http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59625
Bug ID: 59625
Summary: asm goto and TARGET_FOUR_JUMP_LIMIT
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #98 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
It was not commited yet, or was it please?
I still cannot compile scipy with -flto by trunk gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59605
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 30 08:48:25 2013
New Revision: 206242
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206242root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59605
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59501
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 30 08:53:10 2013
New Revision: 206243
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206243root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59501
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
Bug ID: 59626
Summary: [4.9 lto] /usr/include/bits/unistd.h:173:1: error:
inlining failed in call to always_inline 'readlinkat':
recursive inlining
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59501
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 59544, which changed state.
Bug 59544 Summary: Vectorizing store with negative step
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59544
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59544
Bingfeng Mei bmei at broadcom dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59591
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31525|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
Bug ID: 59627
Summary: ICE with OpenMP declare reduction and -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59628
Bug ID: 59628
Summary: ICE with invalid OpenMP declare reduction clause
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59629
Bug ID: 59629
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with invalid use of auto
in lambda function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59630
Bug ID: 59630
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE converting the return
type of a builtin function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
First block is:
(insn:TI 551 2434 552 38 (set (mem/f/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 7 sp)
(const_int 104 [0x68])) [17 MEM[(struct *)bs]+0 S4 A64])
(reg/f:SI 6 bp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59631
Bug ID: 59631
Summary: ICE using _Cilk_spawn without -fcilkplus
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59632
Bug ID: 59632
Summary: ICE with erroneous loop condition after #pragma GCC
ivdep
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59633
Bug ID: 59633
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with
__attribute((vector_size(...))) for enum
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59633
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What makes you think the code is valid? From the doc, I think this should be
rejected (with a proper error message).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59591
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 30 17:05:10 2013
New Revision: 206248
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206248root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59591
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59591
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59634
Bug ID: 59634
Summary: Documentation (info/man page): lack of information for
cache size parameters (--param)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59635
Bug ID: 59635
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto and ... as lambda parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59635
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 30 17:33:21 2013
New Revision: 206249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206249root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-12-30 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/58998
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59636
Bug ID: 59636
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with missing template parameter in lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59636
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59631
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nickc
Date: Mon Dec 30 17:37:08 2013
New Revision: 206250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206250root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59631
* stor-layout.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52856
Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59613
Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pab at pabigot dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59613
Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59615
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
Anyway, you definitely don't want
to use inline asm in this case, if there is some code GCC doesn't optimize
as good as you'd like to,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59637
Bug ID: 59637
Summary: [c++11] ICE with decltype and destructor call in
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59615
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #6)
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
Anyway, you definitely don't want
to use inline asm in this case, if there is some code GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #5)
In this range are three committs for PR 48858, which might be to blame here:
r199118, r199119, r199120. At first sight I suspect the middle one could be
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59615
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
They are modelled in the .md files now, we just don't have general purpose
builtins for this yet in GCC 4.9, it is only used for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59638
Bug ID: 59638
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with pointer to function that has auto as
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59638
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59639
Bug ID: 59639
Summary: Code in a cold basic block is not pushed to
.text.unlikely
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59623
--- Comment #1 from Morten Kristiansen millibit at gmail dot com ---
Not a bug in GCC, after all. Caused by some mixup of cygwin dll's. Closing bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59623
Morten Kristiansen millibit at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59639
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59631
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch in comment #1 was meant for PR 59613.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59639
--- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity a...@cloudius-systems.com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
The option you want is -freorder-blocks-and-partition but it only does
something when there are real profiling info (aka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59639
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
--- Comment #9 from Kristis Makris mkgnu at mkgnu dot net ---
I won't see, open or read your email.
I won't even know you emailed me.
If there's something you want me to do you have to use this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59640
Bug ID: 59640
Summary: templated conversion pointer type comparison causes
segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
--- Comment #10 from Kristis Makris mkgnu at mkgnu dot net ---
I won't see, open or read your email.
I won't even know you emailed me.
If there's something you want me to do you have to use this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59634
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-param-935
l1-cache-line-size
The size of cache line in L1 cache, in bytes.
l1-cache-size
The size of L1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
--- Comment #11 from Kristis Makris mkgnu at mkgnu dot net ---
I won't see, open or read your email.
I won't even know you emailed me.
If there's something you want me to do you have to use this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090
--- Comment #23 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Dec 30 19:34:53 2013
New Revision: 206252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206252root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/41090
* g++.dg/ext/label13.C:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090
--- Comment #24 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net ---
Thanks for the fix and the update guys.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31542
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31542action=edit
patch
Here is a patch which removes the ICE, although I don't actually understand why
(maybe someone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59634
--- Comment #2 from ytrezq at myopera dot com ---
Ok. So, does it worth to make a change to the documentation?
An another possibility it to rename the parameter in this way:
l1-cache-size--l1-data-cache-size
l2-cache-size--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I had a closer look at what actually changes with the patch in comment 7, and
found out that the crucial part is that the patch does not set the 'ns' member
of the gsymbol. This observation leads to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59641
Bug ID: 59641
Summary: ICE with invalid expression in vector arithmetic
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, sched2 reorders:
(insn 762 761 765 50 (set (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 7 sp)
(const_int 112 [0x70])) [17 MEM[(struct *)bs + 8B]+0 S4 A64])
(const_int 8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26493
--- Comment #12 from Kristis Makris mkgnu at mkgnu dot net ---
Please revise and resubmit. I can't tell clearly why whatever it is you are
asking is important.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59642
Bug ID: 59642
Summary: Performance regression (4.7/4.8) with
-ftree-loop-distribute-patterns
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am testing:
Index: combine-stack-adj.c
===
--- combine-stack-adj.c (revision 206233)
+++ combine-stack-adj.c (working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59379
--- Comment #13 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
I meant that with 3-stage gcc of r204980 testcase from the attachment was
compiled and ran successfully, i.e. no infinite loop.
Currently debugging shows that routine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59633
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What makes you think the code is valid? From the doc, I think this should be
rejected (with a proper error message).
Well, because the C-frontend compiles it, the C++-frontend
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following patch is more reasonable, I think:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c(revision 206252)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
My comment was about warning at a time we fold to unreachable. Higher level
warning a-la clang is of course good idea.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59349
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reichelt at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 58613, which changed state.
Bug 58613 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE with invalid lambda capture
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58613
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58613
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The second testcase is now also wrongly accepted, due to the fix for PR57887.
However, the following testcase still crashes with almost the same stacktrace:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59643
Bug ID: 59643
Summary: Predictive commoning unnecessarily punts on scimark2
SOR
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59643
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31543
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31543action=edit
gcc49-pr59643.patch
Completely untested patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59641
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59642
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've noticed the same in other PRs, normally we manage to track the actual
value of *p, but we don't manage that when *p was written by __builtin_mem*,
which should still be doable:
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59644
Bug ID: 59644
Summary: [4.9 Regression] r206243 miscompiles Linux kernel
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59644
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Weird, I thought the kernel is compiled even with -mno-sse, so there shouldn't
be AVX used and thus no need for realignment anywhere. What arch is that?
i?86 or x86_64? Can you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47226
Dennis Brentjes d.brentjes at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.brentjes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59645
Bug ID: 59645
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with covariant return and
volatile
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59646
Bug ID: 59646
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with volatile in
initializer list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158
--- Comment #11 from Tom Li biergaizi2009 at gmail dot com ---
My Gentoo system is nearly broken because of this bug :(
I'm going to report it to Loongson's mailing list.
);
struct B
{
int _M_finish;
};
B _M_impl;
};
void
fn2 (A p1)
{
unsigned b = p1.m_fn2 ();
fn1i (b - 1 - p1[p1.m_fn2 () - 1]);
}
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.8.3 20131230 (prerelease)
Configured for x86_64.
gcc -c t.ii -m32 -fno-tree-vrp -mfpmath=sse -O2
t.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56066
Solomon Gibbs solomon.gibbs.lists at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29236|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
--- Comment #10 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Hello Jakub,
I tried your patch.
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.3-r2/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp:
In member function ‘llvm::Value*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
--- Comment #11 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Without -m32 it not ICEs after patch applied.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56066
Solomon Gibbs solomon.gibbs.lists at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59379
--- Comment #14 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
I meant new_coef from aff_combination_scale
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
--- Comment #12 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31546
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31546action=edit
After patch ICE generating reduced preprocessed source file
95 matches
Mail list logo
