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57858 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/57854] Would like to have a warning for virtual overrides without C++11 override keyword

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #0) It should be in -Weffc++. Not unless a new C++11 edition of Effective C++

[Bug c/57862] invalid read struct uint32_t member (ARMV5)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57862 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- This has all the indications of a mis-aligned memory access. Since you're on Linux, please make sure that the 'User faults' field in /proc/cpu/alignment shows a value of 2 (fixup) or

[Bug c/57862] invalid read struct uint32_t member (ARMV5)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57862 --- Comment #2 from Gaetano Mendola mendola at gmail dot com --- I had 0. Putting 2 or 3 fixed the problem. Now my question is: who is faulty? Kernel configuration on this platform, the architecture, the compiler or even me ? BTW, compiling that

[Bug c/57853] pointer arithmetic on arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal

[Bug libstdc++/32354] libstdc++.so.6 missing RPATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32354 Mark R. Bannister chapter34 at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chapter34

[Bug c++/57863] New: std::vector::emplace_back() internal compiler error when passing wrong number of arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57863 Bug ID: 57863 Summary: std::vector::emplace_back() internal compiler error when passing wrong number of arguments Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/57863] std::vector::emplace_back() internal compiler error when passing wrong number of arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57863 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57086] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/57862] invalid read struct uint32_t member (ARMV5)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57862 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- (In reply to Gaetano Mendola from comment #2) who is faulty? Kernel configuration on this platform, the architecture, the compiler or even me ? All of the above. The

[Bug target/57848] internal compiler error on build with mingw-w64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/57864] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in bitmap_set_replace_value, at tree-ssa-pre.c:862

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864 Bug ID: 57864 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in bitmap_set_replace_value, at tree-ssa-pre.c:862 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/57865] New: Broken _save64gpr and _rest64gpr usage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57865 Bug ID: 57865 Summary: Broken _save64gpr and _rest64gpr usage Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug preprocessor/53525] Performance regression due to enabling track-macro-expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53525 --- Comment #18 from Mathias Gaunard mathias at gaunard dot com --- I'm not competent enough to make my own builds of GCC with patches, and I unfortunately do not have much time to contribute to this either. If someone can give me binaries for

[Bug other/57866] New: Erroneous constant folding of SSE intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57866 Bug ID: 57866 Summary: Erroneous constant folding of SSE intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/57858] AVX2: ymm used for div, not for sqrt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57858 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch --- actually the code for div and sqr is different already for standard SSE c++ -std=c++11 -Ofast -S avx2sqrt.cc -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=1 -Wall ; cat avx2sqrt.s .L2:

[Bug libgomp/57867] New: SIGSEGV on libgomp into a GDB session

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57867 Bug ID: 57867 Summary: SIGSEGV on libgomp into a GDB session Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp

[Bug c++/57868] New: misleading location for invalid variadic template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57868 Bug ID: 57868 Summary: misleading location for invalid variadic template Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/57866] Erroneous constant folding of SSE intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57866 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- There is no constant folding going on, the compiler simply sees the addition as dead code. To work around it, you would need to introduce a use of result, which would disable this tree

[Bug tree-optimization/57858] AVX2: ymm used for div, not for sqrt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57858 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- -fno-tree-pre lets it vectorize sqr as well. PRE creates a jump to the middle of the loop body, which is nice but prevents vectorization.

[Bug middle-end/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 --- Comment #9 from Charles L. Wilcox zxClhzAApX1EdJwQANqrjLERmFeURQVy at cynd dot net --- So, given a month has gone by, should I expect any response or action on this bug-report?

[Bug c++/53094] constexpr vector subscripting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094 --- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- r200822 | glisse | 2013-07-09 17:58:36 +0200 (Tue, 09 Jul 2013) | 11 lines 2013-07-09 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr PR c++/53094 gcc/cp/ * semantics.c

[Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000 --- Comment #25 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (not a complete fix) r200821 | glisse | 2013-07-09 17:55:49 +0200 (Tue, 09 Jul 2013) | 9 lines 2013-07-09 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr PR c++/53000 gcc/cp/ *

[Bug c++/53094] constexpr vector subscripting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at

[Bug tree-optimization/57864] [4.7 Regression] ICE in bitmap_set_replace_value, at tree-ssa-pre.c:862

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Created attachment 30486 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30486action=edit slightly reduced test case in plain C Doesn't depend on C++, this plain C version also

[Bug middle-end/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 --- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #10) Maybe Uros can help. On an x86 target using the legacy x87 instructions and the 80-bit registers, a load of a 64-bit or 32-bit value in

Trouble running GCC compiled program using XOP intrinsic instructions?

Hi, I'm getting a seg-fault running this code. #include emmintrin.h #include x86intrin.h #include stdio.h #include stdint.h void print_2_64_bit_ints(const char * label, __m128i m64_r) { int *val = (int *) m64_r; printf(%s: %d %d\n, label, val[0], val[1]); } int main() { __m128i

[Bug c++/57831] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] pointer to member function inaccessible through using statement (or ICE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57831 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57751] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/semantics.c:7648

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57751 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57545] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Generation of debug symbols leads to internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57545 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57532] [4.8/4.9 regression] operator broken when used on rvalues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57532 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57526] [4.8/4.9 Regression] use of X before deduction of auto error for seemingly good code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57526 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57437] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] C++11: mutable lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57437 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 57437, which changed state. Bug 57437 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] C++11: mutable lambdas http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57437 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 --- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11) (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #10) Maybe Uros can help. On an x86 target using the legacy x87 instructions and the 80-bit

[Bug c++/57658] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12213

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 57658, which changed state. Bug 57658 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12213 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/57415] [4.9 Regression] New PPC testsuite failure C++ compound literarl expr unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57415 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57751] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/semantics.c:7648

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57751 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Thanks! Jason, 4.8.1 is already out, I guess you mean 4.8.2.

[Bug middle-end/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Thanks Uros, you are providing plenty of detaild which I largely ignored. Thus, realistically, do you think this issue is largely unfixable?

[Bug c++/57471] [4.9 Regression] Bizarre error for template parameter pack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57471 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/57389] ICE in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on powerpc-spe target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57389 Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at gcc dot

[Bug libitm/56801] Internal Compiler Error when compiling relaxed transaction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56801 --- Comment #3 from Mike Spear spear at cse dot lehigh.edu --- Patrick, I just tried again, with gcc --version: gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-1ubuntu1) 4.7.3 Result: $ gcc -std=gnu11 -g -O2 -fgnu-tm -pthread -c testcase.c -o testcase.o testcase.c:

[Bug c++/57869] New: [C++11] Casting a object pointer to a function pointer should not warn about a forbidden conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57869 Bug ID: 57869 Summary: [C++11] Casting a object pointer to a function pointer should not warn about a forbidden conversion Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/57864] [4.7 Regression] ICE in bitmap_set_replace_value, at tree-ssa-pre.c:862

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- The ICE on 4.7 branch started with the PR55107 backport in r195755.

[Bug c++/57870] New: Internal compiler error in use of emplace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57870 Bug ID: 57870 Summary: Internal compiler error in use of emplace Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 --- Comment #14 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #13) Thanks Uros, you are providing plenty of detaild which I largely ignored. Thus, realistically, do you think this issue is largely

[Bug c++/57870] Internal compiler error in use of emplace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57870 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57086] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 Charles L. Wilcox zxClhzAApX1EdJwQANqrjLERmFeURQVy at cynd dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30239|0

[Bug target/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 --- Comment #17 from Charles L. Wilcox zxClhzAApX1EdJwQANqrjLERmFeURQVy at cynd dot net --- Okay... so why not avoid the x87 restriction and use aliasing to load the correct value? I've updated my example to show how I was doing exactly this for

[Bug target/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 --- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Charles L. Wilcox from comment #17) Okay... so why not avoid the x87 restriction and use aliasing to load the correct value? Load to x87 stack? The very moment sNaN gets

[Bug c++/57471] [4.9 Regression] Bizarre error for template parameter pack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57471 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57869] [C++11] Casting a object pointer to a function pointer should not warn about a forbidden conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57869 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/57871] New: gfortran -freal-4-real-16 gives wrong result for selected_real_kind(1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57871 Bug ID: 57871 Summary: gfortran -freal-4-real-16 gives wrong result for selected_real_kind(1) Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/57856] for an uninitialized variable, gcc assumes it already has value instead of report uninitialized warnings.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57856 Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED ---

[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 --- Comment #64 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez) Firstly, thank you very much for keeping tracing this bug almost 10 years, and provided your suggestions as much as possible. What you have done

[Bug c++/57402] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147 when initializing variable-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57402 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/12081] Gcc can't be compiled with -mregparm=3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081 --- Comment #24 from Stefan Kristiansson stefan.kristiansson at saunalahti dot fi --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #23) (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #22) FWIW, the updated patch for gcc 4.9 bootstraps and regtests

[Bug regression/57766] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.sum c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/sec_implicit_ex.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57766 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 James Y Knight foom at fuhm dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||foom at fuhm dot net

[Bug c/57872] New: ICE occurs for cross-compile of PPC target with e500v2 core

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57872 Bug ID: 57872 Summary: ICE occurs for cross-compile of PPC target with e500v2 core Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/57848] internal compiler error on builtin and '#pragma GCC target()' option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848 --- Comment #6 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com --- Linux gcc 4.4.5 (Debian GNU/Linux 6.0), gcc 4.4.7 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4) failed too.

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch does seem safe enough for 4.7, even though I usually prefer not to backport C++11 fixes to older release series.

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.4 ---