http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58548
Bug ID: 58548
Summary: ICE with local struct in function with auto parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
Bug ID: 58549
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with local function in function with auto
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58548
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58546
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550
Bug ID: 58550
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ][c++0x] ICE with auto in function
return type and lto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
To me they look like a (syntactically simpler) alternative to template
parameters. They were introduced here:
2013-09-16 Adam Butcher a...@jessamine.co.uk
* cp-tree.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abutcher at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58547
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58545
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 27 08:14:53 2013
New Revision: 202966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202966root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58547
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Bug ID: 58551
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with abort in OpenMP SESE region
inside of some loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58547
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Sep 27 08:59:18 2013
New Revision: 202967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202967root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc:
PR middle-end/58547
* rtlanal.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Anoter testcase that ICEs even with -O2 -fopenmp:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options -O2 -fopenmp } */
void bar (int, int);
void
foo (int *a)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i 8; i++)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 30908
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30908action=edit
Test results
Tests seem to pass both on x86_64 and on ARM (attached).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30907|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is a compare-debug failure on fortran/parse.o at least, reducing that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58507
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 30910
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30910action=edit
Fix objdump output
Proposed patch to fix objdump output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
One difference happens in 057.cunrolli already, we create a preheader for a
loop depending on -g:
;; Function bool gfc_parse_file() (_Z14gfc_parse_filev, funcdef_no=257,
decl_ui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
Bug ID: 58552
Summary: [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
First testcase reduction ended in PR58552, re-reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58528
--- Comment #6 from Charles charles.frasch at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30912
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30912action=edit
script to reproduce the ICE
This script reproduces the bug. It requires 27 .ii files and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #19 from Joshua Cogliati jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com ---
Created attachment 30913
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30913action=edit
Patch to add -Wfloat-conversion option against trunk
This version is against gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced:
extern void fancy_abort () __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
extern C {
struct __jmp_buf_tag { };
typedef struct __jmp_buf_tag jmp_buf[1];
extern int _setjmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: gcc/tree-cfg.c
===
--- gcc/tree-cfg.c (revision 202971)
+++ gcc/tree-cfg.c (working copy)
@@ -1013,6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 27 13:44:10 2013
New Revision: 202972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202972root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58551
* tree-cfg.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Sep 27 14:06:09 2013
New Revision: 202974
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202974root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/57465
* include/std/functional
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 9/21/2013 11:13 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Is this PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359
--- Comment #4 from Anatoly Sinyavin a.sinyavin at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 30914
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30914action=edit
Fisrt patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359
--- Comment #5 from Anatoly Sinyavin a.sinyavin at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 30915
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30915action=edit
Second patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359
--- Comment #6 from Anatoly Sinyavin a.sinyavin at samsung dot com ---
I have created two patches to fix this problem.
The first patch (bug_fix_58359_builit_unreachable.patch) just moves
functionality of optimize_unreachable from fab pass to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #8 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmatos
Date: Fri Sep 27 14:54:43 2013
New Revision: 202976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202976root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58463
* gcc.dg/pr58463.c: New test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58507
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 30916
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30916action=edit
Add parsing of known MSP430 MCU types
I am currently testing this patch to see if it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #9 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmatos
Date: Fri Sep 27 16:30:15 2013
New Revision: 202978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202978root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline.
2013-09-27 Paulo Matos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56716
--- Comment #11 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmatos
Date: Fri Sep 27 16:44:39 2013
New Revision: 202979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202979root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline.
PR middle-end/58463
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #10 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmatos
Date: Fri Sep 27 16:44:39 2013
New Revision: 202979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202979root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline.
PR middle-end/58463
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Bug ID: 58553
Summary: New fail in PASS-FAIL:
gcc.c-torture/execute/memcpy-2.c execution on arm and
aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
--- Comment #1 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30918
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30918action=edit
Output of dom1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
Bug ID: 58554
Summary: Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006
benchmark 445.gobmk
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
James. Look in the .ldist dump. In particular look at that memset call.
We're writing off the end of the structure. Now to walk backwards and figure
out why :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||58554
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555
Bug ID: 58555
Summary: Floating point exception in
want_inline_self_recursive_call_p
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Andrew. Yes it does. I've never looked at the ldist code, but the dump seems
a bit strange:
Analyzing # of iterations of loop 3
exit condition [1, + , 1](no_overflow) != 96
bounds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Bug 58553 depends on bug 58554, which changed state.
Bug 58554 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in
CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Bug 58553 depends on bug 58554, which changed state.
Bug 58554 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in
CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58556
Bug ID: 58556
Summary: gen-vect-26.c / gen-vect-28.c regression merging from
r202839 to r202981
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58490
--- Comment #3 from Erik van der Werf erikvanderwerf at gmail dot com ---
I'm sorry, that patch definitely looks relevant, and I'd like to try it, but
somehow I did not manage to rebuild the arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.7 package.
I'm not a gcc
65 matches
Mail list logo
