http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58691
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
Looks reasonable, bind-var default value is indeed implementation defined and
setting it to true by default if OMP_PLACES or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58691
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
(Note that that will turn an explicit OMP_PROC_BIND=false into true, which
looks odd - even if I regard it as unlikely that someone wants
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58691
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Oct 12 07:52:15 2013
New Revision: 203479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203479root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/58691
* config/linux/proc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58696
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Broke with r203061, works again with r203463, likely dup of PR58640.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40365
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Dolomanov oleg_dolomanov at hotmail dot com ---
Sorry guys, it really was the hardware: I wish you could see (I have a
picture!), but it was one of the memory chips (one along the 16 on the OCZ 2Gb
PC2 6400 5-5-5-18!)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58697
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
You can go farther if the return operation overwrites entirely the anonymous
return object and for example allow returning literals, but I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58699
Bug ID: 58699
Summary: ARM: emit PLDW instruction for prefetch with write
intent
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58690
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Oct 12 14:55:28 2013
New Revision: 203486
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203486root=gccview=rev
Log:
Truncate x32 DImode TLS address to a SImode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|conradsand.arma at gmail dot com |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58641
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Sure, but you can just skip the testcase like on Darwin.
It is not! I was about to open a PR for it:
On x86_64-apple-darwin(10|12) gnat.dg/specs/linker_section.ads fails,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55912
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
Most of the math builtin folding needs to be re-done at GIMPLE level based
on SSA form. Convenient places are either tree-ssa-forwprop.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #3 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Sure, but you can just skip the testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Sure, but you can just skip the testcase like on Darwin.
It is not! I was about to open a PR for it:
Actually the new output is as expected since types are now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57605
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57572
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30992
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30992action=edit
vector-only patch
I have had this lying around for a while. IIRC it seemed to work, but it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52794
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|std::tuple missed |std::get and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52795
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #70 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Oct 12 20:47:22 2013
New Revision: 203492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203492root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/51244
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700
Bug ID: 58700
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE declaring static bit-field
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701
Bug ID: 58701
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of
static union
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0, 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58702
Bug ID: 58702
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with undeclared variable in
OpenMP reduction clause
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58702
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58703
Bug ID: 58703
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid types in OpenMP
declare reduction clause
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is not! I was about to open a PR for it:
On x86_64-apple-darwin(10|12) gnat.dg/specs/linker_section.ads fails,
It is, you're confusing 2 different tests here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58703
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58704
Bug ID: 58704
Summary: [c++11] ICE initializing array member of template
class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #71 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #70)
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Oct 12 20:47:22 2013
New Revision: 203492
The issue raised in comment #59 has been fixed on 4.9.
There are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58705
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58705
Bug ID: 58705
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with invalid
initializer for _Complex variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58706
Bug ID: 58706
Summary: ICE with lambda in OpenMP for-loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58707
Bug ID: 58707
Summary: [C++11] A greater-than operator in square brackets
should not end a template argument list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338
bredelin at ucla dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bredelin at ucla dot edu
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58708
Bug ID: 58708
Summary: string literal operator templates broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58605
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #3)
A new library has been opened:
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2334
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58709
Bug ID: 58709
Summary: [c++11] Bogus? int vs. scoped enum printf warning when
-fabi-version = 6
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58709
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the warning is correct as it is not promoted to int in the function
call. This is the same reason why bitfields warn when passing them for printf
too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58709
--- Comment #2 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
I think the warning is correct as it is not promoted to int in the function
call.
How is it passed then?
I see:
movl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58710
Bug ID: 58710
Summary: HAVE_GETIPINFO is incorrectly set on Mac OS X 10.4
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58711
Bug ID: 58711
Summary: Missing uninitialized warning in loop condition
(when compiling without optimization)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
49 matches
Mail list logo
