[Bug fortran/58225] In show_locus at fortran/error.c:391 pointer beyond end of line

2013-08-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58225 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/58226] New: negative subscript pos at fortran/options.c:1205

2013-08-22 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58226 Bug ID: 58226 Summary: negative subscript pos at fortran/options.c:1205 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: f

[Bug fortran/58225] New: In show_locus at fortran/error.c:391 pointer beyond end of line

2013-08-22 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58225 Bug ID: 58225 Summary: In show_locus at fortran/error.c:391 pointer beyond end of line Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/58224] New: -fcheck=pointer should detect that an unallocated allocatable data-target is forbidden

2013-08-22 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58224 Bug ID: 58224 Summary: -fcheck=pointer should detect that an unallocated allocatable data-target is forbidden Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug tree-optimization/58223] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-08-22 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
. $ gcc-trunk -v gcc version 4.9.0 20130822 (experimental) [trunk revision 201915] (GCC) $ gcc-4.7 -O3 reduced.c $ a.out 1 $ gcc-trunk -O2 reduced.c $ a.out 1 $ gcc-trunk -O3 reduced.c $ a.out 0 $ gcc-4.8 -O3 reduced.c $ a.out 0 $ --- int printf (const char

[Bug fortran/58222] :0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2013-08-22 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:07:07AM +, blake.fumberger at gmail dot com wrote: > --- Comment #3 from blake.fumberger at gmail dot com --- > "What compiler options did you use?" > I haven't changed any options

[Bug fortran/58222] :0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2013-08-22 Thread blake.fumberger at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 --- Comment #3 from blake.fumberger at gmail dot com --- "What compiler options did you use?" I haven't changed any options with post-install. "Where did you get the compiler you are using?" The compiler was downloaded from this link: http://inter

[Bug fortran/58222] :0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2013-08-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/58222] :0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2013-08-22 Thread blake.fumberger at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 --- Comment #1 from blake.fumberger at gmail dot com --- reviewing the attached file shows that line 45 wasn't in the correct position. After fixing this, the compiler still doesn't cooperate.

[Bug fortran/58222] New: :0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2013-08-22 Thread blake.fumberger at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 Bug ID: 58222 Summary: :0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug regression/58221] New: [4.9 Regression]: Immense amount of execution regressions and increased test-time for cris-elf

2013-08-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58221 Bug ID: 58221 Summary: [4.9 Regression]: Immense amount of execution regressions and increased test-time for cris-elf Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-08-22 Thread eraman at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #22 from Easwaran Raman --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #20) > Yes, the patch maybe fixes the debuginfo issue, but there's something else > that is wrong. E.g., on the testcase from PR58018, we have in > reassociate_bb *af

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-08-22 Thread eraman at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #21 from Easwaran Raman --- Created attachment 30690 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30690&action=edit Proposed patch

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

2013-08-22 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #67 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #66) > Kaz, the "WIP status" aside, would you be OK with something like that? Yep. Sounds good to me.

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

2013-08-22 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #66 from Oleg Endo --- Created attachment 30689 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30689&action=edit WIP RTL pass Just wanted to give an update on the issue. I've been writing an SH specific RTL pass that handles tho

[Bug rtl-optimization/58220] New: [4.9 Regression] Many new failures for SH after rev. 201833

2013-08-22 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58220 Bug ID: 58220 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Many new failures for SH after rev. 201833 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/58219] New: [SH] mov.l insn length is wrong on SH2A

2013-08-22 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58219 Bug ID: 58219 Summary: [SH] mov.l insn length is wrong on SH2A Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/58158] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with conditional moves on GPRs with a floating point conditional on mipsel with loongson2f

2013-08-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2 Summary|internal compile

[Bug target/58158] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150 while compiling ImageMagick on mipsel

2013-08-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/58158] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150 while compiling ImageMagick on mipsel

2013-08-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|mips

[Bug c++/51488] ICE on infinite template recursion

2013-08-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Another one: c++/53618

[Bug c++/53618] segfault on self-referential class partial specialization argument

2013-08-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53618 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/53477] pretty printer fails with: Python Exception list index out of range

2013-08-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.9.0 --- Comment #16 from Pawel Sikora -

[Bug target/58218] -mcmodel=medium cause assembler warning "ignoring incorrect section type for .lbss"

2013-08-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58218 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56380] Const/reference mutable members are not always rejected in class templates

2013-08-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56380 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/52306] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

2013-08-22 Thread tg at mirbsd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 Thorsten Glaser changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.8.1 --- Comment #22 from Thorsten Gla

[Bug target/58218] -mcmodel=medium cause assembler warning "ignoring incorrect section type for .lbss"

2013-08-22 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58218 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson --- I can reproduce with gcc-4.7.3. It generates: .section.lbss,"aw",@progbits gas doesn't like ,@progbits on .lbss and ignores it; readelf on the produced .o file then shows: [ 4] .lbss

[Bug c/58218] New: -mcmodel=medium cause assembler warning "ignoring incorrect section type for .lbss"

2013-08-22 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58218 Bug ID: 58218 Summary: -mcmodel=medium cause assembler warning "ignoring incorrect section type for .lbss" Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug ada/40936] Assert_Failure atree.adb:884 on illegal code (mixture of protected object and accept of entry family)

2013-08-22 Thread nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40936 --- Comment #4 from nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr --- I let you decide if this is related, but I get the same 4.6.4 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure atree.adb:794 with this source package Bug is package P is type T is new Integer;

[Bug other/58202] [graphite] qtcore-4.8* (compiling with glib support):error fatal: glib.h: No such file or directory

2013-08-22 Thread de.techno at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58202 --- Comment #2 from dE --- I don't know... what else can be provided apart from the build log (which are attached in the Gentoo bug). Anyway, the instructions?

[Bug target/58166] ARMv5: poor register allocation in function containing smull instruction

2013-08-22 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58166 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Jay Foad from comment #3) > I've bisected this to r191805: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=191805 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01764.html I suspect

[Bug target/58166] ARMv5: poor register allocation in function containing smull instruction

2013-08-22 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58166 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/58185] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE when selector in SELECT TYPE is non-polymorphic

2013-08-22 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58185 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on trunk with the commit below. Backport pending. Author: janus Date: Thu Aug 22 11:49:46 2013 New Revision: 201919 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201919&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-08-

[Bug c++/53756] [C++1y] ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:18774 with -g and operator auto ()

2013-08-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53756 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.nixman at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/58216] ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:19484

2013-08-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58216 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|i.nixman at g

[Bug c++/56380] Const/reference mutable members are not always rejected in class templates

2013-08-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56380 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/58166] ARMv5: poor register allocation in function containing smull instruction

2013-08-22 Thread jay.foad at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58166 --- Comment #3 from Jay Foad --- I've bisected this to r191805: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=191805 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01764.html

[Bug c/58217] warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute

2013-08-22 Thread z...@droids-corp.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58217 --- Comment #2 from Olivier MATZ --- Created attachment 30686 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30686&action=edit gcc -dumpspecs

[Bug c/58217] warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute

2013-08-22 Thread z...@droids-corp.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58217 --- Comment #3 from Olivier MATZ --- Created attachment 30687 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30687&action=edit intermediate file foo.i

[Bug c/58217] warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute

2013-08-22 Thread z...@droids-corp.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58217 --- Comment #1 from Olivier MATZ --- Created attachment 30685 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30685&action=edit code that triggers the issue

[Bug c/58217] New: warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute

2013-08-22 Thread z...@droids-corp.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58217 Bug ID: 58217 Summary: warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58216] New: ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:19484

2013-08-22 Thread i.nixman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58216 Bug ID: 58216 Summary: ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:19484 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/58209] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_range_from_binary_expr, at tree-vrp.c:2294

2013-08-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58209 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug java/58215] New: -fwhole-program cause gcj undefined reference to `Main::class$'

2013-08-22 Thread pj at csc dot fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58215 Bug ID: 58215 Summary: -fwhole-program cause gcj undefined reference to `Main::class$' Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/58100] Spurious "DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times" warning

2013-08-22 Thread roland.kaufmann at uni dot no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100 --- Comment #5 from Roland Kaufmann --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3) > Roland: Is the new warning option -W(no-)zerotrip sufficient for you? As a general principle: I believe that the compiler should not issue any warnings if run w