[Bug middle-end/58387] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58387 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Not even with r202421. Content of main with that revision for x86_64 -Os is: .cfi_startproc pushq%rcx .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16 movla(%rip), %esi testl

[Bug middle-end/58387] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58387 --- Comment #4 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) Not even with r202421. Content of main with that revision for x86_64 -Os is: .cfi_startproc pushq %rcx

[Bug middle-end/58387] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58387 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Cannot reproduce either. Maybe you got hit by Jeffs bus introducing random bits into your bootstrap? So I wonder if it reproduces for you if you rebuild GCC ;)

[Bug ipa/58371] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:892

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58371 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjambor at suse

[Bug rtl-optimization/58384] [4.9 regression] Runfail on spec2000/253.perlbmk if lto and pre-reload scheduler is used on x86 after r200133.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58384 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug target/55543] diamond shaped inheritance involving strings leads to crashing executables (MinGW, 32 bit)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55543 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking martin.gieseking at uos dot de --- I can confirm that the issue seems to be gone in 4.8, and I can't reproduce it with 4.7.3 either. So it's probably fixed in the recent releases.

[Bug target/55543] diamond shaped inheritance involving strings leads to crashing executables (MinGW, 32 bit)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55543 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58377] spurious may be used uninitialized warning with -Og

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58377 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to davidxl from comment #10) When an incoming edge to a phi is a critical edge, the 'use BB' for the phi arg should be in the split BB of the edge. Pushing the use into

[Bug c++/57504] invalid this pointer passed in call to virtual function that returns a struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57504 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/18649] terminate called after throwing - IOT/Abort trap (core dumped)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18649 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/57797] configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/58388] New: LTO profiledbootstrap fails in stage feedback for tree-ssa-structalias.c with internal compiler error: in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call, at ipa-prop.c:2606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58388 Bug ID: 58388 Summary: LTO profiledbootstrap fails in stage feedback for tree-ssa-structalias.c with internal compiler error: in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call, at

[Bug c++/58389] New: g++ ICE in ipa_find_reference

-trunk --enable-languages=c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130911 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/57848] internal compiler error on builtin and '#pragma GCC target()' option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848 --- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Does the following patch helps to you? Index: c/c-decl.c === --- c/c-decl.c (Revision 202491) +++ c/c-decl.c

[Bug tree-optimization/58389] [4.9 Regression] g++ ICE in ipa_find_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58389 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/58385] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58385 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Sep 11 11:35:51 2013 New Revision: 202494 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202494root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/58385 * fold-const.c

[Bug debug/58315] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Excessive memory use with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15930 for the as bugreport.

[Bug bootstrap/57797] configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797 Earnie earnie at users dot sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/57797] configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- (In reply to Earnie from comment #4) Your statement doesn't resolve anything at all. It is fine for gcc to require c++ but it is not fine for configure to continue if I only

[Bug bootstrap/58388] LTO profiledbootstrap fails in stage feedback for tree-ssa-structalias.c with internal compiler error: in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call, at ipa-prop.c:2606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58388 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjambor at suse

[Bug bootstrap/57797] configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/57797] configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797 --- Comment #7 from Earnie earnie at users dot sourceforge.net --- --disable-bootstrap is an answer I can live with as resolving this issue. Use of --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx should become an error in configure with the suggestion to use

[Bug tree-optimization/58389] [4.9 Regression] g++ ICE in ipa_find_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58389 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug ipa/58371] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:892

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58371 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc

[Bug middle-end/58385] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58385 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Sep 11 12:17:47 2013 New Revision: 202495 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202495root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/58385 * fold-const.c

[Bug middle-end/58385] [4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58385 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]|[4.7 Regression]

[Bug c++/58377] spurious may be used uninitialized warning with -Og

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58377 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 11 12:20:07 2013 New Revision: 202496 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202496root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-09-11 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/58389] [4.9 Regression] g++ ICE in ipa_find_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58389 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/58389] [4.9 Regression] g++ ICE in ipa_find_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58389 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r202281.

[Bug c++/58377] spurious may be used uninitialized warning with -Og

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58377 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 11 12:23:15 2013 New Revision: 202498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202498root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-09-11 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug c++/58377] spurious may be used uninitialized warning with -Og

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58377 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/57797] configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797 --- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- please note that bugzilla isn't the proper place to get end-user support about how to use options. To cite your favorite sentence please read first the mail-archive. Actually you

[Bug target/57848] internal compiler error on builtin and '#pragma GCC target()' option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848 --- Comment #13 from Jacek Caban jacek at codeweavers dot com --- Yes, it helps. Thanks.

[Bug c++/35878] Useless NULL pointer check when constructing object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35878 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/19476] Missed null checking elimination with new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19476 --- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- I posted a patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00676.html However, note that it only optimizes the testcase from this PR if we add #include new at the beginning,

[Bug target/58390] New: avr-gcc produces unusable code when label address is placed in register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58390 Bug ID: 58390 Summary: avr-gcc produces unusable code when label address is placed in register Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/58391] New: avr-gcc: Certain functions with computed goto could be inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58391 Bug ID: 58391 Summary: avr-gcc: Certain functions with computed goto could be inlined Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/35878] Useless NULL pointer check when constructing object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35878 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) The only place I can think of where we could tell the compiler to skip this check is in the library. I don't know if we should add

[Bug c++/19476] Missed null checking elimination with new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19476 --- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #15) However, note that it only optimizes the testcase from this PR if we add #include new at the beginning, otherwise the implicit declaration

[Bug c++/58337] Mangling of nullptr_t values do not follow ABI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58337 Hubert Tong hstong at ca dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/58387] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130911 (experimental) [trunk revision 202489] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -Os small.c $ a.out 0 $ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c $ a.out $

[Bug libgomp/58392] internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 30798 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30798action=edit pre-processed source

[Bug libgomp/58392] internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 30799 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30799action=edit C source

[Bug libgomp/58392] New: internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392 Bug ID: 58392 Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/58393] Please relax feature check for std::to_string and std::sto* for uClibc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58393 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- In any case, please send patches to the mailing list, attached to bug report will be easily overlooked. More specifically, if we are going to be more fine grained about C99

[Bug fortran/58007] [OOP] ICE in free_pi_tree(): Unresolved fixup - resolve_fixups does not fixup component of __class_bsr_Bsr_matrix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007 Rich Townsend townsend at astro dot wisc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||townsend at

[Bug libstdc++/35878] Useless NULL pointer check when constructing object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35878 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/58391] avr-gcc: Certain functions with computed goto could be inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58391 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |

[Bug libstdc++/58395] New: Undefined behavior vs. exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58395 Bug ID: 58395 Summary: Undefined behavior vs. exception Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #36 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #35) The #c34 testcase seems to fail starting r199048 till current HEAD. Besides John's new testcase from #c34, I've also encountered quite a

[Bug libstdc++/35878] Useless NULL pointer check when constructing object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35878 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- No, I never got round to sending it to the reflector, but I'd be interested to hear the committee's views on a change.

[Bug tree-optimization/58396] New: [4.9 Regression] heap-use-after-free at gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c:1959

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58396 Bug ID: 58396 Summary: [4.9 Regression] heap-use-after-free at gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c:1959 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libgomp/58392] internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392 --- Comment #3 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 30801 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30801action=edit include file needed for compilation from C source

[Bug target/58390] avr-gcc produces unusable code when label address is placed in register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58390 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/58398] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-4.c runfail regression after r202111

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58398 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/58387] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58387 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug ipa/58398] New: [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-4.c runfail regression after r202111

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58398 Bug ID: 58398 Summary: [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-4.c runfail regression after r202111 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/58393] New: Please relax feature check for std::to_string and std::sto* for uClibc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58393 Bug ID: 58393 Summary: Please relax feature check for std::to_string and std::sto* for uClibc Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ipa/58371] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:892

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58371 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/58394] New: unrecognizable insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58394 Bug ID: 58394 Summary: unrecognizable insn Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug preprocessor/58397] Please add host_hooks for NetBSD to make precompiled headers work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58397 --- Comment #1 from Martin Husemann martin at netbsd dot org --- Created attachment 30803 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30803action=edit host hooks for NetBSD

[Bug preprocessor/58397] New: Please add host_hooks for NetBSD to make precompiled headers work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58397 Bug ID: 58397 Summary: Please add host_hooks for NetBSD to make precompiled headers work Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/44848] Bogus array subscript is below array bounds with loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44848 --- Comment #4 from Eero Tamminen eerott at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) This is the same as PR43270 (and the fix for it cures it). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 43270 *** Current status is

[Bug libstdc++/58358] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] search_n has a Complexity violation for random access iterator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58358 --- Comment #24 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Sep 11 22:24:50 2013 New Revision: 202510 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202510root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-09-11 Mitsuru Kariya

[Bug libstdc++/58358] [4.7/4.8 Regression] search_n has a Complexity violation for random access iterator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58358 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]|[4.7/4.8

[Bug ipa/58389] [4.9 Regression] g++ ICE in ipa_find_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58389 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/58369] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in subreg_get_info when compiling boost for m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58369 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- (All source references here are for vanilla gcc-4.8.1.) The problem appears to start in choose_reload_regs, in the if (inheritance) block at lines 6497 to 6679. It finds (reg:DF 0

[Bug c++/58399] New: explicit constructor called implicitly with empty init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58399 Bug ID: 58399 Summary: explicit constructor called implicitly with empty init-list Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/58256] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256 --- Comment #1 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com --- It is for Linux kernel next-20130828 version. and for the latest Linux kernel, h8/300 has been removed.

[Bug c/58256] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256 --- Comment #2 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com --- it is not found in gcc-4.8.0.

[Bug c/58256] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256 --- Comment #3 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com --- The related command line: /usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-gcc -Wp,-MD,fs/.namei.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/local/lib/gcc/h8300-gchen-elf/4.9.0/include

[Bug c/58256] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256 Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gang.chen at

[Bug c/58400] New: gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'mb_free_blocks':

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400 Bug ID: 58400 Summary: gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'mb_free_blocks': Product: gcc

[Bug c/58400] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'mb_free_blocks':

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400 --- Comment #1 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1459:1: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411 0x8e0a95 _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*)

[Bug c/58400] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'mb_free_blocks':

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400 --- Comment #2 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com --- For gcc-4.8.0 and gcc-4.7.4, it has this issue too.

[Bug c/58400] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'mb_free_blocks':

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400 --- Comment #3 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com --- If no opitimization (without -Os), it will be OK.

[Bug c/58401] New: gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c: In function 'dlm_query_join_handler'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401 Bug ID: 58401 Summary: gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c: In function 'dlm_query_join_handler'

[Bug c/58401] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c: In function 'dlm_query_join_handler'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401 Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gang.chen at

[Bug c/58401] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c: In function 'dlm_query_join_handler'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401 --- Comment #2 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com --- Alos for fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c /usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-gcc -Wp,-MD,fs/ocfs2/dlm/.dlmrecovery.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/local/lib/gcc/h8300-gchen-elf/4.9.0/include

[Bug c/58401] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c: In function 'dlm_query_join_handler'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401 --- Comment #3 from Chen Gang gang.chen at asianux dot com --- It has too many same issues (maybe they are duplicating), if necessary, I will list them too (non-reply means not need list them).